China’s Paris pledge on climate change: inadequate and irresponsible

  • Paul G. HarrisEmail author


This essay critically assesses China’s pledge—its “intended nationally determined contributions”—toward achieving objectives of the 2015 Paris Agreement on climate change. It addresses some potential misconceptions about China’s pledge, including their inadequacy relative to the scale of pollution causing climate change and the dangers posed by its impacts. China’s pledge is little more than business as usual. Significant ethical obligations arise from China’s role as the largest national source of greenhouse gas pollution and home to hundreds of millions of affluent consumers. The Paris Agreement disregards such obligations. The inadequacy and irresponsibility of China’s Paris pledge exposes some fundamental flaws in the international climate change negotiations and agreements, demonstrating that science and environmental studies cannot be disconnected from ethics and justice.


China Climate change Common but differentiated responsibility Paris agreement 


  1. Albert E and Xu B (2016) China’s Environmental Crisis. Council on Foreign Relations. Available at:
  2. Damassa T et al. (2015) Interpreting INDCs: Assessing Transparency of Post-2020 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Targets for 8 Top-Emitting Economies. World Resources Institute Working Paper. Available at:
  3. Davenport C (2016) Donald Trump Could Put Climate Change on Course for “Danger Zone.” New York Times (10 November). Available at:
  4. Dimitrov RS (2016) The Paris agreement on climate change: behind closed doors. Global Environmental Politics 16(3):1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Economist Intelligence Unit (2016) The Chinese consumer in 2030. Available at:
  6. European Commission Joint Research Centre (2016) CO2 time series 1990–2014 per region/country. Available at:
  7. Flannery R (2016) Inside The 2016 Forbes List Of China's 400 Richest People: Wang Jianlin Repeats at No. 1. Forbes (26 October). Available at: russellflannery/2016/10/26/inside-the-2016-forbes-list-of-china-400-richest-people-wang-jianlin-repeats-at-no-1/#3ef3ad432145
  8. Global Carbon Project (2016) Carbon Budget 2016. Available at:
  9. Green F and Stern N (2016) China’s changing economy: implications for its carbon dioxide emissions. Climate Policy [published online 16 March]. Available at:
  10. Greenpeace (2016) Why the Paris agreement on climate change means the end of coal. Available at:
  11. Gupta J (2016) The Paris climate change agreement: China and India. Climate Law 6(1–2):171–181Google Scholar
  12. Harris PG (ed) (2016a) Ethics, environmental justice, and climate change. Edward Elgar, CheltenhamGoogle Scholar
  13. Harris PG (2016b) Global ethics and climate change. Edinburgh University Press, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  14. Jing, L (2016) Warning Over Hyping China as Climate Leader. South China Morning Post (2 December):A3Google Scholar
  15. National Development and Reform Commission of China (2015) Enhanced actions on climate change: China’s intended nationally determined contributions. NDRC Department of Climate Change, Beijing. English translation available at:'s%20INDC%20-%20on%2030%20June%202015.pdf
  16. National Research Council (2011) Warming World: Impacts by Degree. Available at:
  17. Nordhaus T and Lovering J (2016) Does Climate Policy Matter? Evaluating the Efficacy of Emissions Caps and Targets Around the World. The Breakthrough (28 November). Available at:
  18. Obergassel W et al (2015) Phoenix from the ashes: an analysis of the Paris agreement to the United Nations framework convention on climate change, part I. Environmental Law & Management 27(6):243–262Google Scholar
  19. Schreurs M (2016) The Paris climate agreement and the three largest emitters: China, the United States, and the European Union. Politics and Governance 4(3):219–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. South China Morning Post (2016) China, If Not US, Needs Paris Deal, Sunday Morning Post [Hong Kong], p 11Google Scholar
  21. United Nations (1992) United Nations framework convention on climate change. Available at:
  22. United Nations Environment Program (2016) Emissions gap report 2016: a UNEP synthesis report. UNEP, Nairobi. Available at:
  23. Vivid Economics (2013) Energy efficiency and economic growth. Report for the Climate Institute. Available at:
  24. World Economic Forum (2016) The Paris agreement was just the first step, Now We Need to Change the Way We Do Business. Available at:
  25. Zhang, Zhongxiang (2016) Are China’s Climate Commitments in a Post-Paris Agreement Sufficiently Ambitious? Working Paper 1607, Centre for Climate Economics and Policy, Crawford School of Public Policy, Australian National University. Available at:

Copyright information

© AESS 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Social SciencesEducation University of Hong KongTai PoHong Kong

Personalised recommendations