Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences

, Volume 2, Issue 3, pp 205–221 | Cite as

The social cost of carbon in U.S. regulatory impact analyses: an introduction and critique

Article

Abstract

In 2010, as part of a rulemaking on efficiency standards, the U.S. government published its first estimates of the benefits of reducing CO2 emissions, referred to as the social cost of carbon (SCC). Using three climate economic models, an interagency task force concluded that regulatory impact analyses should use a central value of \$21 per metric ton of CO2 for the monetized benefits of emission reductions. In addition, it suggested that sensitivity analysis be carried out with values of \$5, \$35, and \$65. These estimates have been criticized for relying upon discount rates that are considered too high for intergenerational cost–benefit analysis, and for treating monetized damages equivalently between regions, without regard to income levels. We reestimate the values from the models (1) using a range of discount rates and methodologies considered more appropriate for the very long time horizons associated with climate change and (2) using a methodology that assigns “equity weights” to damages based upon relative income levels between regions—i.e., a dollar’s worth of damages occurring in a poor region is given more weight than one occurring in a wealthy region. Under our alternative discount rate specifications, we find an SCC 2.6 to over 12 times larger than the Working Group’s central estimate of \$21; results are similar when the government’s estimates are equity weighted. Our results suggest that regulatory impact analyses that use the government’s limited range of SCC estimates will significantly understate potential benefits of climate mitigation. This has important implications with respect to greenhouse gas standards, in which debates over their stringency focus critically on the benefits of regulations justifying the industry compliance costs.

Keywords

Social cost of carbon Cost–benefit analysis Climate change Regulatory impact analysis 

References

  1. Ackerman F, Stanton EA (2011) Climate economics: the state of the art. Stockholm Environment Institute—U.S. Center, Summerville, MAGoogle Scholar
  2. Ackerman F, Stanton EA, Hope C, Alberth S (2009) Did the Stern Review underestimate US and global climate damages? Energy Policy 37(7):2717–2721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anthoff D, Hepburn C, Tol R (2009) Equity weighting and the marginal damage costs of climate change. Ecol Econ 68(3):836–849CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arrow K (2000) A comment on cooper. The World Bank Research Observer 15(2)Google Scholar
  5. Azar C, Sterner T (1996) Discounting and distributional considerations in the context of global warming. Ecol Econ 19(2):169–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Arrow KJ, Cline WR, Maler KG, Munasinghe M, Squitieri R, Stiglitz JE (1996) Intertemporal equity, discounting, and economic efficiency. In: Bruce JP, Lee H, Haites EF (eds) Climate Change 1995: Economic and Social Dimensions of Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
  7. Clarkson R, Deyes K (2002) Estimating the social cost of carbon emissions. Government Economics Service Working Paper. HM Treasury, LondonGoogle Scholar
  8. Cochrane JH (2001) Asset pricing. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  9. Daly H, Cobb J (1989) For the common good. Beacon, BostonGoogle Scholar
  10. Dietz S, Hepburn C, Stern N (2009) Economics, ethics and climate change. In: Basu K, Kanbur R (eds) Arguments for a better world: essays in Honour of Amartya Sen (volume 2: Society Institutions and Development). Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  11. Fankhauser S, Tol R, Pearce DW (1997) The aggregation of climate change damages: a welfare theoretic approach. Environ Resour Econ 10(3):249–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fisher A, Hanemann M, Roberts M, Schlenker W (2012) The economic impacts of climate change: evidence from agricultural output and random fluctuations in weather: comment. American Economic ReviewGoogle Scholar
  13. Goodstein ES (2004) Economics and the environment, 3rd edn. Hoboken, NJ, WileyGoogle Scholar
  14. Hope C (2006) The marginal impact of CO2 from PAGE2002: an integrated assessment model incorporating the IPCC’s five reasons for concern. The Integrated Assessment Journal 6(1):19–56Google Scholar
  15. Hope C (2008) Optimal carbon emissions and the social cost of carbon under uncertainty. The Integrated Assessment Journal 8(1):107–122Google Scholar
  16. Howarth RB (2003) Discounting and uncertainty in climate change policy analysis. Land Economics 79(3):369–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ibbotson Associates (2001) Stocks, bonds, and inflation. Ibbotson Associates, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  18. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2007) Fourth Assessment Report Climate ChangeGoogle Scholar
  19. Kousky C, Kopp RE (2011) Risk premia and the social cost of carbon: a review. Economics: The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal. Discussion Paper No. 2011-19. http://www.economics-ejournal.org/economics/discussionpapers/2011-19
  20. Le Treut HR, Somerville I, Cubasch Y, Ding C, Mauritzen A, Mokssit, Peterson T, Prather M (2007). Historical overview of climate change. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  21. Lobell D, Schlenker W, Costa-Roberts J (2011) Climate trends and global crop production since 1980. Science 333(6042):616–620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lowe J (2008) Intergenerational wealth transfers and social discounting: supplementary greenbook guidance. UK Treasury. http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/d/4(5).pdf
  23. Mastrandrea M (2009) Calculating the benefits of climate policy: examining the assumptions of Integrated Assessment Models. Pew Center on Global Climate Change Working PaperGoogle Scholar
  24. Masur JS, Posner EA (2010) Climate regulation and the limits of cost–benefit analysis. John M. Olin Law & Economics Working Paper No. 525 and Public Law and Legal Theory Working Paper No. 315Google Scholar
  25. Newell R, Pizer W (2003) Discounting the distant future: how much do uncertain rates increase valuations? J Environ Econ Manag 46:52–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nordhaus W (2008) A question of balance: weighing the options on global warming policies. Yale University Press, Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
  27. Nordhaus W (2011) Estimates of the social cost of carbon: background and results from the RICE-2011 model. Cowles Foundation Discussion Paper No. 1826Google Scholar
  28. Nordhaus W, Boyer J (2000) Warming the world: economic models of global warming. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  29. Nordhaus W, Tobin J (1972) Is growth obsolete? In Economic research: retrospect and prospect Vol 5: Economic Growth, National Bureau of Economic ResearchGoogle Scholar
  30. Ramsey F (1928) A mathematical theory of saving. Econ J 38:543–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Roberts M, Schlenker W (2012) Is agricultural production becoming more or less sensitive to extreme heat? Evidence from U.S. corn and soybean yields. In: Fullerton D, Catherine, W (eds) The Design and Implementation of U.S. Climate Policy. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  32. Roe G, Baker M (2007) Why is climate sensitivity so unpredictable? Science 318:629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schlenker W, Roberts M (2009) Nonlinear temperature effects indicate severe damages to U.S. crop yields under climate change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106(37):15594–15598Google Scholar
  34. Stern N (2007) The Stern Review: the economics of climate change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, available online at http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/independent_reviews/stern_review_economics_climate_change/sternreview_index.cfm
  35. Sterner T, Persson UM (2008). An even sterner review: introducing relative prices into the discounting debate. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 2(1):61–76Google Scholar
  36. Talberth J, Cobb J, Slattery N (2007) The genuine progress indicator 2006: a tool for sustainable development. Redefining progress, Oakland, CAGoogle Scholar
  37. Tol R (2002a) Estimates of the damage costs of climate change. Part I: benchmark estimates. Environmental and Resource Economics 21:47–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tol R (2002b) Estimates of the damage costs of climate change. Part II: dynamic estimates. Environmental and Resource Economics 21:135–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tol R (2009) An analysis of mitigation as a response to climate change. Copenhagen Consensus on Climate. Discussion PaperGoogle Scholar
  40. Umweltbundesamt (2007) Okonomisch Bewertung von Umweltschaden: Methodenkonvention zur Schantzun externer Umweltkosten. DessauGoogle Scholar
  41. U.S. Department of Energy (2010) Energy conservation program: energy conservation standards for small electric motors. Fed Regist 75:10874–10948Google Scholar
  42. U.S. Energy Information Administration (2012) Levelized cost of new generation resources in the Annual Energy Outlook 2012. USEIA, Washington DC. www.eia.gov/forecasts/aeo/electricity_generation.cfm
  43. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2008) Technical support document on benefits of reducing GHG emissions. USEPA, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  44. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2011) The benefits and costs of the Clean Air Act from 1990 to 2020. USEPA, Washinton DCGoogle Scholar
  45. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2012) Standards of performance for greenhouse gas emissions for stationary sources; electricity utility generating units. Fed Regist 72:22392–22441Google Scholar
  46. U.S. Government (2010) Interagency Working Group on Social Cost of Carbon. Technical support document: social cost of carbon for regulatory impact analysis under Executive Order 12866Google Scholar
  47. U.S. Office of Management and Budget (September 17, 2003) Regulatory analysis (OMB Circular A-4)Google Scholar
  48. Weitzman M (2001) Gamma discounting. Am Econ Rev 91(1):260–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Zolatas X (1981) Economic growth and declining social welfare. New York University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© AESS 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Natural Resources Defense CouncilWashingtonUSA
  2. 2.Judge Business SchoolUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations