Demography

, Volume 50, Issue 3, pp 1129–1134

Skewed Sex Ratios in India: “Physician, Heal Thyself”

  • Archana B. Patel
  • Neetu Badhoniya
  • Manju Mamtani
  • Hemant Kulkarni
Article

Abstract

Sex selection, a gender discrimination of the worst kind, is highly prevalent across all strata of Indian society. Physicians have a crucial role in this practice and implementation of the Indian Government’s Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques Act in 1996 to prevent the misuse of ultrasound techniques for the purpose of prenatal sex determination. Little is known about family preferences, let alone preferences among families of physicians. We investigated the sex ratios in 946 nuclear families with 1,624 children, for which either one or both parents were physicians. The overall child sex ratio was more skewed than the national average of 914. The conditional sex ratios decreased with increasing number of previous female births, and a previous birth of a daughter in the family was associated with a 38 % reduced likelihood of a subsequent female birth. The heavily skewed sex ratios in the families of physicians are indicative of a deeply rooted social malady that could pose a critical challenge in correcting the sex ratios in India.

Keywords

Gender Sex ratio Female Prenatal diagnosis Sex determination 

References

  1. Arnold, F., Choe, M. K., & Roy, T. K. (1998). Son preference, the family-building process and child mortality in India. Population Studies, 52, 301–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arnold, F., Kishor, S., & Roy, T. K. (2002). Sex-selective abortion in India. Population and Development Review, 28, 759–785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bhat, P. N. M., & Zavier, A. J. F. (2003). Fertility decline and gender bias in northern India. Demography, 40, 637–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Echávarri, R. A., & Eczurra, R. (2010). Education and gender bias in the sex ratio at birth: Evidence from India. Demography, 47, 249–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Garg, S., & Nath, A. (2008). Female feticide in India: Issues and concerns. Journal of Postgraduate Medicine, 54, 276–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gaudin, S. (2011). Son preference in Indian families: Absolute versus relative wealth effects. Demography, 48, 343–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Government of India. (2005). Annual report on implementation of the Pre-Conception and Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex Selection) Act. New Delhi: PNDT Division, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India. Retrieved from http://pndt.gov.in/writereaddata/mainlinkfi le/File22.pdf
  8. Government of India. (2011). Census of India, 2011. Retrieved from http://censusindia.gov.in
  9. International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) and Macro International. (2007). National Family Health Survey (NFHS-3), 2005–06: India: Volume I. Mumbai, India: IIPS.Google Scholar
  10. Jha, P., Kesler, M. A., Kumar, R., Ram, F., Ram, U., Aleksandrowicz, L., & Banthia, J. (2011). Trends in selective abortions of girls in India: analysis of nationally representative birth histories from 1990 to 2005 and census data from 1991 to 2011. Lancet, 377, 1921–1928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Puri, S., & Nachtigall, R. D. (2010). The ethics of sex selection: a comparison of the attitudes and experiences of primary care physicians and physician providers of clinical sex selection services. Fertility and Sterility, 93, 2107–2114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Rosenzweig, M. R., & Schultz, T. P. (1982). Market opportunities, genetic endowments, and intrafamily resource distribution: Child survival in rural India. American Economic Review, 72, 803–815.Google Scholar
  13. StataCorp. (2007). Stata Statistical Software: Release 10. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP.Google Scholar
  14. Sudha, S., & Rajan, S. I. (1999). Female demographic disadvantage in India 1981–1991: Sex selective abortions and female infanticide. Development and Change, 30, 585–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Zavier, A. J., Jejeebhoy, S., & Kalyanwala, S. (2012). Factors associated with second trimester abortion in rural Maharashtra and Rajasthan, India. Global Public Health, 7, 897–908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Archana B. Patel
    • 1
    • 2
  • Neetu Badhoniya
    • 1
  • Manju Mamtani
    • 1
  • Hemant Kulkarni
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Lata Medical Research FoundationNagpurIndia
  2. 2.Indira Gandhi Government Medical CollegeNagpurIndia
  3. 3.Texas Biomedical Research InstituteSan AntonioUSA

Personalised recommendations