WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs

, Volume 18, Issue 4, pp 595–616 | Cite as

Building business, enriching lives: an Indonesian initiative to empower women in the fishing communities

  • Setyawati FitrianggraeniEmail author


An estimated 34 million Indonesians are dependent on the fisheries sector for their livelihood in a nation with over 17.504 islands and a total coastal length of 104.000 km. One important aspect that needs to be evaluated on the lives of artisanal fisherman is gender equality and the role of the woman in fishing and fish processing. Indonesian Government initiatives like Kartu Nelayan (Fisherman Identity Cards) have barely improved the participation, capacity building, development, and welfare of these women who are wives of the fisherman. This paper explores the viability of organizing women into a cooperative to achieve greater gender equality and participation. The paper investigates the grassroot support for such a cooperative to achieve Sustainable Development Goal 5 (equality in gender) and Goal 1 (end of poverty). The research uses both primary and secondary sources; and in particular responses to a questionnaire that was administered to the wives of fishermen conducted in Tegal and Wonogiri, Central Java, Indonesia. It was found that the women overwhelmingly supported the establishment of a cooperative in both these areas due to the familiarity with the business model but identified several problems in its execution . The paper makes practical recommendations for the realisation of this business model. This research can also serve as a starting point for women in other fishing communities throughout the world to achieve alternative ways in participating and contributing in the economic lives of their families.


Gender equality Sustainable Goal 5 Fishing Cooperative Women empowerment Indonesia 



  1. Bell DC, Cox ML (2015) Social norms: do we love norms too much? J Fam Theory Rev 7(1):28–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Broussard SC, Garrison MEB (2004) The relationship between classroom motivation and academic achievement in elementary school-aged children. Fam Consum Sci Res J 33(2):106–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cooper AC (1981) Strategic management: new ventures and small business. Long Range Plan 4(5):39–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Egerstorm L (2001) Obstacles to cooperation, in merret and walzer ed, cooperatives local development. M.E.Sharpe Inc, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Fauzan MR (2013) Woman in frame visual culture. Garudhawaca, YogyakartaGoogle Scholar
  6. Fishbein M, Ajzen I (2010) Predicting and changing behavior: the reasoned action approach. Psychology Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Frymier AB, Nadler MK (2017) Persuasion: integrating theory, research and practice, 4th edn. Kendall Hunt PublishingGoogle Scholar
  8. Guay F, Chanal J, Ratelle CF, Marsh HW, Larose S, Boivin M (2010) Intrinsic identified, and controlled types of motivation for school subjects in young elementary school children. Br J Educ Psychol 80(4):711–735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Handayani MT, Artini NWT (2009, 2009) Contribution of income for housewives of processed food makers to family income. J Popul Hum Resour Dev V(1)Google Scholar
  10. Hatta M (2015) Politics, nationality, economics (1926-1977). Kompas, JakartaGoogle Scholar
  11. Hendar (2010) Management of cooperatives firm. Erlangga publisher, JakartaGoogle Scholar
  12. Hermawati T (2007) Javanese culture and gender equality. J Mass Commun 1:18–24Google Scholar
  13. Humm M (1990) The dictionary of feminist theory. Ohio State University Press, USAGoogle Scholar
  14. Ismangil W (1989) Cooperatives look at the future, some managerial problems. Sriwijaya University Accessed 3 February 2019
  15. Khalid I, Ahmad AR, Gadar K, Yunus (2012) Stimulating factors on women entrepreneurial intention. Bus Manag Dyn 2(6):20–28Google Scholar
  16. Kobeissi N (2010) Gender factors and female entrepreneurship: international evidence and policy implications. J Int Entrep 8(1):1–35. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Leidenfrost NB (1992) An educational delivery method which helps to empower women and families, families in transition international federation for home economics, XVII World Congress, Hanover, Germany, pp 115-119Google Scholar
  18. Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries (2011) Marine and fisheries in figures. Center of data statistic and information.[_Konten_]-Konten%20C9759.pdf. Accessed 31 Jan 2019
  19. Mollen S, Rimal RN, Lapinski MK (2010) What is normative in health communication research on norms? A review and recommendations for future scholarship. Health Commun 25:544–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Moorhead G, Griffin RW (1999) Organizational behaviour: managing people and organization, 3rd edn. Jaico publishing house, MumbaiGoogle Scholar
  21. Munkner H (2001) Rediscovery of cooperatives in development policy. Yakoma PGI, JakartaGoogle Scholar
  22. Olson DH, DeFrain J (2003) Marriages and families: intimacy, diversity, and strengths. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Pinderhughes E (1983) Empowerment for our clients and for ourselves. Soc Case Work 64(6):331–338Google Scholar
  24. Pristiana U, Kusumaningtyas A, Mujanah S (2009) Factors that influence women’s entrepreneurial decision making in Surabaya. J Econ Bus Res 9(1):52–65Google Scholar
  25. Rokhmansyah A (2016) Introduction to gender and feminism: an initial understanding of literary criticism of feminism. Garudhawaca, YogyakartaGoogle Scholar
  26. Sihite R (2007) Women, health & justice. Raja grafindo persada, JakartaGoogle Scholar
  27. Singh N, Butt AP, Canepa C (2018) Shifting social norms in the economy for women’s economic empowerment, insights from a practitioner learning group. The SEEP Network. Accessed 31 Jan 2019
  28. Siwu, Paula SS (1995) The correlation between interest in the teaching profession, study habits, as well as intelligence and the academic achievement of PGSD students at IKIP manado. Thesis, Gadjah Mada UniversityGoogle Scholar
  29. Smet B (1994) Health psychology. Grasindo, JakartaGoogle Scholar
  30. Sunstein CR (1996) Social norms and social roles. Columbia Law Rev 4:903–968CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tambunan TTH (2017) Women entrepreneurs in MSEs in Indonesia: their motivations and main constraints. JWE (2017, No. 1-2, 56-86)Google Scholar
  32. Taylor SE, Peplau LA, Sears DO (1994) Social psychology. Pretice hall, New JerseyGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© World Maritime University 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Law University of Indonesia Anggraeni and PartnersJakartaIndonesia

Personalised recommendations