A personal view: environmental education—its content and delivery

Article

Abstract

Arguably, no challenge faced by humanity is more critical than generating an environmentally literate public. Otherwise the present “business as usual” course of human affairs will lead inevitably to a collapse of civilization. I list obvious topics that should be covered in education from kindergarten through college, and constantly updated by public education and the media. For instance, these include earth science (especially climatology), the importance of biodiversity, basic demography, the problems of overconsumption, the fact that the current economic system compels producers and consumers to do the wrong thing environmentally, and the I = PAT equation. I also summarize less well-recognized aspects of the environmental situation that are critical but are only rarely taught or discussed, such as the nonlinear effects of continued population growth, the impacts of climate disruption on agricultural production, and the basic issues of human behavior, including economic behavior. Finally, I suggest some of the ways that this material can be made a major focus of all education, ranging from using environmental examples in kindergarten stories and middle school math to establish an international discussion of the behavioral barriers to sustainability.

Keywords

Environment Education Culture gap population Consumption 

References

  1. Anderson RM, May RM (1991) Infectious diseases of humans: dynamics and control. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  2. Arrow K et al (2004) Are we consuming too much? J Econ Perspect 18:147–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bandura A (2004) Social cognitive theory for personal change by enabling media. In: Singhal A, Cody MJ, Rogers EM, Sabido M (eds) Entertainment-education and social change: history, research, and practice. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, pp 75–96Google Scholar
  4. Blumstein DT, Saylan C (2007) The failure of environmental education (and how we can fix it). PLoS Biol 5:e120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blumstein DT, Saylan C (2011) The failure of environmental Education (and how we can fix it). University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  6. Bradshaw CJA (2009) Climate change’s ugly cousin—biodiversity loss. Available at: http://conservationbytes.com/2009/05/17/climate-changes-ugly-cousin-biodiversity-loss/
  7. Brulle RJ, Young LE (2007) Advertising, individual consumption levels, and the natural environment, 1900–2000. Sociol Inq 77:522–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carson RT (2010) The environmental Kuznets curve: seeking empirical regularity and theoretical structure. Rev Environ Econ Policy 4:3–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Daily GC, Ehrlich PR (1996a) Global change and human susceptibility to disease. Annu Rev Energy Env 21:125–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Daily GC, Ehrlich PR (1996b) Socioeconomic equity, sustainability, and Earth's carrying capacity. Ecol Appl 6:991–1001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Daily GC, Ehrlich AH, Ehrlich PR (1994) Optimum human population size. Popul Environ 15:469–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Daly HE, Farley J (2004) Ecological economics: principles and applications. Island Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  13. Dasgupta P (2001) Human well-being and the natural environment. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dasgupta P (2007) Economics: a very short introduction. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  15. Dasgupta S, Laplante B, Meisner C, Wheeler D, Yan J (2009) The impact of sea level rise on developing countries: a comparative analysis. Clim Change 93:379–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Diamond JM (1997) Guns, germs, and steel: the fates of human societies. W.W. Norton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Dietz T, Rosa E (1994) Rethinking the environmental impacts of population, affluence and technology. Hum Ecol Rev 1:277–300Google Scholar
  18. Doudoroff P, Katz M (1953) Critical review of literature on the toxicity of industrial wastes and their components to fish: II. The metals, as salts. Sewage Ind Waste 25:802–839Google Scholar
  19. Durning A (1992) How much is enough?: the consumer society and the future of the earth. W.W. Norton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. Ehrlich PR (2000) Human natures: genes, cultures, and the human prospect. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  21. Ehrlich PR (2008) Key issues for attention from ecological economists. Environ Dev Econ 13:1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ehrlich PR (2009) Ecoethics: now central to all ethics. J Bioethical Inq 6:417–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ehrlich PR, Ehrlich AH (1981) Extinction: the causes and consequences of the disappearance of species. Random House, NYGoogle Scholar
  24. Ehrlich PR, Ehrlich AH (2005) One with Nineveh: politics, consumption, and the human future, (with new afterword). Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  25. Ehrlich PR, Ehrlich AH (2009) The dominant animal: human evolution and the environment, 2nd edn. Island Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  26. Ehrlich PR, Ehrlich AH (2010) The culture gap and its needed closures. Int J Environ Stud 67:481–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ehrlich PR, Goulder LH (2007) Is current consumption excessive? A general framework and some indications for the U.S. Conserv Biol 21:1145–1154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ehrlich PR, Holdren J (1971) Impact of population growth. Science 171:1212–1217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ehrlich PR, Ornstein RE (2010) Humanity on a tightrope: thoughts on empathy, family, and big changes for a viable future. Rowman & Littlefield, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  30. Friedländer S (2007) Nazi Germany and the Jews 1939–1945: the years of extermination. HarperCollins, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  31. Garrett L (1994) The coming plague: newly emerging diseases in a world out of balance. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  32. Godfrey-Smith P (2003) An introduction to the philosophy of science. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  33. Goulder LH (2000) Steps from environmental science to effective policy. In: Ernst G (ed) Earth systems: processes and issues. Stanford University Press, Stanford, pp 425–433Google Scholar
  34. Harte J (2007) Human population as a dynamic factor in environmental degradation. Popul Environ 28:223–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hrdy SB (2009) Mothers and others: the evolutionary origins of mutual understanding. Belknap Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  36. Hughes JB, Daily GC, Ehrlich PR (1997) Population diversity: its extent and extinction. Science 278:689–692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Jackson JBC (2008) Ecological extinction and evolution in the brave new ocean. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:11458–11465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Jackson T (2009) Prosperity without growth: economics for a finite planet. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  39. Knight K, Rosa EA (2011) The environmental efficiency of well-being: a cross-national analysis. Social Science Research (in press)Google Scholar
  40. Leahy T, Bowden V, Threadgold S (2010) Stumbling towards collapse: coming to terms with the climate crisis. Environ Polit 19:851–868CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lobell DD, Field CB (2007) Global scale climate-crop yield relationships and the impacts of recent warming. Environ Res Lett 2:014002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lobell DB, Burke MB, Tebaldi C, Mastrandrea MD, Falcon WP, Naylor RL (2008) Prioritizing climate change adaptation needs for food security in 2030. Science 319:607–610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lovett RA (2010) A warming Earth could mean stronger toxins: climate change may force a rethink of toxicity measurements. Scientific American. Available at: http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=warming-earth-toxins
  44. Lubchenco J, Palumbi SR, Gaines SD, Andleman S (2003) Plugging a hole in the ocean: the emerging science of marine reserves. Ecol Appl 13(Supplement):S3–S7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. McKibben B (1999) The end of nature. 10th anniversary edition. Doubleday, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  46. Myers P, Hessler W (2007) Does the dose make the poison?: extensive results challenge a core assumption in toxicology. Environmental Health News, 30 April. pp 1–6.Google Scholar
  47. Myers N, Kent J (2004) The New consumers:the influence of affluence on the environment. Island Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  48. Naylor RL, Goldburg RJ, Primavera JH, Kautsky N, Beveridge MCM, Clay J, Folke C, Lubchenco J, Mooney H, Troell M (2000) Effect of aquaculture on world fish supplies. Nature 405:1017–1024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Norgaard KM (2006a) "People want to protect themselves a little bit”: emotions, denial, and social movement nonparticipation. Sociol Inq 76:372–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Norgaard KM (2006b) “We really don't want to know”: environmental justice and socially organized denial of global warming in Norway. Organ Environ 19:347–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Oak Ridge National Laboratory (1968) Nuclear energy centers, industrial and agro-industrial complexes. ORNL-4291: summary reportGoogle Scholar
  52. Oreskes N, Conway EM (2010) Merchants of doubt: how a handful of scientists obscured the truth on issues from tobacco smoke to global warming. Bloomsbury Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  53. Pirages DC (2007) Nature, disease, and globalization: an evolutionary perspective. Int Stud Rev 9:616–628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Pirages DC, DeGeest TM (2003) Ecological security: an evolutionary perspective on globalization. Rowman & Littlefield, LanhamGoogle Scholar
  55. Princen T, Maniates M, Conca K (2002) Confronting consumption. Pages 1–20. In: Princen T, Maniates M, Conca K (eds) Confronting consumption. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  56. Repetto R, Wells M, Beer C, Rossini F (1987) Natural resource accounting for Indonesia. World Resources Institute, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  57. Rosa EA, York R, Dietz T (2004) Tracking the anthropogenic drivers of ecological impacts. Ambio 333:509–512Google Scholar
  58. Schmidhuber J, Tubiello FN (2007) Food security under climate change. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:19703–19708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Singer P (2002) Famine, affluence, and morality. Pages 386–393. In: Schmidtz D, Willott E (eds) Environmental ethics: what really matters, what really works. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  60. Smith A (1759\1974). The theory of moral sentiments. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  61. Smith A (1776\1976) An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
  62. Trenberth KE (2010) Fixing the planet? Science 330:1178–1179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Trenberth KE, Dai A (2007) Effects of Mount Pinatubo volcanic eruption on the hydrological cycle as an analog of geoengineering. Geophysical Research Letters L15702, doi:10.1029/2007GL030524Google Scholar
  64. Wallerstein I, Juma C, Keller EF, Kocka J, Lecourt D (1996) Open the social sciences: report of the Gulbenkian Commission on the restructuring of the social sciences. Stanford University Press, StanfordGoogle Scholar
  65. Weisman A (2007) The world without us. Picador, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  66. Wilson EO (1992) The diversity of life. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  67. Wilson EO (1994) Naturalist. Island Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© AESS 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Stanford UniversityStanfordUSA

Personalised recommendations