Demography

, Volume 50, Issue 5, pp 1663–1686 | Cite as

Marital Processes, Arranged Marriage, and Contraception to Limit Fertility

Article

Abstract

An international transition away from familially arranged marriages toward participation in spouse choice has endured for decades and continues to spread through rural Asia today. Although we know that this transformation has important consequences for childbearing early in marriage, we know much less about longer-term consequences of this marital revolution. Drawing on theories of family and fertility change and a rural Asian panel study designed to measure changes in both marital and childbearing behaviors, this study seeks to investigate these long-term consequences. Controlling for social changes that shape both marital practices and childbearing behaviors, and explicitly considering multiple dimensions of marital processes, we find evidence consistent with an independent, long-standing association of participation in spouse choice with higher rates of contraception to terminate childbearing. These results add a new dimension to the evidence linking revolutions in marital behavior to long-term declines in fertility and suggest that new research should consider a broader range of long-term consequences of changing marital processes.

Keywords

Marriage Contraception Arranged marriage Fertility South Asia 

References

  1. Acharya, M., & Bennett, L. (1981). The status of women in Nepal (Vol. 2). Kathmandu, Nepal: Centre for Economic Development and Administration.Google Scholar
  2. Adams, S. D. (2000). Palestinian marital satisfaction: An analysis of arranged marriages in the West Bank and Gaza Strip. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of Sociology, Brigham Young University.Google Scholar
  3. Ahearn, L. M. (2001). Invitations to love: Literacy, love letters, and social change in Nepal. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  4. Ahearn, L. M. (2003). Writing desire in Nepali love letters. Languages and Communication, 23, 107–122.Google Scholar
  5. Ahearn, L. M. (2004). Literacy, power and agency: Love letters and development in Nepal. Language and Education, 18, 305–316.Google Scholar
  6. Allendorf, K. (2009). The quality of family relationships, women’s agency, and maternal and child health in India. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of Sociology, University of Wisconsin, Madison.Google Scholar
  7. Allendorf, K. (2012). Marital quality from a rural Indian context in comparative perspective. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 43, 527–544.Google Scholar
  8. Allison, P. D. (1982). Discrete-time methods for the analysis of event histories. In S. Leinhardt (Ed.), Sociological Methodology (pp. 61–98). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  9. Allison, P. D. (1984). Event history analysis: Regression for longitudinal event data. Beverley Hills, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  10. Axinn, W. G. (1992). Family organization and fertility limitation in Nepal. Demography, 29, 503–521.Google Scholar
  11. Axinn, W. G., & Barber, J. S. (2001). Mass education and fertility transition. American Sociological Review, 66, 481–505.Google Scholar
  12. Axinn, W. G., Clarkberg, M., & Thornton, A. (1994). Family influences on family size preferences. Demography, 31, 65–79.Google Scholar
  13. Axinn, W. G., & Pearce, L. D. (2006). Mixed method data collection strategies. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Axinn, W. G., Pearce, L. D., & Ghimire, D. (1999). Innovations in life history calendar applications. Social Science Research, 28, 243–264.Google Scholar
  15. Axinn, W. G., & Yabiku, S. T. (2001). Social change, the social organization of families, and fertility limitation. American Journal of Sociology, 106, 1219–1261.Google Scholar
  16. Barber, J. S., & Axinn, W. G. (2004). New ideas and fertility limitation: The role of mass media. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 1180–1200.Google Scholar
  17. Barber, J. S., Murphy, S., Axinn, W. G., & Maples, J. (2000). Discrete-time multilevel hazard analysis. Sociological Methodology, 30, 201–235.Google Scholar
  18. Barber, J. S., Pearce, L. D., Chaudhary, I., & Gurung, S. (2002). Voluntary associations and fertility limitation. Social Forces, 80, 1369–1401.Google Scholar
  19. Basu, A. M. (1993). Cultural influences on timing of first birth in India: Large differences that add up to little difference. Population Studies, 47, 85–95.Google Scholar
  20. Beckman, L. J. (1983). Communication, power, and the influence of social networks in couple decisions on fertility. In R. A. Bulatao & R. D. Lee (Eds.), Determinants of fertility in developing countries (Vol. 2, pp. 415–443). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  21. Belli, R. F. (1998). The structure of autobiographical memory and the event history calendar: Potential improvements in the quality of retrospective reports in surveys. Memory, 6, 383–406.Google Scholar
  22. Bengtson, V. L. (1975). Generation and family effects in value socialization. American Journal of Sociology, 40, 358–371.Google Scholar
  23. Bennett, L. (1983). Dangerous wives and sacred sisters: Social and symbolic roles of high caste women in Nepal. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Bista, D. B. (1972). People of Nepal. Kathmandu, Nepal: Ratna Pustak Bhandar.Google Scholar
  25. Blaikie, P., Cameron, J., & Seddon, D. (1980). Nepal in crisis: Growth and stagnation at the periphery. Delhi, India: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Blood, R. O., Jr. (1967). Love match and arranged marriage: A Tokyo-Detroit comparison. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  27. Bloom, D. E., & Reddy, P. H. (1986). Age patterns of women at marriage, cohabitation, and first birth in India. Demography, 23, 509–523.Google Scholar
  28. Blossfeld, H.-P., & Huinink, J. (1991). Human capital investments or norms of role transition? How women’s schooling and career affect the process of family formation. American Journal of Sociology, 97, 143–168.Google Scholar
  29. Bongaarts, J. (1978). A framework for analyzing the proximate determinants of fertility. Population and Development Review, 4, 105–132.Google Scholar
  30. Brauner-Otto, S. R., Axinn, W. G., & Ghimire, D. J. (2007). The spread of health services and fertility transition. Demography, 44, 747–770.Google Scholar
  31. Brewster, K. L. (1994). Neighborhood context and the transition to sexual activity among young black women. Demography, 31, 603–614.Google Scholar
  32. Brien, M. J., & Lillard, L. A. (1994). Education, marriage, and first conception in Malaysia. The Journal of Human Resources, 29, 1167–1204.Google Scholar
  33. Bulatao, R. A., & Lee, R. D. (1983). Determinants of fertility in developing countries. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  34. Bumpass, L. L., Martin, T. C., & Sweet, J. A. (1991). The impact of family background and early marital factors on marital disruption. Journal of Family Issues, 12, 22–42.Google Scholar
  35. Bumpass, L. L., & Sweet, J. A. (1989). National estimates of cohabitation: Cohort levels and union stability. Demography, 26, 615–625.Google Scholar
  36. Caldwell, J. C. (1982). Theory of fertility decline. London, UK: Academic Press Inc.Google Scholar
  37. Caldwell, J. C., Reddy, P. H., & Caldwell, P. (1983). The causes of marriage change in South India. Population Studies, 37, 343–361.Google Scholar
  38. Caldwell, J. C., Reddy, P. H., & Caldwell, P. (1988). The causes of demographic change: Experimental research in south India. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  39. Cherlin, A. J. (1992). Marriage, divorce and remarriage. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Chesnais, J.-C. (1992). The demographic transition: Stages, patterns, and economic implications. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Choe, M. K., Thapa, S., & Mishra, V. (2004). Early marriage and early motherhood in Nepal. Journal of Biosocial Science, 37, 143–162.Google Scholar
  42. Cooksey, E. C., Menaghan, E. G., & Jekielek, S. M. (1997). Life-course effects of work and family circumstances on children. Social Forces, 76, 637–665.Google Scholar
  43. Crane, J. (1991). The epidemic theory of ghettos and neighborhood effects on dropping out and teenage childbearing. American Journal of Sociology, 96, 1226–1259.Google Scholar
  44. Dahal, D. R. (1993). Rethinking fertility transition: Some observations from Nepal. Population Dynamics in Nepal, 2, 49–58.Google Scholar
  45. de Jong, J., Ghimire, D., Thornton, A., & Pearce, L. D. (2006). Developmental idealism and changing models of marriage (Research Report No. 06-609). Ann Arbor, MI: Population Studies Center, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  46. Dyson, T., & Moore, M. (1983). On kinship structure, female autonomy, and demographic behavior in India. Population and Development Review, 9, 25–60.Google Scholar
  47. Easterlin, R. A., & Crimmins, E. N. (1985). The fertility revolution: A demand-supply analysis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  48. Elder, G. H., Jr. (1974). Children of the Great Depression: Social change in life experiences. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  49. Elder, G. H., Jr. (1985). The life course dynamics: Trajectories and transitions: 1968–1980. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Elder, G. H., Jr. (1994). Time, human agency, and social change: Perspective on the life course. Social Psychology Quarterly, 57, 4–15.Google Scholar
  51. Elder, G. H., Jr. (1998). The life course as developmental theory. Child Development, 69, 1–12.Google Scholar
  52. Entwisle, B., & Mason, W. M. (1985). Multilevel effects of socioeconomic development and family planning programs on children ever born. The American Journal of Sociology, 91, 616–649.Google Scholar
  53. Entwisle, B., Rindfuss, R. R., Walsh, S. J., Evans, T. P., & Curran, S. R. (1997). Geographic information systems, spatial network analysis, and contraceptive choice. Demography, 34, 171–187.Google Scholar
  54. Feyisetan, B. J., & Bankole, A. (1991). Mate selection and fertility in urban Nigeria. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 22, 273–292.Google Scholar
  55. Fox, G. L. (1975). Love match and arranged marriage in a modernizing nation: Mate selection in Ankara, Turkey. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 37, 180–193.Google Scholar
  56. Freedman, D. A., Thornton, A., Camburn, D., Alwin, D., & Young-DeMarco, L. (1988). The life history calendar: A technique for collecting retrospective data. In C. C. Clogg (Ed.), Sociological Methodology 1988 (pp. 37–68). Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.Google Scholar
  57. Freedman, R. (1979). Theories of fertility decline: A reappraisal. Social Forces, 58, 1–17.Google Scholar
  58. Freedman, R. (1987). The contribution of social science research to population policy and family planning program effectiveness. Studies in Family Planning, 18, 57–82.Google Scholar
  59. Fricke, T. (1986). Himalayan households: Tamang demography and domestic processes. Ann Arbor, MI: UMI Research Press.Google Scholar
  60. Fricke, T. E., & Teachman, J. D. (1993). Writing the names: Marriage style living arrangement, and first birth interval in Nepali society. Demography, 30, 175–188.Google Scholar
  61. Ghimire, D. J. (2003). The social context of first birth timing in Nepal. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of Sociology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
  62. Ghimire, D. J., & Axinn, W. G. (2006). Family change in Nepal: Evidence from western Chitwan. Contributions to Nepalese Studies, 33, 177–201.Google Scholar
  63. Ghimire, D. J., & Axinn, W. G. (2010). Community context, land use and first birth. Rural Sociology, 75, 478–513.Google Scholar
  64. Ghimire, D. J., Axinn, W. G., Yabiku, S. T., & Thornton, A. (2006). Social change, premarital non-family experiences, and spouse choice in an arranged marriage society. American Journal of Sociology, 11, 1181–1218.Google Scholar
  65. Goode, W. J. (1970). World revolution and family patterns. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  66. Goode, W. (1982). Why men resist. In B. Thorne & M. Yalom (Eds.), Rethinking the family: Some feminist questions (pp. 287–310). New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  67. Gray, J. N. (1991). Marriage and the constitution of hierarchy and gender in Bhaun-Chhetri households. Contribution to Nepalese Studies, 18, 53–82.Google Scholar
  68. Gray, J. N. (1995). The householder’s world: Purity, power and dominance in a Nepali Village. Dehli, India: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  69. Guneratne, U. A. (1994). The Tharus of Chitwan: Ethnicity, class and the state in Nepal. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  70. Gurung, H. B. (1980). Vignettes of Nepal. Kathmandu, Nepal: Sajha Prakashan.Google Scholar
  71. Gurung, H. B. (1998). Nepal social demography and expressions. Kathmandu, Nepal: New Era.Google Scholar
  72. Hart, K. (2007). Love by arrangement: The ambiguity of “spousal choice” in a Turkish village. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 13, 345–362.Google Scholar
  73. Hill, R., Stycos, J. M., & Back, K. W. (1959). The family and population control: A Puerto Rican experiment in social change. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  74. Hirschman, C. (1985). Premarital socioeconomic roles and the timing of family formation: A comparative study of five Asian societies. Demography, 22, 35–59.Google Scholar
  75. Hirschman, C., & Rindfuss, R. (1980). Social, cultural, and economic determinants of age at birth of first child in peninsular Malaysia. Population Studies, 34, 507–518.Google Scholar
  76. Hirschman, C., & Young, Y. J. (2000). Social context and fertility decline in Southeast Asia: 1968–70 to 1988–90. Population and Development Review, 26(Suppl), 11–39.Google Scholar
  77. Hoelter, L. F., Axinn, W. G., & Ghimire, D. J. (2004). Social change, premarital non-family experiences, and marital dynamics. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 1131–1151.Google Scholar
  78. Hogan, D., & Kitagawa, E. M. (1985). The impact of social status, family structure, and neighborhood on fertility of black adolescents. American Journal of Sociology, 90, 825–855.Google Scholar
  79. Hong, Y. (2006). Marital decision-making and the timing of first birth in rural China before the 1990s. Population Studies, 60, 329–341.Google Scholar
  80. Knodel, J. (1987). Starting, stopping, and spacing during the early stage of fertility transition: The experiences of German village populations in the 18th and 19th centuries. Demography, 24, 143–162.Google Scholar
  81. Lesthaeghe, R. (1983). A century of demographic and cultural change in Western Europe: An exploration of underlying dimensions. Population and Development Review, 9, 411–435.Google Scholar
  82. Link, C. F. (2011). Spousal communication and contraceptive use in rural Nepal: An event history analysis. Studies in Family Planning, 42, 83–92.Google Scholar
  83. Macfarlane, A. (1976). Resources and population: A study of the Gurungs of Nepal. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  84. Macfarlane, A. (1986). Marriage and love in England: Modes of reproduction. New York: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  85. Majupuria, I., & Majupuria, T. C. (1989). Marriage customs in Nepal: Traditions and wedding ceremonies among various Nepalese ethnic groups. Bangkok, Thailand: Craftsman Press, Ltd.Google Scholar
  86. Malhotra, A. (1991). Gender and changing generational relations: Spouse choice in Indonesia. Demography, 28, 549–570.Google Scholar
  87. Mason, K. O., & Smith, H. L. (2000). Husbands’ versus wives’ fertility goals and use of contraception: The influence of gender context in five Asian countries. Demography, 37, 299–311.Google Scholar
  88. McCarthy, J. F. (1982). Differentials in age at first marriage: Comparative studies, cross-national summaries (Vol. 19). Voorburg, Netherlands: International Statistical Institute.Google Scholar
  89. Mitchell, C. (2010, April). Whose will dominates? Individual, family and community influences on participation in spouse selection. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Population Association of America, Dallas, TX.Google Scholar
  90. Mitchell, R. E. (1971). Changes in fertility and family size in response to changes in age at marriage, the trend away from arranged marriage, and increasing urbanization. Population Studies, 25, 481–489.Google Scholar
  91. Morgan, S. P., & Niraula, B. B. (1995). Gender inequality and fertility in two Nepali villages. Population and Development Review, 21, 541–561.Google Scholar
  92. Niraula, B. (1994). Marriage changes in the central Nepali hills. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 29, 91–109.Google Scholar
  93. Notestein, F. (1953). Economic problems of population change. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference of Agricultural Economics (pp. 13–31). London, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  94. Pasupathi, M. (2002). Arranged marriages: What’s love got to do with it? In M. Yalom & L. L. Carstensen (Eds.), Inside the American couple: New thinking, new challenges (pp. 211–235). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  95. Petersen, T. (1986). Estimating fully parametric hazard rate models with time-dependent covariates: Use of maximum likelihood. Sociological Methods & Research, 14, 219–246.Google Scholar
  96. Petersen, T. (1991). The statistical analysis of event histories. Sociological Methods & Research, 19, 270–323.Google Scholar
  97. Rindfuss, R. R., & Hirschman, C. (1984). The timing of family formation: Structural and societal factors in the Asian context. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 46, 205–214.Google Scholar
  98. Rindfuss, R. R., & Morgan, S. P. (1983). Marriage, sex, and the first birth interval: The quiet revolution in Asia. Population Development and Review, 9, 259–278.Google Scholar
  99. Satayavada, A., & Adamchak, D. J. (2000). Determinants of current use of contraception and children ever born in Nepal. Social Biology, 47, 51–61.Google Scholar
  100. Schuler, S. R., Bates, L. M., Islam, F., & Islam, M. K. (2006). The timing of marriage and childbearing among rural families in Bangladesh: Choosing between competing risks. Social Science & Medicine, 62, 2826–2837.Google Scholar
  101. Sewell, W. H., Hauser, R. M., & Wolf, W. C. (1980). Sex, schooling and occupational status. American Journal of Sociology, 86, 551–583.Google Scholar
  102. Sharan, M., & Valente, T. W. (2002). Spousal communication and family planning adoption: Effects of a radio drama serial in Nepal. International Family Planning Perspectives, 28, 16–25.Google Scholar
  103. Shorter, E. (1975). The making of the modern family. New York: Basic.Google Scholar
  104. Smock, P. J. (2000). Cohabitation in the United States: An appraisal of research themes, findings, and implications. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 1–20.Google Scholar
  105. Stash, S. (2005). Explanation of unmet need for contraception in Chitwan, Nepal. Studies in Family Planning, 30, 267–287.Google Scholar
  106. Suwal, J. V. (2001). Socio-cultural dynamics of first birth intervals in Nepal. Contributions to Nepalese Studies, 28, 11–33.Google Scholar
  107. Thomson, E. (1997). Couple childbearing desires, intentions, and births. Demography, 34, 343–354.Google Scholar
  108. Thornton, A. (2001). The developmental paradigm, reading history sideways, and family change. Demography, 38, 449–465.Google Scholar
  109. Thornton, A. (2005). Reading history sideways: The fallacy and enduring impact of the developmental paradigm on family life. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  110. Thornton, A., Axinn, W. G., & Xie, Y. (2007). Marriage and cohabitation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  111. Thornton, A., & Fricke, T. (1987). Social change and the family: Comparative perspectives from the West, China, and South Asia. Sociological Forum, 2, 746–779.Google Scholar
  112. Thornton, A., Fricke, T., Yang, L. S., & Chang, J. S. (1994). Theoretical mechanisms of family change. In A. Thornton & H. Lin (Eds.), Social change and the family in Taiwan (pp. 88–115). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  113. Thornton, A., & Lin, H. S. (1994). Social change and the family in Taiwan. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  114. Tuladhar, J. M. (1987). Effect of family planning availability and accessibility on contraceptive use in Nepal. Studies in Family Planning, 18, 49–53.Google Scholar
  115. Tuladhar, J. M. (1989). The onset of a fertility decline in Nepal. Asia-Pacific Population Journal, 4, 15–30.Google Scholar
  116. Van Bavel, J., & Kok, J. (2009). Social control and the intergenerational transmission of age at marriage in rural Holland, 1850–1940. Population (English ed.), 64, 343–360.Google Scholar
  117. Wang, F., & Quanche, Y. (1996). Age at marriage and the first birth interval: The emerging change in sexual behavior among young couples in China. Population and Development Review, 22, 299–320.Google Scholar
  118. Whyte, M. K. (1990). Dating, mating, and marriage. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  119. Xiaohe, X., & Whyte, M. K. (1990). Love matches and arranged marriages: A Chinese replication. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 709–722.Google Scholar
  120. Yabiku, S. T. (2004). Marriage timing in Nepal: Organizational effects and individual mechanisms. Social Forces, 83, 559–586.Google Scholar
  121. Yabiku, S. T. (2005). The effect of non-family experiences on age of marriage in a setting of rapid social change. Population Studies, 59, 339–354.Google Scholar
  122. Yabiku, S. T. (2006). Land use and marriage timing in Nepal. Population and Environment, 27, 445–461.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Survey Research Center and Population Studies Center, Institute for Social ResearchUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA
  2. 2.Survey Research Center and Population Studies Center, Institute for Social Research, and SociologyUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations