Demography

, Volume 48, Issue 1, pp 73–99 | Cite as

The Effect of Family Member Migration on Education and Work Among Nonmigrant Youth in Mexico

Article

Abstract

While academic and policy circles have given much attention to the assimilatory experiences of Mexican immigrants in the United States, less is known about those who stay behind—an especially unfortunate oversight given the increasing number of Mexican youth with migrant family members. Of the studies on this topic, most have sought to identify the effect that migration has on youths’ migratory and educational aspirations, often using qualitative methods in individual sending communities. The present article supplements this research in two ways: (1) in addition to assessing educational outcomes, the scope of the analysis is expanded to include nonmigrants’ interaction with another homeland institution of upward mobility: the labor market; and (2) using a large demographic data set, statistical techniques are employed to adjust for unobserved selectivity into the migrant family-member population, thus accounting for a potentially serious source of bias. The results suggest that youth in migrant-sending families are less likely to complete the educational transitions leading up to postsecondary school and have a lower probability of participating in the local economy. The results also indicate that unobserved factors play a “nonignorable” role in sorting youth into migrant and nonmigrant families.

Keywords

Migration Youth Sending areas Employment Educational attainment Mexico 

Supplementary material

13524_2010_10_MOESM1_ESM.xls (24 kb)
Supplementary Appendix TableParameter estimates for the selection equation predicting family-member migration (DOC 24.5 kb)

References

  1. Alarcón, R. (1992). Norteñización: Self-perpetuating migration from a Mexican town. In J. Bustamante, R. A. Hinojosa, & C. Reynolds (Eds.), U.S.-Mexico relations: Labor market interdependence (pp. 302–318). Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Alba, R., & Nee, V. (2003). Remaking the American mainstream: Assimilation and contemporary immigration. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Astone, N. M., & McLanahan, S. (1991). Family Structure, parental practices and high school completion. American Sociological Review, 56, 309–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blake, J. (1989). Family size and achievement. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  5. Canales, A. (2007). Remittances, development and poverty in Mexico: A critical view. In G. Zárate-Hoyos (Ed.), New perspectives on remittances from Mexicans and Central Americans in the United States (pp. 59–101). Kassel: Kassel University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Cohen, J. (2004). The culture of migration in southern Mexico. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  7. Delgado Wise, R., & Márquez, H. (2007). Migration and development in Mexico: Toward a new analytical approach. Journal of Latino-Latin American Studies, 2, 101–119.Google Scholar
  8. Durand, J., & Massey, D. S. (1992). Mexican migration to the United States: A Critical Review. Latin American Research Review, 27, 3–42.Google Scholar
  9. Durand, J., Parrado, E., & Massey, D. S. (1996). Migradollars and development: A reconsideration of the Mexican case. International Migration Review, 30, 423–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Durand, J., Massey, D. S., & Zenteno, R. (2001). Mexican immigration to the United States: Continuities and changes. Latin American Research Review, 36, 107–127.Google Scholar
  11. Duryea, S., Lam, D., & Levison, D. (2007). Effects of economic shocks on children’s employment and schooling in Brazil. Journal of Development Economics, 84, 188–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Edwards, A. C., & Ureta, M. (2003). International migration, remittances, and schooling: Evidence from El Salvador. Journal of Development Economics, 72, 429–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Esteve, A., & Sobek, M. (2003). Challenges and methods of international census harmonization. Historical Methods, 36, 66–79.Google Scholar
  14. Feliciano, C. (2005). Educational selectivity in U.S. immigration: How Do immigrants compare to those left behind? Demography, 42, 131–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Feliciano, C. (2006). Beyond the family: The influence of premigration group status on the educational expectations of immigrants’ children. Sociology of Education, 79, 281–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fussell, E. (2004). Sources of Mexico’s migration stream: Rural, urban, and border migrants to the United States. Social Forces, 82, 937–967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fussell, E., & Massey, D. S. (2004). The limits to cumulative causation: International migration from Mexican urban areas. Demography, 41, 151–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gamoran, A., & Mare, R. D. (1989). Secondary school tracking and educational inequality: Compensation, reinforcement, or neutrality? The American Journal of Sociology, 94, 1146–1183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gans, H. (1992). Second-generation decline: Scenarios for the economic and ethnic futures of the post-1965 American immigrants. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 15, 173–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Guarnizo, L. (1994). Los Dominicanyorks: The making of a binational society. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 533, 70–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Guarnizo, L., & Díaz, L. M. (1999). Transnational migration: A view from Colombia. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 22, 397–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hanson, G. H., & Woodruff, C. (2003). Emigration and educational attainment in Mexico (Working paper). San Diego: School of International Relations and Pacific Studies, University of California at San Diego.Google Scholar
  23. Heckman, J., Ichimura, H., Smith, J., & Todd, P. (1998). Characterizing selection bias using experimental data. Econometrica, 66, 1017–1098.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Heckman, J., LaLonde, R., & Smith, J. (1999). The economics and econometrics of active labor market programs. In O. Ashenfelter & D. Card (Eds.), Handbook of labor economics (pp. 1865–2097). New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  25. Hirschman, C. (2001). The educational enrollment of immigrant youth: A test of the segmented-assimilation hypothesis. Demography, 38, 317–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hondagneu-Sotelo, P., & Avila, E. (1997). I’m here, but I’m there: The meanings of Latina transnational motherhood. Gender and Society, 11, 548–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kandel, W. (2003). The impact of U.S. migration on Mexican children’s educational attainment. In M. Cosio, R. Marcoux, M. Pilon, & A. Quesnel (Eds.), Education, family and population dynamics (pp. 305–328). Paris: CICRED.Google Scholar
  28. Kandel, W., & Kao, G. (2001). The impact of temporary labor migration on Mexican student outcomes. International Migration Review, 35, 1205–1231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kandel, W., & Massey, D. S. (2002). The culture of Mexican migration: A theoretical and empirical analysis. Social Forces, 80, 981–1004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kapur, D. (2005). Remittances: The new development mantra? In S. M. Maimbo & D. Ratha (Eds.), Remittances: Development impact and future prospects (pp. 331–360). Washington: The World Bank.Google Scholar
  31. Latapí, A. E., & González de la Rocha, M. (1995). Crisis, restructuring and urban poverty in Mexico. Environment and Urbanization, 7, 57–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Levison, D., Moe, K., & Knaul, F. M. (2001). Youth education and work in Mexico. World Development, 29, 167–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Levitt, P. (1998). Social remittances: Migration driven local-level forms of cultural diffusion. International Migration Review, 32, 926–948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Levitt, P. (2001). The transnational villagers. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  35. López-Córdova, E. (2005). Globalization, migration and development: The role of Mexican migrant remittances. Economía, 6, 217–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mare, R. D. (1980). Social background and school continuation decisions. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 75, 295–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mare, R. D., & Winship, C. (1988). Endogenous switching regression models for the causes and effects of discrete variables. In J. S. Long (Ed.), Common problems/proper solutions: Avoiding error in quantitative research (pp. 132–160). Newbury Park: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  38. Massey, D. S. (1986). The social organization of Mexican migration to the United States. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 407, 102–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Massey, D. S. (1987). Understanding Mexican migration to the United States. The American Journal of Sociology, 92, 1372–1403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Massey, D. S. (1990a). The social and economic origins of immigration. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 510, 60–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Massey, D. S. (1990b). Social structure, household strategies, and the cumulative causation of migration. Population Index, 56, 3–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Massey, D. S., & Parrado, E. (1994). Migradollars: The remittances and savings of Mexican migrants to the United States. Population Research and Policy Review, 13, 3–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Massey, D. S., Goldring, L., & Durand, J. (1994). Continuities in transnational migration: An analysis of nineteen Mexican communities. The American Journal of Sociology, 99, 1492–1533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Massey, D. S., Arango, J., Hugo, G., Kouaouci, A., Pellegrino, A., & Taylor, J. E. (1998). Worlds in motion: International migration at the end of the millennium. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  45. McKenzie, D., & Rapoport, H. (2007). Migration and education inequality in rural Mexico. Integration and Trade, 27, 135–158.Google Scholar
  46. Meza, L., & Pederzini, C. (2008). International migration and schooling as alternative means to social mobility in Mexico. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the Population Association of America, New Orleans, April 17–19.Google Scholar
  47. Mines, R. (1981). Developing a community tradition of migration: A field study in rural Zacatecas, Mexico, and California settlement areas. (Monographs in U.S.-Mexican Studies No. 3). La Jolla: Program in United States Mexican Studies, University of California-San Diego.Google Scholar
  48. Mines, R., & Massey, D. (1985). Patterns of migration to the United States from two Mexican communities. Latin American Research Review, 20, 104–123.Google Scholar
  49. Minnesota Population Center (2008). Integrated public use microdata series—international: Version 4.0 [Machine-readable database]. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota [producer and distributor]. Available online at https://international.ipums.org/international.
  50. Miranda, A. (2007). Migrant networks, migrant selection, and high school graduation in Mexico. (IZA Discussion Paper No. 3204). Bonn: Institute for the Study of Labor.Google Scholar
  51. Office of Immigration Statistics. (2005). 2004 yearbook of immigration statistics. Washington: U.S. Department of Homeland Security.Google Scholar
  52. Orozco, M. (2002). Globalization and migration: The impact of family remittances in Latin America. Latin American Politics and Society, 44, 41–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Parreñas, R. S. (2001). Servants of globalization: Women, migration and domestic work. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Parreñas, R. S. (2005a). Children of global migration: Transnational families and gendered woes. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Parreñas, R. S. (2005b). Long distance intimacy: Class, gender and intergenerational relations between mothers and children in Filipino transnational families. Global Networks, 5, 317–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Passel, J. S., Van Hook, J., & Bean, F. D. (2004). Estimates of the legal and unauthorized foreign-born population for the United States and selected states, based on Census 2000. Report to the Census Bureau. Washington: Urban Institute.Google Scholar
  57. Piore, M. (1979). Birds of passage: Migrant labor in industrial societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Portes, A., & Rumbaut, R. (1996). Immigrant America: A portrait. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  59. Portes, A., & Walton, J. (1981). Labor, class, and the international system. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  60. Portes, A., Fernández-Kelly, P., & Haller, W. (2005). Segmented assimilation on the ground: The new second generation in early adulthood. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 28, 1000–1040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Powers, D. A., & Ellison, C. G. (1995). Interracial contact and black racial attitudes: The contact hypothesis and selectivity bias. Social Forces, 74, 205–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Raftery, A. (1995). Bayesian model selection in social research. Sociological Methodology, 25, 111–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Reichert, J. (1981). The migrant syndrome: Seasonal U.S. wage labor and rural development in central Mexico. Human Organization, 40, 56–66.Google Scholar
  64. Reichert, J. (1982). A town divided: Economic stratification and social relations in a Mexican migrant community. Social Problems, 29, 411–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Roberts, B., Frank, R., & Lozano-Ascencio, F. (1999). Transnational migrant communities and Mexican migration to the US. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 22, 238–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Root, B. D., & De Jong, G. (1991). Family migration in a developing country. Population Studies, 45, 221–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Rouse, R. C. (1992). Making sense of settlement: Class transformation, cultural struggle, and transnationalism among Mexican migrants in the United States. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 645, 25–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Ruggles, S., Sobek, M., Alexander, T., Fitch, C. A., Goeken, R., Hall, P. K., . . . Ronnander, C. (2008). Integrated public use microdata series: Version 4.0 [Machine-readable database]. Minneapolis: Minnesota Population Center [producer and distributor]. Available online at http://usa.ipums.org/usa.
  69. Russell, S. (1992). Migrant remittances and development. International Migration Review, 30, 269–290.Google Scholar
  70. Sakamoto, A., & Chen, M. D. (1991a). Inequality and attainment in a dual labor market. American Sociological Review, 56, 295–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Sakamoto, A., & Chen, M. D. (1991b). Sample selection and the dual labor market. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 10, 171–198.Google Scholar
  72. Sana, M. (2008). Growth of migrant remittances from the United States to Mexico, 1990–2004. Social Forces, 86, 995–1025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Skoufias, E., & Parker, S. W. (2006). Job loss and family adjustment to work and schooling during the Mexican peso crisis. Journal of Population Economics, 19, 163–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Smith, R. C. (1998). Transnational localities: Technology, community, and the politics of membership within the context of Mexico-U.S. migration. Journal of Urban and Comparative Research, 6, 196–241.Google Scholar
  75. Smock, P. J., Manning, W. D., & Gupta, S. (1999). The effect of marriage and divorce on women’s economic well-being. American Sociological Review, 64, 794–812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. South, S. J., Crowder, K., & Chavez, E. (2005). Migration and spatial assimilation among U.S. Latinos: Classical versus segmented trajectories. Demography, 42, 497–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Stark, O. (1991). The migration of labor. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  78. Stecklov, G., Winters, P., Stampini, M., & Davis, B. (2005). Do conditional cash transfers influence migration? A study using experimental data from the Mexican PROGRESA program. Demography, 42, 769–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Stuart, J., & Kearney, M. (1981). Causes and effects of agricultural labor migration from the Mixteca of Oaxaca to California. La Jolla: Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies, University of California-San Diego.Google Scholar
  80. Taylor, J. E. (1999). The new economics of labour migration and the role of remittances in the migration process. International Migration, 37, 63–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Taylor, J. E., & Mora, J. (2006). Does migration reshape expenditures in rural households? Evidence from Mexico. (World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3842). Washington: World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Taylor, J. E., Arango, J., Hugo, G., Kouaouci, A., Massey, D. S., & Pellegrino, A. (1996a). International migration and community development. Population Index, 62, 397–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Taylor, J. E., Arango, J., Hugo, G., Kouaouci, A., Massey, D. S., & Pellegrino, A. (1996b). International migration and national development. Population Index, 62, 181–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Tienda, M., & Wilson, F. D. (1992). Migration and the earnings of Hispanic men. American Sociological Review, 57, 661–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Todaro, M. (1976). Internal migration in developing countries. Geneva: International Labor Office.Google Scholar
  86. White, H. (1980). A heteroskedastic-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica, 48, 817–838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Wiest, R. E. (1973). Wage-labor migration and the household in a Mexican town. Journal of Anthropological Research, 29, 108–209.Google Scholar
  88. Winship, C., & Mare, R. D. (1992). Models for sample selection bias. Annual Review of Sociology, 18, 327–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Zhou, M. (1997). Growing up American: The challenge confronting immigrant children and children of immigrants. Annual Review of Sociology, 23, 63–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Sociology and Minnesota Population CenterUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations