Translational training for tomorrow’s environmental scientists

Article

Abstract

Environmental science exists to seek solutions to problems related to human-nature interactions. Unfortunately, in many cases, environmental research findings are not effectively used because scientists are not able to convey their knowledge effectively to policy makers and the public, and/or because the questions they address are not directly linked to the answers stakeholders need. To address this issue, Schlesinger (2010) called for development of a “translational ecology” that would be understandable and usable by decision-makers, interest groups, and citizens. A barrier to usable science is that researchers are not usually trained to be translational. We convened a multi-disciplinary group of scholars to identify a comprehensive pedagogical approach for training doctoral students to be translational scientists. From this work has emerged a list of 53 skills, content areas, and dispositional attributes that lead to translational research in environmental science, as well as a set of instructional approaches that can be used to build those competencies. Future work will identify examples of how instructional activities can be linked to competencies to provide accessible tools and activities in support of a “community of practice” whose work enhances social-ecological resilience through translational environmental science.

Keywords

Translational ecology Graduate education Social-ecological systems Usable science 

References

  1. Bammer G (2005) Integration and implementation sciences: building a new specialization. Ecol Soc 10(2):6. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss2/art6/
  2. Clark WC (2007) Sustainability science: a room of its own. Proc Nat Acad Sci 104:1737–8. doi:10.1073/pnas.0611291104 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Clark SG, Rutherford MB et al (2011) College and university environmental programs as a policy problem (part 2): strategies for improvement. Envir Manag 47:716–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Clauset A, Arbesman S et al (2015) Systematic inequality and hierarchy in faculty hiring networks. Science Advances 1(12Feb), e1400005. http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/1/1/e1400005.short
  5. Coimbra Group (2012) Survey on PhD program structures and administration in Europe and North America. http://www.coimbra-group.eu/transdoc/index.php?page=survey.
  6. Cronin B (2005) The hand of science: academic writing and its rewards. Scarecrow PressGoogle Scholar
  7. Cyranoski D, Gilbert N et al (2011) Education: the PhD factory. Nature 472:276–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hirsch Hadorn G, Hoffmann-Riem H et al (eds) (2008) Handbook of transdisciplinary research. Springer, ZurichGoogle Scholar
  9. Holdren JP (2008) Science and technology for sustainable well-being. Science 319(5862):424–34. doi:10.1126/science.1153386 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Mankoff SP, Brander C, et al (2004) Lost in translation: obstacles to translational medicine. J Translational Med 2:14. http://www.translational-medicine.com/content/2/1/14
  11. Marincola FM (2003) Translational medicine: a two-way road. J Translational Med 1:1. http://www.translational-medicine.com/content/1/1/1
  12. Nadkarni NM, Stasch AE (2013) How broad are our broader impacts? An analysis of the National Science Foundation’s Ecosystem Studies program and the Broader Impacts requirement. Frontiers Ecol Environ 11:13–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Schlesinger WH (2010) Translational ecology. Science 329(5992):609. doi:10.1126/science.1195642 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. SPARC (2010) Usable science: a handbook for science policy decision makers. http://cstpr.colorado.edu/sparc/outreach/sparc_handbook/
  15. Stokes DE (2007) Pasteur’s quadrant: basic science and technological innovation. Brookings Institution, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  16. Whitmer A, Ogden L et al (2010) The engaged university: providing a platform for research that transforms society. Frontiers Ecol Environ 8:314–21. doi:10.1890.090241Google Scholar
  17. Zerhouni EA (2005) Translational and clinical science—time for a new vision. N Engl J Med 353(15):1621–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© AESS 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Environment and SocietyUtah State UniversityLoganUSA
  2. 2.Department of BiologyUtah State UniversityLoganUSA

Personalised recommendations