, Volume 49, Issue 3, pp 857–865 | Cite as

Mortality From the Influenza Pandemic of 1918–1919: The Case of India

  • Siddharth Chandra
  • Goran Kuljanin
  • Jennifer Wray


Estimates of worldwide mortality from the influenza pandemic of 1918–1919 vary widely, from 15 million to 100 million. In terms of loss of life, India was the focal point of this profound demographic event. In this article, we calculate mortality from the influenza pandemic in India using panel data models and data from the Census of India. The new estimates suggest that for the districts included in the sample, mortality was at most 13.88 million, compared with 17.21 million when calculated using the assumptions of Davis (1951). We conclude that Davis’ influential estimate of mortality from influenza in British India is overstated by at least 24%. Future analyses of the effects of the pandemic on demographic change in India and worldwide will need to account for this significant downward revision.


Influenza Pandemic India Mortality Population loss 



This research was made possible by Grant No. 1R21DA025917-01A1 from the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) of the National Institutes of Health. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of NIDA. The authors would also like to thank participants of the XXXIII Annual Conference of the Indian Association for the Study of Population (IASP) held in Lucknow, India, in 2011, for their input.


  1. Afkhami, A. (2003). Compromised constitutions: The Iranian experience with the 1918 influenza pandemic. Bulletin of the History of Medicine, 77, 367–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Almond, D. (2006). Is the 1918 influenza pandemic over? Long–term effects of in utero influenza exposure in the post–1940 U.S. population. Journal of Political Economy, 114, 672–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Census of India. (Various years). Calcutta, India: Superintendent, Government Printing.Google Scholar
  4. Davis, K. (1951). The population of India and Pakistan. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Government of India. (1920). Annual report of the Sanitary Commissioner with the Government of India for 1918. Calcutta, India: Superintendent, Government Printing.Google Scholar
  6. Government of India. (Various years). Annual report of the Sanitary Commissioner with the Government of India. Calcutta, India: Superintendent, Government Printing.Google Scholar
  7. Johnson, N. P. A. S., & Mueller, J. (2002). Updating the accounts: Global mortality of the 1918–1920 “Spanish” influenza pandemic. Bulletin of the History of Medicine, 76, 105–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jordan, E. O. (1927). Epidemic influenza: A survey. Chicago, IL: American Medical Association.Google Scholar
  9. Klein, I. (1973). Death in India, 1871–1921. The Journal of Asian Studies, 32, 639–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Klein, I. (1974). Population and agriculture in northern India, 1872–1921. Modern Asian Studies, 8, 191–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Klein, I. (1988). Plague, policy and popular unrest in British India. Modern Asian Studies, 22, 723–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Klein, I. (1990). Population growth and mortality in British India Part II: The demographic revolution. Indian Economic and Social History Review, 27, 33–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Marten, J. T. (1923). Census of India, 1921 (Vol. I, Part I) (Report). Calcutta, India: Superintendent of Government Printing.Google Scholar
  14. Mazumder, B., Almond, D., Park, K., Crimmins, E. M., & Finch, C. E. (2010). Lingering prenatal effects of the 1918 influenza pandemic on cardiovascular disease. Journal of Developmental Origins of Health and Disease, 1, 26–34. doi: 10.1017/S2040174409990031 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mills, I. D. (1986). The 1918–1919 influenza pandemic—The Indian experience. Indian Economic and Social History Review, 23, 1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Morens, D. M., Taubenberger, J. K., & Fauci, A. S. (2009). The persistent legacy of the 1918 influenza virus. New England Journal of Medicine, 361, 225–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Patterson, K. D., & Pyle, G. (1991). The geography and mortality of the 1918 influenza pandemic. Bulletin of the History of Medicine, 65, 4–21.Google Scholar
  18. SAS Institute, Inc. (2011a). SAS/ETS(R) 9.2 user’s guide: The PANEL procedure. Retrieved from
  19. SAS Institute, Inc. (2011b). SAS/STAT(R) 9.2 user’s guide : The MIXED procedure (2nd ed.). Retrieved from
  20. Taubenberger, J. K., & Morens, D. M. (2006). 1918 influenza: The mother of all pandemics. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 12, 15–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Waring, J. I. (1971). A history of medicine in South Carolina 1900–1970. Columbia: South Carolina Medical Association.Google Scholar
  22. Yeatts, M. W. M. (1943). Census of india, 1941 (Vol. I, Part I) (Report). Simla, India: Government of India Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Siddharth Chandra
    • 1
  • Goran Kuljanin
    • 2
  • Jennifer Wray
    • 3
  1. 1.Asian Studies Center, 301 International CenterMichigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyMichigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA
  3. 3.Department of SociologyMichigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA

Personalised recommendations