Integrated bagasse utilization system based on hydrothermal liquefaction in sugarcane mills: theoretical approach compared with present practices

Abstract

Sugarcane bagasse is used to produce bioenergy in sugar mills and export excess energy as electricity to the community. Researchers have investigated the production of high-energy bio-oil and hydrochar from bagasse using hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) on a laboratory scale. However, the energy efficiency of the HTL integrated bagasse utilization system at the industrial level is unknown, especially compared with present practices of baggage utilization. Therefore, the objective of this study was to analyze the theoretical energy utilization of an HTL integrated bagasse utilization system compared with conventional bagasse utilization systems. A new bagasse utilization system was modeled and combined with HTL. We used data from published articles and experiments to analyze the model. We simulated the model with different bio-oil and hydrochar yields and four levels of heat recovery from the HTL final products. The results show that the novel process could exceed electricity export rate compared with the conventional system, with high bio-oil and hydrochar yield at 23% heat recovery level. Further results show that the HTL integrated system with high bio-oil and hydrochar yields and 75% heat recovery presented an electricity export benefit, which was above 170% higher than that of the existing method in ideal conditions when using high-moisture bagasse. Finally, further research should develop high-efficiency heat recovery systems, environmentally friendly HTL product separation techniques, and direct combustion of bio-oil and hydrochar to realize this concept for improving the energy utilization of sugarcane mills.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Abbreviations

BUS1 :

Existing bagasse utilization system

BUS2 :

Hydrothermal liquefaction integrated bagasse utilization system

EE:

Electricity export

HHV:

High heating value

HTL:

Hydrothermal liquefaction

YC :

Yield configurations

DCM :

Dichloromethane

ηCHP :

Combined efficiency of cogeneration (decimal)

A :

Ash content (decimal)

B :

Bix level (decimal)

BP :

Bagasse percentage (decimal)

c :

Specific heat of bagasse (kJ/(kg °C))

C i :

Specific heat of the ith feedstock component (kJ/(kg °C))

CP :

Sugarcane processed (kg)

E bh :

Energy requirements for bagasse heating (MJ/t-cane)

E C1 :

Energy available from the cogeneration of BUS1 (MJ)

EE1 :

Electricity exported from BUS1 (MJ)

EE2 :

Electricity exported from BUS2 (MJ)

E HTL :

Energy requirements for HTL of wet bagasse (MJ/t-cane)

E l :

Energy loss at HTL (MJ/t-cane) (i.e., assumed 25% of the sum of Ebh and Ew)

E P :

Energy required for material pump (MJ/t-cane)

E R :

Energy required for separation of bio-oil (MJ/t-cane)

E U :

Electricity used to process sugarcane (MJ)

E w :

Energy required to heat the water (MJ/t-cane)

HHV hp :

Higher heating value of dry HTL product (bio-oil or hydrochar) (MJ/kg)

HHV p :

Predicted high heating value based on Ash and Brix free conditions (kJ/kg)

H u :

Heat used to process sugarcane (MJ)

LHV b :

Low heating value of bagasse (kJ/kg)

LHV hc :

Low heating value of hydrochar (MJ/kg)

LHV bo :

Low heating value of bio-oil (MJ/kg)

LHV hp :

Low heating value of HTL product (bio-oil or hydrochar) (MJ/kg)

m :

Dry weight of bagasse per t-cane (kg)

M :

Moisture content of bagasse (decimal)

m i :

Weight of ith feedstock component (water or bagasse) (kg)

Q :

Recoverable heat from the HTL product (kJ)

T e :

Environment temperature (°C)

T f :

Maximum approachable temperature of the feed at the end of the heat exchanger (°C)

Y hc :

Yield of hydrochar (kg)

Y bo :

Yield of bio-oil (kg)

ΔT :

Temperature difference (°C)

M hp :

Moisture content of HTL products (bio-oil or hydrochar) (decimal)

EEB :

Electricity export benefits (%)

References

  1. 1.

    Chambon CL, Mkhize TY, Reddy P, Brandt-Talbot A, Deenadayalu N, Fennell PS, Hallett JP (2018) Pretreatment of South African sugarcane bagasse using a low-cost protic ionic liquid: a comparison of whole, depithed, fibrous and pith bagasse fractions. Biotechnol Biofuels 11:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-018-1247-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    FOA (2018) Food security and conflict

  3. 3.

    Chauhan MK, Varun CS et al (2011) Life cycle assessment of sugar industry: a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 15:3445–3453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.04.033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Alena A (2013) Cogenerations of energy from sugar factory bagasse. Am J Energy Eng 1:22. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajee.20130102.11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Rípoli TCC, Molina WF Jr, Rípoli MLCR (2000) Energy potential of sugar cane biomass in Brazil. Sci Agric 57:677–681. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-90162000000400013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Peterson AA, Vogel F, Lachance RP, Fröling M, Antal MJ Jr, Tester JW (2008) Thermochemical biofuel production in hydrothermal media: a review of sub- and supercritical water technologies. Energy Environ Sci 1:32–65. https://doi.org/10.1039/b810100k

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Ahmed Baloch H, Nizamuddin S, Siddiqui MTH, Mubarak NM, Dumbre DK, Srinivasan MP, Griffin GJ (2018) Sub-supercritical liquefaction of sugarcane bagasse for production of bio-oil and char: effect of two solvents. J Environ Chem Eng 6:6589–6601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2018.10.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Kosinkova J, Ramirez JA, Nguyen J, Ristovski Z, Brown R, Lin CSK, Rainey TJ (2015) Hydrothermal liquefaction of bagasse using ethanol and black liquor as solvents. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefin 9:630–638. https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Yan X, Wang W, Zhao Y, Zhou J (2018) The effect of different catalysts and process parameters on the chemical content of bio-oils from hydrothermal liquefaction of sugarcane bagasse. BioResources 13:997–1018

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Kambo HS, Dutta A (2015) A comparative review of biochar and hydrochar in terms of production, physico-chemical properties and applications. Renew Sust Energ Rev 45:359–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.01.050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Anastasakis K, Biller P, Madsen RB, Glasius M, Johannsen I (2018) Continuous hydrothermal liquefaction of biomass in a novel pilot plant with heat recovery and hydraulic oscillation. Energies 11:1–23. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11102695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Haarlemmer G, Guizani C, Anouti S, Déniel M, Roubaud A, Valin S (2016) Analysis and comparison of bio-oils obtained by hydrothermal liquefaction and fast pyrolysis of beech wood. Fuel 174:180–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2016.01.082

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Lehto J, Oasmaa A, Solantausta Y, Kytö M, Chiaramonti D (2014) Review of fuel oil quality and combustion of fast pyrolysis bio-oils from lignocellulosic biomass. Appl Energy 116:178–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.11.040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Bioenergy IEA (2020) Boiler combustion. In: IEA bioenergy. http://task34.ieabioenergy.com/boiler-combustion/. Accessed 7 Mar 2020

  15. 15.

    Supriya A, Samantray R, Mishra SC (2016) Biochar, a substitute for fossil fuels Akankshya. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 178. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/755/1/011001

  16. 16.

    Gao X, Wu H (2011) Biochar as a fuel: 4. Emission behavior and characteristics of PM 1 and PM10 from the combustion of pulverized biochar in a drop-tube furnace. Energy Fuel 25:2702–2710. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef200296u

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Ramirez JA, Brown R, Rainey TJ (2018) Techno-economic analysis of the thermal liquefaction of sugarcane bagasse in ethanol to produce liquid fuels. Appl Energy 224:184–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.04.127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Engineering ToolBox (2003) Heat capacity of common substances heat. In: Heat capacity of common substances heat. https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/specific-heat-capacity-d_391.html. Accessed 17 Sep 2019

  19. 19.

    Ariyawansha T, Abeyrathna D, Kulasekara B (2020) A novel approach to minimize energy requirements and maximize biomass utilization of the sugarcane harvesting system in Sri Lanka. Energies 13:1497. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13061497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    MoistTech Corp (2020) Bagasse moisture. https://www.moisttech.com/applications/bioenergy-moisture/bagasse-moisture/. Accessed 7 Apr 2020

  21. 21.

    Anwar SI (2010) Determination of moisture content of bagasse of jaggery unit using microwave oven. J Eng Sci Technol 5:472–478

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Camargo JMO, Gallego-Ríos JM, Neto AMP, Antonio GC, Modesto M, Leite JTC (2020) Characterization of sugarcane straw and bagasse from dry cleaning system of sugarcane for cogeneration system. Renew Energy 158:500–508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.05.107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Sosa-Arnao JH, Corrêa JLG, Silva MA, Nebra SA (2006) Sugar cane bagasse drying—a review. Int Sugar J 108:381–386

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Polanco LS, Day DF, Kochergin V, Alvarez J (2014) Potential role of a superheated steam dryer in an energy cane/sweet sorgum biorefinery. In: Sustainable bioproducts initiative—SUBI Annual Meeting. Baton Rouge, LA

  25. 25.

    Watson J, Lu J, de Souza R, Si B, Zhang Y, Liu Z (2019) Effects of the extraction solvents in hydrothermal liquefaction processes: biocrude oil quality and energy conversion efficiency. Energy 167:189–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.11.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Singh R, Prakash A, Balagurumurthy B, Singh R, Saran S, Bhaskar T (2015) Hydrothermal liquefaction of agricultural and forest biomass residue: comparative study. J Mater Cycles Waste Manage 17:442–452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-014-0277-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Mohamed Abdalla A, Hasan Hassan T, Eltayeb Mansour M (2018) Performance of wet and dry bagasse combustion in Assalaya Sugar Factory—Sudan. Innov Ener Res 74172:1792576–1791463. https://doi.org/10.4172/2576-1463.1000179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Kader EA, Hussein HS, Hussien NH, Hawash SI (2015) Effect of extractive solvents on bio-oil production from microalgae via hydrothermal liquefaction. 38:1–7

  29. 29.

    Rosendahl L (2017) Direct thermochemical liquefaction for energy applications. Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    B. Boundy, S. W. Diegel LW and SCD (2011) Biomass energy data book, 4th ed. Department of Energy

  31. 31.

    NTP (National Toxicology Program) (2016) Dichloromethane. Research Triangle Park, NC, USA

  32. 32.

    Castro ZS, Gauthier-Maradei P, Hernández HE (2013) Effect of particle size and humidity on sugarcane bagasse combustion in a fixed bed furnace. Revista Ion 26:73–85

    Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Wang W, Zhang Y, Lee KS, Li B (2019) Optimal design of a double pipe heat exchanger based on the outward helically corrugated tube. Int J Heat Mass Transf 135:706–716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2019.01.115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Peccini A, Lemos JC, Costa ALH, Bagajewicz MJ (2019) Optimal design of double pipe heat exchanger structures. Ind Eng Chem Res 58:12080–12096. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.9b01536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Klemmer M, Madsen RB, Houlberg K, Mørup AJ, Christensen PS, Becker J, Glasius M, Iversen BB (2016) Effect of aqueous phase recycling in continuous hydrothermal liquefaction. Ind Eng Chem Res 55:12317–12325. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.6b03414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Shah AA, Toor SS, Seehar TH, Nielsen RS, H. Nielsen A, Pedersen TH, Rosendahl LA (2020) Bio-crude production through aqueous phase recycling of hydrothermal liquefaction of sewage sludge. Energies 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13020493

  37. 37.

    Cortés MG, Verelst H, Pedraja RE, Suárez EG (2011) Water and wastewater management in a sugar process production. Chem Eng Trans 25:839–844. https://doi.org/10.3303/CET1125140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Gunjal B, Gunjal A (2013) Water conservation in sugar industry. Nat Environ Pollut Technol 12:325–330

    Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Wang B, Huang Y, Zhang J (2014) Hydrothermal liquefaction of lignite, wheat straw and plastic waste in sub-critical water for oil: product distribution. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 110:382–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2014.10.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Minowa T, Kondo T, Sudirjo ST (1998) Thermochemical liquefaction of Indonesian biomass residues. Biomass Bioenergy 14:517–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0961-9534(98)00006-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Mathanker A, Pudasainee D, Kumar A, Gupta R (2020) Hydrothermal liquefaction of lignocellulosic biomass feedstock to produce biofuels: parametric study and products characterization. Fuel 271:117534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.117534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Bauer SK, Reynolds CF, Peng S, Colosi LM (2018) Evaluating the water quality impacts of hydrothermal liquefaction assessment of carbon, nitrogen, and energy recovery. Bioresour Technol Rep 2:115–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biteb.2018.04.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Martinez-Hernandez E, Amezcua-Allieri MA, Sadhukhan J, Anell JA (2017) Sugarcane bagasse valorization strategies for bioethanol and energy production. In: Oliveira A De (ed) Sugarcane—technology and research. pp 71–83

  44. 44.

    Jayapal N, Samanta AK, Kolte AP, Senani S, Sridhar M, Suresh KP, Sampath KT (2013) Value addition to sugarcane bagasse: xylan extraction and its process optimization for xylooligosaccharides production. Ind Crop Prod 42:14–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2012.05.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Soares LA, Braga JK, Motteran F, Sakamoto IK, Monteiro PAS, Seleghim P Jr, Varesche MBA (2019) Bioconversion of sugarcane bagasse into value-added products by bioaugmentation of endogenous cellulolytic and fermentative communities. Waste Biomass Valoriz 10:1899–1912. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-018-0201-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Shao Y, Tsang DCW, Shen D, Zhou Y, Jin Z, Zhou D, Lu W, Long Y (2020) Acidic seawater improved 5-hydroxymethylfurfural yield from sugarcane bagasse under microwave hydrothermal liquefaction. Environ Res 184:109340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.109340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Ebikade E, Athaley A, Fisher B, Yang K, Wu C, Ierapetritou MG, Vlachos DG (2020) The future is garbage: repurposing of food waste to an integrated biorefinery. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 8:8124–8136. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b07479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Kim S, Lee Y, Andrew Lin KY, Hong E, Kwon EE, Lee J (2020) The valorization of food waste via pyrolysis. J Clean Prod 259:120816. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Cherubini F (2010) The biorefinery concept: using biomass instead of oil for producing energy and chemicals. Energy Convers Manag 51:1412–1421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2010.01.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ryozo Noguchi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ariyawansha, T., Abeyrathna, D., Ahamed, T. et al. Integrated bagasse utilization system based on hydrothermal liquefaction in sugarcane mills: theoretical approach compared with present practices. Biomass Conv. Bioref. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-00958-w

Download citation

Keywords

  • Biomass
  • Bioenergy
  • Bio-oil
  • Hydrochar
  • Sugarcane
  • System