Earth stewardship: a strategy for social–ecological transformation to reverse planetary degradation

  • F. Stuart ChapinIII
  • Steward T. A. Pickett
  • Mary E. Power
  • Robert B. Jackson
  • David M. Carter
  • Clifford Duke
Article

Abstract

A century ago, stewards were responsible for managing estates or for keeping order at public events. Today, the Earth is one global estate, and improved stewardship is vital for maintaining social order and for preserving life on Earth. In this paper, we describe Earth Stewardship, a social–ecological framework for sustaining life in a rapidly changing world. The paper defines the components of Earth Stewardship, characterizes the scientific needs for its agenda, and discusses initial efforts to engage multiple disciplines and segments of society in its application. As a beginning, new knowledge for global stewardship must be generated by teams of physical, biological, and social scientists. However, other stakeholders are needed for generating and applying such knowledge, including people in communities of faith, professions involved in design, planning and restoration, and policymakers and managers. Communicating environmental problems and solutions must take into account the psychology of how people perceive problems, promoting positive stances toward the actions needed for an adaptive approach to Earth Stewardship. Successful long-term stewardship of the Earth will require a global partnership linking researchers, managers, policymakers, and citizens.

Keywords

Communities of faith Earth stewardship Ecological Society of America Positive psychology Science literacy Social norms Sustainability 

References

  1. Armitage D, Berkes F, Doubleday N (eds) (2007) Adaptive Co-Management: Collaboration, Learning, and Multi-Level Governance. University of British Columbia Press, VancouverGoogle Scholar
  2. Baumeister RF, Bratslavsky E, Finkenauer C, Vohs KD (2001) Bad is stronger than good. Rev Gen Psychol 5:323–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berkes F, Colding J, Folke C (eds) (2003) Navigating social–ecological systems: building resilience for complexity and change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  4. Bohm D (1996) On dialog. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown KW, Kasser T (2005) Are psychological and ecological well-being compatible? The role of values, mindfulness, and lifestyle. Soc Indic Res 74:349–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carpenter SR, Mooney HA, Agard J, Capistrano D, DeFries R, Díaz S, Dietz T, Duraiappah AK, Oteng-Yeboah A, Pereira HM, Perrings C, Reid WV, Sarukhan J, Scholes RJ, Whyte A (2009) Science for managing ecosystem services: beyond the millennium ecosystem assessment. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:1305–1312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chapin FS III, Kofinas GP, Folke C (eds) (2009) Principles of ecosystem stewardship: resilience-based natural resource management in a changing world. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Chapin FS III, Carpenter SR, Kofinas GP, Folke C, Abel N, Clark WC, Olsson P, Stafford Smith DM, Walker B, Young OR, Berkes F, Biggs R, Grove JM, Naylor RL, Pinkerton E, Steffen W, Swanson FJ (2010) Ecosystem stewardship: sustainability strategies for a rapidly changing planet. Trends Ecol Evol 25:241–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Clark WC, Dickson NM (2003) Sustainability science: the emerging research program. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:8059–8061CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clark WC, Levin SA (2010) Toward a science of sustainability. Princeton Environmental Institute, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  11. Conradie E (2006) Christianity and ecological theology: resources for further research. Sun, ClevelandGoogle Scholar
  12. Daily GC (1997) Nature’s services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Island, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  13. Daily GC, Polasky S, Goldstein J, Kareiva PM, Mooney HA, Pejchar L, Ricketts TH, Salzman J, Shallenberger R (2009) Ecosystem services in decision making: time to deliver. Front Ecol Environ 7:21–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Diener E, Biswas-Diener R (2008) Happiness: unlocking the mysteries of psychological wealth. Blackwell, MaldenGoogle Scholar
  15. Dietz T, Ostrom E, Stern PC (2003) The struggle to govern the commons. Science 302:1907–1912CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ellis EC, Ramankutty N (2008) Putting people on the map: anthropogenic biomes of the world. Front Ecol Environ 6:439–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Felson AJ, Pickett STA (2005) Designed experiments: new approaches to studying urban ecosystems. Front Ecol Environ 3:549–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Foley JA, DeFries R, Asner GP, Barford C, Bonan G, Carpenter SR, Chapin FS III, Coe MT, Daily GC, Gibbs HK, Helkowski JH, Holloway T, Howard EA, Kucharik CJ, Monfreda C, Patz JA, Prentice IC, Ramankutty N, Snyder PK (2005) Global consequences of land use. Science 309:570–574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fredrickson BL, Branigan C (2005) Positive emotions broaden the scope of attention and thought-action repertoires. Cogn Emot 19:313–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Graedel TE, Crutzen PJ (1995) Atmosphere, climate, and change. Scientific American Library, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Grove JM (2009) Cities: managing densely settled social–ecological systems. In: Chapin FS III, Kofinas GP, Folke C (eds) Principles of ecosystem stewardship: resilience-based natural resource management in a changing world. Springer, New York, pp 281–294Google Scholar
  22. Haberl H, Erb KH, Krausmann F, Gaube V, Bondeau A, Plutzar C, Gingrich S, Lucht W, Fischer-Kowalski M (2007) Quantifying and mapping the human appropriation of net primary production in Earth’s terrestrial ecosystems. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:12942–12945CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hardin G (1968) The tragedy of the commons. Science 162:1243–1248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. ICSU (2010) Earth system science for global sustainability: the grand challenges. International Council for Science, ParisGoogle Scholar
  25. IPCC (2007) Climate Change 2007: the physical science basis, contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  26. Kasser T (2002) The high price of materialism. MIT, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  27. Kates RW, Clark WC, Corell RW, Hall JM, Jaeger CC, Lowe I, McCarthy JJ, Schellnhuber HJ, Bolin B, Dickson NM, Faucheux S, Gallopin GC, Grübler A, Huntley B, Jäger J, Jodha NS, Kasperson RE, Mobogunje A, Matson PA, Mooney HA, Moore B III, O’Riordan T, Svedin U (2001) Sustainability science. Science 292:641–642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kearns L, Keller C (2007) Eco-Spirit: religions and philosophy for the earth. Fordham University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  29. Kofinas GP (2009) Adaptive Co-management in social–ecological governance. In: Chapin FS III, Kofinas GP, Folke C (eds) Principles of ecosystem stewardship: resilience-based natural resource management in a changing world. Springer, New York, pp 77–101Google Scholar
  30. Likens GE (1991) Human-accelerated environmental change. Bioscience 41:130Google Scholar
  31. Lubchenco J, Olson AM, Brubaker LB, Carpenter SR, Holland MM, Hubbell SP, Levin SA, MacMahon JA, Matson PA, Melillo JM, Mooney HA, Peterson CH, Pulliam HR, Real LA, Regal PJ, Risser PG (1991) The sustainable biosphere initiative: an ecological research agenda. Ecology 72:371–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Matson PA (2009) The sustainability transition. Issues Sci Technol 25:39–42Google Scholar
  33. MEA (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Island, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  34. Moser SC (2010) Communicating climate change: history, challenges, process and future directions. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Change 1:31–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nelson DR, Adger WN, Brown K (2007) Adaptation to environmental change: contributions of a resilience frameowrk. Ann Rev Environ Resour 32:395–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. NRC (1999) Our common journey: a transition toward sustainability. National Academies Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  37. NRC (2010) America’s climate choices: adapting to the impacts of climate change. National Academies Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  38. Olsson P, Folke C, Hughes TP (2008) Navigating the transition to ecosystem-based management of the Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:9489–9494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ostrom E (2009) A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social–ecological systems. Science 325:419–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Palmer M, Bernhardt E, Chornesky E, Collins S, Dobson A, Duke C, Gold B, Jacobson R, Kingsland S, Kranz R, Mappin M, Martinez ML, Micheli F, Morse J, Pace M, Pascual M, Palumbi S, Reichman OJ, Simons A, Townsend A, Turner M (2004) Ecology for a crowded planet. Science 304:1251–1252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pickett STA (1999) The culture of synthesis: habits of mind in novel ecological integration. Oikos 87:479–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pickett STA, Cadenasso ML (2008) Linking ecological and built components of urban mosaics: an open cycle of ecological design. J Ecol 96:8–12Google Scholar
  43. Pickett STA, Burch WR Jr, Grove JM (1999) Interdisciplinary research: maintaining the constructive impulse in a culture of criticism. Ecosystems 2:302–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Power ME, Chapin FS III (2009) Planetary stewardship. Front Ecol Environ 7:399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rockström J, Steffen W, Noone K, Persson Å, Chapin FS III, Lambin EF, Lenton TM, Scheffer M, Folke C, Schellnhuber HJ, Nykvist B, de Wit CA, Hughes T, van der Leeuw S, Rodhe H, Sörlin S, Snyder PK, Costanza R, Svedin U, Falkenmark M, Karlberg L, Corell RW, Fabry VJ, Hansen J, Walker B, Liverman D, Richardson K, Crutzen P, Foley JA (2009) A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 461:472–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Schneider S, Turner BL II, Garriga HM (1998) Imaginable surprise in global change science. J Risk Res 1:165–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Schneider SH, Rosencranz A, Niles JO (2002) Climate change policy: a survey. Island, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  48. Schultz PW, Nolan J, Cialdini R, Goldstein N, Griskevicius V (2007) The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms. Psychol Sci 18:429–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Seligman MEP (2011) Flourish: a visionary new understanding of happiness and well-being. Free, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  50. Steffen WL, Sanderson A, Tyson PD, Jäger J, Matson PA, Moore B III, Oldfield F, Richardson K, Schellnhuber H-J, Turner BL II, Wasson RJ (2004) Global change and the earth system: a planet under pressure. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  51. Stern N (2007) The economics of climate change: the Stern review. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  52. Szaro RC, Johnson ND, Sexton WT, Malk AJ (eds) (1999) Ecological stewardship: a common reference for ecosystem management. Elsevier, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  53. Turner BL II, Kasperson RE, Matson PA, McCarthy JJ, Corell RW, Christensen L, Eckley N, Kasperson JX, Luers A, Martello ML, Polsky C, Pulsipher A, Schiller A (2003) A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:8074–8079CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. UN (2010) The millennium development goals report 2010. United Nations, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  55. Vitousek PM, Mooney HA, Lubchenco J, Melillo JM (1997) Human domination of earth’s ecosystems. Science 277:494–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. WCED (1987) Our common future. World commission on environment and development. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© AESS 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. Stuart ChapinIII
    • 1
  • Steward T. A. Pickett
    • 2
  • Mary E. Power
    • 3
  • Robert B. Jackson
    • 4
  • David M. Carter
    • 5
  • Clifford Duke
    • 6
  1. 1.University of Alaska FairbanksFairbanksUSA
  2. 2.Cary Institute of Ecosystem StudiesMillbrookUSA
  3. 3.University of CaliforniaBerkeleyUSA
  4. 4.Duke UniversityDurhamUSA
  5. 5.University of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA
  6. 6.Ecological Society of AmericaWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations