Professional development of interdisciplinary environmental scholars

  • Susan G. Clark
  • Michelle M. Steen-Adams
  • Stephanie Pfirman
  • Richard L. Wallace
Article

Abstract

The need is urgent to build capacity in the environmental community, and the interdisciplinary approach is one of the most promising avenues to accomplish this. The environmental studies and sciences program movement can ably lead this effort. Based on a workshop at the second annual meeting of the Association for Environmental Studies and Sciences (AESS) in 2010, we look at barriers to interdisciplinarity in academia, including the cultural, historical, and institutional context of disciplinary scholarship. It is within this context that interdisciplinarians must fight for identity, recognition, roles, legitimacy, and standing. Teaching, research, service, publishing, competing for funding, and meeting reappointment/promotion/tenure evaluation criteria can all pose unique difficulties for interdisciplinary scholars. We offer advice to those seeking professional interdisciplinary education, including finding the right program and advisor, developing skills, designing and completing the dissertation, and establishing a professional network. We also offer advice on securing a job—setting the stage while still in graduate school and highlighting interdisciplinary strengths in the application and interview process. We also offer advice on career advancement, such as clarifying one’s expertise and its significance, setting and fulfilling tenure-track benchmarks, adapting the career trajectory to capitalize on an interdisciplinary career, clarifying with one’s institution the criteria for advancement, and preparing the tenure portfolio. Finally, we offer an introduction to interdisciplinarity as an explicit, systematic approach in concept and framework that rests on a higher order means of organizing knowledge and action, with a focus on integration. AESS is emerging as an organization to assist professionals by assembling a supportive community of environmental educators, researchers, and problem solvers, by clarifying and promoting standards for successful interdisciplinarity in the classroom and in the field, and by offering advice and support on career issues for both up-and-coming professionals and established faculty and practitioners.

Keywords

Environmental scholars Academic careers Interdisciplinarity 

References

  1. Adso J (2002 [Feb. 27]) Figuring out what counts in the tenure game. Chronicle of Higher Education. http://chronicle.com/article/Figuring-Out-What-Counts-in/46255. Accessed Feb. 18, 2011
  2. American Council on Education/American Association of University Professors/United Educators (2000 [rev. 2007]) Good Practice in Tenure Evaluation. American Council on Education, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  3. Benton TH (2003) The 5 virtues of successful graduate students. http://chronicle.com/article/The-5-Virtues-of-Successful/5060/ Accessed 2/18/11
  4. Bok D (2006) Our underachieving colleges: a candid look at how much students learn and why they should be learning more. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  5. Boyer EL (1990) Scholarship reconsidered: priorities of the professoriate. Jossey-Bass, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Boyer EL (1996) The scholarship of engagement. Bull Am Acad Arts Sci 49(7):18–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brunner RD (1996) A milestone in the policy sciences. Policy Sci 29:45–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brunner RD (1997a) Raising standards: a prototyping strategy for undergraduate education. Policy Sci 30:167–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brunner RD (1997b) Teaching the policy sciences: reflections on a graduate seminary. Policy Sci 39:217–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brunner RD (2006) A paradigm of practice. Policy Sci 39:135–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brunner RD, Willard AR (2003) Professional insecurities: a guide to understanding and career management. Policy Sci 36:3–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brunner RD, Steelman TA, Coe-Juell L, Cromley CM, Edwards CM, Tucker DW (2005) Adaptive governance: integrating science, policy, and decision-making. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Campbell LM (2005) Overcoming obstacles to interdisciplinary research. Conserv Biol 19:574–577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Carson R (1962) Silent spring. Houghton Mifflin, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Charon JM (2009) Symbolic interactionism: an introduction, an interpretation, and an integration, 10th edn. Pearson, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
  16. Cherney DN, Bond AC, Clark SG (2009) Understanding human interactions and decision making: an initial map of Podocarpus National Park, Ecuador. J Sustain For 28:680–693Google Scholar
  17. Cherney DN, Kurauchi Y, McIntosh A, Mortimer K (2010) Large scale conservation in the Connecticut River Watershed: moving from competition/fragmentation to collaboration/integration. Report No. 24: 59–78. Yale School of Forestry & Environmental Studies, New Haven, CTGoogle Scholar
  18. Clark TW (2002) The policy process: a practical guide for natural resource professionals. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  19. Clark SG, Wallace R (2010) Learning interdisciplinary problem solving and leadership skills: comparison of four designs. Report No 14: 171–206. Yale School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  20. Clark SG, Hohl A, Picard C, Newsome D (eds) (2010a) Large-scale conservation: integrating science management and policy in the common interests. Report No. 14: 1–243. Yale School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  21. Clark SG, Hohl A, Picard C (2010b) Pursuing large-scale conservation in the common interest: a perspective. Report No 14: 17–31. Yale School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  22. Clark SG et al (2011a) College and university environmental programs as a policy problem (part 1): Integrating knowledge, education, and action for a better world? Environ ManagGoogle Scholar
  23. Clark SG et al (2011b) College and university environmental programs as a policy problem (part 2): strategies for improvement. Environ ManagGoogle Scholar
  24. Collins JP (2002) May you live in interesting times: using multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary programs to cope with change in the life sciences. BioScience 52:75–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Committee on Facilitating Interdisciplinary Research (2004) Committee on Facilitating Interdisciplinary Research, National Academy of Sciences, National Academy ofEngineering, Institute of Medicine. http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=11153#toc
  26. Cromley CM (2002) Beyond boundaries: learning from bison management in Greater Yellowstone. Dissertation: Yale UniversityGoogle Scholar
  27. Csikszentmihalyi M (1996) Creativity: flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. Harper Perennial, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  28. Dewey J (1922) Human nature and conduct. Modern Library, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  29. Elkana Y (2006) Unmasking uncertainties and embracing contradictions: graduate education in the sciences. In: Golde CM, Walker GE (eds) Envisioning the future of doctoral education: preparing stewards of the discipline. Carnegie Essays on the Doctorate. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp 65–96Google Scholar
  30. Evaluation Associates Limited (1999) Interdisciplinary research and the research assessment exercise. UK Higher Education Funding Bodies Report. RAE 1Google Scholar
  31. Foundation H (2005) The millennium ecosystem assessment series and synthesis reports. Island Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  32. Fox HE, Christian C, Nordby JC, Pergams ORW, Peterson GD, Pyke CR (2006) Perceived barriers to integrating social science and conservation. Conserv Biol 20:1817–1820CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Golde CM, Gallagher HA (1999) The challenges of conducting interdisciplinary research in traditional doctoral programs. Ecosystems 2:281–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Harrison R, Stokes H (1992) Diagnosing organizational culture. Jossey-Bass/Pfiffer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  35. Heasley L (2000) A thousand pieces of paradise: property, nature, and community in the Kickapoo Valley, Wisconsin. Dissertation, University of Wisconsin–MadisonGoogle Scholar
  36. Heemskerk M, Wilson K, Pavao-Zuckerman M (2003) Conceptual models as tools for communication across disciplines, Conserv Ecol 7(3): 8, http://www.consecol.org/vol7/iss3/art8/
  37. Heiberger MM, Vick JM (1999) Making the most of your campus interview. http://chronicle.com/article//Making-the-Most-of-Your-Cam/45713/ Accessed June 14, 2010
  38. Hohl A, Clark SG (2010) Best practices: The concept, an assessment, and recommendations. Report 24: 171–208. Yale School of Forestry & Environmental Studies, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  39. Jantsch E (1970) Inter- and transdisciplinary university: a system approach to education and innovation. Policy Sci 1:403–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Jenkins R (2009) How to make your application stand out, Chronicle of Higher Education. http://chronile.com/article/How-to-Make-Your-Applicatio/49234 Accessed 23 November 2009
  41. Johnson RB, Onweugbuzie AJ (2004) Mixed methods research: a research paradigm whose time has come. Educ Res 33:14–26Google Scholar
  42. Kegan R (1983) The evolving self. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  43. Kegan R (1994) In over our heads: the mental demands of modern life. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  44. Land M (2001) Being yourself on the interview trail. http://chronicle/com/article/Being-Yourself-on-the-Inter/45434/ Accessed 6-14-10
  45. Lasswell HD (1970) The emerging conception of the policy sciences. Policy Sci 1:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lasswell HD (1971a) From fragmentation to configuration. Policy Sci 2:439–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lasswell HD (1971b) A pre-view of the policy sciences. Elsevier, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  48. Lasswell HD (1975) The future of government and politics in the United States. In: Rubin L (ed) The future of education: perspectives on tomorrow’s schooling. Allyn and Bacon, Boston, pp 1–30Google Scholar
  49. Lasswell HD, Kaplan A (1950) Power and society: a framework for political inquiry. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  50. Lasswell HD, McDougal MS (1992) Jurisprudence for a free society: studies in law, science, and policy. New Haven Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  51. Lattuca LR (2001) Creating interdisciplinarity: interdisciplinary research and teaching among college and university faculty. Vanderbilt University Press, NashvilleGoogle Scholar
  52. Lee S, Bozeman B (2005) The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity. Soc Stud Sci 35:673–702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Lele S, Norgaard RB (2005) Practicing interdisciplinarity. BioScience 55:967–975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Leopold A (1949) A sand county almanac and sketches here and there. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  55. Likens GE (1998) Limitations to intellectual progress in ecosystem science. In: Pace ML, Groffman PM (eds) Successes, limitations, and frontiers in ecosystem science. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp 247–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. MacMynowski DP (2007) Pausing at the brink of interdisciplinarity: power and knowledge at the meeting of social and biophysical science. Ecol Soc 12:1–14Google Scholar
  57. Mattson DJ, Clark SG (2011) The human dignity in concept and practice. Policy Sci (in press)Google Scholar
  58. Meade GH (1934) Mind, self and society. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  59. Meany C, Sullivan C, Clark SG (2010) Water management on the Wind River Indian Reservation, Wyoming: a rapid assessment and recommendations. Report No. 24: 79–98. Yale School of Forestry & Environmental Studies, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  60. Miller RC (1981) Varieties of interdisciplinary approaches in the social sciences: a 1981 overview. Issues Integr Stud 1982:1–37Google Scholar
  61. Musacchio L, Ozdenerol E, Bryant M, Evans T (2005) Changing landscapes, changing disciplines: seeking to understand interdisciplinarity in landscape ecological change research. Landsc Urban Plan 73:326–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Muth R, Bolland JM (1983) The social planetarium: toward a revitalized civic order. Urban Interest 3:13–25Google Scholar
  63. Nelson Institute (2006) Guidelines for merit evaluation and criteria for excellence in interdisciplinary scholarship in the Nelson Institute for Environmental Studies, http://www.nelson.wisc.edu/docs/criteria.pdf Accessed 1/30/11.
  64. Newsome D et al (2010) Large-scale conservation in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem: A field assessment and recommendations. Report No. 24: 99–126. Yale School of Forestry & Environmental Studies, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  65. Orr DW (1993) The problem of disciplines/the discipline of problems. Conserv Biol 7:10–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Parson W (1995) Public policy: an introduction to the theory and practice of policy analysis. Edward Elgar, LymeGoogle Scholar
  67. Perlmutter DD (2009) Presenting your tenure file. Chronicle of Higher Education — Chronicle Careers, http://honolulu.hawaii.edu/intranet/committees/FacDevCom/guidebk/reappt/tenurefile.htm
  68. Petrie HG (1976) Do you see what I see? The epistemology of interdisciplinary inquiry. Educ Res 5:9–15Google Scholar
  69. Petts J, Owens S, Bulkeley H (2008) Crossing boundaries: interdisciplinarity in the context of urban environments. Geoforum 39:593–601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Pfirman S, Martin P (2010) Fostering interdisciplinary scholars. In: Frodeman R, Thompson Klein J, Mitcham C (eds) Oxford handbook on interdisciplinarity. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  71. Pfirman S, Martin P, Berry L, Fletcher M, Hempel M, Southard R, Hornbach D, Morehouse B (2007) Interdisciplinary hiring, tenure and promotion: Guidance for individuals and institutions, http://ncseonline.org/CEDD/cms.cfm?id=2042
  72. Pfirman S, Bell RE, Culligan PJ, Balsam P, Laird JD (2008) Maximizing productivity and recognition: Part 3. Developing a research plan. Science Careers, October 10, 2008 http://sciencecareers.sciencemag.org/career_magazine/previous_issues/articles/2008_10_10/caredit.a0800148
  73. Pfirman S, Block C, Bell R, Roberson L, Culligan P (2010) Perspective: Transitioning from pet to peer. Science Careers, January 29, 2010. http://sciencecareers.sciencemag.org/career_magazine/previous_issues/articles/2010_01_29/caredit.a1000011
  74. Pfirman S, Martin P, Berry L, Fletcher M, Hempel M, Hornbach D, Martin P, Morehouse B, Mutter J, Rikakis T, Southard R, Steen-Adams M, Waggett C (2011) Interdisciplinary hiring and career development: Guidance for individuals and institutions. Report to the Council of Environmental Deans and Directors (CEDD). Council of Environmental Deans and Directors, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  75. Picard C (2010) The promise and peril of large scale conservation: an appraisal of the Selous Niassa Wildlife Corridor. Dissertation, Yale UniversityGoogle Scholar
  76. Pickett STA, Burch WR, Grove JM (1999) Interdisciplinary research: maintaining the constructive impulse in a culture of criticism. Ecosystems 2:302–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Reich SM, Reich JA (2006) Cultural competence in interdisciplinary collaborations: A method for respecting diversity in research partnerships. Am J Commun Psychol 38:51–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Reisman WM, Wiesser S, Willard AR (2007) The New Haven School: a brief introduction. Yale J Int Law 32:575–582Google Scholar
  79. Rutherford MB (2003) Ecosystem management and the U.S. Forest Service. Dissertation, Yale UniversityGoogle Scholar
  80. Schoenberger E (2001) Interdisciplinarity and social power. Prog Hum Geogr 25:365–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Schön DA (1983) The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. BasicBooks, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  82. Schön DA (1987) Educating the reflective practioner: toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. Jossey-Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  83. Steen-Adams MM (2005) Change on a northern Wisconsin landscape: legacies of human history. Dissertation, University of Wisconsin–MadisonGoogle Scholar
  84. Thoma GA (1993) The Perry framework and tactics for teaching critical thinking in economics. J Econ Educ 24:128–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Turner MG, Carpenter SR (1999) Tips and traps in interdisciplinary research. Ecosystems 2:275–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. University of Michigan, Office of the Provost, Subcommittee on Interdisciplinarity (1999) Issues at the intersection. http://www.provost.umich.edu/reports/issues_intersection/interdisciplinarity.html Accessed August 2010
  87. Vincent S, Focht W (2009) Perspectives on environmental program, curricula, and core competencies. Natl Council Sci Environ, July: 1–141Google Scholar
  88. Wagner R (2000) The secret to a successful job interview. https://webspace.utexas.edu/cherwitz/www/ie/successful.html Accessed 2/18/11
  89. Walker GE, Golde CM, Jones L, Bueschel AC, Hutchings P (2008) The formation of scholars: rethinking doctoral education for the twenty-first century. Jossey-Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  90. Ward JC (1991) Reversing the traditional problem-solving order. J Coll Sci Teach 13:140–141Google Scholar
  91. Weiss J (1989) The powers of problem definition: the case of government paperwork. Policy Sci 22:92–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© AESS 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Susan G. Clark
    • 1
  • Michelle M. Steen-Adams
    • 2
  • Stephanie Pfirman
    • 3
  • Richard L. Wallace
    • 4
  1. 1.School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, Institution for Social and Policy StudiesYale UniversityNew HavenUSA
  2. 2.Department of Environmental StudiesUniversity of New EnglandBiddefordUSA
  3. 3.Environmental Science DepartmentBarnard College, Columbia UniversityNew YorkUSA
  4. 4.Ursinus CollegeCollegevilleUSA

Personalised recommendations