Advertisement

Asian Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 5, Issue 1–2, pp 1–18 | Cite as

Board gender diversity and firm performance: evidence from India

  • Neeti Khetarpal SananEmail author
Article

Abstract

This study examines the impact of board gender diversity on financial performance of listed Indian firms in a dynamic modelling framework. Using a firm-year unit of analysis, a sample of 148 publicly listed firms across multiple industries have been studied over a period of five financial years namely FY 2008–2009 to FY 2012–2013. Employing panel data analysis, percentage of women directors is taken as the independent variable and firm performance measured by return on assets (ROA) and Tobin’s Q as the dependent variables. The primary results of the study using ordinary least squares (OLS) and fixed effects (FE) estimation models point towards a positive and significant relationship between percentage of independent women directors (IWD) and firm performance. However, results are reversed when the theoretically superior Arellano Bond estimation is used. Findings of the study indicate that the number of companies with no IWDs is reducing across the 5 years of study. This may be due to external pressure created by stakeholders. Also, the number of companies with one IWD is increasing over the period of the study, while the number of companies with two or three or more directors is more or less the same. The number of two or three IWD companies remaining the same could arguably be due to lack of availability of independent directors who are women.

Keywords

Corporate boards Gender diversity Indian firms Performance 

References

  1. Adams, R., & Ferreira, D. (2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 94(2), 291–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bhagat, S., & Black, B. (2001). The non-correlation between board independence and long term firm performance. Journal of Corporation Law, 27, 231–274.Google Scholar
  4. Bilimoria, D. (2000). Building the business case for women corporate directors. In R. J. Burke & M. C. Mattis (Eds.), Women on corporate boards of directors: international challenges and opportunities (pp. 25–40). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bøhren, Ø., & Strøm, R. Ø. (2007). Aligned, informed, and decisive: characteristics of value-creating boards. Working Paper. Available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=966407
  6. Bonn, I., Yoshikawa, T., & Phan, P. H. (2004). Effects of board structure on firm performance: a comparison between Japan and Australia. Asian Business & Management, 3, 105–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burke, R. J., & Mattis, M. C. (2000). Women in corporate boards of directors: international challenges and opportunities. The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publisher.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Campbell, K., & Mınguez-Vera, A. (2008). Gender diversity in the boardroom and firm financial performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(3), 435–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carter, D., Simkins, B., & Simpson, W. G. (2003). Corporate governance, board diversity, and firm value. Financial Review, 38(1), 33–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carter, D.A., D’Souza, F., Simkins, B.J., & Simpson, W.G. (2007). The diversity of corporate board committees and firm financial performance. http://ssrn.com/abstract=972763
  11. Catalyst (2004). The bottom line: connecting corporate performance and gender diversity.Google Scholar
  12. Chung, K.H, & Pruitt, S.W. (1994). A simple approximation of Tobin’s Q. Financial Management, 23(3), Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=957032
  13. Dobbin, F., & Jung, J. (2011). Corporate board gender diversity and stock performance: the competence gap or institutional investor bias? North Carolina Law Review, 89, 809–838.Google Scholar
  14. Dutta, P., & Bose, S. (2006). Gender diversity in the boardroom and financial performance of commercial banks: evidence from Bangladesh. The Cost and Management, 34(6), 70–74.Google Scholar
  15. Erhardt, N., Werbel, J., & Shrader, S. (2003). Board of director diversity and firm financial performance. Corporate Governance, 11(2), 102–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Agency problems and residual claims. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 327–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Farrell, K. A., & Hersch, P. L. (2005). Additions to corporate boards: the effect of gender. Journal of Corporate Finance, 11(1–2), 85–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Francoeur, C., Labelle, R., & Desgagne, B. S. (2008). Gender diversity in corporate governance and top management. Journal of Business Ethics, 81, 83–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hermalin, B. E., & Weisbach, M. S. (2003). Boards of directors as an endogenously determined institution: a survey of the economic literature. FRBNY Economic Policy Review, 9(1), 7–26.Google Scholar
  20. Hoskisson, R., Johnson, R., & Moesel, D. (1994). Corporate divestiture intensity of restructuring firms—effects of governance, strategy, and performance. Academy Management Journal, 37(5), 1207–1251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jurkus, A.F., Park, J.C. & Woodard, L.S. (2008). Gender diversity, firm performance, and environment.” SSRN Working PaperGoogle Scholar
  22. Keats, B. W., & Hitt, M. A. (1988). A causal model of linkages among environmental dimensions, macro organizational characteristics, and performance. The Academy of Management Journal, 31(3), 570–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Larcker, D. F., & Tayan, B. (2011). Corporate governance matters: a closer look at organizational choices and their consequences. Upper Saddle River: FT Press.Google Scholar
  24. Neter, J., Wasserman, W., & Kutner, M. H. (1983). Applied linear regression models. Homewood: Irwin.Google Scholar
  25. OECD. (2004). OECD principles of corporate governance. Paris: OECD Publication.Google Scholar
  26. Pearce, J. A., & Zahra, S. A. (1991). The relative power of CEOs and boards of directors: associations with corporate performance. Strategic Management Journal, 12, 135–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Smith, N., Smith, V., & Verner, M. (2006). Do women in top management affect firm performance? A panel study of 2,500 Danish Firms. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 55(7), 569–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Stanwick, P. A., & Stanwick, S. D. (2010). The relationship between corporate governance and financial performance: an empirical study of Canadian firms. The Business Review, Cambridge, 16(2), 35–41.Google Scholar
  29. Terjesen, S., Sealy, R., & Singh, V. (2009). Women directors and corporate boards: a review and research agenda. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(3), 320–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wintoki, M. B., & Yang, T. (2007). Do firms adjust to a target board structure ? Working paper. USA: University of Georgia.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.IIM UdaipurUdaipurIndia

Personalised recommendations