Demography

, Volume 48, Issue 1, pp 25–47 | Cite as

Paternal Incarceration and Support for Children in Fragile Families

Article

Abstract

High U.S. incarceration rates have motivated recent research on the negative effects of imprisonment on later employment, earnings, and family relationships. Because most men in jail and prison are fathers, a large number of children may be placed at considerable risk by policies of incarceration. This article examines one dimension of the economic risk faced by children of incarcerated fathers: the reduction in the financial support that they receive. We use a population-based sample of urban children to examine the effects of incarceration on this support. Both cross-sectional and longitudinal regressions indicate that formerly incarcerated men are less likely to contribute to their families, and those who do contribute provide significantly less. The negative effects of incarceration on fathers’ financial support are due not only to the low earnings of formerly incarcerated men but also to their increased likelihood to live apart from their children. Men contribute far less through child support (formal or informal) than they do when they share their earnings within their household, suggesting that the destabilizing effects of incarceration on family relationships place children at significant economic disadvantage.

Keywords

Incarceration Fatherhood Child support 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by the Annie E. Casey Foundation. The authors thank the Foundation for its support, but acknowledge that the findings and conclusions in presented in this article are those of the authors alone, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of the Foundation. The Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study was supported by Grant R01HD36916 from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. The contents of the article are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. The authors are grateful for the constructive feedback of Herbert Smith and Mark Kleiman, participants in the Fragile Families Working Group, and two anonymous referees.

References

  1. Anderson, E. (1999). Code of the street: Decency, violence, and the moral life of the inner city. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  2. Arditti, J. A., Smock, S. A., & Parkman, T. S. (2005). “It’s been hard to be a father”: A qualitative exploration of incarcerated fatherhood. Fathering, 3, 267–288.Google Scholar
  3. Betson, D. (2006). Parental expenditures on children: Rothbarth estimates. Denver: Policy Studies, Inc.Google Scholar
  4. Bloom, D. (2006). Employment-focused programs for ex-prisoners: What have we learned, what are we learning, and where should we go from here? Background paper prepared for the meeting, Research on Prisoner Reentry: What Do We Know and What Do We Want to Know. Gerald R. Ford School of Public Policy, University of Michigan, May 24.Google Scholar
  5. Braman, D. S. (2004). Doing time on the outside: Incarceration and family life in urban America. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bushway, S. (2004). Labor market effects of permitting employer access to criminal history records. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 20, 276–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Comfort, M. (2008). Doing time together: Love and family in the shadow of the prison. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  8. Council of State Governments. (2009). Repaying debts. New York: Council of State Governments. Available online at http://tools.reentrypolicy.org/repaying_debts.
  9. Dickman, S. J. (1990). Functional and dysfunctional impulsivity: Personality and cognitive correlates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 95–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Edin, K. (2000). Few good men: Why poor mothers don’t marry or remarry. American Prospect, 11, 26–31.Google Scholar
  11. Edin, K., Nelson, T. J., & Paranal, R. (2004). Fatherhood and incarceration as potential turning points in the criminal careers of unskilled men. In M. Patillo, D. F. Weiman, & B. Western (Eds.), Imprisoning America: The social effects of mass incarceration (pp. 46–75). New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  12. Fagan, J., & Freeman, R. (1999). Crime and work. Crime and Justice, 25, 225–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Farrington, D. P. (1998). Predictors, causes, and correlates of male youth violence. Crime and Justice, 24, 421–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Foster, H., & Hagan, J. (2007). Incarceration and intergenerational social exclusion. Social Problems, 54, 399–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Freeman, R. (1996). Why do so many young Americans commit crimes and what might we do about it? The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10, 25–42.Google Scholar
  16. Geller, A., Garfinkel, I., Cooper, C. E., & Mincy, R. B. (2009). Parental incarceration and child wellbeing: Implications for urban families. Social Science Quarterly, 90, 1186–1202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Golub, A., Johnson, B. D., Taylor, A., & Liberty, H. J. (2002). The validity of arrestees’ self-reports: Variations across questions and persons. Justice Quarterly, 19, 477–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gottfredson, M. R., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Hagan, J., & Dinovitzer, R. (1999). Collateral consequences of imprisonment for children, communities, and prisoners. Crime and Justice, 26, 121–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hairston, C. F. (1998). The forgotten parent. Understanding the forces that influence incarcerated fathers’ relationships with their children. Child Welfare, 77, 617–639.Google Scholar
  21. Holzer, H. J. (2007). Collateral costs: The effects of incarceration on the employment and earnings of young workers (IZA Discussion Paper 3118). Bonn, Germany: Institute for the Study of Labor.Google Scholar
  22. Holzer, H. J., Raphael, S., & Stoll, M. A. (2003). Employment barriers facing ex-offenders. Paper presented at the Urban Institute Reentry Roundtable, Employment Dimensions of Re-Entry: Understanding the Nexus Between Prisoner Reentry and Work, New York, May 19–20.Google Scholar
  23. Jacobs, E., & Western, B. (2007). Report on the evaluation of the ComALERT prisoner reentry program. Brooklyn: Kings County District Attorney.Google Scholar
  24. Johnston, D. (2006). The wrong road: Efforts to understand the effects of parental crime and incarceration. Criminology and Public Policy, 5, 703–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kling, J. (2006). Incarceration length, employment, and earnings. The American Economic Review, 86, 863–876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lindquist, C., & Bir, A. (2008). The National evaluation of the responsible fatherhood, marriage, and family strengthening grants for incarcerated and re-entering fathers and their partners: Program overview and evaluation summary. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.Google Scholar
  27. Lopoo, L., & Western, B. (2006). Incarceration, marriage, and family life. In B. Western (Ed.), Punishment and inequality in America (pp. 131–167). New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  28. Mumola, C. J. (2006). Parents under correctional supervision: National statistics. Presented at the conference, Children of parents in the criminal justice system: Children at risk, November 6, Bethesda, MD.Google Scholar
  29. Myers, S. L., Jr. (1980). The rehabilitation effect of punishment. Economic Inquiry, 18, 353–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Myers, S. L., Jr. (1983). Estimating the economic model of crime: Employment versus punishment effects. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 98, 157–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. National Corrections Reporting Program. (2003). Time served in state prison, by offense, release type, gender, and race. Available online at http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/index.cfm?ty=pbdetail&iid=2045.
  32. Nepomnyaschy, L. (2007). Child support and father-child contact: Testing reciprocal pathways. Demography, 44, 93–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nepomnyaschy, L., & Garfinkel, I. (2009). Child support enforcement and fathers’ contributions to their nonmarital children (CRCW Working Paper 2006-09-FF). Princeton, NJ: Center for Research on Child Wellbeing, Princeton University.Google Scholar
  34. Pager, D. (2003). The mark of a criminal record. The American Journal of Sociology, 108, 937–975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Parke, R., & Clarke-Stewart, K. A. (2002). Effects of parental incarceration on young children. Paper prepared for the conference, “From Prison to Home,” January 30–31, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  36. Petersilia, J. (2003). When prisoners come home: Parole and prisoner reentry. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Phillips, S. D., Erkanli, A., Keeler, G. P., Costello, E. J., & Angold, A. (2006). Disentangling the risks: Parent criminal justice involvement and children’s exposure to family risks. Criminology and Public Policy, 5, 677–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Reichman, N., Teitler, J., Garfinkel, I., & McLanahan, S. (2001). Fragile families: Sample and design. Child and Youth Services Review, 23, 303–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Reuter, P. H., MacCoun, R. J., Murphy, P., Abrahamse, A., & Simon, B. (1990). Money from crime: A study of the economics of drug dealing in Washington, DC. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.Google Scholar
  40. Roy, K. M., & Dyson, O. L. (2005). Gatekeeping in context: Babymama drama and the involvement of incarcerated fathers. Fathering, 3, 267–288.Google Scholar
  41. Saylor, W. G., & Gaes, G. G. (1997). PREP: Training inmates through industrial work participation, and vocational and apprenticeship instruction. Corrections Management Quarterly, 1, 32–43.Google Scholar
  42. Travis, J. (2005). But they all come back: Facing the challenges of prisoner reentry. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.Google Scholar
  43. Western, B. (2002). The impact of incarceration on wage mobility and inequality. American Sociological Review, 67, 526–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Western, B. (2006). Punishment and inequality in America. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  45. Western, B., Kling, J. R., & Weiman, D. F. (2001). The labor market consequences of incarceration. Crime and Delinquency, 47, 410–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Western, B., & Wildeman, C. (2009). The black family and mass incarceration. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 621, 221–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wilbur, M. B., Marani, J. E., Appugliese, D., Woods, R., Siegel, J. A., Cabral, H. J., et al. (2007). Socioemotional effects of fathers’ incarceration on low-income, urban, school-aged children. Pediatrics, 120, e678–e685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wildeman, C. (2009). Parental imprisonment, the prison boom, and the concentration of childhood disadvantage. Demography, 46, 265–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Schools of Social Work and LawColumbia UniversityNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.School of Social WorkColumbia UniversityNew YorkUSA
  3. 3.Department of SociologyHarvard UniversityBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations