Sustainability science graduate students as boundary spanners

  • Spencer R. Meyer
  • Vanessa R. Levesque
  • Karen Hutchins Bieluch
  • Michelle L. Johnson
  • Bridie McGreavy
  • Stacia Dreyer
  • Hollie Smith


Graduate training in sustainability science (SS) focuses on interdisciplinary research, stakeholder-researcher partnerships, and creating solutions from knowledge. But becoming a sustainability scientist also requires specialized training that addresses the complex boundaries implicit in sustainability science approaches to solving social-ecological system challenges. Using boundary spanning as a framework, we use a case study of the Sustainability Solutions Initiative (SSI) at the University of Maine to explicate key elements for graduate education training in SS. We used a mixed-methods approach, including a quantitative survey and autoethnographic reflection, to analyze our experiences as SSI doctoral students. Through this research, we identified four essential SS boundaries that build on core sustainability competencies which need to be addressed in SS graduate programs, including: disciplines within academia, students and their advisors, researchers and stakeholders, and place-based and generalizable research. We identified key elements of training necessary to help students understand and navigate these boundaries using core competencies. We then offer six best practice recommendations to provide a basis for a SS education framework. Our reflections are intended for academic leaders in SS who are training new scientists to solve complex sustainability challenges. Our experiences as a cohort of doctoral students with diverse academic and professional backgrounds provide a unique opportunity to reflect not only on the challenges of SS but also on the specific needs of students and programs striving to provide solutions.


Sustainability Graduate education Interdisciplinary research Boundary spanning Organizational innovation Problem-solving competencies 



This research was entirely funded by the Maine Sustainability Solutions Initiative (National Science Foundation Grant No. EPS-0904155). We thank Thomas Parr for his encouragement to conduct this study. We thank our SSI colleagues Mark Anderson, Susan Gardner, and Linda Silka for thoughtful reviews of the earlier versions of this manuscript. It was also greatly improved through comments by several anonymous reviewers. Finally, we are grateful for the mentoring and support of our faculty advisors and the SSI leadership, especially David Hart.


  1. Allen JH, Beaudoin F, Lloyd-Pool E, Sherman J (2014) Pathways to sustainability careers: building capacity to solve complex problems. Sustain J Rec 7(1):47–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Armstrong L, Loomis C, Mairena-Torres E (2012) Is participatory research compatible with graduate research? Reflections from three stakeholders. Glob J Community Psychol Prac 3:1–10Google Scholar
  3. Bäckstrand K (2003) Civic science for sustainability: reframing the role of experts, policy-makers and citizens in environmental governance. Glob Environ Polit 3:24–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barth M, Godemann J, Rieckmann M, Stoltenberg U (2007) Developing key competencies for sustainable development in higher education. Int J Sustain High Educ 8(4):416–430Google Scholar
  5. Borrego M, Newswander LK (2010) Definitions of interdisciplinary research: toward graduate-level interdisciplinary learning outcomes. Rev High Educ 34:61–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brundiers K, Wiek A (2013) Do we teach what we preach? An international comparison of problem-and project-based learning courses in sustainability. Sustainability 5(4):1725–1746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bruntland Commission (1987) Our common future. World Commission on Environment and Development, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  8. Cash DW, Clark WC, Alcock F, Dickson NM, Eckley N, Guston DH, Jäger J, Mitchell RB (2003) Knowledge systems for sustainable development. Proc Natl Acad Sci 100:8086–8091CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Clark WC (2007) Sustainability science: a room of its own. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104:1737–1738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clark WC, Dickson NM (2003) Sustainability science: the emerging research program. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100:8059–8061CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Clark, W. C., Tomich, T. P., van Noordwijk, M., Guston, D., Catacutan, D., Dickson, N. M., McNie, E. (2011), Boundary work for sustainable development: natural resource management at the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR), Proc Natl Acad Sci U S AGoogle Scholar
  12. Creswell JW (2003) Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches, 2nd edn. SageGoogle Scholar
  13. De Haan G (2006) The BLK ‘21’ programme in Germany: a ‘Gestaltungskompetenz’-based model for education for sustainable development. Environ Educ Res 12(1)Google Scholar
  14. Evans J, Randalls S (2008) Geography and paratactical interdisciplinarity: views from the ESRC–NERC PhD studentship programme. Geoforum 39:581–592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gardner SK, Jansujwicz J, Hutchins K, Cline B, Levesque V (2012) Interdisciplinary doctoral student socialization. Int J Doctoral Stud 7:377–394Google Scholar
  16. Gieryn TF (1983) Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. Am Sociol Rev 48:781–795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Graybill JK, Dooling S, Shandas V, Withey J, Greve A, Simon GL (2006) A rough guide to interdisciplinarity: graduate student perspectives. Bioscience 56:757–763CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hart, D. D., K. P. Bell, L. A. Lindenfeld, S. Jain, T. R. Johnson, D. Ranco, and B. McGill. (2015). Strengthening the role of universities in addressing sustainability challenges: the Mitchell Center for Sustainability Solutions as an institutional experiment. Ecol Soc 20(2), 4.
  19. Holley K (2009) The challenge of an interdisciplinary curriculum: a cultural analysis of a doctoral-degree program in neuroscience. High Educ 58:241–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Israel BA, Schulz AJ, Parker EA, Becker AB (1998) Review of community-based research: assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annu Rev Public Health 19(1):173–202. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.19.1.173 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jasanoff SS (1987) Contested boundaries in policy-relevant science. Soc Stud Sci 17:195–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kajikawa Y (2008) Research core and framework of sustainability science. Sustain Sci 3:215–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kajikawa Y, Tacoa F, Yamaguchi K (2014) Sustainability science: the changing landscape of sustainability research. Sustain Sci 9(4):431–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kates RW (2011) What kind of a science is sustainability science? Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108:19449–19450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kates RW, Clark WC, Corell R, Hall JM, Jaeger CC, Lowe I, McCarthy JJ, Schellnhuber HJ, Bolin B, Dickson NM, Faucheux S, Gallopin GC, Grübler A, Huntley B, Jäger J, Jodah NS, Kasperson RE, Mabogunje A, Matson P, Mooney H, Moore B, O’Riordan T, Svedin U (2001) Sustainability science. Science 292:641–642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kueffer C, Underwood E, Hirsch Hadorn G, Holderegger R, Lehning M, Pohl C, Schirmer M, Schwarzenbach R, Stauffacher M, Wuelser G, Edwards P (2012) Enabling effective problem-oriented research for sustainable development. Ecol Soc 17(4)Google Scholar
  27. Lang DJ, Wiek A, Bergmann M, Stauffacher M, Martens P, Moll P, Thomas CJ (2012) Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: practice, principles, and challenges. Sustain Sci 7(1):25–43. doi: 10.1007/s11625-011-0149-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. McGreavy B, Hutchins K, Smith H, Lindenfeld L, Silka L (2013) Addressing the complexities of boundary work in sustainability science through communication. Sustainability 5(10):4195–4221. doi: 10.3390/su5104195 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. McGreavy, B., Lindenfeld, L., Bieluch, K., Silka, L., Leahy, J., & Zoellick, B. (2015) Communication and sustainability science teams as complex systems. Ecol Soc 20(1), 2.
  30. Miller TR (2013) Constructing sustainability science: emerging perspectives and research trajectories. Sustain Sci 8:279–293. doi: 10.1007/s11625-012-0180-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Miller TR, Baird TD, Littlefield CM, Kofinas G, Chapin FS, Redman CL (2008) Epistemological pluralism: reorganizing interdisciplinary research. Ecol Soc 13(2)Google Scholar
  32. Moslemi JM, Capps KA, Johnson MS, Maul J, McIntyre PB, Melvin AM, Vadas TM, Vallano DM, Watkins JM, Weiss M (2009) Training tomorrow’s environmental problem solvers: an integrative approach to graduate education. Bioscience 59:514–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. National Science Foundation. (2012), Doctorate recipients from U.S. universities, available at: (accessed 2 January 2014)
  34. Palmer M (2012) Socioenvironmental sustainability and actionable science. Bioscience 62(1):5–6. doi: 10.1525/bio.2012.62.1.2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Polk M (2014) Achieving the promise of transdisciplinarity: a critical exploration of the relationship between transdisciplinary research and societal problem solving. Sustain Sci 9:1–13. doi: 10.1007/s11625-014-0247-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Reich SM, Reich JA (2006) Cultural competence in interdisciplinary collaborations: a method for respecting diversity in research partnerships. Am J Community Psychol 38:51–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rittel HWJ, Webber MM (1973) Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sci 4:155–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schmidt AH, Robbins AST, Combs JK, Freeburg A, Jesperson RG, Rogers HS, Sheldon KS, Wheat E (2012) A new model for training graduate students to conduct interdisciplinary, interorganizational, and international research. Bioscience 62:296–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Schoolman ED, Guest JS, Bush KF, Bell AR (2012) How interdisciplinary is sustainability research? Analyzing the structure of an emerging scientific field. Sustain Sci 7:67–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Silka L (1999) Paradoxes of partnership: reflections on university-community partnerships. In: Kleniewski N, Rabrenovic G (eds) Research in politics and society: community politics and policies. JAI Press, pp. 335–359Google Scholar
  41. Tress B, Tress G, Fry G (2009) Integrative research on environmental and landscape change: PhD students’ motivations and challenges. J Environ Manag 90:2921–2929CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. [USCB] US Census Bureau. (2010) Urban and rural classification, available at: (accessed 9 December 2013)
  43. van Kerkhoff L (2014) Developing integrative research for sustainability science through a complexity principles-based approach. Sustain Sci 9(2):143–155. doi: 10.1007/s11625-013-0203-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. van Kerkhoff L, Lebel L (2006) Linking knowledge and action for sustainable development. Annu Rev Environ Resour 31:445–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wagner HH, Murphy MA, Holderegger R, Waits L (2012) Developing an interdisciplinary, distributed graduate course for twenty-first century scientists. Bioscience 62:182–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Weber EP, Khademian AM (2008) Wicked problems, knowledge challenges, and collaborative capacity builders in network settings. Public Adm Rev 68:334–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Weerts DJ, Sandmann LR (2010) Community engagement and boundary spanning roles at public research universities. J High Educ 81:632–657Google Scholar
  48. Weidman JC, Twale DJ, Stein EL (2001) Socialization of graduate and professional students in higher education: A perilous passage? ASHE–ERIC High Educ Rep 28(3)Google Scholar
  49. Whitmer A, Ogden L, Lawton J, Sturner P, Groffman PM, Schneider L, Hart D, Halpern B, Schlesinger W, Raciti S, Bettez N, Ortega S, Rustad L, Pickett S, Killilea M (2010) The engaged university: providing a platform for research that transforms society. Front Ecol Environ 8:314–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wiek A, Bernstein MJ, Foley R, Cohen M, Forrest N, Kuzdas C, Keeler L (2015) Operationalising competencies in higher education for sustainable development. In: Barth M, Michelsen G, Rieckmann M, Thomas I (eds) Handbook of higher education. RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  51. Wiek A, Withycombe L, Redman CL (2011) Key competencies in sustainability: a reference framework for academic program development. Sustain Sci 6(2):203–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© AESS 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Spencer R. Meyer
    • 1
  • Vanessa R. Levesque
    • 2
  • Karen Hutchins Bieluch
    • 3
  • Michelle L. Johnson
    • 4
  • Bridie McGreavy
    • 5
  • Stacia Dreyer
    • 6
  • Hollie Smith
    • 7
  1. 1.Yale School of Forestry and Environmental StudiesNew HavenUSA
  2. 2.School of EconomicsUniversity of MaineOronoUSA
  3. 3.Environmental Studies ProgramDartmouth CollegeHanoverUSA
  4. 4.U.S. Forest ServiceNew York City Urban Field StationNew YorkUSA
  5. 5.Department of Communication and JournalismUniversity of MaineOronoUSA
  6. 6.School of Marine and Environmental AffairsUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA
  7. 7.Department of Communication Studies, Harrington School of Communication and MediaUniversity of Rhode IslandKingstonUSA

Personalised recommendations