Demography

, Volume 49, Issue 1, pp 291–314 | Cite as

Modeling Disability Trajectories and Mortality of the Oldest-Old in China

  • Zachary Zimmer
  • Linda G. Martin
  • Daniel S. Nagin
  • Bobby L. Jones
Article

Abstract

This article uses a group-based modeling approach to jointly estimate disability and mortality trajectories over time based on data from the population aged 80 and older in China, and explores relations of demographic, socioeconomic, and early-life characteristics to membership in gender-specific trajectory groups. A three-group model best fits the data for both males and females. For most groups, predicted numbers of limitations in activities of daily living (ADLs) increase with age, but the pace is gradual in some cases and rapid in others. For each gender, the estimated mortality probability trajectories for the three groups follow a hierarchy that is related to the predicted ADL counts at age 80. Only a few characteristics predict trajectory-group membership. Prior nonagricultural occupation is associated with less favorable disability trajectories for both genders. For females, rural residence, a greater number of children ever born, and having a father who did not work in agriculture are associated with more favorable trajectories. For a small group of males who received education, disability is moderate but changes little with age. Findings may reflect heterogeneity of survival among the least advantaged, as well as a possible expansion of morbidity among a small advantaged group.

Keywords

Aging Activities of daily living China Disability Trajectory 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The current research was assisted by a grant from the National Institutes of Health–National Institute on Aging, Grant No. 1R21 AG036938-01, “Modeling Disability Trajectories in Rapidly Aging Population.” The authors thank Douglas A. Wolf for his thoughtful comments on an earlier version of this article, Danan Gu for providing insight into the CLHLS data set, and two anonymous reviewers. An earlier version of this article was presented at the annual meeting of the Population Association of America, Detroit, Michigan, April 30–May 2, 2009.

References

  1. Andreescu, C., Chang, C. C. H., Mulsant, B. H., & Ganguli, M. (2008). Twelve-year depressive symptom trajectories and their predictors in a community sample of older adults. International Psychogeriatrics, 20, 221–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beydoun, M. A., & Popkin, B. M. (2005). The impact of socio-economic factors on functional status decline among community-dwelling older adults in China. Social Science & Medicine, 60, 2045–2057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Connor, J. (2006). Multivariate mixture models to describe longitudinal patterns of frailty in American seniors (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Department of Statistics, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.Google Scholar
  4. Dahlgren, G., & Whitehead, M. (1991). Policies and strategies to promote social equity in health. Stockholm, Sweden: Institute for Futures Studies.Google Scholar
  5. Dodge, H. H., Du, Y., Saxton, J. A., & Ganguli, M. (2006). Cognitive domains and trajectories of functional independence in nondemented elderly persons. Journal of Gerontology: Medical Sciences, 61, 1330–1337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Erosheva, E. A. (2002). Partial membership models with application to disability survey data. In H. Bozdogan (Ed.), Statistical data mining and knowledge discovery (pp. 117–134). Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
  7. Erosheva, E. A. (2005). Comparing latent structures of the grade of membership, Rasch, and latent class models. Psychometrika, 70, 619–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ferrucci, L., Guralnik, J. M., Simonsick, E., Salive, M. E., Corti, C., & Langlois, J. (1996). Progressive versus catastrophic disability: A longitudinal view of the disablement process. Journal of Gerontology: Medical Sciences, 51, 123–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Freedman, V. A., & Martin, L. G. (1999). The role of education in explaining and forecasting trends in functional limitations among older Americans. Demography, 36, 461–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fries, J. F. (1980). Aging, natural death and the compression of morbidity. New England Journal of Medicine, 303, 130–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gill, T. M., Gahbauer, E. A., Han, L., & Allore, H. G. (2010). Trajectories of disability in the last year of life. New England Journal of Medicine, 362, 1173–1180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gu, D. (2007). General data quality assessment for the 2005 CLHLS wave (CLHLS Technical Report 2007–1). Durham, NC: Center for the Study of Aging and Human Development, Duke University.Google Scholar
  13. Gu, D., & Zeng, Y. (2004). Sociodemographic effects on the onset and recovery of ADL disability among Chinese oldest-old. Demographic Research, 11, article 1, 1–42. doi:  10.4054/DemRes.2004.11.1
  14. Haviland, A. H., Jones, B. L., & Nagin, D. S. (2011). Group-based trajectory modeling extended to account for nonrandom subject attrition. Sociological Methods & Research, 40, 367–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hayward, M. D., & Gorman, B. K. (2004). The long arm of childhood: The influence of early-life social conditions on men’s mortality. Demography, 41, 87–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. He, W., Sengupta, M., Zhang, K., & Guo, P. (2007). Health and health care of the older population in urban and rural China: 2000. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  17. Heikkinen, E. (2003). What are the main risk factors for disability in old age and how can disability be prevented? (Health Evidence Network report). Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe. Retrieved from http://www.euro.who.int/document/E82970.pdf
  18. Jones, B. L., & Nagin, D. S. (2007). Advances in group-based trajectory modeling and a SAS procedure for estimating them. Sociological Methods & Research, 35, 542–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jones, B. L., Nagin, D. S., & Roeder, K. (2001). A SAS procedure based on mixture models for estimating developmental trajectories. Sociological Methods & Research, 29, 374–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kaneda, T., Zimmer, Z., Fang, X., & Tang, Z. (2009). Gender differences in functional health and mortality among the Chinese elderly: Testing an exposure versus vulnerability hypothesis. Research on Aging, 31, 361–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kaneda, T., Zimmer, Z., & Zhang, K. (2010). Explaining the urban-rural divergence in disability among older Chinese using a large scale national dataset (IPIA working paper). Salt Lake City: Institute of Public and International Affairs, University of Utah. Retrieved from http://www.ipia.utah.edu/workingpapers/2010_4_19.pdf
  22. Katz, S., Ford, A. B., Moskowitz, R. W., Jackson, B. A., & Jaffee, M. W. (1963). Studies of illness in the aged: The index of ADL, a standardized measure of biological and psychosocial function. Journal of the American Medical Association, 185, 914–919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lardy, N. R. (1987). The Chinese economy under stress, 1958–1965. In R. MacFarquhar & J. K. Fairbank (Eds.), The People’s Republic, Part 1: The Emergence of Revolutionary China 1949–1965 (pp. 360–397). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Leigh, J. P., & Fries, J. F. (1992). Disability in occupations in a national sample. American Journal of Public Health, 82, 1517–1524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Li, L. W. (2005). Trajectories of ADL disability among community-dwelling frail older persons. Research on Aging, 27, 56–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Li, L. W., Zhang, J., & Liang, J. (2009). Health among the oldest-old in China: Which living arrangements make a difference? Social Science & Medicine, 68, 220–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Liang, J., McCarthy, J. F., Jain, A., Krause, N., Bennett, J. M., & Gu, S. (2000). Socioeconomic gradient in old age mortality in Wuhan, China. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 55, 222–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Liang, J., Liu, X., & Gu, S. (2001). Transitions in functional status among older people in Wuhan, China: Socioeconomic differentials. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 54, 1126–1138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Liang, J., Xiao, X., Bennett, J. M., Ye, W., & Quinones, A. R. (2010). Ethnicity and changing functional health in middle and late life: A person-centered approach. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 65, 470–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lynch, S. M. (2008). Race, socioeconomic status and health across the life course: Introduction to the special issue. Research on Aging, 30, 127–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Manton, K. G., Gu, X., & Lowrimore, G. R. (2008). Cohort changes in active life expectancy in the U.S. elderly population: Experience from the 1982–2004 National Long-Term Care Survey. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 63, 269–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Marmot, M. (1999). Epidemiology of socioeconomic status and health: Are determinants within countries the same as between countries? Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 896, 16–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mihelic, A. H., & Crimmins, E. M. (1997). Loss to follow-up in a sample of Americans 70 years of age and older: The LSOA 1984–1990. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 52, 37–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nagi, S. Z. (1976). An epidemiology of disability among adults in the United States. Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly, 54, 439–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nagin, D. S. (2005). Group-based modeling of development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Nagin, D. S., & Land, K. C. (1993). Age, criminal careers, and population heterogeneity: Specification and estimation of a nonparametric, mixed Poisson model. Criminology, 31, 327–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Nagin, D. S., & Tremblay, R. E. (2001). Analyzing developmental trajectories of distinct but related behaviors: A group-based method. Psychological Methods, 6, 18–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nathanson, C. A. (1975). Illness and the feminine role: A theoretical review. Social Science & Medicine, 9, 57–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pope, A. M., & Tarlov, A. R. (1991). Disability in America: Toward a national agenda for prevention. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  40. Reuben, D. B., Seeman, T. E., Keeler, E., Hayes, R. P., Bowman, L., Sewall, A., . . . Guralnik, J. M. (2004). Refining the categorization of physical functional status: The added value of combining self-reported and performance-based measures. Journal of Gerontology: Medical Sciences, 59, 1056–1061.Google Scholar
  41. Roeder, K., Lynch, K., & Nagin, D. (1999). Modeling uncertainty in latent class membership: A case study in criminology. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94, 766–776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Smedley, B. D., & Syme, S. L. (Eds.). (2000). Promoting health: Intervention strategies from social and behavioral research. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  43. Stallard, E. (2007). Trajectories of morbidity, disability, and mortality among the U.S. elderly population: Evidence from the 1984–1999 NLTCS. North American Actuarial Journal, 11, 16–53.Google Scholar
  44. Taylor, M. G. (2005). Disaggregating disability trajectories: Exploring differences in the disability experience of older adults in the United States (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Durham, NC: Department of Sociology, Duke University.Google Scholar
  45. Taylor, M. G., & Lynch, S. M. (2004). Trajectories of impairment, social support, and depressive symptoms in later life. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 59, 238–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. United Nations. (2009). World population prospects: The 2008 revision. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
  47. Verbrugge, L. M. (1989). The twains meet: Empirical explanations for sex differences in health and mortality. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 30, 282–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Verbrugge, L. M., & Jette, A. M. (1994). The disablement process. Social Science & Medicine, 38, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wolf, D. A., Mendes de Leon, C. F., & Glass, T. A. (2007). Trends in rates of onset of and recovery from disability at older ages: 1982–1994. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 62, 3–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wolinsky, F. D., Armbrecht, E. S., & Wyrwich, K. W. (2000). Rethinking functional limitation pathways. The Gerontologist, 40, 137–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. World Health Organization (WHO). (2002). Towards a common language for functioning, disability and health: ICF. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/classifications/icf/training/icfbeginnersguide.pdf
  52. Yang, Y., & Lee, L. C. (2010). Dynamics and heterogeneity in the process of human frailty and aging: Evidence from the U.S. older adult population. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 65, 245–255.Google Scholar
  53. Zeng, Y., & Vaupel, J. W. (2004). Association of late childbearing with healthy longevity among the oldest-old in China. Population Studies, 58, 37–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Zeng, Y., Vaupel, J. W., Xiao, Z., Zhang, C., & Liu, Y. (2001). The Healthy Longevity Survey and the active life expectancy of the oldest old in China. Population: An English Selection, 13, 95–116.Google Scholar
  55. Zhao, Z. (2008). Analysis of health and longevity in the oldest-old population—A health capital approach. In Y. Zeng, D. L. Poston, D. A. Vlosky, & D. Gu (Eds.), Healthy longevity in China (pp. 157–176). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Zhu, J. (1998). Rural out-migration in China: A multilevel model. In R. E. Bilsborrow (Ed.), Migration, urbanization, and development: New directions and issues (pp. 157–186). Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Zimmer, Z. (2005). Health and living arrangement transitions among China’s oldest-old. Research on Aging, 27, 526–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zachary Zimmer
    • 1
  • Linda G. Martin
    • 2
  • Daniel S. Nagin
    • 3
  • Bobby L. Jones
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Social and Behavioral SciencesUniversity of California San FranciscoSan FranciscoUSA
  2. 2.RAND CorporationArlingtonUSA
  3. 3.Heinz CollegeCarnegie Mellon UniversityPittsburghUSA
  4. 4.Behavioral Genetics Research ProgramUniversity of PittsburghPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations