Demography

, Volume 50, Issue 4, pp 1197–1216 | Cite as

Educational Homogamy and Gender-Specific Earnings: Sweden, 1990–2009

Article

Abstract

Several studies have shown strong educational homogamy in most Western societies, although the trends over time differ across countries. In this article, we study the connection between educational assortative mating and gender-specific earnings in a sample containing the entire Swedish population born 1960–1974; we follow this sample from 1990 to 2009. Our empirical strategy exploits a longitudinal design, using distributed fixed-effects models capturing the impact of partner education on postmarital earnings, relating it to the income development before union formation. We find that being partnered with someone with more education (hypergamy) is associated with higher earnings, while partnering someone with less education (hypogamy) is associated with lower earnings. However, most of these differences in earnings emerge prior to the time of marriage, implying that the effect is explained by marital selection processes rather than by partner education affecting earnings. The exception is hypogamy among the highly educated, for which there are strong indications that in comparison with homogamy and hypergamy, earnings grow slower after union formation.

Keywords

Educational homogamy Assortative mating Marriage premium Distributed fixed effects Earnings 

References

  1. Akerlof, G. (1998). Men without children. Economic Journal, 108, 287–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Angrist, J., & Evans, W. (1998). Children and their parents’ labor supply: Evidence from exogenous variation in family size. American Economic Review, 88, 450–477.Google Scholar
  3. Antelius, J., & Björklund, A. (2000). How reliable are register data for studies of the return to schooling? An examination of Swedish data. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 44, 341–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Åström, J. (2009). Marriage, money and migration (Doctoral dissertation). Department of Economics, Umeå University, Sweden.Google Scholar
  5. Becker, G. S. (1965). A theory of the allocation of time. Economic Journal, 75, 493–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Becker, G. S. (1981). A treatise on the family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Benham, L. (1974). Benefits of women’s education within marriage. Journal of Political Economy, 82, S57–S71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Berk, S. F. (1985). The gender factory. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bernardi, F. (1999). Does the husband matter? Married women and employment in Italy. European Sociological Review, 15, 285–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bernasco, W. (1994). Coupled careers. The effects of spouse’s resources on success at work. Amesterdam, The Netherlands: Thesis Publishers.Google Scholar
  11. Bernasco, W., de Graaf, P. M., & Ultee, W. C. (1998). Coupled careers. Effects of spouse’s resources on occupational attainment in the Netherlands. European Sociological Review, 14, 15–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Birkelund, G. E., & Heldal, J. (2003). Who marries whom? Educational homogamy in Norway. Demographic Research, 8(article 1), 1–30. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2003.8.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bittman, M., England, P., Folbre, N., Sayer, L., & Matheson, G. (2003). When does gender trump money? Bargaining and time in household work. American Journal of Sociology, 109, 186–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Björklund, A. (1992). Rising female labor force participation and the distribution of family income: The Swedish experience. Acta Sociologica, 35, 299–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Blackburn, M., & Korenman, S. (1994). The declining marital status earnings differentials. Journal of Population Economics, 7, 247–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Blood, R. O., & Wolfe, D. M. (1960). Husbands and wives. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
  17. Blossfeld, H.-P. (2009). Educational assortative marriage in comparative perspective. Annual Review of Sociology, 35, 513–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Blossfeld, H.-P., & Drobnic, S. (Eds.). (2001). Careers of couples in contemporary society. From male breadwinner to dual-earner families. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Blossfeld, H.-P., & Timm, A. (Eds.). (2003). Who marries whom? Educational systems as marriage markets in modern societies. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  20. Brines, J. (1993). The exchange value of housework. Rationality and Society, 5, 302–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Brines, J. (1994). Economic dependency, gender, and the division of labor at home. American Journal of Sociology, 100, 652–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Brynin, M., & Schupp, J. (2000). Education, employment, and gender inequality amongst couples. A comparative analysis of Britain and Germany. European Sociological Review, 16, 349–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Budig, M. J., & England, P. (2001). The wage penalty for motherhood. American Sociological Review, 66, 204–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Budig, M. J., & Hodges, M. J. (2010). Differences in disadvantage: Variations in motherhood penalty across white women’s earnings distribution. American Sociological Review, 75, 705–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Chiappori, P.-A. (1992). Collective labor supply and welfare. Journal of Political Economy, 100, 437–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Chun, H., & Lee, I. (2001). Why do married men earn more: Productivity or marriage selection? Economic Inquiry, 39, 301–319.Google Scholar
  27. Dougherty, C. (2006). The marriage earnings premium as a distributed fixed effect. Journal of Human Resources, 41, 433–443.Google Scholar
  28. Dribe, M., & Stanfors, M. (2009). Does parenthood strengthen a traditional household division of labor? Evidence from Sweden. Journal of Marriage and Family, 17, 33–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Duvander, A.-Z. (2000). Couples in Sweden. Studies on family and work (Doctoral dissertation). Swedish Institute for Social Research, Stockholm University, Sweden.Google Scholar
  30. Edwards, J. N. (1969). Familial behavior as social exchange. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 31, 518–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Evertsson, M., & Nermo, M. (2007). Changing resources and the division of housework: A longitudinal study of Swedish couples. European Sociological Review, 23, 455–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ginther, D. K., & Sundström, M. (2010). Does marriage lead to specialization in Sweden? An evaluation of trends in adult earnings before and after marriage (SOFI Working Paper 1/2010). Stockholm: Swedish Institute for Social Research.Google Scholar
  33. Ginther, D. K., & Zavodny, M. (2001). Is the male marriage premium due to selection? The effect of shotgun weddings on the return to marriage. Journal of Population Economics, 14, 313–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gray, J. S. (1997). The fall in men’s return to marriage. Declining productivity effects or changing selection? Journal of Human Resources, 32, 482–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Gronau, R. (1977). Leisure, home production, and work: The theory of the allocation of time revisited. Journal of Political Economy, 85, 1099–1123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Henz, U., & Jonsson, J. (2003). Who marries whom in Sweden. In H.-P. Blossfeld & A. Timm (Eds.), Who marries whom? Educational systems as marriage markets in modern societies (pp. 235–236). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Henz, U., & Sundström, M. (2001). Partner choice and women’s paid work in Sweden. The role of earnings. European Sociological Review, 17, 295–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hill, M. (1979). The wage effects of marital status and children. Journal of Human Resources, 14, 579–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Huang, C., Li, H., Liu, P. W., & Zhang, J. (2009). Why does spousal education matter for earnings? Assortative mating and cross-productivity. Journal of Labor Economics, 27, 633–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Jepsen, L. K. (2005). The relationship between wife’s education and husband’s earnings: Evidence from 1960 to 2000. Review of Economics of the Household, 3, 197–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kalmijn, M. (1998). Intermarriage and homogamy: Causes, patterns, trends. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 395–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Konrad, K. A., & Lommerud, K. E. (1995). Family policy with non-cooperative families. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 97, 581–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Korenman, S., & Neumark, D. (1991). Does marriage really make men more productive? Journal of Human Resources, 26, 282–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Korenman, S., & Neumark, D. (1992). Marriage, motherhood and wages. Journal of Human Resources, 27, 233–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Krashinsky, H. A. (2004). Do marital status and computer use really change the wage structure? Journal of Human Resources, 29, 774–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lam, D. (1988). Marriage markets and assortative mating with household public goods: Theoretical results and empirical implications. Journal of Human Resources, 23, 462–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lefgren, L., & McIntyre, F. (2006). The relationship between women’s education and marriage outcomes. Journal of Labor Economics, 24, 787–830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Light, A. (2004). Gender differences in the marriage and cohabitation income premium. Demography, 41, 263–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Loughran, D. S., & Zissimopoulos, J. M. (2009). Why wait? The effect of marriage and childbearing on the wages of men and women. Journal of Human Resources, 44, 326–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Manser, M., & Brown, M. (1980). Marriage and household decision-making: A bargaining analysis. International Economic Review, 21, 31–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Mare, R. D. (1991). Five decades of educational assortative mating. American Sociological Review, 56, 15–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. McElroy, M. B., & Horney, M. J. (1981). Nash-bargained household decisions: Toward a generalization of the theory of demand. International Economic Review, 22, 333–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Meyer, A. (2007). Studies on the Swedish parental insurance (Doctoral dissertation). Department of Economics, Lund University, Sweden.Google Scholar
  54. Nakosteen, R. A., Westerlund, O., & Zimmer, M. A. (2004). Marital matching and earnings. Evidence from the unmarried population in Sweden. Journal of Human Resources, 39, 1033–1044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Nakosteen, R. A., & Zimmer, M. A. (1997). Men, money and marriage: Are high earners more prone than low earners to marry? Social Science Quarterly, 78, 66–82.Google Scholar
  56. Nakosteen, R. A., & Zimmer, M. A. (2001). Spouse selection and earnings: Evidence of marital sorting. Economic Inquiry, 39, 201–213.Google Scholar
  57. Presser, H. B. (1994). Employment schedules among dual earner spouses and the division of household labor by gender. American Sociological Review, 59, 348–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Richardson, K. (1997). Essays on family and labor economics (Doctoral dissertation). Swedish Institute for Social Research, Stockholm University, Sweden.Google Scholar
  59. Schwartz, C. R., & Mare, R. D. (2005). Trends in educational assortative marriage from 1940 to 2003. Demography, 42, 621–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Shelton, B. A., & John, D. (1996). The division of household labor. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 299–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Skedinger, P. (2006). Hur höga är minimilönerna? [How high are the minimum wages?] (IFN Policy Paper No. 6). Stockholm, Sweden: Research Institute of Industrial Economics.Google Scholar
  62. Skedinger, P. (2008). En exkluderande arbetsmarknadsmodell? Den svenska arbetsmarknadens trösklar i ett globalt perspektiv [An excluding labor market model? Thresholds on the Swedish labor market in a global perspective] (Report No 24 to the Swedish Globalization Council). Stockholm, Sweden: Ministry of Education, Stockholm.Google Scholar
  63. Smits, J., Lammers, J., & Ultee, W. (1998). Educational homogamy in 65 countries: The explanation of differences in openness with country-level explanatory variables. American Sociological Review, 63, 264–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Staff, J., & Mortimer, J. T. (2012). Explaining the motherhood wage penalty during the early occupational career. Demography, 49, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Sullivan, O. (2011). An end to gender display through the performance of housework? A review and reassessment of the quantitative literature using insights from the qualitative literature. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 3, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Tichenor, V. J. (1999). Status and income as gendered resources. The case of marital power. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 638–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Waldfogel, J. (1997). The effect of children on women’s wages. American Sociological Review, 62, 209–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Welch, F. (1974). Benefits of women’s education within marriage: Comment. Journal of Political Economy, 82, S72–S75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. West, C., & Fenstermaker, S. (1995). Doing difference. Gender and Society, 9, 8–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender and Society, 1, 125–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Economic DemographyLund UniversityLundSweden
  2. 2.Department of Management and EngineeringLinköping UniversityLinköpingSweden

Personalised recommendations