Environmental Science: the interdisciplinary STEM field
- 327 Downloads
The recognition of Environmental Science (ES) academic programs as science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) is important to the role ES will play in scholarship and in socio-economic development. The National Science Foundation, other federal agencies, and many academic leaders recognize ES as a STEM discipline. However, some state agencies and academic colleagues do not. This article builds the case that ES is a STEM discipline, is a “rigorous science,” and provides in-depth treatments of science disciplines. In general, ES qualifies as STEM education for four reasons: ES is grounded in the scientific method and the process of discovery, ES is empirical and predictive, ES is rigorous in its provision of specific skills for analytical analysis, and ES provides students with critical thinking skills. We develop viewpoints that the interdisciplinary field of ES is a mature science that appeals to students and prepares them for meaningful careers. Recognition and classification of ES as a STEM discipline provides a crucial link for their funding, provides career opportunities and research initiatives for students and faculty members, and gives those from ES academic programs standing in the science-based discussions for advancing sustainability in a rapidly changing world.
KeywordsSTEM Environmental Science Curriculum Quantitative Rigor Complex models Systems
- Carson R (1962) Silent spring. Houghton Mifflin, BostonGoogle Scholar
- Christensen, N. and L. Legge (2015) Environment and you, 2nd Edition. Benjamin Cummings Pub., 704 p.Google Scholar
- Committee on Prospering in the Global Economy of the 21st Century: an agenda for American science and technology. Rising above the gathering storm. National Academy of Science, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine (2007) National Academies Press, 562 p.Google Scholar
- Committee on Prospering in the Global Economy of the 21st Century: an agenda for American science and technology. Rising above the gathering storm, revisited: rapidly approaching category 5. National Academy of Science, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine. (2010). National Academies Press, 562 p.Google Scholar
- Cunningham, W. and M. Cunningham (2014) Environmental science: a human concern, 13th Edition. McGraw-Hill Pub., 640 p.Google Scholar
- Emmett R, Zelko F (eds) (2014) Minding the gap: working across disciplines in environmental studies. Rachel Carson Center Perspectives. Ludwig-Maximilinas-Universitat, MunichGoogle Scholar
- Enger, E. and B. Smith (2012) Environmental science: a study of interrelationships, 13th Edition. McGraw-Hill Pub., 512 p.Google Scholar
- Gonzalez, H. B. and J. J. Kuenzi (2012) Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Education: a primer. Congressional Research Service Pub., 34 p. https://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R42642.pdf
- Kuenzi, J.J. 2008. Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Education: background, federal policy, and legislative action. Congressional Research Service Pub., Report to US Congress, Order Code RL33434. http://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/RL33434.pdf.
- National Academy of Sciences (2012) Research universities and the future of America: ten breakthrough actions vital to our nation’s prosperity and security. National Academy Press, 24 p.Google Scholar
- National Science Foundation Budget (2015). Innovations at the Nexus Of Food, Energy, And Water Systems (INFEWS) $74,960,000. www.nsf.gov/about/budget/fy2016/pdf/37_fy2016.pdf. Accessed 3 May 2015.
- National Science Board (2014) Science & engineering indicators 2014. National Science Foundation Pub. NSB, Arlington, pp. 14–01Google Scholar
- National Science Board (2015) Revisiting the STEM workforce: a companion to science and engineering indicators 2014. Pub. NSB-2015-10, 38 p.Google Scholar
- National Science and Technology Council, Committee on STEM Education (2011) The Federal Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Education portfolio. Pub. L. No. 111,358, 102 p.Google Scholar
- Piegorsch, W.W. (2014). Twenty five years of environmetrics. Environmetrics 2014: 25:1. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/env.2260/epdf.
- Romero A, Silveri P (2006) Not all are created equal: an analysis of the environmental programs/departments in U.S. academic institutions from 1900 until May 2005. J. Integrative Biol 1:1–15Google Scholar
- Sanders, M. 2009. STEM, STEM Education, STEMmania. The technology teacher, p. 20–26. South Carolina Commission on Higher Education (2011) http://www.che.sc.gov/InstitutionsEducators.aspx, accessed August 2015 and http://www.che.sc.gov/CHE_Docs/StudentServices/LIFE/Directives/PolicyGuidelineforthePalmettoFellowsandLIFEScholarshipEnhancements.pdf
- Stevenson, R. B., Brody, M., Dillon, J., & Wals, A. E. (Eds.) (2014) International handbook of research on environmental education. Routledge Pub., 592 p.Google Scholar
- US Bureau of Labor (2010) USBL Statistics Standard Occupational Classification under the category of Physical Science described as code 19-2041. See: http://www.bls.gov/soc/2010/soc192041.htm.
- Wasem, R. E. (2012) Immigration of Foreign Nationals with Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Degree. Congressional Research Service, Report 7-5700; R42530, 26 p.Google Scholar
- Wyatt, J.M., A. Wiley, W. J. Camara, and N. Proestler, 2011. The development of an index of academic rigor for college readiness. College Board Pub., 43 p.Google Scholar