Demography

, Volume 49, Issue 3, pp 773–796 | Cite as

Uncrossing the U.S. Black-White Mortality Crossover: The Role of Cohort Forces in Life Course Mortality Risk

Article

Abstract

In this article, I examine the black-white crossover in U.S. adult all-cause mortality, emphasizing how cohort effects condition age-specific estimates of mortality risk. I employ hierarchical age-period-cohort methods on the National Health Interview Survey-Linked Mortality Files between 1986 and 2006 to show that the black-white mortality crossover can be uncrossed by factoring out period and cohort effects of mortality risk. That is, when controlling for variations in cohort and period patterns of U.S. adult mortality, the estimated age effects of non-Hispanic black and non-Hispanic white U.S. adult mortality risk do not cross at any age. This is the case for both men and women. Further, results show that nearly all the recent temporal change in U.S. adult mortality risk was cohort driven. The findings support the contention that the non-Hispanic black and non-Hispanic white U.S. adult populations experienced disparate cohort patterns of mortality risk and that these different experiences are driving the convergence and crossover of mortality risk at older ages.

Keywords

Mortality Race United States Age-period-cohort Crossover 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Dr. Masters is currently a Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Health & Society Scholar at Columbia University. This research was completed when Dr. Masters was supported by a grant (1 R01-HD053696, PI Robert A. Hummer) from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health Research and Human Development and by an NICHD infrastructure grant (5 R24 HD042849) awarded to the Population Research Center (PRC) at the University of Texas at Austin. This is a revised article based on a presentation at the 2010 annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, August 14–17, Atlanta, GA. The author thanks Bob Hummer, Mark Hayward, Dan Powers, and the anonymous reviewers for very helpful comments and advice on this draft.

References

  1. Arias, E. (2006). United States life tables, 2003 (National Vital Statistics Reports Vol. 54, No. 14). Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.Google Scholar
  2. Ben-Shlomo, Y., & Kuh, D. (2002). A life course approach to chronic disease epidemiology: Conceptual models, empirical challenges and interdisciplinary perspectives. International Journal of Epidemiology, 31, 285–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blackwell, D., Hayward, M., & Crimmins, E. (2001). Does childhood health affect chronic morbidity in later life? Social Science & Medicine, 52, 1269–1284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Coale, A. J., & Kisker, E. E. (1986). Mortality crossovers: Reality or bad data? Population Studies, 40, 389–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cutler, D. M., & Miller, G. (2005). The role of public health improvements in health advances: The twentieth century United States. Demography, 42, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Eberstein, I. W., Nam, C. B., & Heyman, K. M. (2008). Causes of death and mortality crossovers by race. Biodemography and Social Biology, 54, 214–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ewbank, D. C. (1987). History of black mortality before 1940. The Milbank Quarterly, 65(Suppl. 1), 100–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Finch, C., & Crimmins, E. (2004). Inflammatory exposure and historical changes in human life-spans. Science, 305, 1736–1739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fogel, R. W. (2005). Changes in the disparities in chronic diseases during the course of the 20th century. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 48, S150–S165.Google Scholar
  10. Fogel, R. W., & Costa, D. L. (1997). A theory of technophysio evolution, with some implications for health care costs, and pension costs. Demography, 34, 49–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Glenn, N. D. (2005). Cohort analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  12. Glied, S., & Lleras-Muney, A. (2008). Technological innovation and inequality in health. Demography, 45, 741–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hayward, M. D., Miles, T. P., Crimmins, E. M., & Yang, Y. (2000). The significance of socioeconomic status in explaining the racial gap in chronic health conditions. American Sociological Review, 65, 910–930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hill, M. E., Preston, S. H., & Rosenwaike, I. (2000). Age reporting among white Americans aged 85+: Results of a record linkage study. Demography, 37, 175–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jayachandran, S., Lleras-Muney, A., & Smith, K. V. (2010). Modern medicine and the twentieth century decline in mortality: Evidence of the impact of sulfa drugs. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 2, 118–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jemal, A., Ward, E., Hao, Y., & Thun, M. (2005). Trends in the leading causes of death in the United States, 1970–2002. Journal of the American Medical Association, 294, 1255–1259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Johnson, N. E. (2000). The racial crossover in comorbidity, disability, and mortality. Demography, 37, 267–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kestenbaum, B. (1992). A description of the extreme aged population based on improved Medicare enrollment data. Demography, 29, 565–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kuh, D., & Ben-Shlomo, Y. (2004). A life course approach to chronic disease epidemiology (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press Inc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lauderdale, D. S. (2001). Education and survival: Birth cohort, age and period effects. Demography, 38, 551–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Link, B. G. (2008). Epidemiological sociology and the social shaping of population health. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 49, 367–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Link, B. G., & Phelan, J. C. (1995). Social conditions as fundamental causes of disease. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 35, 80–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lynch, S. M., Brown, J. S., & Harmsen, K. G. (2003). Black-white differences in mortality compression and deceleration and the mortality crossover reconsidered. Research on Aging, 25, 456–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Manton, K. G., & Stallard, E. (1981). Methods for evaluating the heterogeneity of aging processes in human populations using vital statistics data: Explaining the black/white mortality crossover by a model of mortality selection. Human Biology, 53, 47–67.Google Scholar
  25. Manton, K. G., Stallard, E., & Corder, L. (1997). Changes in the age dependence of mortality and disability: Cohort and other determinants. Demography, 34, 135–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Manton, K. G., Stallard, E., & Vaupel, J. W. (1984). Methods for comparing the mortality experience of heterogeneous populations. Demography, 18, 389–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mason, K. O., Mason, W. H., Winsborough, H. H., & Poole, K. (1973). Some methodological issues in cohort analysis of archival data. American Sociological Review, 32, 242–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Meara, E., Richards, S., & Cutler, D. (2008). The gap gets bigger: Changes in mortality and life expectancy, by education. Health Affairs, 27, 350–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Montez, J. K., & Hayward, M. D. (2011). Early life conditions and later life mortality. In R. G. Rogers & E. M. Crimmins (Eds.), International handbook of adult mortality (pp. 187–206). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nam, C. B. (1995). Another look at mortality crossovers. Social Biology, 42, 133–142.Google Scholar
  31. Pampel, F. C. (2005). Diffusion, cohort change, and social patterns of smoking. Social Science Research, 34, 117–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Parnell, A. M., & Owens, C. R. (1999). Evaluation of U.S. mortality patterns at old ages using the Medicare enrollment data base. Demographic Research, 1, article 2. doi: 10.4054/DemRes.1999.1.2
  33. Powers, D., & Xie, Y. (2000). Statistical methods for categorical data analysis. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  34. Preston, S. H., & Elo, I. T. (2006). Black mortality at very old ages in official U.S. life tables: A skeptical appraisal. Population and Development Review, 32, 557–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Preston, S. H., Elo, I. T., Rosenwaike, I., & Hill, M. (1996). African-American mortality at older ages: Results of a matching study. Demography, 33, 193–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Preston, S. H., Elo, I. T., & Stewart, Q. (1999). Effects of age misreporting on mortality estimates at older ages. Population Studies, 53, 165–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Preston, S. H., & Wang, H. (2006). Sex mortality differences in the United States: The role of cohort smoking patterns. Demography, 43, 631–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Riley, M. W. (1973). Aging and cohort succession: Interpretation and misinterpretations. Public Opinion Quarterly, 37, 35–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Riley, M. W. (1978). Aging, social change, and the power of ideas. Daedalus, 107, 39–52.Google Scholar
  40. Riley, M. W. (1987). On the significance of age in sociology. American Sociological Review, 52, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ross, C. E., & Wu, C. (1995). The links between education and health. American Sociological Review, 60, 719–745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ruggles, S. J., Alexander, J. T., Genadek, K., Goeken, R., Schroeder, M. B., & Sobek, M. (2010). Integrated Public Use Microdata Series: Version 5.0 [Machine-readable database]. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
  43. Ryder, N. (1965). The cohort as a concept in the study of social change. American Sociological Review, 30, 843–861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Vaupel, J. W., Manton, K. G., & Stallard, E. (1979). The impact of heterogeneity in individual frailty on the dynamics of mortality. Demography, 16, 439–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Vaupel, J. W., & Yashin, A. (1985). Heterogeneity’s ruses: Some surprising effects of selection on population dynamics. The American Statistician, 39, 176–185.Google Scholar
  46. Yang, Y. (2008). Trends in U.S. adult chronic disease mortality, 1960–1999: Age, period, and cohort variations. Demography, 45, 387–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Yang, Y., & Land, K. (2006). A mixed models approach to the age-period-cohort analysis of repeated cross-section surveys, with an application to data on trends in verbal test scores. Sociological Methodology, 36, 75–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Yang, Y., & Land, K. (2008). Age-period-cohort analysis of repeated cross-section surveys: Fixed or random effects? Sociological Methods & Research, 36, 297–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Columbia University, Institute for Social and Economic Research and PolicyNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations