Advertisement

Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences

, Volume 9, Issue 4, pp 429–436 | Cite as

Shocks, states, and societal corporatism: a shorter path to sustainability?

  • Thomas K. RudelEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

Fatalism about the inevitability of disruptive climate change has spread in recent years among environmentally concerned citizens. Slow moving, delayed, and ineffectual campaigns to limit greenhouse gas emissions have persuaded some observers that industrial societies are incapable of enacting and implementing thoroughgoing environmental reforms. This paper tries to counter this pessimism by outlining the circumstances that enabled rapid and far-reaching environmental reforms during the twentieth century. It does so through a comparative historical analysis of radical environmental reforms in Maine, the Great Plains, Cuba, and England. Three circumstances spurred these episodes of radical reform. Disruptive focusing events alarmed people by underlining sharp limits in the resources available to them. In response to the alarm, citizens and elites mobilized across scales to press for change. The changes occurred through corporatist political processes in which practitioners like farmers and real estate developers altered the norms governing environmentally consequential activities in ways beneficial to the environment.

Keywords

Focusing events Radical environmental reforms Caged populations Corporatism 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank Tom Heberlein for insightful comments on an earlier draft of this article.

References

  1. Acheson JM (2003) Capturing the commons: devising institutions to manage the Maine lobster industry. University Press of New England, Hanover, N.HGoogle Scholar
  2. Bennett HH (1939) Soil conservation. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Coughenour CM, Chamala S (2000) Conservation tillage and cropping innovation: constructing the new culture of agriculture. Iowa State University Press, Ames, IaCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dahl RA (1978) Pluralism revisited. Comp Polit 10(2):191–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Davis K (1963) The theory of change and response in modern demographic history. Popul Index 29:345–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dryzek JS, Downes D, Hunold C, Schlosberg D (2003) Green states and social movements: environmentalism in the United States, United Kingdom, Germany, and Norway. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Elson MJ (1986) Green belts: conflict mediation in the urban fringe. Heinemann, London, UKGoogle Scholar
  8. Enriquez L (2003) Economic reform and repeasantization in post-1990 Cuba. Lat Am Res Rev 38(1):202–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. FAO (Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations) (2018) FAOSTAT. (http://faostat3.fao.org/browse/Q/QC/E). Accessed on December 15, 2018
  10. Feldmann M (2014) Coalitions and corporatism: the Slovenian political economy and the crisis. Gov Oppos 49(1):70–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fisher DR (2004) National governance and the global climate change regime. Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham, Md.Google Scholar
  12. Funes Monzote R (2016) Sugar cane and historical transformations in Cuban agriculture. In: Latin American History: Oxford Research Encyclopedia.  https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199366439.013.4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gilbert J (2015) Planning democracy: agrarian intellectuals and the intended New Deal. Yale University Press, New Haven, CtCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hall P, Gracey H, Drewett, D, Thomas R (1973) The containment of urban England, volumes I & II. London: George Allen & UnwinGoogle Scholar
  15. Heberlein TA (2012) Navigating environmental attitudes. Oxford University Press, New York, NYCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kirkendall RS (1962) Franklin D. Roosevelt and the service intellectual. Miss Valley Hist Rev 49(3):456–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kraft ME (2016) Environmental policy and politics, 6th edn. Routledge, New York, N.YGoogle Scholar
  18. Lind M (2014) The “corporatist” confusion: why a prominent political term needs to be retired. Salon, January 5th, 2014. https://www.salon.com/2014/01/05/the_corporatist_confusion_why_a_prominent_political_term_needs_to_be_retired/
  19. Mann M (1986) The sources of social power, volume I: a history of power from the beginning to A.D. 1760. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, EngCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Manoilesco M (1936) Le siecle du corporatisme: Doctrine du corporatisme integral y pur. Libr. Felix Alcan, ParisGoogle Scholar
  21. Mao KR, Hanley EA (2018) State corporatism and environmental harm: tax farming and desertification in northwestern China. J Agrar Change 18:848–868CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ministry of Works and Public Planning (1942a) Report of the Committee on Land Utilization in Rural Areas. Her Majesty’s Stationary Office, London, England (Scott report)Google Scholar
  23. Ministry of Works and Public Planning (1942b) Final Report of Expert Committee on Compensation and Betterment. Her Majesty’s Stationary Office, London, Eng. (Uthwatt report)Google Scholar
  24. Munton R (1983) London’s green belt: containment in practice. Allen and Unwin, LondonGoogle Scholar
  25. Ollinaho O (2016) Environmental destruction as (objectively) uneventful and (subjectively) irrelevant. Environ Sociol 2(1):53–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Olson M (1982) The rise and decline of nations: economic growth, stagflation, and social rigidities. Yale University Press, New Haven, CtGoogle Scholar
  27. Orestes N, Conway E (2014) The collapse of western civilization: a view from the future. Columbia University Press, New York, NYCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ostrom E (1990) Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Premat A (2012) Sowing change: the making of Havana’s urban agriculture. Vanderbilt University Press, Nashville, TennGoogle Scholar
  30. Raper AF, Reid I (1941) Sharecroppers all. Russell and Russell, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  31. Rudel TK (2019) Shocks, states, and sustainability: the origins of radical environmental reforms. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Schmitter PC (1974) Still a century of corporatism? Rev Polit 36(1):85–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sklodowska E (2016) Invento, luego resisto: El periodo especial en Cuba como experiencias y metafora (1990–2015). Editorial Quarto Propio, Santiago, ChileGoogle Scholar
  34. Van der Ploeg JD (2013) Peasants and the art of farming: a Chaynovian manifesto. Fernwood, Winnipeg and Halifax, CanadaCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Vogel D (2012) The politics of precaution. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.JCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Walters BB, Vayda AP (2009) Event ecology, causal historical analysis, and human–environment research. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 99(3):534–553CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© AESS 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Rutgers UniversityMetuchenUSA

Personalised recommendations