, Volume 48, Issue 1, pp 267–290 | Cite as

Heterogeneity in the Strehler-Mildvan General Theory of Mortality and Aging

  • Hui Zheng
  • Yang Yang
  • Kenneth C. Land


This study examines and further develops the classic Strehler-Mildvan (SM) general theory of mortality and aging. Three predictions from the SM theory are tested by examining the age dependence of mortality patterns for 42 countries (including developed and developing countries) over the period 1955–2003. By applying finite mixture regression models, principal component analysis, and random-effects panel regression models, we find that (1) the negative correlation between the initial adulthood mortality rate and the rate of increase in mortality with age derived in the SM theory exists but is not constant; (2) within the SM framework, the implied age of expected zero vitality (expected maximum survival age) also is variable over time; (3) longevity trajectories are not homogeneous among the countries; (4) Central American and Southeast Asian countries have higher expected age of zero vitality than other countries in spite of relatively disadvantageous national ecological systems; (5) within the group of Central American and Southeast Asian countries, a more disadvantageous national ecological system is associated with a higher expected age of zero vitality; and (6) larger agricultural and food productivities, higher labor participation rates, higher percentages of population living in urban areas, and larger GDP per capita and GDP per unit of energy use are important beneficial national ecological system factors that can promote survival. These findings indicate that the SM theory needs to be generalized to incorporate heterogeneity among human populations.


Strehler-Mildvan theory Ecological system Population heterogeneity Age of expected zero vitality 



This article is a revision of a paper presented at the 2008 annual meeting of the Population Association of America, New Orleans, Louisiana. We thank C. M. Suchindran for insightful comments and suggestions. We also benefitted from comments from two anonymous Demography reviewers and those of Anatoli Yashin, Eric Stallard, and other members of the Demography, Life Course, and Aging Workshop at Duke University. We also are grateful for the support from the Leadership in Aging Society Program at Duke University.


  1. Broe, K. E., Chen, T. C., Weinberg, J., Bischoff-Ferrari, H. A., Holick, M. F., & Kiel, D. P. (2007). A higher dose of vitamin D reduces the risk of falls in nursing home residents: A randomized, multiple-dose study. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 55, 234–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1987). Application of hierarchical linear models to assessing change. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 147–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models for social and behavioral research: Application and data analysis methods. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  4. Duncan, O. D. (1959). Human ecology and population studies. In P. M. Hauser & O. D. Duncan (Eds.), The study of population: An inventory and appraisal (pp. 678–716). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  5. Faloon, W. (2008). An overlooked method to prevent millions of needless deaths. Life Extension, 3–12.Google Scholar
  6. Garcia-Palmieri, M. R., Feliberti, M., Costas, P., Benson, H., Blanton, J. H., & Aixala, R. (1965). Coronary heart disease mortality—A death certificate study. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 18, 1317–1323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Garland, C. F., Garland, F. C., Gorham, E. D., Lipkin, M., Newmark, H., Mohr, S. B., Holick M. F. (2006). The role of vitamin D in cancer prevention. American Journal of Public Health, 96, 252–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Garland, C. F., Gorham, E. D., Mohr, S. B., Grant, W. B., Giovannucci, E. L., Lipkin, ... Garland F. C. (2007). Vitamin D and prevention of breast cancer: Pooled analysis. Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 103, 708–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gibbs, J. P., & Poston, D. L., Jr. (1975). The division of labor: Conceptualization and related measures. Social Forces, 53, 468–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Goldstein, H. (1995). Multilevel statistical models (2nd ed.). London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
  11. Gompertz, B. (1825). On the nature of the function expressive of the law of mortality. Philosophical Transactions, 27, 513–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gordan, T., Garcia-Palmieri, M. R., Kagan, A., Kannel, W. B., & Schiffman, J. (1974). Differences in coronary heart disease in Framingham, Honolulu and Puerto Rico. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 27, 329–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gorham, E. D., Garland, C. F., Garland, F. C., Grant, W. B., Mohr, S. B., Lipkin, M., Newmar H. L., Giovannucci E., Wei M., Holick M. F. (2005). Vitamin D and prevention of colorectal cancer. Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 97, 179–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Grant, W. B., & Holick, M. E. (2005). Benefits and requirements of vitamin D for optimal health: A review. Alternative Medicine Review, 10, 94–111.Google Scholar
  15. Grant, W. B., Strange, R. C., & Garland, C. F. (2003). Sunshine is good medicine. The health benefits of ultraviolet-b induced vitamin D production. Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology, 2(2), 86–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gross, M. D. (2005). Vitamin D and calcium in the prevention of prostate and colon cancer: New approaches for the identification of needs. Journal of Nutrition, 135, 326–331.Google Scholar
  17. Hawley, A. H. (1950). Human ecology: A theory of community structure. New York: Ronald.Google Scholar
  18. Holick, M. E. (2007). Vitamin D deficiency. New England Journal of Medicine, 357, 266–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Horiuchi, S., & Wilmoth, J. R. (1998). Deceleration in the age pattern of mortality at older ages. Demography, 35, 391–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. John, E. M., Schwartz, G. G., Koo, J., Berg, D. V. D., & Ingles, S. A. (2005). Sun exposure, vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms, and risk of advanced prostate cancer. Cancer Research, 65, 5470–5479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jones, B., Nagin, D., & Roeder, K. (2001). A SAS procedure based on mixture models for estimating developmental trajectories. Sociological Method and Research, 29, 374–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kannisto, V., Lauritsen, J., Thatcher, A. R., & Vaupel, J. W. (1994). Reductions in mortality at advanced ages: Several decades of evidence from 27 countries. Population and Development Review, 20, 793–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kirkwood, T. B. L. (1990). The disposable soma theory of aging. In D. E. Harrison (Ed.), Genetic effects on aging II (pp. 9–19). Caldwell: Telford.Google Scholar
  24. Kirkwood, T. B. L. (1996). Human senescence. BioEssays, 18, 1009–1016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kowald, A., & Kirkwood, T. B. L. (1993). Explaining fruit fly longevity. Science, 260, 1664–1665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Land, K., McCall, P., & Cohen, L. (1990). Structural covariates of homicide rates: Are there any invariances across time and social space? American Journal of Sociology, 95, 922–963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Land, K., McCall, P., & Nagin, D. (1996). A comparison of Poisson, negative binomial, and semiparametric mixed Poisson regression models with empirical applications to criminal careers data. Sociological Methods and Research, 24, 387–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lynch, S. M., & Brown, J. S. (2001). Reconsidering mortality compression and deceleration: An alternative model of mortality rates. Demography, 38, 79–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Martinez, I., Torres, R., & Frias, Z. (1975). Cancer incidence in the United States and Puerto Rico. Cancer Research, 35, 3265–3271.Google Scholar
  30. McArdle, J. J., & Epstein, D. (1987). Latent growth curves within developmental structural equation models. Child Development, 58, 110–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Meredith, W., & Tisak, J. (1990). Latent curve analysis. Psychometrika, 55, 107–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Muthen, B. O. (1989). Latent variable modeling in heterogeneous populations. Psychometrika, 54, 557–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nagin, D. (1999). Analyzing developmental trajectories: A semi-parametric, group-based approach. Psychological Methods, 4, 139–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nagin, D., & Land, L. (1993). Age, criminal careers, and population heterogeneity: Specification and estimation of a nonparametric, mixed Poisson model. Criminology, 31, 327–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Omran, A. R. (1982). Epidemiologic transition. In International encyclopedia of population (pp. 172–83). New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  36. Poston, D. L., & Frisbie, W. P. (2005). Ecological demography. In D. L. Poston & M. Micklin (Eds.), Handbook of population. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Prieto, M. D., Llorca, L., & Delgado-Rodriguez, M. (1996). Longitudinal Gompertzian and Weibull analyses of adult mortality in Spain (Europe), 1990–1992. Mechanisms of Ageing and Development, 90, 35–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rau, R., Soroko, E., Jasilionis, D., & Vaupel, J. W. (2008). Continued reductions in mortality at advanced ages. Population and Development Review, 34, 747–768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Riggs, J. E. (1992). Longitudinal Gompertzian analysis of adult mortality in the US, 1900–1986. Mechanisms of Ageing and Development, 54, 235–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Riggs, J. E. (1993). Aging, genomic entropy and carcinogenesis: Implications derived from longitudinal age-specific colon cancer mortality rate dynamics. Mechanisms of Ageing and Development, 72, 165–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Riggs, J. E. (1994). Carcinogenesis, genetic instability and genomic entropy: Insight derived from malignant brain tumor age specific mortality rate dynamics. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 170, 331–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Riggs, J. E. (1995). Increasing multiple myeloma mortality among the elderly: A manifestation of aging and different survival. Mechanisms of Ageing and Development, 77, 227–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Riggs, J. E., & Millecchia, R. J. (1992). Using the Gompertz-Strehler model of aging and mortality to explain mortality trends in industrialized countries. Mechanisms of Ageing and Development, 65, 217–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Riggs, J. E., & Myers, E. J. (1994). Defining the impact of prevention and improved management upon stroke mortality. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 47, 931–939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rosenwaike, I. (1987). Mortality differentials among person born in Cuba, Mexico, and Puerto Rico residing in the United States, 1979–81. American Journal of Public Health, 77, 603–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rosenwaike, I., & Hempstead, K. (1990). Mortality among three Puerto Rican populations: Residents of Puerto Rico and migrants in New York City and in the balance of the United States, 1979–1981. International Migration Review, 24, 684–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rosero-Bixby, L. (2008). The exceptionally high life expectancy of Costa Rican nonagenarians. Demography, 45, 673–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Schnore, L. F. (1958). Social morphology and human ecology. American Journal of Sociology, 63, 620–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sorlie, P. D., Backlund, E., Johnson, N. J., & Rogot, E. (1993). Mortality by Hispanic status in the United States. Journal of the American Medical Association, 270, 2464–2468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Strehler, B. L., & Mildvan, A. S. (1960). General theory of mortality and aging. Science, 132, 14–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Tuohimaa, P., Pukkala, E., Scelo, G., Olsen, J., Brewster, D., Hemminki, K., ... Brennan, P. (2007). Does solar exposure, as indicated by the non-melanoma skin cancers, protect from solid cancers: Vitamin D as a possible explanation. European Journal of Cancer, 43, 1701–1712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. U.N. Department of International Economic and Social Affairs. (1982). Model life tables for developing countries. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
  53. Vaupel, J. W. (1997). Trajectories of mortality at advanced ages. In K. H. Wachter & C. E. Finch (Eds.), Between Zeus and the salmon: The biodemography of longevity (pp. 17–37). Washington, DC: National Academy.Google Scholar
  54. Willett, J. B., & Sayer, A. G. (1994). Using covariance structure analysis to detect correlates and predictors of individual change over time. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 363–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wilmoth, J. R. (1997). In search of limits. In K. H. Wachter & C. E. Finch (Eds.), Between Zeus and the salmon: The biodemography of longevity (pp. 38–64). Washington, DC: National Academy.Google Scholar
  56. Wilmoth, J. R., & Lundstrom, H. (1996). Extreme longevity in five countries: Presentation of trends with special attention to issues of data quality. European Journal of Population, 12, 63–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wooldridge, J. M. (2002). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge: MIT.Google Scholar
  58. World Development Indicators. (2008). Indicators published by the World Bank. Available online at
  59. Yashin, A. I., Iachine, I. A., & Begun, A. S. (2000). Mortality modeling: A review. Mathematical Population Studies, 8, 305–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Yashin, A. I., Begun, A. S., Boiko, S. I., Ukraintseva, S. V., & Oeppen, J. (2001). The new trends in survival improvement require a revision of traditional gerontological concepts. Experimental Gerontology, 37, 157–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Yashin, A. I., Begun, A. S., Boiko, S. I., Ukrainsteva, S. V., & Oeppen, J. (2002a). New age patterns of survival improvement in Sweden: Do they characterize changes in individual aging? Mechanisms of Ageing and Development, 123, 637–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Yashin, A. I., Ukraintseva, S. V., Boiko, S. I., & Arbeev, K. G. (2002b). Individual aging and mortality rate: How are they related? Social Biology, 49, 206–217.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Population Health and Aging, Duke Population Research Institute and Department of SociologyDuke UniversityDurhamUSA
  2. 2.Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Carolina Population Center, Department of SociologyUniversity of North CarolinaChapel HillUSA

Personalised recommendations