Demography

, Volume 49, Issue 1, pp 197–217 | Cite as

Different Reasons, Different Results: Implications of Migration by Gender and Family Status

Article

Abstract

Previous research on migration and gendered career outcomes centers on couples and rarely examines the reason for the move. The implicit assumption is usually that households migrate in response to job opportunities. Based on a two-year panel from the Current Population Survey, this article uses stated reasons for geographic mobility to compare earnings outcomes among job migrants, family migrants, and quality-of-life migrants by gender and family status. We further assess the impact of migration on couples’ internal household economy. The effects of job-related moves that we find are reduced substantially in the fixed-effects models, indicating strong selection effects. Married women who moved for family reasons experience significant and substantial earnings declines. Consistent with conventional models of migration, we find that household earnings and income and gender specialization increase following job migration. Married women who are secondary earners have increased odds of reducing their labor supply following migration for job or family reasons. However, we also find that migrating women who contributed as equals to the household economy before the move are no more likely than nonmigrant women to exit work or to work part-time. Equal breadwinner status may protect women from becoming tied movers.

Keywords

Internal migration Gender Family Employment 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Previous versions of the article were presented at the annual meeting of the Population Association of America, the Workshop in Politics, Economy and Culture at Indiana University, and the MZES Colloquium at the University of Mannheim.

References

  1. Baldridge, D. C., Eddleston, K. A., & Veiga, J. F. (2006). Saying “no” to being uprooted: The impact of family and gender on willingness to relocate. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 79, 131–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Becker, G. (1973). A theory of marriage: Part I. Journal of Political Economy, 81, 813–846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Becker, G. (1974). A theory of marriage: Part II. Journal of Political Economy, 82(2), S11–S26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bielby, D. D., & Bielby, W. T. (1992). I will follow him: Family ties, gender role beliefs and reluctance to relocate for a better job. American Journal of Sociology, 97, 1241–1267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bird, G. A., & Bird, G. W. (1985). Determinants of mobility in two-earner families: Does the wife’s income count. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 47, 753–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blau, P. M., & Duncan, O. D. (1967). The American occupational structure. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  7. Boyle, P., Cooke, T., Halfacree, K., & Smith, D. (2003). The effect of long-distance family migration and motherhood on partnered women’s labour-market activity rates in Great Britain and the USA. Environment and Planning A, 35, 2097–2114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Büchel, F. (2000). Tied movers, tied stayers: The higher risk of overeducation among married women in West Germany. In S. Gustafsson & D. Meulder (Eds.), Gender and the market (pp. 133–146). London, UK: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  9. Büchel, F., & van Ham, M. (2003). Overeducation, regional labor markets, and spatial flexibility. Journal of Urban Economics, 53, 482–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clark, W. A. V., & Withers, S. D. (2002). Disentangling the interaction of migration, mobility, and labor-force participation. Environment and Planning A, 34, 923–945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cooke, T. J. (2003). Family migration and the relative earnings of husbands and wives. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 93, 338–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cooke, T. J., & Speirs, K. (2005). Migration and employment among the civilian spouses of military personnel. Social Science Quarterly, 86, 343–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Davis, K., & Moore, W. E. (1945). Some principles of stratification. American Sociological Review, 10, 242–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Duncan, P. R., & Perrucci, C. C. (1976). Dual occupation families and migration. American Sociolocial Review, 2, 335–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Greenwood, M. (1975). Research on internal migration in the United States: A survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 13, 397–433.Google Scholar
  16. King, M., Ruggles, S., Alexander, T., Leicach, D., & Sobek, M. (2004). Integrated Public Use Microdata Series, Current Population Survey: Version 2.0 [Machine-readable database]. Minneapolis: Minnesota Population Center [producer and distributor].Google Scholar
  17. Lichter, D. T. (1982). The migration of dual-worker families: Does the wife’s job matter? Social Science Quarterly, 63, 48–57.Google Scholar
  18. Long, L. H. (1974). Women’s labor force participation and the residential mobility of families. Social Forces, 52, 342–348.Google Scholar
  19. Madrian, B. C., & Lefgren, L. J. (2000). An approach to longitudinally matching Current Population Survey (CPS) respondents. Journal of Economic and Social Measurement, 26, 31–62.Google Scholar
  20. Markham, W. T., Macken, P. O., Bonjean, C. M., & Corder, J. (1983). A note on sex, geographic mobility, and career advancement. Social Forces, 61, 1138–1146.Google Scholar
  21. Maxwell, N. L. (1988). Economic returns to migration: Marital status and gender differences. Social Science Quarterly, 69, 109–121.Google Scholar
  22. McKinnish, T. (2008). Spousal mobility and earnings. Demography, 45, 829–849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mincer, J. (1978). Family migration decisions. Journal of Political Economy, 86, 749–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Morrison, D. R., & Lichter, D. T. (1988). Family migration and female employment: The problem of underemployment among migrant married women. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50, 161–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2008). Growing unequal? Income distribution and poverty in OECD countries. Paris, France: OECD.Google Scholar
  26. Rossi, P. H. (1955). Why families move. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  27. Shachter, J. P., Franklin, R. S., & Perry, M. J. (2003). Migration and geographic mobility in metropolitan and nonmetropolitan America: 1995 to 2000 (Census 2000 Special Reports No. 9). Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.Google Scholar
  28. Shihadeh, E. S. (1991). The prevalence of husband-centered migration: Employment consequences for married mothers. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 53, 432–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sjaastad, L. A. (1962). The costs and returns of human migration. Journal of Political Economy, 70(5), 80–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of UtahSalt Lake CityUSA
  2. 2.Department of SociologyIndiana UniversityBloomingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations