Advertisement

Gold Bulletin

, Volume 52, Issue 3–4, pp 185–196 | Cite as

Enhancing the radiotherapeutic index of gamma radiation on cervical cancer cells by gold nanoparticles

  • Priya Yadav
  • Arghya Bandyopadhyay
  • Anindita Chakraborty
  • Sk. Manirul Islam
  • Keka SarkarEmail author
Original Paper
  • 57 Downloads

Abstract

Nanotechnology has the impending ability to improve the therapeutic potential of drugs and radiation-based treatment approaches for reducing cancerous cell death while curtailing collateral toxicity to non-cancerous cells. Among all metal nanomaterials, gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) are establishing themselves as an excellent radiosensitizer and serve as a multimodal modality due to their unique physicochemical properties. The primordial purpose of the work is to evaluate the synergistic effect and molecular level interaction of gamma (γ) radiation on human cervical cancer cell (HeLa) in the presence of AuNPs. Biocompatible AuNPs in combination with γ-radiation were found to exhibit elated cytotoxic effects on cancer cells as evidenced by cell-based assays. The implication of AuNPs facilitates the minimization of radiation dose employment on cultured cells. As per our experimental evaluation, the modus operandi of dual effectors ascertained that a higher amount of reactive oxygen species (ROS) plays a key role in cellular functionality collapse. In that scenario, it can be concluded that AuNP-mediated radiosensitization proved to be the plausible candidate for preclinical testing in nanoparticle-based radiotherapy.

Keywords

Gold nanoparticles Cancer Radiosensitization Ionizing radiation Gamma radiation Oxidative stress 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express their sincere gratitude to Dr. Sayan Bhattacharya for providing many conveniences at the Department of Chemical Sciences, IISER-Kolkata. Authors are also thankful to Dr. Abhijit Saha and Dr. Aparna Datta for providing the in vitro gamma irradiation facility to cells at UGC-DAE, CSR Kolkata Centre. The authors would like to acknowledge the faculties of the Department of Molecular Biology & Biotechnology, University of Kalyani, for providing departmental facilities.

Funding

Priya Yadav is thankful to University Grant Commission-Department of Atomic Energy, Consortium of Scientific Research, Kolkata (UGC-DAE, CSR, Kolkata) for providing fellowship. The authors gratefully acknowledge UGC-DAE Kolkata (UGC-DAE-CSR-KC/CSR/13/RB-03/0840) and Department of Science and Technology (DST-Nano mission) (SR/NM/NS-1447/2014) for financial support.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

13404_2019_260_MOESM1_ESM.docx (1.1 mb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 1085 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Yadav P, Bandyopadhyay A, Chakraborty A, Sarkar K (2018) Enhancement of anticancer activity and drug delivery of chitosan-curcumin nanoparticle via molecular docking and simulation analysis. Carbohydr Polym 182:188–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Calixto G, Bernegossi J, Fonseca-Santos B, Chorilli M (2014) Nanotechnology-based drug delivery systems for treatment of oral cancer: a review. Int J Nanomedicine 9:3719–3735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Suri SS, Fenniri H, Singh B (2007) Nanotechnology-based drug delivery systems. J Occup Med Toxicol 2:16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mohamadreza KB, Mahdi S, Milad P-M, Claudio T (2012) Scope of nanotechnology-based radiation therapy and thermotherapy methods in cancer treatment. Curr Cancer Drug Targets 12:998–1015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mi Y, Shao Z, Vang J, Kaidar-Person O, Wang AZ (2016) Application of nanotechnology to cancer radiotherapy. Cancer Nanotechnol 7:11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Song G, Cheng L, Chao Y, Yang K, Liu Z (2017) Emerging nanotechnology and advanced materials for cancer radiation therapy. Adv Mater 29:1700996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Richardson DB, Cardis E, Daniels RD, Gillies M, O’Hagan JA, Hamra GB, et al. (2015) Risk of cancer from occupational exposure to ionising radiation: retrospective cohort study of workers in France, the United Kingdom, and the United States (INWORKS). BMJ 351Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ma N, Wu F-G, Zhang X, Jiang Y-W, Jia H-R, Wang H-Y et al (2017) Shape-dependent radiosensitization effect of gold nanostructures in cancer radiotherapy: comparison of gold nanoparticles, nanospikes, and nanorods. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9:13037–13048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ma N, Liu P, He N, Gu N, Wu F-G, Chen Z (2017) Action of gold nanospikes-based nanoradiosensitizers: cellular internalization, radiotherapy, and autophagy. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9:31526–31542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ma N, Jiang Y-W, Zhang X, Wu H, Myers JN, Liu P et al (2016) Enhanced radiosensitization of gold nanospikes via hyperthermia in combined cancer radiation and photothermal therapy. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8:28480–28494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Desouky O, Ding N, Zhou G (2015) Targeted and non-targeted effects of ionizing radiation. J Radiat Res Appl Sci 8:247–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hubenak JR, Zhang Q, Branch CD, Kronowitz SJ (2014) Mechanisms of injury to normal tissue after radiotherapy: a review. Plast Reconstr Surg 133:49e–56eCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Baskar R, Dai J, Wenlong N, Yeo R, Yeoh K-W (2014) Biological response of cancer cells to radiation treatment. Front Mol Biosci 1:24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hashmi ASK, Hutchings GJ (2006) Gold catalysis. Angew Chem Int Ed 45:7896–7936CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hashmi ASK, Frost TM, Bats JW (2000) Highly selective gold-catalyzed arene synthesis. J Am Chem Soc 122:11553–11554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hashmi ASK, Schwarz L, Choi J-H, Frost TM (2000) A new gold-catalyzed C−C bond formation. Angew Chem Int Ed 39:2285–2288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kim S-R, Kim E-H (2018) Feasibility study on the use of gold nanoparticles in fractionated kilovoltage X-ray treatment of melanoma. Int J Radiat Biol 94:8–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    McQuaid HN, Muir MF, Taggart LE, McMahon SJ, Coulter JA, Hyland WB et al (2016) Imaging and radiation effects of gold nanoparticles in tumour cells. Sci Rep 6:19442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Xie X, Liao J, Shao X, Li Q, Lin Y (2017) The effect of shape on cellular uptake of gold nanoparticles in the forms of stars, rods, and triangles. Sci Rep 7:3827CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Oh N, Park J-H (2014) Endocytosis and exocytosis of nanoparticles in mammalian cells. Int J Nanomedicine 9:51–63Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    O’Connor MJ (2015) Targeting the DNA damage response in cancer. Mol Cell 60:547–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Borrego-Soto G, Ortiz-López R, Rojas-Martínez A (2015) Ionizing radiation-induced DNA injury and damage detection in patients with breast cancer. Genet Mol Biol 38:420–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Retif P, Pinel S, Toussaint M, Frochot C, Chouikrat R, Bastogne T et al (2015) Nanoparticles for radiation therapy enhancement: the key parameters. Theranostics. 5:1030–1044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Prado AR, Oliveira JP, Keijok WJ, Milaneze BA, Nogueira BV, Guimarães MCC et al (2014) Comparison between the synthesis of gold nanoparticles with sodium citrate and sodium tetraboreto. BMC Proc 8:P252-PCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mosmann T (1983) Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. J Immunol Methods 65:55–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ito A, Kuga Y, Honda H, Kikkawa H, Horiuchi A, Watanabe Y et al Magnetite nanoparticle-loaded anti-HER2 immunoliposomes for combination of antibody therapy with hyperthermia. Cancer Lett 212:167–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Strober W (1997) Trypan blue exclusion test of cell viability. Curr Protoc Immunol 21:A.3B.1–A.3B.2Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Franken NAP, Rodermond HM, Stap J, Haveman J, van Bree C (2006) Clonogenic assay of cells in vitro. Nat Protoc 1:2315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Srivastava P, Sarma A, Chaturvedi CM (2018) Targeting DNA repair with PNKP inhibition sensitizes radioresistant prostate cancer cells to high LET radiation. PLoS One 13:e0190516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Enferadi M, Fu S-Y, Hong J-H, Tung C-J, Chao T-C, Wey S-P et al (2018) Radiosensitization of ultrasmall GNP–PEG–cRGDfK in ALTS1C1 exposed to therapeutic protons and kilovoltage and megavoltage photons. Int J Radiat Biol 94:124–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T (1989) Molecular cloning. Cold spring harbor laboratory press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW (2012) NIH image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods 9:671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Huang X, El-Sayed MA (2010) Gold nanoparticles: optical properties and implementations in cancer diagnosis and photothermal therapy. J Adv Res 1:13–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Connor Ellen E, Mwamuka J, Gole A, Murphy Catherine J, Wyatt Michael D (2005) Gold nanoparticles are taken up by human cells but do not cause acute cytotoxicity. Small 1:325–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Zhang X-D, Guo M-L, Wu H-Y, Sun Y-M, Ding Y-Q, Feng X et al (2009) Irradiation stability and cytotoxicity of gold nanoparticles for radiotherapy. Int J Nanomedicine 4:165–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Chithrani BD, Ghazani AA, Chan WCW (2006) Determining the size and shape dependence of gold nanoparticle uptake into mammalian cells. Nano Lett 6:662–668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Strober W (2001) Trypan blue exclusion test of cell viability. Curr Protoc Immunol:21:A.3B.1–21:A.3B.2Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Hahn AT, Jones JT, Meyer T (2009) Quantitative analysis of cell cycle phase durations and PC12 differentiation using fluorescent biosensors. Cell Cycle 8:1044–1052CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Rave-Frank M, Schmidberger H Fau - Christiansen H, Christiansen H Fau - Boll C, Boll C Fau - Lehmann J, Lehmann J Fau - Weiss E, Weiss E. (n.d.) Comparison of the combined action of oxaliplatin or cisplatin and radiation in cervical and lung cancer cells. Int J Radiat Biol 83(1):41-47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Kubli DA, Sussman MA (2017) Eat, breathe, ROS: controlling stem cell fate through metabolism. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther 15:345–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Ramkumar R, Balasubramani G, Raja RK, Raja M, Govindan R, Girija EK et al (2017) Lantana camara Linn root extract-mediated gold nanoparticles and their in vitro antioxidant and cytotoxic potentials. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol 45:748–757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Geetha R, Ashokkumar T, Tamilselvan S, Govindaraju K, Sadiq M, Singaravelu G (2013) Green synthesis of gold nanoparticles and their anticancer activity. Cancer Nanotechnol 4:91–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Krishnaraj C, Muthukumaran P, Ramachandrana R, Balakumarana MD, Kalaichelvana PT (2014) Acalypha indica Linn: biogenic synthesis of silver and gold nanoparticles and their cytotoxic effects against MDA-MB-231, human breast cancer cells. Biotechnol Rep (Amst) 4:42-49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Sakamuru S, Attene-Ramos MS, Xia M (2016) Mitochondrial membrane potential assay. In: Zhu H, Xia M (eds) High-throughput screening assays in toxicology. Springer New York, New York, pp 17–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Baracca A, Sgarbi G, Solaini G, Lenaz G (2003) Rhodamine 123 as a probe of mitochondrial membrane potential: evaluation of proton flux through F(0) during ATP synthesis. Biochim Biophys Acta 1606:137–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Sakamuru S, Li X, Attene-Ramos MS, Huang R, Lu J, Shou L et al (2012) Application of a homogenous membrane potential assay to assess mitochondrial function. Physiol Genomics 44:495–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Baselet B, Belmans N, Coninx E, Lowe D, Janssen A, Michaux A et al (2017) Functional gene analysis reveals cell cycle changes and inflammation in endothelial cells irradiated with a single X-ray dose. Front Pharmacol 8:213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Jiang J, Mao Q, Li H, Lou J (2017) Apigenin stabilized gold nanoparticles increased radiation therapy efficiency in lung cancer cells. Int J Clin Exp Med 10:13298–13305Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Priya Yadav
    • 1
  • Arghya Bandyopadhyay
    • 1
    • 2
  • Anindita Chakraborty
    • 3
  • Sk. Manirul Islam
    • 4
  • Keka Sarkar
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of MicrobiologyUniversity of KalyaniKalyaniIndia
  2. 2.Department of Chemical SciencesIndian Institute of Science Education and Research (IISER) KolkataMohanpurIndia
  3. 3.Radiation Biology, UGC-DAE CSR (Kolkata Centre)KolkataIndia
  4. 4.Department of ChemistryUniversity of KalyaniKalyaniIndia

Personalised recommendations