Demography

, Volume 48, Issue 3, pp 1203–1229

The Determinants of Neighborhood Satisfaction: Racial Proxy Revisited

Article

Abstract

Understanding the factors that drive individuals’ residential preferences is a critical issue in the study of racial segregation. An important debate within this field is whether individuals—especially whites—prefer to live in predominantly white neighborhoods because they wish to avoid the social problems that may be more likely to occur in predominantly black neighborhoods (i.e., the racial proxy hypothesis) or because of racial factors that go beyond these social class–related characteristics. Through a multilevel analysis of data from the 2004–2005 Chicago Area Study and several administrative sources, we assess the extent to which the racial proxy hypothesis describes neighborhood satisfaction among whites, African Americans, and Latinos living across a broad range of neighborhood contexts. The racial proxy perspective applies weakly to whites’ satisfaction: whites report less satisfaction in neighborhoods with more minority residents, and only some of their dissatisfaction can be attributed to local social characteristics. The racial proxy hypothesis applies more strongly to blacks’ and Latinos’ satisfaction. In some cases, especially for Latinos, higher levels of satisfaction in integrated neighborhoods can largely be attributed to the fact that these places have better socioeconomic conditions and fewer social problems than predominantly minority communities. At the same time, effects of racial/ethnic composition persist in unique and somewhat divergent ways for blacks and Latinos, supporting the assertion that racial composition matters, above and beyond its relation to social class. Taken together, these findings suggest that individuals balance both socioeconomic and race-related concerns in their residential preferences.

Keywords

Segregation Residential preferences Neighborhood satisfaction 

Supplementary material

13524_2011_47_MOESM1_ESM.docx (98 kb)
ESM 1(DOCX 98 kb)

References

  1. Almaguer, T. (1994). Racial fault lines: The historical origins of white supremacy in California. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  2. Baybeck, B. (2006). Sorting out the competing effects of racial context. Journal of Politics, 68, 386–396.Google Scholar
  3. Bobo, L., & Hutchings, V. L. (1996). Perceptions of racial group competition: Extending Blumer’s theory of group position to a multiracial social context. American Sociological Review, 61, 951–972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bobo, L., & Zubrinsky, C. L. (1996). Attitudes on residential integration: Perceived status differences, mere in-group preference, or racial prejudice? Social Forces, 74, 883–909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bonilla-Silva, E. (2004). From bi-racial to tri-racial: Towards a new system of racial stratification in the USA. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 27, 931–950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Charles, C. Z. (2000). Neighborhood racial composition preferences: Evidence from a multiethnic metropolis. Social Problems, 47, 379–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Charles, C. Z. (2001). Processes of residential segregation. In A. O’Connor, C. Tilly, & L. D. Bobo (Eds.), Urban inequality: Evidence from four cities (pp. 217–271). New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  8. Charles, C. Z. (2003). The dynamics of racial residential segregation. Annual Review of Sociology, 29, 167–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Charles, C. Z. (2006). Won’t you be my neighbor? Race, class and residence in Los Angeles. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  10. Chicago Public Schools Office of Performance. (2002). School & citywide report cards. Retrieved from http://research.cps.k12.il.us/cps/accountweb/Reports/allschools.html
  11. Clark, W. A. (1991). Residential preferences and neighborhood racial segregation: A test of the Schelling segregation model. Demography, 28, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Clark, W. A. (1992). Residential preferences and residential choices in a multiethnic context. Demography, 29, 451–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Crowder, K. D. (2000). The racial context of white mobility: An individual-level assessment of the white flight hypothesis. Social Science Research, 29, 223–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ellen, I. G. (2000). Sharing America’s neighborhoods: The prospects for stable racial integration. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Emerson, M. O., Yancey, G., & Chai, K. J. (2001). Does race matter in residential segregation? Exploring the preferences of white Americans. American Sociological Review, 66, 922–935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Farley, R., Steeh, C., Krysan, M., Jackson, T., & Reeves, K. (1994). Stereotypes and segregation: Neighborhoods in the Detroit area. American Journal of Sociology, 100, 750–780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Farley, R., Fielding, E., & Krysan, M. (1997). The residential preferences of blacks and whites: A four metropolis analysis. Housing Policy Debate, 8, 763–800.Google Scholar
  18. Feagin, J. R. (2000). Racist America: Roots, current realities, and future reparations. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Feagin, J. R., & Sikes, M. P. (1994). Living with racism: The black middle-class experience. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  20. Flippen, C. (2001). Neighborhood transition and social organization: The white to Hispanic case. Social Problems, 48, 299–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Glenn, E. N. (1986). Issei, nisei, warbride: Three generations of Japanese American women in domestic service. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Harris, D. R. (1999). “Property values drop when blacks move in, because...”: Racial and socioeconomic determinants of neighborhood desirability. American Sociological Review, 64, 461–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Harris, D. R. (2001). Why are whites and blacks averse to black neighbors? Social Science Research, 30, 100–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Iceland, J., Weinberg, D. H., & Steinmetz, E. (2002). Racial and ethnic residential segregation in the United States: 1980–2000. Washington: U.S. Census Bureau.Google Scholar
  25. Kefalas, M. (2003). Working-class heroes: Protecting home, community, and nation in a Chicago neighborhood. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  26. Krysan, M. (2002a). Community undesirability in black and white: Examining racial residential preferences through community perceptions. Social Problems, 49, 521–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Krysan, M. (2002b). Whites who say they’d flee: Who are they and why would they leave? Demography, 39, 675–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Krysan, M., & Bader, M. (2007). Perceiving the metropolis: Seeing the city through a prism of race. Social Forces, 49, 531–543.Google Scholar
  29. Krysan, M., & Farley, R. (2002). The residential preferences of blacks: Do they explain persistent segregation? Social Forces, 80, 937–980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Krysan, M., Couper, M. P., Farley, R., & Forman, T. A. (2009). Does race matter in neighborhood preferences? Results from a video experiment. American Journal of Sociology, 115, 527–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lee, B. A., Salvador Oropesa, R., & Kanan, J. W. (1994). Neighborhood context and residential mobility. Demography, 31, 249–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Logan, J. R. (2001). Ethnic diversity grows, neighborhood diversity lags behind (report). Albany, NY: Lewis Mumford Center for Comparative Urban and Regional Research.Google Scholar
  33. Massey, D. S., & Denton, N. A. (1993). American apartheid: Segregation and the making of the underclass. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  34. O’Brien, D. J., & Clough, L. (1982). The future of urban neighborhoods. In G. Gappert & R. V. Knight (Eds.), Cities in the 21st century (pp. 232–248). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  35. Oliver, J. E., & Wong, J. (2003). Intergroup prejudice in multiethnic settings. American Journal of Political Science, 47, 567–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Park, R. E. (1924). The concept of social distance as applied to the study of racial attitudes and racial relations. Journal of Applied Sociology, 8, 339–344.Google Scholar
  37. Patterson, O. (1997). The ordeal of integration: Progress and resentment in Americas’ “racial” crisis. New York: Citivas/Counterpoint.Google Scholar
  38. Peterson, R. D., & Krivo, L. J. (2006). The national neighborhood crime study [data set]. Columbus: Ohio State University, Criminal Justice Research Center.Google Scholar
  39. Quillian, L., & Pager, D. (2001). Black neighbors, higher crime? The role of racial stereotypes in evaluations of neighborhood crime. American Journal of Sociology, 107, 717–767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  41. Sampson, R. J., & Raudenbush, S. W. (2004). Seeing disorder: Neighborhood stigma and the social construction of “broken windows.” Social Psychology Quarterly, 67, 319–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Stipak, B., & Hensler, C. (1983). Effect of neighborhood racial and socioeconomic composition on urban residents’ evaluations of their neighborhoods. Social Indicators Research, 12, 311–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. St. John, C., & Bates, N. A. (1990). Racial composition and neighborhood evaluation. Social Science Research, 19, 47–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Taub, R. P., Garth Taylor, D., & Dunham, J. D. (1984). Paths of neighborhood change: Race and crime in urban America. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  45. Thernstrom, S., & Thernstrom, A. (1997). America in black and white: One nation, indivisible. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  46. Timberlake, J. M. (2000). Still life in black and white: Effects of racial and class attitudes on prospects for residential integration in Atlanta. Sociological Inquiry, 70, 420–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. U.S. Census Bureau. (1990). Table P009. Hispanic origin—universe: Persons. Retrieved from http://factfinder.census.gov
  48. U.S. Census Bureau. (2000). Table QT-P9. Hispanic or Latino by type: 2000. Retrieved from http://factfinder.census.gov
  49. Zubrinsky, C. L., & Bobo, L. (1996). Prismatic metropolis: Race and residential segregation in the City of Angels. Social Science Research, 25, 335–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Invitation Health & Wellness, Inc.EaganUSA
  2. 2.Department of Sociology and Institute of Government and Public AffairsUniversity of Illinois at ChicagoChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations