Asian Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 4, Issue 1, pp 73–99 | Cite as

Developing civic-mindedness in undergraduate business students through service-learning projects for civic engagement and service leadership practices for civic improvement

  • Robin Stanley Snell
  • Maureen Yin Lee Chan
  • Carol Hok Ka Ma
  • Carman Ka Man Chan
Special Issue Paper
  • 180 Downloads

Abstract

Projects that challenge students to practice service leadership for civic improvement can address the aim of developing civic-mindedness in undergraduates. We conducted two qualitative studies. First, we investigated the learning experiences of four teams of undergraduate business students, who undertook semester-long course-embedded service-learning projects in partnership with four Hong Kong-based social enterprises. The students described five modes of civic engagement as project purposes, mentioned applying six types of service leadership practice for civic improvement, and described eight types of developmental outcome within the domain of civic-mindedness. Comparisons suggested that besides relational support through training and guidance, empowering infrastructure, opportunities to exercise autonomy, and opportunities to demonstrate competence, three project-related features that varied between projects were important in fostering civic-mindedness. These were direct contact with grassroots-based beneficiaries; the experience of making a tangible difference; and linking the campus with the wider community. A second qualitative study indicated that course-embedded team projects with these features that were undertaken in mixed teams that included freshman and senior year business students fostered civic-mindedness for both categories of student.

Keywords

Service-learning Service leadership Civic engagement Civic-mindedness Self-determination theory Intergroup contact theory 

References

  1. Astin, A. W., Vogelgesang, L. J., Ikeda, E. K., & Yee, J. A. (2000). Executive summary: How service learning affects students. Los Angeles: UCLA Higher Education Research Institute.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Batchelder, T. H., & Root, S. (1994). Effects of an undergraduate program to integrate academic learning and service: cognitive, prosocial cognitive, and identity outcomes. Journal of Adolescence, 17(4), 341–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beatty, R. (2003). Democracy, Asian values, and Hong Kong: Evaluating political elite beliefs. Westport: Praeger.Google Scholar
  4. Berman, S. (1990). Education for social responsibility. Educational Leadership, 48(3), 75–80.Google Scholar
  5. Bertelsmann Foundation. (2003). Civic mindedness: Participation in modern society. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Foundation Publishers.Google Scholar
  6. Bitner, M. J., Booms, B. H., & Tetreault, M. S. (1990). The service encounter: diagnosing favorable and unfavorable incidents. Journal of Marketing, 54(1), 71–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bitner, M. J., Booms, B. H., & Mohr, L. A. (1994). Critical service encounters: the employee’s viewpoint. Journal of Marketing, 58(4), 95–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boje, D. M. (2001). Narrative methods for organization research and communication research. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  9. Boneck, R., Barnes, J. N., & Stillman, T. F. (2014). VITA experiential, service-learning, learned competencies, and changed mindsets. Journal of College Teaching & Learning, 11(2), 71–83.Google Scholar
  10. Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Boyer, E. L. (1987). College: The undergraduate experience in America. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  12. Boyle, M.-E. (2007). Learning to neighbor? Service-learning in context. Journal of Academic Ethics, 5(1), 85–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brabant, M., & Braid, D. (2009). The devil is in the details: defining civic engagement. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 13(2), 59–87.Google Scholar
  14. Bringle, R. G., Studer, M., Wilson, J., Clayton, P. H., & Steinberg, K. S. (2011). Designing programs with a purpose: to promote civic engagement for life. Journal of Academic Ethics, 9(2), 149–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Brown, K. A. (2000). Developing project management skills: a service-learning approach. Project Management Journal, 31(4), 53–59.Google Scholar
  16. Brown, K. G. (2007). Theoretical reflections on service learning: Using self-determination theory to improve teaching practice. In K. G. Brown, L. A. Flowers & P. Levine (Eds.), The impact of civic engagement efforts on students: Creating a nexus between research scholars and practitioners (pp. 13–16). Upper Midwest Campus Compact. National Service-Learning Clearinghouse.Google Scholar
  17. Carson, R. L., & Domangue, E. A. (2013). The emotional component of service-learning. Journal of Experiential Education, 36(2), 139–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cheng, W. H., & Khoo, E. W. (2011). Civic mindedness: Components, correlates and implications for the public service. Singapore: Civil Service College.Google Scholar
  19. Chung, P. (2012). Service reborn: the knowledge, skills and attributes of service companies. Tiburon: Lexingford.Google Scholar
  20. Coles, R. (1993). The call of service: a witness to idealism. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.Google Scholar
  21. Conklin, T. A. (2007). Method or madness: phenomenology as knowledge creator. Journal of Management Inquiry, 16(3), 275–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Creswell, J. W. (1994). Research design: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  23. Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  24. Debeljuh, P., & Destephano, A. (2005). An inside look into teaching corporate social responsibility: a practical study with NGOs. Journal of Business Ethics Education, 2(2), 137–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The ‘what’ and ‘why’ of goal pursuits: human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125(6), 627–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Delbecq, A. L., Cavanagh, G. F., Haughey, J., Hendrickson, A., Stebbins, M., & Winkler, A. (2010). Higher education for business in the Jesuit tradition. Journal of Jesuit Business Education, 1(1), 119–123.Google Scholar
  28. Denzin, N. K. (1978). The research act: a theoretical introduction to sociological methods (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  29. Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education: an introduction to the philosophy of education. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  30. Dharamsi, S., Espinoza, N., Cramer, C., Amin, M., Bainbridge, L., & Poole, G. (2010). Nurturing social responsibility through community service-learning: lessons learned from a pilot project. Medical Teacher, 32(11), 905–911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ehrlich, T. (Ed.). (2000). Civic responsibility and higher education. Phoenix: The American Council on Education and Oryx Press.Google Scholar
  32. Farnsworth, K. A. (2007). Leadership as service: a new model for higher education in a new century. Westport: Praeger.Google Scholar
  33. Flanagan, J. C. (1954). The critical incident technique. Psychological Bulletin, 51(4), 327–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Flanagan, C., & Levine, P. (2010). Youth civic engagement during the transition to adulthood. Transition to Adulthood, 20(1), 159–180.Google Scholar
  35. Fram, S. M. (2013). The constant comparative analysis method outside of grounded theory. The Qualitative Report, 18(1), Article 1: 1–25.Google Scholar
  36. Gabriel, Y. (2000). Storytelling in organizations: Facts, fictions, and fantasies. London: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ghoshal, S. (2005). Bad management theories are destroying good management. The Academy of Management Learning and Education, 4(1), 75–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  39. Grant, A. (2013). Give and take: a revolutionary approach to success. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
  40. Gray, M. J., Ondaatje, E. H., Fricker, R. D., & Geschwind, A. (2000). Assessing service-learning. Change, 32(2), 30–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Greenbaum, T. (1998). The handbook for focus group research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  42. Greenleaf, R. K. (2003). In H. Beazley, J. Beggs, & L. C. Spears (Eds.), The servant-leader within: a transformative path. NY: Paulist Press.Google Scholar
  43. Grönfeldt, S., & Strother, J. (2006). Service leadership: the quest for competitive advantage. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  44. Han, Y., Kakabadse, N. K., & Kakabadse, A. (2010). Servant leadership in the PRC: a case study of the public sector. Journal of Management Development, 29(3), 265–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Hewstone, M., & Brown, R. J. (Eds.). (1986). Contact and conflict in intergroup encounters. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  46. Hutchinson, M. (2005). Living the rhetoric: service learning and increased value of social responsibility. Pedagogy: Critical Approaches to Teaching Literature, Language, Composition, and Culture, 5(3), 427–444.Google Scholar
  47. Jacoby, B., et al. (Eds.). (1996). Service-learning in higher education: Concepts and practices. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  48. James, K. T., Mann, J., & Creasy, J. (2007). Leaders as lead learners: a case example of facilitating collaborative leadership learning for school leaders. Management Learning, 38(1), 79–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Jonsen, K., & Jehn, K. A. (2009). Using triangulation to validate themes in qualitative studies. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management, 4(2), 123–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kenworthy, A. L. (2010). Service-learning and negotiation: an educational “win-win”. Journal of Management Education, 34(1), 62–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kouzes, J., & Posner, B. (2003). The leadership challenge. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  52. Kvale, S. (1996). InterViews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  53. Laing, G. K. (2013). Service learning: an auditing project study. International Education Studies, 6(1), 174–183.Google Scholar
  54. Litzky, B. E., Godshalk, V. M., & Walton-Bongers, C. (2010). Social entrepreneurship and community leadership: a service-learning model for management education. Journal of Management Education, 34(1), 142–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. McCallum, D. C., & Horian, L. (2013). A leadership education model for Jesuit business schools. Journal of Jesuit Business Education, 4(1), 37–52.Google Scholar
  56. McCarthy, A. M., & Tucker, M. L. (1999). Student attitudes toward service-learning: implications for implementation. Journal of Management Education, 23(5), 554–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Metz, E. C., & Youniss, J. (2005). Longitudinal gains in civic development through school- based required service. Political Psychology, 26(3), 413–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Niemiec, C., & Ryan, R. M. (2009). Autonomy, competence, and relatedness in the classroom: applying self-determination theory to educational practice. Theory and Research in Education, 7(2), 133–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Normann, R. (2002). Service management: Strategy and leadership in service business. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  60. Nussbaum, M. (2004). Liberal education and global community. Liberal Education, 90(1), 42–47.Google Scholar
  61. Oliva, R., & Kallenberg, R. (2003). Managing the transition from products to services. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 14(2), 160–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Papamarcos, S. D. (2005). Giving traction to management theory: today’s service-learning. The Academy of Management Learning and Education, 4(3), 325–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Paulins, A. (1999). Service learning and civic responsibility: the consumer in American society. Journal of Family and Consumer Sciences, 91(2), 66–72.Google Scholar
  64. Pearce, C. L., & Conger, J. A. (Eds.). (2003). Shared leadership: Reframing the hows and whys of leadership. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  65. Penner, L. A., Fritzsche, B. A., Craiger, J. P., & Freifeld, T. S. (1995). Measuring the prosocial personality. In J. N. Butcher & C. D. Spielberger (Eds.), Advances in personality assessment (Vol. 10, pp. 147–163). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  66. Poff, D. C. (2010). Ethical leadership and global citizenship: considerations for a just and sustainable future. Journal of Business Ethics, 93(1 Supplement), 9–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Poon, P., Chan, T. S., & Zhou, L. (2011). Implementation of service-learning in business education: issues and challenges. Journal of Teaching in International Business, 22(3), 185–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Prasertsang, P., Nuangchalerm, P., & Pumipuntu, C. (2013). Service learning and its influence on pre-service teachers: social responsibility and self-efficacy study. International Education Studies, 6(7), 144–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Robinson, D. F., Sherwood, A. L., & DePaulo, C. A. (2010). Service-learning by doing: how a student-run company finds relevance and purpose in a business strategy capstone course. Journal of Management Education, 34(1), 88–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Sabbaghi, O., Cavanagh, G. F., & Hipskind, S. J. (2013). Service-learning and leadership: evidence from teaching financial literacy. Journal of Business Ethics, 118(1), 127–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Saltmarsh, J., & Zlotkowski, E. (Eds.). (2011). Higher education and democracy: Essays on service-learning and civic engagement. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  72. Scott, J. H. (2012). The intersection of service-learning and moral growth. New Directions for Student Services, 139, 27–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Shirky, C. (2010). Cognitive surplus: Creativity and generosity in a connected age. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  74. Sims, R. R., & Sims, S. J. (1991). Increasing applied business ethics courses in business school curricula. Journal of Business Ethics, 10(3), 211–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Sing, M. (2009). The quality of life in Hong Kong. Social Indicators Research, 92(2), 295–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Smart, D., Sanson, A., Da Silva, L., & Toumbourou, J. (2000). The development of civic mindedness in Australian adolescents. Family Matters (Spring/Summer), 57, 4–10.Google Scholar
  77. Snell, R. S., Chan, M. Y. L., Ma, C. H. K., & Chan, C. K. M. (2015a). A road map for empowering undergraduates to practice service leadership through service-learning in teams. Journal of Management Education, 39(3), 372–399. doi:10.1177/1052562914545631. first published online before print, August 14, 2014.
  78. Snell, R. S., Chan, M. Y. L., Ma, C. H. K., & Chan, C. K. M. (2015b). The service leadership initiative at Lingnan University. In D. Shek & P. Chung (Eds.), Promoting service leadership qualities in university students: The case of Hong Kong. Singapore: Springer. In press.Google Scholar
  79. Spears, L. C. (2010). Character and servant leadership: ten characteristics of effective, caring leaders. Journal of Virtues and Leadership, 1(1), 25–30.Google Scholar
  80. Spiegelberg, H. (1978). The essentials of the phenomenological method. In H. Spiegelberg (Ed.), The phenomenological movement: A historical introduction (2nd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 653–701). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  81. Steiner, S. D., & Watson, M. A. (2006). The service-learning component in business education: the values linkage void. The Academy of Management Learning and Education, 5(4), 422–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Trompenaars, A., & Voerman, E. (2010). Servant-leadership across cultures: Harnessing the strength of the world’s most powerful management philosophy. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  83. Wade, R. C. (1997). Community service-learning. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  84. Ward, K., & Wolf-Wendel, L. (2000). Community-centered service learning. American Behavioral Scientist, 43(5), 767–780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Wong, C. K. (2008). Squaring the welfare circle in Hong Kong: lessons for governance in social policy. Asian Survey, 48(2), 323–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Wong, K. Y., & Wan, P. S. (2009). New evidence of the postmaterialist shift: the experience of Hong Kong. Social Indicators Research, 92(3), 497–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Xing, J., & Ma, C. H. K. (Eds.). (2010). Service-learning in Asia: Curricular models and practices. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robin Stanley Snell
    • 1
  • Maureen Yin Lee Chan
    • 1
  • Carol Hok Ka Ma
    • 2
  • Carman Ka Man Chan
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of ManagementLingnan UniversityTuen MunHong Kong
  2. 2.Office of Service LearningLingnan UniversityTuen MunHong Kong

Personalised recommendations