Experimental investigation on anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and water hyacinth in batch type reactor under mesophilic condition

  • Mayank Zala
  • Ravi Solanki
  • Purnanand V. BhaleEmail author
  • Vaishak S
Original Article


India generated around 1.45 lakh tonne of municipal solid waste (MSW) per day, out of which 40% is organic biodegradable waste, which has food waste as the major component. Scientific conversion of this food waste to energy is always challenging. In the present study, anaerobic digestibility of food waste as a mono digestion substrate and co-digestion of food waste with water hyacinth were tested and analyzed in a batch type anaerobic digester of capacity 60 l. Four different samples, i.e., only food waste, only water hyacinth, and with food waste to water hyacinth in the ratio of 15:2 and 8:3 to maintain total solids contain equal in all samples were analyzed for the anaerobic digestion (AD). Biogas yield for the above four samples were found to be 370.85 (ml/g VS), 320.54 (ml/g VS), 286.50 (ml/g VS), and 298.83 (ml/g VS), respectively. The average methane content was found to be 68.3%, 58.2%, 52.1%, and 65.4%, respectively whereas CO2 content was found to be 30.2%, 40.9%, 46.6%, and 33.3%, respectively, using gas chromatography. The temperature variation for anaerobic digester was measured in the range of 32 to 43 °C during the experiment without supplying any external heat. pH value of all samples was ranged between 6.5 and 7.5 at the end of the experiment. The results of this study conclude that co-digestion of food waste with water hyacinth has higher operational stability compared to mono digestion of food waste.


Anaerobic co-digestion Water hyacinth Mesophilic Biogas yield Food waste 



  1. 1.
    Gustavsson J, Cederberg C, Sonesson U, et al (2011) Global food losses and food wasteGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Searchinger T, Waite R, Hanson C, et al (2018) Creating a sustainable food future: synthesis reportGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Joshi R, Ahmed S (2016) Status and challenges of municipal solid waste management in India: a review. Cogent Environ Sci 2:1–18. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kumar V, Pandit RK (2013) Problems of solid waste management in Indian cities. Int J Sci Res Publ 3:2250–3153Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zhang C, Su H, Baeyens J, Tan T (2014) Reviewing the anaerobic digestion of food waste for biogas production. Renew Sust Energ Rev 38:383–392. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Banks CJ, Chesshire M, Heaven S, Arnold R (2011) Anaerobic digestion of source-segregated domestic food waste: performance assessment by mass and energy balance. Bioresour Technol 102:612–620. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zhang C, Xiao G, Peng L, Su H, Tan T (2013) The anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and cattle manure. Bioresour Technol 129:170–176. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhang R, El-Mashad HM, Hartman K et al (2007) Characterization of food waste as feedstock for anaerobic digestion. Bioresour Technol 98:929–935. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kim HW, Han SK, Shin HS (2003) The optimisation of food waste addition as a co-substrate in anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge. Waste Manag Res 21:515–526. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cho JK, Park SC, Chang HN (1995) Biochemical methane potential and solid state anaerobic digestion of Korean food wastes. Bioresour Technol 52:245–253. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Heo NH, Park SC, Kang PH (2004) Effects of mixture ratio and hydraulic retention time on single-stage anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and waste activated sludge. J Environ Sci Health A 39:1739–1756. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zhang J, Wang Q, Jiang J (2013) Lime mud from paper-making process addition to food waste synergistically enhances hydrogen fermentation performance. Int J Hydrog Energy 38:2738–2745. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Haider MR, Zeshan YS et al (2015) Effect of mixing ratio of food waste and rice husk co-digestion and substrate to inoculum ratio on biogas production. Bioresour Technol 190:451–457. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zhang L, Lee YW, Jahng D (2011) Anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and piggery wastewater: focusing on the role of trace elements. Bioresour Technol 102:5048–5059. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Prasad R, Yadav KD (2016) Water hyacinth as a potential natural resourceGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zhang J, Wang Q, Zheng P, Wang Y (2014) Anaerobic digestion of food waste stabilized by lime mud from papermaking process. Bioresour Technol 170:270–277. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zhang Y, Banks CJ, Heaven S (2012) Co-digestion of source segregated domestic food waste to improve process stability. Bioresour Technol 114:168–178. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chen X, Romano RT, Zhang R (2010) Anaerobic digestion of food wastes for biogas production. Int J Agric Biol Eng 3:61–72. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    El-Mashad HM, Zeeman G, Van Loon WKP, et al (2004) Effect of temperature and temperature fluctuation on thermophilic anaerobic digestion of cattle manure. Bioresour Technol 95:191–201. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mayank Zala
    • 1
  • Ravi Solanki
    • 1
  • Purnanand V. Bhale
    • 1
    Email author
  • Vaishak S
    • 1
  1. 1.Renewable and Sustainable Energy Lab, Mechanical Engineering DepartmentS V National Institute of TechnologySuratIndia

Personalised recommendations