Advertisement

A framework for collaborative climate change research

  • Melissa KagleEmail author
  • April Baptiste
Article

Abstract

There is a growing understanding in the scientific community that the traditional ecological knowledge (TEK) of indigenous peoples and other local communities is both different from data collected by scientists and crucial to a more complete understanding of changes occurring due to global warming processes. Despite the increase in collaborative projects between scientists and local communities aimed at bringing together TEK and scientific ecological knowledge (SEK) in the last decade, no systematic analysis of what makes for an effective approach to the integration of the two knowledge systems has yet been undertaken. Through an extensive review of the interdisciplinary literature on such collaborations that identified common factors appearing across multiple studies, we propose a framework for evaluating the quality of collaborative research and, ultimately, predicting its quality. The value of such a framework lies with its broader application for researchers engaging in climate studies across regions, strengthening the quality of the research produced through both replicability and comparability of studies.

Keywords

Arctic Caribbean Climate change Traditional ecological knowledge 

References

  1. Bolton KC, Lougheed M, Ford J, Nickels S, Grable C (2011) What we know, dont know, and need to know about climate change in Inuit Nunangat: a systematic literature review of the Eastern Arctic. Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami, OttawaGoogle Scholar
  2. Burns D (2007) Systemic action research: a strategy for whole system change. The Policy Press, BristolGoogle Scholar
  3. Chambers R (2008) PRA, PLA and pluralism: practice and theory. In: Reason P, Bradbury H (eds) The Sage handbook of action research: participative practice. Sage Publications Ltd, Thousand Oaks, pp 297–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chambers R, Pacey A, Thrupp LA (eds) (1989) Farmer first: farmer innovation and agricultural research. Intermediate Technology Publications, LondonGoogle Scholar
  5. Charmaz K (2006) Constructing grounded theory. Sage Press, Thousand Oaks, CAGoogle Scholar
  6. Conway G (1997) The doubly green revolution: food for all in the 21st century. Cornell University Press, IthacaGoogle Scholar
  7. Eicken H (2010) 15 indigenous knowledge and sea ice science: what can we learn from indigenous ice users? In: Krupnik I, Aporta C, Gearheard S, Laidler GJ, Holm LK (eds) SIKU: knowing our ice. Springer, DordechtGoogle Scholar
  8. Farrington J, Martin A (1987) Farmer participatory research: a review of concepts and practices. Agricultural Administration Network, Discussion Paper No. 19Google Scholar
  9. IPCC (2013) Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change in Stocker, T.F., D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S.K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex and P.M. Midgley (eds.). Cambridge, Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  10. IPCC (2014) Summary for policymakers. In: Field CB et al. (eds) Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: global and sectoral aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (pp. 1–32). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  11. Krupnik I (2012) From knowledge to action: what did we learn from different ways of knowing in IPY?. Paper presented at the IPY 2012 Conference. Montreal, QCGoogle Scholar
  12. Krupnik I, Aporta C, Gearheard S, Laidler GJ, Holm LK (eds) (2010) SIKU: knowing our ice. Springer, DordechtGoogle Scholar
  13. Laidler G, Ford J, Gough W, T. I, A. G, S. K, Irngaut C (2009) Travelling and hunting in a changing Arctic: assessing Inuit vulnerability to sea ice change in Igloolik, Nunavut. Climatic Change 94:363–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Okali C, Sumberg J, Farrington J (1994) Farmer participatory research: rhetoric and reality. Intermediate Technology Publications, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Selener D (1997) Participatory action research and social change. Cornell University, The Cornell Participatory Action Research Network, Ithaca, NYGoogle Scholar
  16. Usher PJ (2000) Traditional ecological knowledge in environmental assessment and management. Arctic 53(2):183–193Google Scholar
  17. Wong PBY, de Groot PVC, Fekken C, Smith H, Pages M, Boag PT (2011) Interpretations of polar bear (Ursusmaritmus) tracks by Inuit hunters: inter-rater reliability and inferences concerning accuracy. Canadian Field-Naturalist 125(2):140–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Further Reading

  1. Agrawal A (1995) Dismantling the divide between indigenous and scientific knowledge. Dev Chang 26:413–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Angeles ME, Gonzalez JE, Ericson DJ, Hernandez JL (2007) Predictions of change in the Caribbean region using global circulation models. Int J Climatol 27(5):555–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beckford C, Barker D, Bailey S (2007) Adaptation, innovation and domestic food production in Jamaica: some examples of survival strategies of small-scale farmers. Singap J Trop Geogr 28(1):273–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berkes F (1999) Sacred ecology: traditional ecological knowledge and resource management. Taylor and Francis, London and PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  5. Berkes F (2009) Indigenous ways of knowing and the study of environmental change. J R Soc N Z 39(4):151–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Druckenmiller ML, Eicken H, George JC, Brower L (2010) Assessing the shorefast ice: inupiat whaling trails off Barrow, Alaska. In: Krupnik I, Aporta C, Gearheard S, Laidler GJ, Holm LK (eds) SIKU: knowing our ice. Springer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  7. Duerden F (2004) Translating climate change impacts at the community level. Arctic 57(2):204–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fienup-Riordan A, Rearden A (2010) The ice is always changing: Yup’ik understandings of sea ice, past and present. In: Krupnik I, Aporta C, Gearheard S, Laidler GJ, Holm LK (eds) SIKU: knowing our ice. Springer, Dordecht, NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  9. Ford JD, Smit B (2004) A framework for assessing the vulnerability of communities in the Canadian Arctic to risks associated with climate change. Arctic Institute of North America, CalgaryGoogle Scholar
  10. Gable FJ, Affs MM, Gentile JH, Aubrey DG (1990) Global climate and coastal impacts in the Caribbean region. Environ Conserv 17(1):51–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gamble DW (2009) Caribbean vulnerability: an appropriate climatic framework. In: McGregor DFM, Dodman D, Barker D (eds) Global change and Caribbean vulnerability: environment, economy and society at risk? University of West Indies Press, KingstonGoogle Scholar
  12. García-Quijano CG (2007) Fishers’ knowledge of marine species assemblages: bridging between scientific and local ecological knowledge in southeastern Puerto Rico. Am Anthropol 109(3):529–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gearheard S, Aipelle G, O’Keefe K (2010) The Igliniit project: combining Inuit knowledge and geomatics engineering to develop a new observation tool for hunters. In: Krupnik I, Aporta C, Gearheard S, Laidler GJ, Holm LK (eds) SIKU: knowing our ice. Springer, DordechtGoogle Scholar
  14. Gearheard S, Ocernish M, Steward R, Sanguya J, Huntington H (2009) Linking Inuit knowledge and meteorological station observations to understand chaning wind patterns at Clyde River, Nunavut. Clim ChangGoogle Scholar
  15. Harvey D (1984) On the history and present condition of geography: an historical materialistic manifesto. Prof Geogr 36(10):1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Huntington HP (2000) Using traditional ecological knowledge in science: methods and applications. Ecol Appl 10(5):1270–1274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. IDRC. IDRC on climate change adaptation. In: IDRC Bulletin. International Development Research Center, OttawaGoogle Scholar
  18. Jacobs JD, Bell TJ (1998) Regional perspectives on 20th century environmental change: introduction and examples from Northern Canada. Can Geogr 42(4):315–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Johnson N (2009) Inuit traditional knowledge and the politics of adaptation: broadening conceptions of agency in climate change governance. URL: http://www.earthsystemgovernance.org/ac2009/papers/AC2009-0068.pdf. Accessed 24 July 2012
  20. Jury MR (2009) An intercomparison of observational, reanalysis, satellite, and coupled model data on mean rainfall in the Caribbean. J Hydrometeorol 10(2):413–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kronik J, Verner D (2010) Indigenous peoples and climate change in Latin America and the Caribbean. The World Bank, WashingtonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Krupnik I (2000) Native perspectives on climate and sea-ice changes. In: Huntington HP (ed) Impacts of changes in sea ice and other environmental parameters in the Arctic. Marine Mammal Commission, BethesdaGoogle Scholar
  23. Krupnik I, Apangalook Sr. L, Apangalook P (2010) “It’s cold, but not cold enough”: observing ice and climate change in Gambell, Alaska, in IPY 2007–2008 and beyond. In: Krupnik I, Aporta C, Gearheard S, Laidler GJ, Holm LK (eds) SIKU: knowing our ice. SpringerGoogle Scholar
  24. Kruse JA, White RG, Epstein HE, Archie B, Berman M, Braund SR, Chapin FS III, Charlie J Sr, Daniel CJ, Eamer J, Flanders N, Griffith B, Haley S, Huskey L, Joseph B, Klein DR, Kofinas GP, Martin SM, Murphy SM, Nebesky W, Nicolson C, Russell DE, Tetlichi J, Tussing A, Walker MD, Young OR (2004) Modeling sustainability of Arctic communities: an interdisciplinary collaboration of researchers and local knowledge holders. Ecosystems 7(8):815–828CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Laidler GJ, Elee P, Ikummaq T, Joamie E, Aporta C (2010) Mapping Inuit sea ice knowledge, use, and change in Nunavut, Canada (Cape Dorset, Igloolik, Pangnirtung). In: Krupnik I, Aporta C, Gearheard S, Laidler GJ, Holm LK (eds) SIKU: knowing our ice. Springer, DordechtGoogle Scholar
  26. Leach M, Fairhead J (2002) Manners of contestation: “citizen science” and “indigenous knowledge” in West Africa and the Caribbean. Int Soc Sci J 54(173):299–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lewsey C, Cid G, Kruse E (2004) Assessing climate change impacts on coastal infrastructure in the Eastern Caribbean. Mar Policy 28:393–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mimura N, Nurse L, McLean RF, Agard J, Brigulio L, Lefale P, Payet R, Sem G (2007) Small islands. In: Parry ML, Canzaina OF, Paultikof JF, van der Linden PJ, Hanson CE (eds) Climate change 2007: impacts, adaption and vulnerability. Contribution of working group II to the Fourth Assessment of Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  29. Pettenger ME (2007) Introduction: power, knowledge and the social construction of climate change. In: Pettenger ME (ed) The social construction of climate change: power, knowledge, norms, discourses. Ashgate, Aldershot, UKGoogle Scholar
  30. Pulwarty RS, Nurse LA, Trotz UO (2010) Caribbean islands in a changing climate. Environment 52(6):16–27Google Scholar
  31. Riedlinger D, Berkes F (2001) Contributions of traditional knowledge to understanding climate change in the Canadian Arctic. Polar Rec 37(203):315–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Semali LM, Kincheloe JL (eds) (1999) What is indigenous knowledge? Voices from the academy. Falmer Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  33. Usher PJ (2000) Traditional ecological knowledge in environmental assessment and management. Arctic 53(2):183–193Google Scholar

Copyright information

© AESS 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Educational StudiesColgate UniversityHamiltonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Environmental StudiesColgate UniversityHamiltonUSA

Personalised recommendations