Advertisement

What makes patients with diabetes adopt physical activity behaviors?—a transtheoretical model approach

  • Aiswarya Sahunthala Nagaraju
  • Devidas Tondare
  • Vijayaprasad GopichandranEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

Background

Physical activity is an essential health behavior in patients with diabetes and is the one which is least adapted in the Indian context. There is a need to understand the motivators and demotivators of this behavior. This study was conducted to evaluate the stages of physical activity behavior change, process of change, decisional balance that influences the change and situational self-efficacy in patients with diabetes attending a tertiary care health facility in Chennai, India.

Methods

Among 150 patients with diabetes attending the tertiary care hospital, selected in a non-random consecutive manner, a questionnaire-based survey was administered covering the domains of stage of change, process of change, decisional balance and situational self-efficacy.

Results

About 50% of the sample were not physically active belonging to the precontemplation or the reversal phase. About 23% were in the maintenance phase of physical activity and remaining 27% were in various intermediate stages of contemplation, preparation and action. The dominant dimensions of process of change were dramatic relief, self-re-evaluation and positive reinforcement. There was a high level of perceived pros of physical activity as well as cons and so there was a decisional balance not favouring either end of the behavior change spectrum. Situational self-efficacy levels were low. The perceived pros (OR 1.042; 95% CI 1.005–1.080) and cons (OR 0.929; 95% CI 0.877–0.985) influenced the behavior change in a statistically significant manner in a multivariate adjusted model.

Conclusion

A very low proportion of patients with diabetes are in maintenance phase of physical activity with a majority in various stages of change. The patients show various processes of change which all help in moving them through the early stages of change. Perceived pros and cons influence the physical activity behavior change and measures taken to address them are likely to positively influence physical activity behavior.

Keywords

Physical activity Diabetes Transtheoretical model Stages of change Process of change Decisional balance Situational self-efficacy 

Abbreviations

ANOVA

Analysis of variance

SPSS

Statistical Package for Social Sciences

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The questionnaire was printed and administered in a pen and paper format, by the principal investigator after obtaining an informed consent from the participants.

Ethical approval

The study was approved by the Institutional Ethical Committee of the ESIC Medical College & PGIMSR, Chennai, through an expedited review process. Verbal informed consent was obtained from all participants before the interview.

References

  1. 1.
    Federation ID. IDF diabetes atlas [Internet]. 2015. Available from: https://www.idf.org/e-library/epidemiology-research/diabetes-atlas.html. Accessed 04 March 2019.
  2. 2.
    Gopichandran V, Lyndon S, Angel MK, Manayalil BP, Blessy KR, Alex RG, et al. Diabetes self-care activities: a community-based survey in urban southern India. Natl Med J India. 2012;25:14–7.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Colberg SR, Sigal RJ, Yardley JE, Riddell MC, Dunstan DW, Dempsey PC, et al. Physical activity/exercise and diabetes: a position statement of the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care. 2016;39:2065 LP–2079. Available from: http://care.diabetesjournals.org/content/39/11/2065.abstract. Accessed 04 March 2019.
  4. 4.
    Sanz C, Gautier J-F, Hanaire H. Physical exercise for the prevention and treatment of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Metab. 2010;36:346–51 Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1262363610001394. Accessed 04 March 2019.
  5. 5.
    Casey D, De Civita M, Dasgupta K. Understanding physical activity facilitators and barriers during and following a supervised exercise programme in type 2 diabetes: a qualitative study. Diabet Med [Internet]. Wiley/Blackwell (10.1111); 2010;27:79–84.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-5491.2009.02873.x.
  6. 6.
    Abraham C, Michie S. A taxonomy of behavior change techniques used in interventions. Health Psychol. 2008;27:379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kirk A, MacMillan F, Webster N. Application of the transtheoretical model to physical activity in older adults with type 2 diabetes and/or cardiovascular disease. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2010;11:320–4 Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1469029210000270. Accessed 04 March 2019.
  8. 8.
    Jackson R, Asimakopoulou K, Scammell A. Assessment of the transtheoretical model as used by dietitians in promoting physical activity in people with type 2 diabetes. J Hum Nutr Diet [Internet]. Wiley/Blackwell (10.1111); 2007;20:27–36.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-277X.2007.00746.x
  9. 9.
    Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC. Transtheoretical therapy: toward a more integrative model of change. Psychother. Theory, Res Pract Division of Psychotherapy (29), American Psychological Association; 1982;19:276.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Prochaska JO, Velicer WF. The transtheoretical model of health behavior change. Am J Health Promot. SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA; 1997;12:38–48.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mohan V, Deepa M, Deepa R, Shanthirani CS, Farooq S, Ganesan A, et al. Secular trends in the prevalence of diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance in urban South India—the Chennai Urban Rural Epidemiology Study (CURES-17). Diabetologia. 2006;49:1175–8.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-006-0219-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jayaprakash K, Raju HG, Thanuja R. Employees State Insurance (ESI) Corporation. Public Health 2011;2011.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Di Noia J, Schinke SP, Prochaska JO, Contento IR. Application of the transtheoretical model to fruit and vegetable consumption among economically disadvantaged African-American adolescents: preliminary findings. Am J Health Promot. 2006;20:342–8 Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1524879/. Accessed 04 March 2019.
  14. 14.
    Anjana RM, Pradeepa R, Das AK, Deepa M, Bhansali A, Joshi SR, et al. Physical activity and inactivity patterns in India—results from the ICMR-INDIAB study (phase-1) [ICMR-INDIAB-5]. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act [Internet]. BioMed Central; 2014;11:26. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3974063/. Accessed 04 March 2019.
  15. 15.
    Aslesh OP, Mayamol P, Suma RK, Usha K, Sheeba G, Jayasree AK. Level of physical activity in population aged 16 to 65 years in rural Kerala, India. Asia Pacific J Public Health [Internet]. SAGE Publications Inc; 2015;28:53S–61S.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1010539515598835.
  16. 16.
    Spencer L, Adams TB, Malone S, Roy L, Yost E. Applying the transtheoretical model to exercise: a systematic and comprehensive review of the literature. Health Promot Pract. Sage Publications Sage CA: Thousand Oaks, CA; 2006;7:428–43.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Janis IL, Mann L. Decision making: a psychological analysis of conflict, choice, and commitment. Free Press; 1977.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bandura A. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev. 1977;84:191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sechrest L, Yeaton WH. Magnitudes of experimental effects in social science research. Eval Rev. Sage Publications Sage CA: Thousand Oaks, CA; 1982;6:579–600.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Research Society for Study of Diabetes in India 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Community MedicineESIC Medical College & PGIMSRChennaiIndia

Personalised recommendations