Demography

, Volume 50, Issue 2, pp 661–671 | Cite as

Trends in Late-Life Activity Limitations in the United States: An Update From Five National Surveys

  • Vicki A. Freedman
  • Brenda C. Spillman
  • Patti M. Andreski
  • Jennifer C. Cornman
  • Eileen M. Crimmins
  • Ellen Kramarow
  • James Lubitz
  • Linda G. Martin
  • Sharon S. Merkin
  • Robert F. Schoeni
  • Teresa E. Seeman
  • Timothy A. Waidmann
Article

Abstract

This article updates trends from five national U.S. surveys to determine whether the prevalence of activity limitations among the older population continued to decline in the first decade of the twenty-first century. Findings across studies suggest that personal care and domestic activity limitations may have continued to decline for those ages 85 and older from 2000 to 2008, but generally were flat since 2000 for those ages 65–84. Modest increases were observed for the 55- to 64-year-old group approaching late life, although prevalence remained low for this age group. Inclusion of the institutional population is important for assessing trends among those ages 85 and older in particular.

Keywords

Aging Disability Functioning Trends Harmonization 

Supplementary material

13524_2012_167_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (206 kb)
ESM 1(PDF 206 kb)

References

  1. Crimmins, E. M. (2004). Trends in the health of the elderly. Annual Review of Public Health, 25, 79–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Freedman, V. A., Crimmins, E., Schoeni, R. F., Spillman, B. C., Aykan, H., Kramarow, E., & Waldmann, T. (2004). Resolving inconsistencies in trends in old-age disability: Report from a technical working group. Demography, 41, 417–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Freedman, V. A., Kasper, J., Cornman, J., Agree, E., Bandeen-Roche, K., Mor, V., & Wolf, D. (2011). Validation of new measures of disability and functioning in the National Health and Aging Trends Study. Journals of Gerontology A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 66(9), 1013–1021.Google Scholar
  4. Johnson R., & Wiener, J. (2006). Profile of frail older Americans and their caregivers (The Retirement Project, Occasional Paper Number 8). Washington, DC: The Urban Institute. Retrieved from http://www.urban.org/UploadedPDF/311284_older_americans.pdf
  5. Martin, L. G., Freedman, V. A., Schoeni, R. F., & Andreski, P. M. (2010a). Trends in disability and related chronic conditions among people ages fifty to sixty-four. Health Affairs, 29, 725–731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Martin, L. G., Schoeni, R. F., & Andreski, P. M. (2010b). Trends in health of older adults in the United States: Past, present and future. Demography, 47(Suppl.), S17–S40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Schoeni, R. F., Freedman, V. A., & Martin, L. G. (2008). Why is late-life disability declining? The Milbank Quarterly, 86, 47–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Seeman, T. E., Merkin, S. S., Crimmins, E. M., & Karlamangla, A. S. (2010). Disability trends among older Americans: National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys, 1988–1994 and 1999–2004. American Journal of Public Health, 100, 100–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Xu, J., Kochanek, K. D., Murphy, S. L., & Tejada-Vera, B. (2010). Deaths: Final data for 2007. National Vital Statistics Reports, 58(19). Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America (outside the USA) 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vicki A. Freedman
    • 1
  • Brenda C. Spillman
    • 2
  • Patti M. Andreski
    • 3
  • Jennifer C. Cornman
    • 4
  • Eileen M. Crimmins
    • 5
  • Ellen Kramarow
    • 6
  • James Lubitz
    • 7
  • Linda G. Martin
    • 8
  • Sharon S. Merkin
    • 9
  • Robert F. Schoeni
    • 3
  • Teresa E. Seeman
    • 9
  • Timothy A. Waidmann
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute for Social ResearchUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA
  2. 2.Urban InstituteWashingtonUSA
  3. 3.University of MichiganAnn ArborUSA
  4. 4.ConsultantGranvilleUSA
  5. 5.University of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA
  6. 6.National Center for Health StatisticsHyattsvilleUSA
  7. 7.ConsultantColumbiaUSA
  8. 8.RANDArlingtonUSA
  9. 9.University of California Los AngelesLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations