Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences

, Volume 1, Issue 3, pp 159–168

Sustainable fisheries: how externalities impact urban fishery management



An economic theory of externalities and Ostrom’s principle of benefits and costs equivalence is used to address the inter-agency tension that reduces the sustainability of a social–ecological system (SES). We examine environmental management challenges by analyzing who benefits and who pays for a man-made, common-pool fishery on Ship Creek in Anchorage, Alaska, and how this cost structure acts as a barrier to sustainability. The economic benefits of the fishery have been estimated and published, but the costs paid to mitigate the fishery’s biophysical effects on the SES are undocumented. We focus on quantifying the fishery’s externalities, which are paid for by public infrastructure providers who do not receive benefits from the fishery and therefore exhibit social distrust and a lack of cooperation. This information is used in conjunction with a property rights regime of the SES to construct a new cost-sharing framework that provides decision makers with an economic incentive to increase the sustainability of the fishery.


Sustainability Sustainable development Social–ecological system Urban stream management Robustness Externality Cost sharing Cooperation Sport fishery Hatchery Salmon 


  1. Acheson JM (2003) Capturing the commons: devising institutions to manage the Maine lobster industry. University Press of New England, LebanonGoogle Scholar
  2. Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (ADEC) (2004) Total maximum daily load (TMDL) for fecal coliform in the waters of ship creek in Anchorage, Alaska. Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation, Anchorage, Alaska. Available at Accessed 19 May 2010
  3. Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (ADEC) (2010) Alaska’s Final 2010 Integrated Water Quality Monitoring and Assessment Report. Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation, Anchorage, Alaska. Available at Accessed 17 May 2011
  4. Alaska Department of Fish and Game (ADFG) (2008) Elmendorf State Fish Hatchery. Sport Fish Division, Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Anchorage, Alaska. Available at Accessed 5 May 2010
  5. Alaska Department of Fish and Game (ADFG) (2009) 10 year recap—Receipts (gross) sales statistics for sport licenses, stamps, and big game tags reported sold. Sport Fish Division, Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Anchorage, Alaska. Available at Accessed 17 May 2011
  6. Alaska Railroad Corporation (ARRC) (2000–2008) Annual reports. Alaska Railroad Corporation, Anchorage, AK. Available at Accessed 19 May 2010
  7. Anchorage Waterways Council (AWC) (2000–2008) Anchorage Waterways Council Annual Budget Reports. Anchorage, AlaskaGoogle Scholar
  8. Anderies JM, Janssen MA, Ostrom E (2004) A framework to analyze the robustness of social–ecological systems from an institutional perspective. Ecol Soc 9(1):18Google Scholar
  9. Anderies JM, Ryan P, Walker BH (2006) Loss of resilience, crisis, and institutional change: lessons from an intensive agricultural system in Southeastern Australia. Ecosystems 9(6):865–878. doi:10.1007/s10021-006-0017-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Azad MdAS, Ancev T (2010) Using ecological indices to measure economic and environmental performance of irrigated agriculture. Ecol Econ 69(8):1731–1739. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.04.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Balsman DM, Shoup DE (2008) Opportunities for urban fishing: developing urban fishing programs to recruit and retain urban anglers. Am Fish Soc Symp 67:31–40Google Scholar
  12. Bator FM (1958) The anatomy of market failure. Q J Econ 72(3):351–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Baumol WJ, Oates WE (1988) Theory of environmental policy, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Berkes F, Folke C (eds) (1998) Linking sociological and ecological systems: management practices and social mechanisms for building resilience. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Berkes F, Colding J, Folke C (2003) Navigating social–ecological systems: building resilience for complexity and change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  16. Bromley DW (1989) Economic interests and institutions: the conceptual foundations of public policy. Basil Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  17. California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) (2010) Hatchery Operations, Final DFG Environmental Impact Report (EIR)/Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). Available at Accessed 18 May 2011
  18. Campbell M (2010) Hatchery will bring more and bigger sport fish. Anchorage, AK: Anchorage Daily News, July 20, 2010Google Scholar
  19. Coase R (1960) The problem of social cost. J Law Econ 3:1–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Daly HE, Cobb JB Jr (1989) For the common good. Beacon, BostonGoogle Scholar
  21. Dasgupta P, Mäler KG (2004) The economics of non-convex ecosystems. Kluwer, DordrechtCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dietz T, Ostrom E, Stern PC (2003) The struggle to govern the commons. Science 302:1907–1912CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Finlayson AC, McCay B (1998) Crossing the threshold of ecosystem resilience: the commercial extinction of northern cod. In: Berkes F, Folke C, Colding J (eds) Linking social and ecological systems: management practices and social mechanisms for building resilience. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 311–337Google Scholar
  24. Folke C (2004) Traditional knowledge in social–ecological systems. Ecol Soc 9(3):7. Available at Google Scholar
  25. Gadgil M (1987) Diversity: cultural and biological. Trends Ecol Evol 2(12):369–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gadgil M, Berkes F, Folke C (1993) Indigenous knowledge for biodiversity conservation. Ambio 22(2–3):151–156Google Scholar
  27. Gunderson LH, Holling CS (2002) Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Island, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  28. Gunderson LH, Pritchard L (2002) Resilience and the behavior of large-scale systems. Island, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  29. Hanna SS (1996) Designing institutions for the environment. Environ Dev Econ 1(1):122–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hanna SS (1998) Institutions for marine ecosystems: economic incentives and fishery management. Ecol App 8(1, Supplement):S10–S174Google Scholar
  31. Hanna SS (1999) Strengthening governance of ocean fishery resources. Ecol Econ 31:275–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hanna SS (2008) Institutions for managing resilient salmon (Oncorhynchus spp.) ecosystems: the role of incentives and transaction costs. Ecol Soc 13(2):35. Available at Google Scholar
  33. Hardin G (1968) The tragedy of the commons. Science 162:1243–1248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jodha NS (1993) Property rights and development. Beijer Discussion Paper Series Number 41, The Beijer International Institute of Ecological Economics, the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  35. Kerr J (2002) Sharing the benefits of watershed management in Sukhomajri, India. In: Pagiola SJ, Bishop SJ, Landell-Mills N (eds) Selling forest environmental services: market-based mechanisms for conservation and development. Earthscan, London, pp. 327–343Google Scholar
  36. Kerr J (2007) Watershed management: lessons from common property theory. Int J Commons 1(1):89–109Google Scholar
  37. King J (2004) Hatchery valuation analysis. Final Memorandum, Northern Economics, Anchorage, AKGoogle Scholar
  38. LaFaive MD (2002) Legislators should spawn hatchery privatization. In Privatization Michigan: Should a Privatized River Run Through It? Mackinac Center for Public Policy, Midland, MI, October 15, 2002Google Scholar
  39. Mansfield B (2011) Is fish health food or poison? Farmed fish and the material production of un/healthy nature. Antipod. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8330.2010.00743.x
  40. McCay BJ (1993) Management regimes. Beijer Discussion Paper Series Number 38, The Beijer International Institute of Ecological Economics, the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  41. McHugh JL (1975) Jeffersonian democracy and the fisheries. In: Rothschild BJ (ed) World fisheries policy: multidisciplinary views. University of Washington Press, SeattleGoogle Scholar
  42. Milton J (2008) Email communication, Hatchery Program Supervisor, Sport Fish Division, Alaska Department of Fish and Game, June 18, 2008, AnchorageGoogle Scholar
  43. Nagabhatla N, Pattnaik C, Sellamuttu SS, Prasad SN, Wickramasuriya R, Finlayson M (2009) Investigation of aquaculture dynamics at a Ramsar site, using earth observation systems in conjunction with a socio-economic assessment. Lakes Reservoirs: Res Manage 14(4):325–336. doi:10.1111/j.1440-1770.2009.00413.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Naish KA, Taylor JE III, Levin PS, Quinn TP, Winton JR, Huppert D, Hilborn R (2007) An evaluation of the effects of conservation and fishery enhancement hatcheries on wild populations of Salmon. Adv Mar Biol 54:61–194. doi:10.1016/S0065-2881(07)53002-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. National Fish and Wildlife Foundation (NFWF) (2002) Lower ship creek fish passage restoration. Available at Search. Accessed 19 May 2010
  46. National Fish and Wildlife Foundation (NFWF) (2004) Ship creek unplugged. Available at Accessed 19 May 2010
  47. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Fisheries (2008) Core principles: adaptation of the GAO stakeholder principles. NOAA, Washington, DC. Available at
  48. Nobre AM, Robertson-Andersson D, Neori A, Sankar K (2010) Ecological–economic assessment of aquaculture options: comparison between abalone monoculture and integrated multi-trophic aquaculture of abalone and seaweeds. Aquaculture 306(1–4):116–126. doi:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2010.06.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Norton BG (2005) Sustainability: a philosophy of adaptive ecosystem management. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  50. O’Brien C (2009) I wish they all could be California environmental quality acts: rethinking NEPA in light of climate change. Boston Coll Environ Aff Law Rev 36(1):239–271Google Scholar
  51. Officer LH, Williamson SH (2010) Measures of worth. Available at Accessed 26 May 2011
  52. Ostrom E (1990) Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  53. Ostrom E (1992) Crafting institutions for self-governing irrigation systems. ICS, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  54. Ostrom E, Field CB (1999) Revisiting the commons: local lessons, global challenges. Science 284(5412):278–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Palmer-Jones R (2003) Agricultural growth, poverty reduction and agro-ecological zones in India: an ecological fallacy? Food Policy 28(5/6):423–431. doi:10.1016/S0306-9192(03)00049-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Pálsson G, Helgason A (1996) Property rights and practical knowledge: the Icelandic Quota System. In: Crean K, Symes D (eds) Fishing places, fishing people. University of Toronto Press, Toronto, pp 340–354Google Scholar
  57. Pinkerton EW (1999) Directions, principles, and practice in the shared governance of Canadian marine fisheries. In: Newell D, Ommer RE (eds) Fishing places, fishing people. University of Toronto Press, Toronto, pp 340–354Google Scholar
  58. Sarker T, Itoh T (2001) Design principles in long-enduring institutions of Japanese irrigation common-pool resources. Agr Water Manag 48:89–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Schlüter M, Post-Wostl C (2007) Mechanisms of resilience in common-pool resource management systems: an agent-based model of water use in a river basin. Ecol Soc 12(2):4Google Scholar
  60. Ship Creek Enhancement Citizens Advisory Task Force (SCECATF) (1998) A Vision for Ship Creek Enhancement: Phase 1. Demonstration Project Briefing Packet: 15. AnchorageGoogle Scholar
  61. State of Alaska (2006) State of Alaska Coastal Impact Assistance Program Competitive Grant Program End of Year Report. January 15, 2006, AnchorageGoogle Scholar
  62. State of Washington (2009) Second Substitute House Bill 1951: Salmonid Hatcheries—Operation and Management. 61st Legislation, State of Washington, July 26, 2009. Available at Accessed 20 May 2011
  63. Steinemann AC, Apgar WC, Brown HJ (2005) Microeconomics for public decision makers. South-Western, Mason, OHGoogle Scholar
  64. Trawick PB (2001) Successfully governing the commons: principles of social organization in an Andean irrigation system. Hum Ecol 29(1):1–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. U.S. Department of Justice (USDOJ) (2004) Law Enforcement Management and Administrative Statistics, 2000: Data for Individual State and Local Agencies with 100 or More Officers, p. 246. NCJ 203350, Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice StatisticsGoogle Scholar
  66. United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) (2008) Habitat Restoration Program. Anchorage Fish and Wildlife Field Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Available at Accessed 5 May 2010
  67. Walker BH, Anderies JM, Kinzig AP, Ryan P (2006) Exploring resilience in social–ecological systems: comparative studies and theory development. CSIRO, Victoria, p 240Google Scholar
  68. Williams R, Bisson PA, Bottom DL, Calvin LD, Coutant CC, Erho MW, Frissell CA, Lichatowich JA, Liss WJ, McConnaha WE, Mundy PR, Stanford JA, Whitney RR (1999) Scientific issues in the restoration of salmonid fisheries in the Columbia River. Fisheries 24:10–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Young O (1982) Resource regimes: natural resources and social institutions. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© AESS 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Environmental ScienceAlaska Pacific UniversityAnchorageUSA
  2. 2.Centre for Coastal & Ocean Governance (CCOG), Scottish Association for Marine Science (SAMS)Scottish Marine InstituteArgyllUK

Personalised recommendations