‘Glocal’ discussion as leverage. Debating urban sustainability in Bogotá

  • Manuel RiveraEmail author


Based on a joint project of IASS and the Botanical Garden of Bogotá, the research note discusses the outlook for global sustainability norms, objectives or standards to become meaningful at city level. The action research project comprised four conference and dialogue events, ex-ante expert interviews, and questionnaires to the general public of the events, which were evaluated mainly qualitatively with quantitative elements. The paper presents a few very first results of the case study. References to the global level can fulfill a legitimating function for certain local actors and programs and can work as a dialogue enabler; their applicability depends on the specific cultural contexts for sustainability topics; political polarization regarding these topics is risky, but also promising for transformational ambitions. The thesis that ‘think locally, act locally’ might be the better recipe for integrating global considerations into local action is therefore refuted. In the case of Bogotá, a city politically at odds with the nation it heads, sustainability transformations will definitely benefit from transdisciplinary contributions which involve international expertise.


Urban studies Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) Transdisciplinarity Bogotá Transformation 


  1. Alcaldía Mayor de Bogotá (2012) Bogotá Humana. Plan de Desarrollo 2012-2016, Bogotá.Google Scholar
  2. Andrade G, Remolina F, Wiesner D (2013) Assembling the pieces: a framework for the integration of multi-functional ecological main structure in the emerging urban region of Bogotá, Colombia. Urban Ecosyst 16:723–739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andrews CJ (2002) Humble analysis: the practice of joint fact-finding. Praeger, WestportGoogle Scholar
  4. Ardila G (2013) Personal Interview, 20 February, BogotáGoogle Scholar
  5. Bai X (2007) Integrating environmental concerns into urban management. the scale and readiness arguments. J Ind Ecol 11(2):15–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cámara de Comercio de Bogotá (CCB) (2012) Invest in Bogotá!Google Scholar
  7. Clark W.C. et al (2010) Toward a general theory of boundary work: insights from the CGIAR's Natural Resource Management Programs. HKS Working Paper (RWP10-035)Google Scholar
  8. UNDP Colombia (2011) Informe Nacional de desarrollo humano 2011: Colombia rural. Razones para la esperanza, BogotáGoogle Scholar
  9. Gibbons, M. and Nowotny, H., 2001. The potential of transdisciplinarity. In: J. Thompson Klein et al. (Editors), Transdisciplinarity: Joint Problem Solving among Science, Technology, and Society. Springer, pp. 67-80Google Scholar
  10. GSW Website: The Global Soil Forum. Accessed: 31 March 2014
  11. Gunz J (1996) Jacob L. Moreno and the origins of action research. Educ Action Res 4(1):145–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hirsch Hadorn G, Bradley D, Pohl C, Rist S, Wiesmann U (2006) Implications of transdisciplinarity for sustainability research. Ecol Econ 60:119–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hoff H (2011) Understanding the nexus. The water, energy and food security nexus. Stockholm Environment Institute, BonnGoogle Scholar
  14. In’t Veld RJ (2011) Transgovernance. The quest for governance of sustainable development. IASS, PotsdamGoogle Scholar
  15. JBJCM Website: Conversatorios para construir sostenibilidad. Accessed: 17 March 2014
  16. Kemmis S, McTaggart R (1982) The action research planner, 2nd edn. Deakin University Press, GeelongGoogle Scholar
  17. Lampis A (2013) Cities and climate change challenges: institutions, policy style and adaptation capacity in Bogotá. Int J Urban Reg Res 37(6):1879–1901CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lewin K (1946) Action research and minority problems. J Soc Issues 2(4):34–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores—República de Colombia (2011) Rio + 20: Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). A Proposal from the Governments of Colombia and GuatemalaGoogle Scholar
  20. Palacios M, Safford F (2002) Colombia: país fragmentado, sociedad dividida, Su Historia. Norma, BogotáGoogle Scholar
  21. Pohl C, Hirsch Hadorn G (2008) Methodological challenges of transdisciplinary research. Nat Sci Soc 16:111–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Prasad N (2009) Climate resilient cities, a primer on reducing vulnerabilites to disasters. The World Bank, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Rivera M (2014) Bogotá Humana - Die Stadt, der Müll und der Frieden. In: H.-J. Burchardt, O. Kaltmeier, and R. Öhlschläger (Editors), Urbane (T)Räume: Städte zwischen Kultur, Kommerz und Konflikt. Nomos, Baden-Baden Google Scholar
  24. Rivera M, Lagos A (2013) Establishing a Sustainable Development Goal on Cities, IASS Policy Brief 3/2013, PotsdamGoogle Scholar
  25. Rodríguez Becerra M, García Portilla J (2013) Las políticas de prosperidad económica y la adaptación al cambio climático: choque de locomotoras? In: Cárdenas M, Rodríguez M (eds) Desarrollo económico y adaptación al cambio climático. Fescol / FNA, Bogotá, pp 31–71Google Scholar
  26. Scholz RW, Lang DJ, Wiek A, Walter AI, Stauffacher M (2006) Transdisciplinary case studies as a means of sustainability learning. Int J Sustain High Educ 7(3):226–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Thompson Klein J (2004) Prospects for transdisciplinarity. Futures 36(4):515–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Townsend A (2013) Action research. The challenges of understanding and changing practice. Open University Press, Berkshire and New YorkGoogle Scholar
  29. Trading Economics Website. Accessed: 17 March 2014
  30. UN-Habitat (2013) State of the world’s cities 2012/13: prosperity of cities. UN-Habitat, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  31. von Barloewen C, Rivera M (2013) Einleitung. In: von Barloewen C, Rivera M, Töpfer K (eds) Nachhaltige Entwicklung in einer pluralen moderne. Lateinamerikanische Perspektiven. Matthes & Seitz, Berlin, pp 11–51Google Scholar

Copyright information

© AESS 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies (IASS)BerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations