Advertisement

Environmental Science: the interdisciplinary STEM field

  • Gwendelyn GeidelEmail author
  • William E. Winner
Article
  • 327 Downloads

Abstract

The recognition of Environmental Science (ES) academic programs as science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) is important to the role ES will play in scholarship and in socio-economic development. The National Science Foundation, other federal agencies, and many academic leaders recognize ES as a STEM discipline. However, some state agencies and academic colleagues do not. This article builds the case that ES is a STEM discipline, is a “rigorous science,” and provides in-depth treatments of science disciplines. In general, ES qualifies as STEM education for four reasons: ES is grounded in the scientific method and the process of discovery, ES is empirical and predictive, ES is rigorous in its provision of specific skills for analytical analysis, and ES provides students with critical thinking skills. We develop viewpoints that the interdisciplinary field of ES is a mature science that appeals to students and prepares them for meaningful careers. Recognition and classification of ES as a STEM discipline provides a crucial link for their funding, provides career opportunities and research initiatives for students and faculty members, and gives those from ES academic programs standing in the science-based discussions for advancing sustainability in a rapidly changing world.

Keywords

STEM Environmental Science Curriculum Quantitative Rigor Complex models Systems 

References

  1. Carson R (1962) Silent spring. Houghton Mifflin, BostonGoogle Scholar
  2. Christensen, N. and L. Legge (2015) Environment and you, 2nd Edition. Benjamin Cummings Pub., 704 p.Google Scholar
  3. Committee on Prospering in the Global Economy of the 21st Century: an agenda for American science and technology. Rising above the gathering storm. National Academy of Science, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine (2007) National Academies Press, 562 p.Google Scholar
  4. Committee on Prospering in the Global Economy of the 21st Century: an agenda for American science and technology. Rising above the gathering storm, revisited: rapidly approaching category 5. National Academy of Science, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine. (2010). National Academies Press, 562 p.Google Scholar
  5. Cunningham, W. and M. Cunningham (2014) Environmental science: a human concern, 13th Edition. McGraw-Hill Pub., 640 p.Google Scholar
  6. Emmett R, Zelko F (eds) (2014) Minding the gap: working across disciplines in environmental studies. Rachel Carson Center Perspectives. Ludwig-Maximilinas-Universitat, MunichGoogle Scholar
  7. Enger, E. and B. Smith (2012) Environmental science: a study of interrelationships, 13th Edition. McGraw-Hill Pub., 512 p.Google Scholar
  8. Gonzalez, H. B. and J. J. Kuenzi (2012) Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Education: a primer. Congressional Research Service Pub., 34 p. https://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R42642.pdf
  9. Kuenzi, J.J. 2008. Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Education: background, federal policy, and legislative action. Congressional Research Service Pub., Report to US Congress, Order Code RL33434. http://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/RL33434.pdf.
  10. Maniates MF, Whissel JC (2000) Environmental studies: the sky is not falling. BioScience 50:509–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. National Academy of Sciences (2012) Research universities and the future of America: ten breakthrough actions vital to our nation’s prosperity and security. National Academy Press, 24 p.Google Scholar
  12. National Science Foundation Budget (2015). Innovations at the Nexus Of Food, Energy, And Water Systems (INFEWS) $74,960,000. www.nsf.gov/about/budget/fy2016/pdf/37_fy2016.pdf. Accessed 3 May 2015.
  13. National Science Board (2014) Science & engineering indicators 2014. National Science Foundation Pub. NSB, Arlington, pp. 14–01Google Scholar
  14. National Science Board (2015) Revisiting the STEM workforce: a companion to science and engineering indicators 2014. Pub. NSB-2015-10, 38 p.Google Scholar
  15. National Science and Technology Council, Committee on STEM Education (2011) The Federal Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Education portfolio. Pub. L. No. 111,358, 102 p.Google Scholar
  16. Piegorsch, W.W. (2014). Twenty five years of environmetrics. Environmetrics 2014: 25:1. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/env.2260/epdf.
  17. Romero A, Silveri P (2006) Not all are created equal: an analysis of the environmental programs/departments in U.S. academic institutions from 1900 until May 2005. J. Integrative Biol 1:1–15Google Scholar
  18. Sanders, M. 2009. STEM, STEM Education, STEMmania. The technology teacher, p. 20–26. South Carolina Commission on Higher Education (2011) http://www.che.sc.gov/InstitutionsEducators.aspx, accessed August 2015 and http://www.che.sc.gov/CHE_Docs/StudentServices/LIFE/Directives/PolicyGuidelineforthePalmettoFellowsandLIFEScholarshipEnhancements.pdf
  19. Stevenson, R. B., Brody, M., Dillon, J., & Wals, A. E. (Eds.) (2014) International handbook of research on environmental education. Routledge Pub., 592 p.Google Scholar
  20. US Bureau of Labor (2010) USBL Statistics Standard Occupational Classification under the category of Physical Science described as code 19-2041. See: http://www.bls.gov/soc/2010/soc192041.htm.
  21. Wasem, R. E. (2012) Immigration of Foreign Nationals with Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Degree. Congressional Research Service, Report 7-5700; R42530, 26 p.Google Scholar
  22. Winner WE, Champion E (2012) Environmental academic programs: advancing sustainability with a new environmental agenda. Sustainability, The Journal of Record 5:248–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Winner WE, Champion E (2013) Embedding environmental academic programs in higher education: rebuilding environmental sciences at North Carolina State University. Sustainability, The Journal of Record 6:327–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Winner WE, Dickey D, Showalter DS (2015) Sustainability and metrics: use of statistics and independent auditing. Sustainability, The Journal of Record 8:54–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wyatt, J.M., A. Wiley, W. J. Camara, and N. Proestler, 2011. The development of an index of academic rigor for college readiness. College Board Pub., 43 p.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© AESS 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Environment & Sustainability Program, School of the Earth, Ocean and EnvironmentUniversity of South CarolinaColumbiaUSA
  2. 2.Environmental Sciences Academic Program, Department of Forestry and Environmental ResourcesNorth Carolina State UniversityRaleighUSA

Personalised recommendations