Simulator training for maritime complex tasks: an experimental study
- 328 Downloads
Training simulators are largely deployed to provide operators working within complex systems to instil adequate skills to handle normal and abnormal situations. Improved technology and higher computation power have significantly increased the use of training simulators in the training programs. The goal of this pilot study is to determine the design of training in order to prepare for complex tasks within the maritime domain. In this experimental study, students are trained to perform docking operations when ocean currents with increasing complexity are introduced in the training program. The effect of the training is evaluated by comparing two groups: one trained with homogenous currents and the other with heterogeneous currents. Objective performance measures are used to analyse the participants’ performance. The results indicate that when the participants were exposed to tasks with gradually increasing complexity, they performed better as compared to those who were exposed to complex tasks too early in the training. The results suggest that even though the technology and computational power provide for new possibilities in training simulators, new features that make the tasks more complicated should not be included too early in the training without sufficient investigation. It is also found that increasing functional fidelity of the simulation during training has resulted in the improved performance of the participants during the complex tasks (docking operations), as compared to those training with the highest fidelity from the beginning.
KeywordsEducation and training assessment Simulator training Maritime education and training Learning theory Competence Ocean currents
The experiments were performed in the SimStrøm research project in a cooperation between Kongsberg Maritime and the University College of Southeast Norway. The project was funded by the regional research fund Oslofjordfondet (research grant no. 248723). We would like to thank Stefan Backmann, Anders Nes and Svend Nordby for facilitating the experiments and for their valuable contributions.
Compliance with ethical standards
The experiment was performed in accordance to the ethical standards laid down in the 1991 Declaration of Helsinki. All participants signed a consent form.
- Berg N, Storgård J, Lappalainen J (2013) The impact of ship crews on maritime safety publications of the Centre for Maritime Studies. Univ Turku A64:1–48Google Scholar
- Bryman A (2012) Social research methods. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Dekker S (2003) When human error becomes a crime. Hum Factors Aerosp Saf 3:83–92Google Scholar
- DNV (2007), Statement of Compliance, DNV Id. No. 135908. Retrieved from:https://kongsberg.com/en/kongsberg-digital/maritime%20simulation/ksim%20navigation%20-page/. Accessed November 2017
- Flin RH, O’Connor P, Crichton M (2008) Safety at the sharp end: a guide to non-technical skills. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd., HampshireGoogle Scholar
- Fujii M, Asaki K, Kubono M, Hamada T (2015) Evaluation method of training scenario for ship manoeuvring simulator exercise in BRM training. Paper presented at the International Conference on Ship Manoeuvrability and Maritime Simulation, New Castle University, Newcastle upon TyneGoogle Scholar
- Kim T-e, Nazir S (2016) Exploring marine accident causation: a case study. Occup Saf Hyg IV:369–374Google Scholar
- Nazir S, Hjelmervik K (2017) Advance use of training simulator in maritime education and training: a questionnaire study. In: International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics. Springer, pp 361–371Google Scholar
- Okazaki T, Kunieda C (2011) Development of a training support tool for marine pilot trainees. In: International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. IEEE, pp 189–194Google Scholar
- Øvergård KI, Nielsen AR, Nazir S, Sorensen LJ (2015) Assessing navigational teamwork through the situational correctness and relevance of communication. Proc Manuf 3:2589–2596Google Scholar
- Pyne R, Koester T (2005) Methods and means for analysis of crew communication in the maritime domain. Arch Transp 17:193–208Google Scholar
- Røed LP, Kristensen NM, Hjelmervik KB, Staalstrøm A (2016) A high-resolution, curvilinear ROMS model for the Oslofjord. FjordOs technical report No. 2. Norwegian Meteriological InstituteGoogle Scholar
- Rothblum AM (2000) Human error and marine safety. Paper presented at National Safety Council Congress and Expo, OrlandoGoogle Scholar
- Saus E-R, Johnsen BH, Eid J (2010) Perceived learning outcome: the relationship between experience, realism and situation awareness during simulator training. Int Marit Health 61:258–264Google Scholar
- Voytkevich A, Bogdanecs A, Fernandez M (2015) Key performance indcators for assessing simulator task scenarios: paper presented at the International Conference on Ship Manoeuvrability and Maritime Simulation. New Castle University, Newcastle upon TyneGoogle Scholar