Mortality From the Influenza Pandemic of 1918–1919: The Case of India
- 396 Downloads
Estimates of worldwide mortality from the influenza pandemic of 1918–1919 vary widely, from 15 million to 100 million. In terms of loss of life, India was the focal point of this profound demographic event. In this article, we calculate mortality from the influenza pandemic in India using panel data models and data from the Census of India. The new estimates suggest that for the districts included in the sample, mortality was at most 13.88 million, compared with 17.21 million when calculated using the assumptions of Davis (1951). We conclude that Davis’ influential estimate of mortality from influenza in British India is overstated by at least 24%. Future analyses of the effects of the pandemic on demographic change in India and worldwide will need to account for this significant downward revision.
KeywordsInfluenza Pandemic India Mortality Population loss
This research was made possible by Grant No. 1R21DA025917-01A1 from the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) of the National Institutes of Health. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of NIDA. The authors would also like to thank participants of the XXXIII Annual Conference of the Indian Association for the Study of Population (IASP) held in Lucknow, India, in 2011, for their input.
- Census of India. (Various years). Calcutta, India: Superintendent, Government Printing.Google Scholar
- Davis, K. (1951). The population of India and Pakistan. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Government of India. (1920). Annual report of the Sanitary Commissioner with the Government of India for 1918. Calcutta, India: Superintendent, Government Printing.Google Scholar
- Government of India. (Various years). Annual report of the Sanitary Commissioner with the Government of India. Calcutta, India: Superintendent, Government Printing.Google Scholar
- Jordan, E. O. (1927). Epidemic influenza: A survey. Chicago, IL: American Medical Association.Google Scholar
- Marten, J. T. (1923). Census of India, 1921 (Vol. I, Part I) (Report). Calcutta, India: Superintendent of Government Printing.Google Scholar
- Patterson, K. D., & Pyle, G. (1991). The geography and mortality of the 1918 influenza pandemic. Bulletin of the History of Medicine, 65, 4–21.Google Scholar
- SAS Institute, Inc. (2011a). SAS/ETS(R) 9.2 user’s guide: The PANEL procedure. Retrieved from http://support.sas.com/documentation/cdl/en/etsug/60372/HTML/default/viewer.htm#panel_toc.htm
- SAS Institute, Inc. (2011b). SAS/STAT(R) 9.2 user’s guide : The MIXED procedure (2nd ed.). Retrieved from http://support.sas.com/documentation/cdl/en/statug/63033/HTML/default/viewer.htm#mixed_toc.htm
- Waring, J. I. (1971). A history of medicine in South Carolina 1900–1970. Columbia: South Carolina Medical Association.Google Scholar
- Yeatts, M. W. M. (1943). Census of india, 1941 (Vol. I, Part I) (Report). Simla, India: Government of India Press.Google Scholar