Demography

, Volume 48, Issue 4, pp 1601–1614 | Cite as

Who Receives Food Stamps During Adulthood? Analyzing Repeatable Events With Incomplete Event Histories

Article

Abstract

Using data from the Panel Study of Income Dynamics (PSID) from 1968 to 2005, we estimate the cumulative probability that young adults in the United States will receive food stamps during adulthood, and examine how that probability varies with an individual’s income and education at age 25 as well as by race and gender. We find that the probability of first food stamp receipt as an adult declines sharply with age, indicating that most adult recipients do so by age 40. Also, those receiving food stamps in early adulthood are likely to receive them again. For these reasons, and because food stamp receipt is a repeatable event, life table analyses that include individuals who are not observed until after they become exposed to the risk of food stamp receipt (whom we label “late entrants”) are likely to overstate cumulative participation during adulthood. For example, one often-cited study included individuals who enter their sample after age 20 (late entrants) and report that 50.8% of 20-year-olds are recipients by age 65. In contrast, when we exclude late entrants, we find that 39.2% of 20-year-olds and 29.7% of 25-year-olds receive benefits during adulthood.

Keywords

Food stamps Life tables Left-censoring PSID 

References

  1. Allison, P. (1982). Discrete-time methods for the analysis of event histories. Sociological Methodology, 13, 61–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Box-Steffensmeier, J., & Jones, B. (2004). Event history modeling: A guide for social scientists. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cox, D. R. (1972). Regression models and life tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, 34, 187–220.Google Scholar
  4. Cox, D. R., & Oakes, D. (1984). Analysis of survival data. London, UK: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
  5. Fitzgerald, J., Gottschalk, P., & Moffitt, R. (1998). An analysis of sample attrition in panel data: The Michigan Panel of Income Dynamics. Journal of Human Resources, 33, 251–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Grieger, L. D., Danziger, S. H., & Schoeni, R. F. (2009). Accurately measuring the trend in poverty in the United States using the Panel Study of Income Dynamics. Journal of Economic and Social Measurement, 34, 105–117.Google Scholar
  7. Nord, M., & Hopwood, H. (2008). A comparison of household food security in Canada and the United States (Economic Research Report No. ERR-67). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture.Google Scholar
  8. Rank, M. R., & Hirschl, T. A. (1999). The likelihood of poverty across the American adult life span. Social Work, 44, 201–216.Google Scholar
  9. Rank, M. R., & Hirschl, T. A. (2001a). The occurrence of poverty across the life cycle: Evidence from the PSID. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 20, 737–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Rank, M. R., & Hirschl, T. A. (2001b). Rags or riches? Estimating the probabilities of poverty and affluence across the adult life span. Social Science Quarterly, 82, 651–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Rank, M. R., & Hirschl, T. A. (2005). Likelihood of using food stamps during the adult years. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 37, 137–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Rank, M. R., & Hirschl, T. A. (2009). Estimating the risk of food stamp use and impoverishment during childhood. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 163, 994–999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ratner, D., & Danziger, S. H. (2008). Investigating food stamp participation in the PSID. Unpublished manuscript, National Poverty Center, Gerald R. Ford School of Public Policy, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  14. Russo, R., & Faux, M. (2003). Characteristics of food stamp households: Fiscal year 2002 (Report No. FSP-03-CHAR02). Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture.Google Scholar
  15. Sandoval, D. A., Rank, M. R., & Hirschl, T. A. (2009). The increasing risk of poverty across the American life course. Demography, 46, 717–737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. U.S. Census Bureau. (1999). Dynamics of economic well-being: Program participation, who gets assistance? (Current Population Reports P70-69). Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.Google Scholar
  17. U.S. Department of Agriculture. (2010). Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from www.fns.usda.gov/pd/34snapmonthly.htm

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Jackson Institute for Global AffairsYale UniversityNew HavenUSA
  2. 2.National Poverty Center, Gerald R. Ford School of Public PolicyUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations