Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences

, Volume 5, Issue 3, pp 432–444 | Cite as

Civil society, corporate power, and food security: counter-revolutionary efforts that limit social change

Article

Abstract

Food is produced, processed, packaged, transported, and sold in a stable, organized system or food regime. The current food regime is focused on calories empty of substantial nutrition designed primarily for the growth of capital and corporate power, fostered through the lax, often corporate-designed, regulatory environment of neoliberalism. The neoliberal food regime is responsible for systemic malnutrition and erosion of the ecological preconditions for food production, as a regularity of the system itself. Consequently, a main line of food vulnerability is the political system that insulates the current food regime from social forces demanding change. This insecurity is contrary to the public or larger human interest, but this unsustainable system remains in place through a stable arrangement of government prescriptions that follow corporate-elite interests. To understand this structural problem, this essay examines the power of the food industry which requires the manufactured consent of civil society. The paper finds that counter-revolutionary efforts, which are anticipatory and reactive efforts that defend and protect capitalist elite from social change, stabilize the neoliberal food regime through covert tactics meant to undermine public interest critics and activists. As a result of these elite-led interventions, true civil society has become less powerful to articulate a public interest that might otherwise intercede in the operation and structure of the food regime. Thus, one leverage point in this political problem is the capacity of civil society, once it is independent of corporate interests, to remove consent to an abusive system and to debate and demand a food system that neither systematically starves whole groups of people nor destroys the ecological systems that make food possible. Building food security, then, requires recapturing a semi-autonomous civil society and eliminating domination of the corporate elite and replacing it with politics aligned with a public and ecological affinity. Scholars, educators, and the public can reduce the food vulnerability by becoming aware of corporate interests and creating strategic alliances to form a new system with more humane and ecological priorities.

Keywords

Food security Gramsci Counter-revolutionary movements Social change Food regime Neoliberalism 

References

  1. Alkon AH, Agyeman J (2011) Cultivating food justice: race, class, and sustainability. MITGoogle Scholar
  2. Andrée P (2005) The genetic engineering revolution in agriculture and food: strategies of the ‘biotech bloc’. In: Levy DL, Newell PJ (eds) The business of global environmental governance. MIT, Cambridge, pp 135–166Google Scholar
  3. ASPCA (2015) Ag-gag bills at the state level. American Society for Prevention of Cruelty to Animals. https://www.aspca.org/fight-cruelty/advocacy-center/ag-gag-whistleblower-suppression-legislation/ag-gag-bills-state-level.
  4. Bhuyan S (2000) Corporate political activities and oligopoly welfare loss. Rev Ind Organ 17(4):411–426. doi:10.1023/A:1007843812053 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Buttel FH (2001) Some reflections on late twentieth century agrarian political economy. Soc Ruralis 41(2):165–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carlson C (2012) The ag gag laws: hiding factory farm abuses from public scrutiny. Atlantic 20Google Scholar
  7. Carolan MS (2013) Reclaiming food security. Earthscan Food and Agriculture. Earthscan/Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  8. Carpenter SR, Stanley EH, Vander Zanden MJ (2011) State of the world’s freshwater ecosystems: physical, chemical, and biological changes. Annu Rev Environ Resour 36(1):75–99. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-021810-094524 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carroll WK (2009) Transnationalists and national networkers in the global corporate elite. Global Networks 9(3):289–314. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0374.2008.00255.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Centeno MA, Cohen JN (2012) The arc of neoliberalism. Annu Rev Sociol 38(1):317–340. doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-081309-150235 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Center for Consumer Freedom (2014) CCF warns congress not to fall for propaganda. https://www.consumerfreedom.com/print-ad/ccf-warns-congress-not-to-fall-for-propaganda/. Accessed 25 Nov 2014
  12. Clapp J, Helleiner E (2012) Troubled futures? The global food crisis and the politics of agricultural derivatives regulation. Rev Int Polit Econ 19(2):181–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Coleman-Jensen A, Nord M, Andrews M, Carlson S (2011) Household food security in the United States in 2010. USDA-ERS Economic Research Report (125)Google Scholar
  14. Conway GR, Pretty JN (2013) Unwelcome harvest: agriculture and pollution. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Corson C (2010) Shifting environmental governance in a neoliberal world: US AID for conservation. Antipode 42(3):576–602. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8330.2010.00764.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dauvergne P, LeBaron G (2014) Protest Inc.: the corporatization of activism. WileyGoogle Scholar
  17. Day RJF (2005) Gramsci is dead: anarchist currents in the newest social movements. Pluto, LondonGoogle Scholar
  18. Dirzo R, Raven PH (2003) Global state of biodiversity and loss. Annu Rev Environ Resour 28(1):137–167. doi:10.1146/annurev.energy.28.050302.105532 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Evans W (2008) Profile: coalition for a democratic workplace. National Public Radio. Retrieved from http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=94399074. Accessed 25 June 2015
  20. Friedmann H (1982) The political economy of food: the rise and fall of the postwar international food order. Amer J Sociol 88 (article type: research article/issue title: Supplement: Marxist inquiries: studies of labor, class, and states/full publication date: 1982/Copyright © 1982. The University of Chicago Press):S248-S286. doi: 10.2307/3083245
  21. Friedmann H (1992) Distance and durability: shaky foundations of the world food economy. Third World Q 13(2):371–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gramsci A (2011) Prison notebooks. vol 1-3, Paperback edn. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Greenhouse S (2014) Advocates for workers raise the ire of business. The New York Times, January 17, 2014, p B1Google Scholar
  24. Harvey D (2005) A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  25. Holt-giménez E (2008) Out of AGRA: the green revolution returns to Africa. Development 51(4):464–471. doi:10.1057/dev.2008.49 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Howard PH (2009) Visualizing consolidation in the global seed industry: 1996–2008. Sustainability 1(4):1266–1287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Indigenous Peoples Global Conference On Rio+20 and Mother Earth (2012) Kari-Oca 2 Declaration. Rio de Janeiro, BrazilGoogle Scholar
  28. Ingram J, Ericksen P, Liverman D (eds) (2010) Food security and global environmental change. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  29. Jacobs D (2014) Rising income inequality in the US was fuelled by Ronald Reagan’s attacks on union strength, and continued by Bill Clinton’s financial deregulation. LSE American Politics and PolicyGoogle Scholar
  30. Jacques PJ (2006) The rearguard of modernity: environmental skepticism as a struggle of citizenship. Global Environ Polit 6(1):76–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jacques PJ (2009) Environmental skepticism: ecology, power, and public life. Global Environmental Governance. Ashgate Publishing Ltd., Burlington; SurreyGoogle Scholar
  32. Jacques P (2015) Sustainability: the basics. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  33. Jacques PJ, Dunlap RE, Freeman M (2008) The organization of denial: conservative think tanks and environmental scepticism. Environ Polit 17(3):349–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kim CS, Hallahan C, Schaible G, Schluter G (2001) Economic analysis of the changing structure of the U.S. flour milling industry. Agribusiness 17(1):161–171. doi:10.1002/1520-6297(200124)17:1<161::aid-agr1008>3.0.co;2-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kokic P, Crimp S, Howden M (2014) A probabilistic analysis of human influence on recent record global mean temperature changes. Climate Risk Manage 3:1–12. doi:10.1016/j.crm.2014.03.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Landfried J (2012) Bound & gagged: potential first amendment challenges to ag-gag laws. Duke Envtl L Pol’y F 23:377Google Scholar
  37. Levy DL, Newell PJ (2005) A neo-Gramscian approach to business in international environmental politics: an interdisciplinary, multilevel framework. In: Levy DL, Newell PJ (eds) The business of global environmental governance. MIT, Cambridge, pp 47–69Google Scholar
  38. Lipton E (2014) Hard-nosed advice from veteran lobbyist: ‘win ugly or lose pretty’: Richard Berman energy industry talk secretly taped. NY Times 31:A19Google Scholar
  39. Lukes S (1974) Power: a radical view. Macmillan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  40. Maniates MF (2001) Individualization: plant a tree, buy a bike, save the world? Global Environ Polit 1(3):31–52. doi:10.1162/152638001316881395 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Marcuse H (1972) Counterrevolution & revolt. Beacon, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  42. Mayer CE, Joyce A (2005) The escalating obesity wars: nonprofit’s tactics, funding sources spark controversy. The Washington PostGoogle Scholar
  43. McMichael P (2005) Global development and the corporate food regime. Res Rural Sociol Dev 11:265–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. McMichael P (2009a) A food regime analysis of the ‘world food crisis’. Agr Human Values 26(4):281–295. doi:10.1007/s10460-009-9218-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. McMichael P (2009b) A food regime genealogy. J Peasant Stud 36(1):139–169. doi:10.1080/03066150902820354 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Milanovic B (2011) Worlds apart: measuring international and global inequality. Princeton University Press, PrincetonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Moss M (2015) U.S. research lab lets livestock suffer in quest for profit. The New York Times, January 20, 2015, pp A1, A12, A13Google Scholar
  48. Mushita A, Thompson C (2007) Biopiracy of biodiversity: global exchange as enclosure. Africa World Press, Inc., TrentonGoogle Scholar
  49. Nestle M (2013) Food politics: how the food industry influences nutrition and health. 10th Anniversary Edition edn. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  50. Pechlaner G, Otero G (2010) The neoliberal food regime: neoregulation and the new division of labor in North America. Rural Sociol 75(2):179–208. doi:10.1111/j.1549-0831.2009.00006.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Pijl K (1989) Ruling classes, hegemony, and the state system: theoretical and historical considerations. Int J Polit Econ 19(3):7–35. doi:10.2307/40470522 Google Scholar
  52. Piketty T (2014) Capital in the twenty-first century (trans: Goldhammer A). The Bellnap Press of Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  53. Piketty T, Saez E (2013) Top incomes and the great recession: recent evolutions and policy implications. IMF Econ Rev 61(3):456–478. doi:10.1057/imfer.2013.14 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Piketty T, Saez E (2014) Inequality in the long run. Science 344(6186):838–843. doi:10.1126/science.1251936 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Putnam RD (2000) Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community. Simon and Schuster, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Ridgeway S, Jacques P (2013) The power of the talking stick: indigenous politics and the world ecological crisis. Paradigm, BoulderGoogle Scholar
  57. Robbins P (2007) Lawn people: how grasses, weeds, and chemicals make us who we are. Temple University Press, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  58. Robertson GP, Vitousek PM (2009) Nitrogen in agriculture: balancing the cost of an essential resource. Annu Rev Environ Resour 34(1):97–125. doi:10.1146/annurev.environ.032108.105046 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Rogers RT (2001) Structural change in U.S. food manufacturing, 1958–1997. Agribusiness 17(1):3–32. doi:10.1002/1520-6297(200124)17:1<3::aid-agr1001>3.0.co;2-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Ruggie JG (1982) International regimes, transactions, and change: embedded liberalism in the postwar economic order. Int Organ 36(2):379–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Sareen A (2014) Animal rights and the erosion of the first amendment: AETA, ag-gag and why you should care. Huffington PostGoogle Scholar
  62. Scholte JA (2013) Civil society and financial markets: what is not happening and why. J Civ Soc 9(2):129–147. doi:10.1080/17448689.2013.788925 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Schroeter JR (1990) Measuring market power in food-processing industries: discussion. Am J Agric Econ 72(5):1227–1229. doi:10.2307/1242537 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Stuckler D, Nestle M (2012) Big food, food systems, and global health. PLoS Med 9(6):e1001242. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001242 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Sutherland B (2015) Monsanto-Syngenta mega-merger would drive more deals: real M&A. Bloomberg Business NewsGoogle Scholar
  66. Thompson CB (2014) Philanthrocapitalism: appropriation of Africa’s genetic wealth. Rev African Polit Econ 41(141):389–405. doi:10.1080/03056244.2014.901946 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. UN Food an Agriculture Organisation, International Fund for Agricultural Development (2014) The state of food insecurity in the world 2014. Strengthening the enabling environment for food security and nutrition. FAO Rome, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  68. van der Pijl K, Yurchenko Y (2014) Neoliberal entrenchment of North Atlantic capital. From Corporate self-regulation to state capture. New Polit Economy 1-23. doi: 10.1080/13563467.2014.923827
  69. Walker ET (2014) Grassroots for hire: the reshaping of participation and policy. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  70. Ward CE (1988) Meatpacking competition and pricing. Research Institute on Livestock Pricing, BlacksburgGoogle Scholar
  71. Werkheiser I, Noll S (2014) From food justice to a tool of the status quo: three sub-movements within local food. J Agr Environ Eth 27(2):201–210. doi:10.1007/s10806-013-9459-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Yang D, Kanae S, Oki T, Koike T, Musiake K (2003) Global potential soil erosion with reference to land use and climate changes. HyPr 17(14):2913–2928Google Scholar

Copyright information

© AESS 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceUniversity of Central FloridaOrlandoUSA

Personalised recommendations