Demography

, Volume 49, Issue 3, pp 889–912 | Cite as

Temporary Integration, Resilient Inequality: Race and Neighborhood Change in the Transition to Adulthood

Article

Abstract

This article focuses on neighborhood and geographic change arising with the first “selection” of an independent residential setting: the transition out of the family home. Data from two sources—the Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods, and the Panel Study of Income Dynamics—are used to provide complementary analyses of trajectories of change in geographic location and neighborhood racial and economic composition during young adulthood. Findings indicate that for young adults who originate in segregated urban areas and remain in such areas, the period of young adulthood is characterized by continuity in neighborhood conditions and persistent racial inequality from childhood to adulthood. For young adults who exit highly segregated urban areas, this period is characterized by a substantial leveling of racial inequality, with African Americans moving into less-poor, less-segregated neighborhoods. However, the trend toward racial equality in young adulthood is temporary, as the gaps between whites and blacks grow as the young adults move further into adulthood. Crucial to the reemergence of racial inequality in neighborhood environments is the process of “unselected” change, or change in neighborhood conditions that occurs around young adults after they move to a new neighborhood environment.

Keywords

Neighborhoods Race Young adulthood Life course Segregation 

Supplementary material

13524_2012_105_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (108 kb)
ESM 1(PDF 107 kb)

References

  1. Alba, R., & Logan, J. (1993). Minority proximity to whites in suburbs: An individual-level analysis of segregation. The American Journal of Sociology, 98, 1388–1427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alba, R. D., Logan, J. R., & Stults, B. J. (2000). The changing neighborhood contexts of the immigrant metropolis. Social Forces, 79, 587–621.Google Scholar
  3. Altman, I., & Low, S. M. (Eds.). (1992). Place attachment. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  4. Becketti, S., Gould, W., Lillard, L., & Welch, F. (1988). The panel study of income dynamics after 14 years: An evaluation. Journal of Labor Economics, 6, 472–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown, C. (1996). Notes on the SEO or census component of the Panel Study of Income Dynamics (PSID Technical Series Paper No. 96–03). Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research, Survey Research Center, University of Michigan. Retrieved from http://psidonline.isr.umich.edu/Publications/Papers/SEO.pdf
  6. Bruch, E. E., & Mare, R. D. (2006). Neighborhood choice and neighborhood change. The American Journal of Sociology, 112, 667–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  8. Charles, C. Z. (2000). Neighborhood racial-composition preferences: Evidence from a multiethnic metropolis. Social Problems, 47, 379–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Clark, W. A. V. (1991). Residential preferences and neighborhood racial segregation: A test of the Schelling segregation model. Demography, 28, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clark, W. A. V. (1992). Residential preferences and residential choices in a multiethnic context. Demography, 29, 451–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Clark, W. A. V. (2007). Race, class, and place: Evaluating mobility outcomes for African Americans. Urban Affairs Review, 42, 295–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Crowder, K., & South, S. J. (2008). Spatial dynamics of white flight: The effects of local and extralocal racial conditions on neighborhood out-migration. American Sociological Review, 73, 792–812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Crowder, K., South, S. J., & Chavez, E. (2006). Wealth, race, and inter-neighborhood migration. American Sociological Review, 71, 72–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dawkins, C. J. (2006). Are social networks the ties that bind families to neighborhoods? Housing Studies, 21, 867–881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Earls, F. J., Raudenbush, S. W., Reiss, A. J., Sampson, R. J. (1997). Project on human development in Chicago neighborhoods: Community survey, 1994–1995 [computer file]. ICPSR02766-v2. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor].Google Scholar
  16. Elder, G. H. (1998). The life course as developmental theory. Child Development, 69, 1–12.Google Scholar
  17. Elder, G. H., King, V., & Conger, R. D. (1996). Attachment to place and migration prospects: A developmental perspective. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 6, 397–425.Google Scholar
  18. Farley, R., & Frey, W. H. (1994). Changes in the segregation of whites from blacks during the 1980s: Small steps toward a more integrated society. American Sociological Review, 59, 23–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fitzgerald, J., Gottschalk, P., & Moffitt, R. (1998a). An analysis of the impact of sample attrition in panel data: The Michigan Panel Study of Income Dynamics. Journal of Human Resources, 33, 251–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fitzgerald, J., Gottschalk, P., & Moffitt, R. (1998b). An analysis of the impact of sample attrition on the second generation of respondents in the Michigan Panel Study of Income Dynamics. Journal of Human Resources, 33, 300–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fossett, M. (2006). Ethnic preferences, social distance dynamics, and residential segregation: Theoretical explorations using simulation analysis. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 30, 185–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Frey, W. H. (2000). Melting pot suburbs: A census 2000 study of suburban diversity. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy.Google Scholar
  23. Fried, M. (1982). Residential attachment: Sources of residential and community satisfaction. Journal of Social Issues, 38, 107–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Garasky, S. (2002). Where are they going? A comparison of urban and rural youths’ locational choices after leaving the parental home. Social Science Research, 31, 409–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. GeoLytics, I. (2003). CensusCD neighborhood change database, 1970–2000 tract data. New Brunswick, NJ: GeoLytics.Google Scholar
  26. Gerson, K., Stueve, C. A., & Fischer, C. S. (1977). Attachment to place. In C. S. Fischer, R. M. Jackson, C. A. Stueve, K. Gerson, L. M. Jones, & M. Baldassare (Eds.), Networks and places: Social relations in the urban setting (pp. 139–161). New York: Free.Google Scholar
  27. Goldscheider, F. K., & DaVanzo, J. (1989). Pathways to independent living in early adulthood: Marriage, semiautonomy, and premarital residential independence. Demography, 26, 597–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Goldscheider, F. K., & Goldscheider, C. (1999). The changing transition to adulthood: Leaving and returning home. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  29. Goldscheider, F., Thornton, A., & Young-Demarco, L. (1993). A portrait of the nest-leaving process in early adulthood. Demography, 30, 683–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Halaby, C. N. (2003). Path models for the analysis of change and growth in life course studies. In J. T. Mortimer & M. J. Shanahan (Eds.), Handbook of the life course (pp. 503–528). New York: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hill, M. S., & Morgan, J. N. (1992). The panel study of income dynamics: A user’s guide. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  32. Ihlanfeldt, K. R., & Scafidi, B. (2002). Black self-segregation as a cause of housing segregation: Evidence from the multi-city study of urban inequality. Journal of Urban Economics, 51, 366–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Laub, J., & Sampson, R. J. (2003). Shared beginnings, divergent lives: Delinquent boys to age 70. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Lee, B. A., Oropesa, R. S., & Kanan, J. W. (1994). Neighborhood context and residential mobility. Demography, 31, 249–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Logan, J. R. (1978). Growth, politics, and the stratification of places. The American Journal of Sociology, 84, 404–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Logan, J. R., & Alba, R. D. (1993). Locational returns to human capital: Minority access to suburban community resources. Demography, 30, 243–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Logan, J., & Molotch, H. (1987). Urban fortunes: The political economy of place. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  38. Logan, J. R., Stults, B. J., & Farley, R. (2004). Segregation of minorities in the metropolis: Two decades of change. Demography, 41, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Long, L. E. (1988). Migration and residential mobility in the United States. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  40. Massey, D. S., & Denton, N. A. (1985). Spatial assimilation as a socioeconomic outcome. American Sociological Review, 50, 94–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Massey, D. S., & Denton, N. A. (1993). American apartheid: Segregation and the making of the underclass. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Massey, D. S., & Mullen, B. (1984). Processes of Hispanic and black spatial assimilation. The American Journal of Sociology, 89, 836–873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Maughan, B., & Champion, L. (1990). Risk and protective factors in the transition to adulthood. In P. Baltes & M. Baltes (Eds.), Successful aging: Perspectives from the behavioral sciences (pp. 296–331). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. McHugh, K. E., Gober, P., & Reid, N. (1990). Determinants of short and long-term mobility expectations for home owners and renters. Demography, 27, 81–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mulder, C. H. (2007). The family context and residential choice: A challenge for new research. Population, Space and Place, 13, 265–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mulder, C. H., & Clark, W. A. V. (2000). Leaving home and leaving the state: Evidence from the United States. International Journal of Population Geography, 6, 423–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mulder, C. H., & Cooke, T. J. (2009). Family ties and residential locations. Population, Space and Place, 15, 299–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Quillian, L. (1999). Migration patterns and the growth of high-poverty neighborhoods, 1970–1990. The American Journal of Sociology, 105, 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rubinowitz, L. S., & Rosenbaum, J. E. (2000). Crossing the class and color lines: From public housing to white suburbia. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  50. Rumbaut, R. G. (2005). Turning points in the transition to adulthood: Determinants of educational attainment, incarceration, and early childbearing among children of immigrants. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 28, 1041–1086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sampson, R. J. (2008). Moving to inequality: Neighborhood effects and experiments meet social structure. The American Journal of Sociology, 114, 189–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sampson, R. J., & Sharkey, P. (2008). Neighborhood selection and the social reproduction of concentrated racial inequality. Demography, 45, 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Schelling, T. (1971). Dynamic models of segregation. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 1, 143–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Settersten, R. A., Furstenberg, F. F., & Rumbaut, R. G. (Eds.). (2005). On the frontier of adulthood: Theory, research, and public policy. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  55. Sharkey, P. (2008). The intergenerational transmission of context. The American Journal of Sociology, 113, 931–969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sharkey, P. (2009). Neighborhoods and the black-white mobility gap (Economic Mobility Project Report). Washington, DC: The Pew Charitable Trusts.Google Scholar
  57. South, S. J., & Deane, G. D. (1993). Race and residential mobility: Individual determinants and structural constraints. Social Forces, 72, 147–167.Google Scholar
  58. Spilimbergo, A., & Ubeda, L. (2004). Family attachment and the decision to move by race. Journal of Urban Economics, 55, 478–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Stevens, G., & Featherman, D. L. (1981). A revised socioeconomic index of occupational status. Social Science Research, 10, 364–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. White, L. (1994). Coresidence and leaving home: Young adults and their parents. Annual Review of Sociology, 20, 81–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Zhang, J. (2004). A dynamic model of residential segregation. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 28, 147–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Zubrinsky, C. L., & Bobo, L. (1996). Attitudes on residential integration: Perceived status differences, mere in-group preference, or racial prejudice? Social Forces, 74, 883–909.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyNew York UniversityNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations