Demography

, Volume 48, Issue 3, pp 1177–1202 | Cite as

Life Shocks and Crime: A Test of the “Turning Point” Hypothesis

  • Hope Corman
  • Kelly Noonan
  • Nancy E. Reichman
  • Ofira Schwartz-Soicher
Article

Abstract

Other researchers have posited that important events in men’s lives—such as employment, marriage, and parenthood—strengthen their social ties and lead them to refrain from crime. A challenge in empirically testing this hypothesis has been the issue of self-selection into life transitions. This study contributes to this literature by estimating the effects of an exogenous life shock on crime. We use data from the Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study, augmented with information from hospital medical records, to estimate the effects of the birth of a child with a severe health problem on the likelihood that the infant’s father engages in illegal activities. We conduct a number of auxiliary analyses to examine exogeneity assumptions. We find that having an infant born with a severe health condition increases the likelihood that the father is convicted of a crime in the three-year period following the birth of the child, and at least part of the effect appears to operate through work and changes in parental relationships. These results provide evidence that life events can cause crime and, as such, support the “turning point” hypothesis.

Keywords

Crime Incarceration Turning points Child health 

References

  1. Becker, G. (1968). Crime and punishment: An economic approach. Journal of Political Economy, 76, 169–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Butcher, K. F., & Piehl, A. M. (1998). Recent immigrants: Unexpected implications for crime and incarceration. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 51, 654–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Butcher, K. F., & Piehl, A. M. (2007). Why are immigrants’ incarceration rates so low? Evidence on selective immigration, deterrence, and deportation (NBER Working Paper No. 13229). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  4. Caceres-Delpiano, J., & Giolito, E. (2008). The impact of unilateral divorce on crime (IZA Discussion Paper No. 3380). Bonn, Germany: Institute for the Study of Labor.Google Scholar
  5. Capaldi, D. M., Kim, H. K., & Owen, L. D. (2008). Romantic partners’ influence on men’s likelihood of arrest in early adulthood. Criminology, 46, 267–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Corman, H., Noonan, K., & Reichman, N. E. (2005). Mothers’ labor supply in fragile families: The role of child health. Eastern Economic Journal, 31, 601–616.Google Scholar
  7. Dahl, G. B., & Moretti, E. (2008). The demand for sons. Review of Economic Studies, 75, 1085–1120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Duncan, G. J., Wilkerson, B., & England, P. (2006). Cleaning up their act: The effects of marriage and cohabitation on licit and illicit drug use. Demography, 43, 691–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Edin, K., & Reed, J. M. (2005). Why don’t they just get married? Barriers to marriage among the disadvantaged. The Future of Children, 15, 117–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Edin, K., Nelson, T. J., & Paranal, R. (2004). Fatherhood and incarceration as potential turning points in the criminal careers of unskilled men. In M. Pattillo, D. Weiman, & B. Western (Eds.), Imprisoning America: The social effects of mass incarceration (pp. 46–75). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  11. Edlund, L., Li, H., Yi, J., & Zhang, J. (2007). Sex ratios and crime: Evidence from China’s one-child policy (IZA Discussion Paper No. 3214). Bonn, Germany: Institute for the Study of Labor.Google Scholar
  12. Ehrlich, I. (1973). Participation in illegitimate activities: A theoretical and empirical investigation. Journal of Political Economy, 81, 521–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Freeman, R. B. (1996). Why do so many young American men commit crimes and what might we do about it? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10, 461–488.Google Scholar
  14. Geller, A., Garfinkel, I., Cooper, C., & Mincy, R. (2009). Parental incarceration and child wellbeing: Implications for urban families. Social Science Quarterly, 90, 1186–1202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gould, E. D., Weinberg, B. A., & Mustard, D. B. (2002). Crime rates and local labor market opportunities in the United States 1979–1997. Review of Economics and Statistics, 84, 45–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Grogger, J. (1998). Market wages and youth crime. Journal of Labor Economics, 16, 756–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Horney, J., Osgood, W., & Marshall, I. H. (1995). Criminal careers in the short-term: Intra-individual variability in crime and its relation to local life circumstances. American Sociological Review, 60, 655–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kerner, H.-J. (2005). The complex dynamics of the onset, the development, and the termination of a criminal career: Lessons on repeat offenders to be drawn from recent longitudinal studies in criminology. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 602, 259–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. King, R. D., Massoglia, M., & MacMillan, R. (2007). The context of marriage and crime: Gender, the propensity to marry, and offending in early adulthood. Criminology, 45, 33–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Laub, J. H., & Sampson, R. J. (1993). Turning points in the life course: Why change matters to the study of crime. Criminology, 31, 301–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Laub, J. H., Nagin, D. S., & Sampson, R. J. (1998). Trajectories of change in criminal offending: Good marriages and the desistance process. American Sociological Review, 63, 225–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lochner, L., & Moretti, E. (2004). The effect of education on crime: Evidence from prison inmates, arrests, and self-reports. American Economic Review, 94, 155–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McLanahan, S., Garfinkel, I., Reichman, N. E., Teitler, J. O., Carlson, M., & Norland Audigier, C. (2003). The fragile families and child wellbeing study: Baseline national report (revised March 2003). Princeton, NJ: Center for Research on Child Wellbeing. Retrieved from http://www.fragilefamilies.princeton.edu/documents/nationalreport.pdf
  24. Mocan, N., & Rees, D. I. (2005). Economic conditions, deterrence and juvenile crime: Evidence from micro data. American Law and Economics Review, 7, 319–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. National Center for Health Statistics. (2011). Health, United States, 2010 with special feature on death and dying. Hyattsville, MD: U.S. Government Printing Office. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/hus.htm
  26. Noonan, K., Reichman, N. E., & Corman, H. (2005). New fathers’ labor supply: Does child health matter? Social Science Quarterly, 86, 1399–1417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Piquero, A. R., Farrington, D. P., & Blumstein, A. (2003). The criminal career paradigm. Crime and Justice, 30, 359–506.Google Scholar
  28. Raphael, S. (2007). Early incarceration spells and the transition to adulthood. In S. Danziger & C. E. Rouse (Eds.), The price of independence: The economics of early adulthood (pp. 278–306). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  29. Reichman, N. E. (2005). Low birth weight and school readiness. The Future of Children, 15, 91–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Reichman, N. E., Teitler, J. O., Garfinkel, I., & McLanahan, S. (2001). Fragile Families: Sample and design. Children and Youth Services Review, 23, 303–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Reichman, N. E., Corman, H., & Noonan, K. (2004). Effects of child health on parents’ relationship status. Demography, 41, 569–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Reichman, N. E., Corman, H., & Noonan, K. (2006). Effects of child health on sources of public support. Southern Economic Journal, 73, 136–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Reichman, N. E., Corman, H., & Noonan, K. (2008). Impact of child disability on the family. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 12, 679–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Reichman, N. E., Corman, H., Noonan, K., & Dave, D. M. (2009). Infant health production functions: What a difference the data make. Health Economics, 18, 761–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Saluter, A. F. (1994). Marital status and living arrangements: March 1994 (Current Population Reports, Series P20-484). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/prod/1/pop/p20-484.pdf
  36. Sampson, R. J., & Laub, J. H. (1990). Crime and deviance over the life course: The salience of adult social bonds. American Sociological Review, 55, 609–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sampson, R. J., & Laub, J. H. (1996). Socioeconomic achievement in the life course of disadvantaged men: Military service as a turning point, circa 1940–1965. American Sociological Review, 61, 347–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sampson, R. J., Laub, J. H., & Wimer, C. (2006). Does marriage reduce crime? A counterfactual approach to within-individual causal effects. Criminology, 44, 465–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sickles, R. C., & Williams, J. (2008). Turning from crime: A dynamic perspective. Journal of Econometrics, 145, 158–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Stein, R. E. K. (2005). Trends in disability in early life. In M. J. Fields, A. M. Jerre, & L. Marin (Eds.), Workshop on disability in America: A new look (pp. 143–156). Washington, DC: The National Academies.Google Scholar
  41. The Cost of Crime: Understanding the Financial Impact of Criminal Activity: Testimony before the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee, Bureau of Justice Statistics, 109th Cong. 4 (2006). (testimony of Jeffery Sedgwick).Google Scholar
  42. U.S. Census Bureau. (2009). America’s families and living arrangements: 2008. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/population/www/socdemo/hh-fam/cps2008.html
  43. U.S. Department of Justice. (2004). Felony sentences in state courts, 2002 (Bulletin NCJ 206916). Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.Google Scholar
  44. Verbrugge, L. M. (1982). Sex differentials in health. Prevention, 97, 417–437.Google Scholar
  45. Wildeman, C. (2009). Parental imprisonment, the prison boom, and the concentration of childhood disadvantage. Demography, 46, 265–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wildeman, C. (2010). Paternal incarceration and children’s physically aggressive behaviors: Evidence from the Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study. Social Forces, 89, 285–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hope Corman
    • 1
  • Kelly Noonan
    • 1
  • Nancy E. Reichman
    • 2
  • Ofira Schwartz-Soicher
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of EconomicsRider University and National Bureau of Economic ResearchLawrencevilleUSA
  2. 2.Department of Pediatrics, Robert Wood Johnson Medical SchoolUniversity of Medicine and Dentistry of New JerseyNew BrunswickUSA
  3. 3.School of Social WorkColumbia UniversityNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations