Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences

, Volume 6, Issue 4, pp 748–752 | Cite as

Replacing nature in environmental studies and sciences

  • James D. ProctorEmail author


The concept and practice of place is an important answer to two questions posed at the outset: what is the environment of environmental studies and sciences (ESS), and what sort of ecoliteracy do we need today? Yet place is more than it has often been understood in ESS, where notions of the local and the natural have loomed large. Scholarship from the field of geography can help ESS reframe environment and ecoliteracy in a manner amenable to the contemporary world. Place has been a century-long conversation in English-language geography, building on traditional regional approaches and running to recent work, paralleling contemporary notions of geographical imaginations, in which places are now understood as diverse nodes in larger hybrid nature-culture networks, and senses of place are now understood as “glocal” identities. Contemporary geographical approaches to place challenge common associations with nature and the local; and ESS may feel a bit like “everything studies and sciences” as a result. But ecoliteracy could become a new knowledge and practice of the larger connections that define place, and this deeper sense of place could suggest to our students a deeper way of dwelling on Earth.


Place Geography Environment Ecoliteracy 



The Andrew Mellon Foundation has provided significant support to help us develop and integrate a geographically informed approach to place in the Environmental Studies Program curriculum at Lewis & Clark. I acknowledge useful input on an earlier version from two anonymous reviewers and the guest editor, Brandn Green. Several other essays in this mini-symposium adopt broadly similar arguments regarding place, and further develop critiques of nature and the local; readers may turn to these essays for additional clarification. Finally, the many conversations I have had with geographers, starting with my Berkeley graduate school cohort and reaching to the present day, continue to be a source of intellectual inspiration as we collectively ponder nature/culture and the global/local.


  1. Abram D (1997) The spell of the sensuous: perception and language in a more-than-human world. Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Abram D (2011) Becoming animal: an earthly cosmology. Vintage Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Barnes TJ (2004) Placing ideas: genius loci, heterotopia and geography’s quantitative revolution. Prog Hum Geogr 28:565–595. doi: 10.1191/0309132504ph506oa CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Becker M (2014) Warming temperatures threaten fragile balance in Canadian Arctic. N. Y. Times. Accessed 29 Sept 2014
  5. Berg P (1978) Reinhabiting a separate country: a bioregional anthology of northern California. Planet Drum Foundation, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  6. Clifford N (2008) Place: Connections and boundaries in an interdependent world. In: Clifford N, Holloway S, Rice SP, Valentine G (eds) Key concepts in geography. SAGE Publications Ltd, London, pp 153–172Google Scholar
  7. Cochrane JH (2011) Understanding policy in the great recession: some unpleasant fiscal arithmetic. Eur Econ Rev 55:2–30. doi: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2010.11.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cresswell T (2004) Place: a short introduction. Blackwell, MaldenGoogle Scholar
  9. Entrikin JN (1991) The betweenness of place: towards a geography of modernity. Macmillan, BasingstokeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gillis J (2014) Global rise reported in 2013 greenhouse gas emissions. N. Y. Times. Accessed 29 Sept 2014
  11. Gorman J (2014) For polar bears, a climate change twist. N. Y. Times. Accessed 29 Sept 2014
  12. Gregory D (1996) Geographical imaginations. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  13. Hartshorne R (1939) The nature of geography. Association of American Geographers, LancasterGoogle Scholar
  14. Harvey D (1973) Social justice and the city. Edward Arnold, LondonGoogle Scholar
  15. Harvey D (1990) Between space and time: reflections on the geographical imagination. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 80:418–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Heise UK (2008) Sense of place and sense of planet: the environmental imagination of the global. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Holliday R (2006) Epigenetics: a historical overview. Epigenetics 1:76–80. doi: 10.4161/epi.1.2.2762 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jonas AEG (2012) Region and place: regionalism in question. Prog Hum Geogr 36:263–272. doi: 10.1177/0309132510394118 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jonas AEG (2013) Place and region III: alternative regionalisms. Prog Hum Geogr 37:822–828. doi: 10.1177/0309132513479088 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Latour B (2004) Politics of nature: how to bring the sciences into democracy. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  21. Massey D (1991) A global sense of place. Marx Today 35:24–29Google Scholar
  22. McGinnis MV (1998) Bioregionalism. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Mills CW (1959) The sociological imagination. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  24. Orr DW (1992) Ecological literacy: education and the transition to a postmodern world. SUNY Press, Albany, NYGoogle Scholar
  25. Parsons JJ (1985) On “bioregionalism” and “watershed consciousness”*. Prof Geogr 37:1–6. doi: 10.1111/j.0033-0124.1985.00001.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Proctor JD (1998) The social construction of nature: relativist accusations, pragmatist and critical realist responses. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 88:352–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Proctor JD (2009a) Environment after nature: time for a new vision. In: Proctor JD (ed) Envisioning nature, science, and religion. Templeton Press, West Conshohocken, pp 293–311Google Scholar
  28. Proctor JD (2009b) Old growth and a new nature: the ambivalence of science and religion. In: Spies TA, Duncan SL (eds) Old growth in a new world: A Pacific Northwest icon reexamined. Island Press, Washington, pp 104–115Google Scholar
  29. Proctor JD (2013) Saving nature in the anthropocene. J Environ Stud Sci 3:83–92. doi: 10.1007/s13412-013-0108-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Proctor JD, Clark SG, Smith KK, Wallace RL (2013) A manifesto for theory in environmental studies and sciences. J Environ Stud Sci 3:331–337. doi: 10.1007/s13412-013-0122-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sack RD (1992) Place, modernity, and the consumer’s world: a relational framework for geographical analysis. Johns Hopkins University Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  32. Sale K (1985) Dwellers in the land: the bioregional vision. Sierra Club Books, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  33. Singer P (1972) Famine, affluence, and morality. Philos Public Aff 1:229–243Google Scholar
  34. Taylor JB (2011) Macroeconomic lessons from the Great Deviation. In: Acemoglu D, Woodford M (eds) NBER macroeconomics annual 2010, vol 25. Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 387–395Google Scholar
  35. Thomashow M (1998) Toward a cosmopolitan bioregionalism. In: McGinnis MV (ed) Bioregionalism. Routledge, New York, pp 121–132Google Scholar
  36. Tomaney J (2014) Region and place I: institutions. Prog Hum Geogr 38:131–140. doi: 10.1177/0309132513493385 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tuan Y (1974) Topophilia: a study of environmental perception, attitudes, and values. Prentice-Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  38. Tuan Y (1977) Space and place: the perspective of experience. University of Minnesota Press, MinneapolisGoogle Scholar
  39. Unger N (2014) To save the planet, don’t plant trees. N. Y. Times. Accessed 29 Sept 2014

Copyright information

© AESS 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Environmental Studies ProgramLewis & Clark CollegePortlandUSA

Personalised recommendations