Advertisement

Effects of hydrothermal carbonization on catalytic fast pyrolysis of tobacco stems

  • Wenlu Gu
  • Zhaosheng YuEmail author
  • Shiwen Fang
  • Minquan Dai
  • Lin Chen
  • Xiaoqian Ma
Original Article
  • 190 Downloads

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of hydrothermal temperature (HT, 160–240 °C) and residence time (RT, 30–90 min) of hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) on the properties of tobacco stems and their pyrolysis behaviors with catalysts (CaO, HZSM-5). The characterization of hydrothermal products (hydrochars) was carried out by X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and 13C superconducting nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). The pyrolysis experiments of the samples were conducted by pyrolysis-gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (Py-GC/MS) and thermogravimetric analyzer coupled to Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (TG-FTIR). The experimental results showed that with the increase of HT and RT, the fixed carbon content, high heating value, and energy densification of hydrochar were increasing and the crystallinity index increased first and then decreased, and the aromaticity increased continuously. HTC reduced the contents of acetic acid and ketones in the bio-oil and increased the contents of hydrocarbons and 1,6-anhydro-β-d-glucopyranose. When the HT was higher than 180 °C, excessive aromatization of hydrochar affected the yield of chemical compounds in bio-oil. When HT was lower than and equal to 200 °C, the catalyst HZSM-5 and HTC exhibited combined effects of promoting an increase in the production of aromatic hydrocarbons. When HT was higher than 200 °C, the catalytic effects of the double-layer catalysts were better than that of the single-layer catalyst, and CaO and HZSM-5 exhibited synergistic effects that promoted an increase in aromatic hydrocarbon content.

Keywords

Tobacco stems Hydrothermal carbonization Catalytic fast pyrolysis CaO HZSM-5 

Notes

Funding information

This work was supported by the National Science and Technology Major Project (2018YFC1901200); the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51406058); the Guangdong Natural Science Foundation (2015A030313227); the China Scholarship Council (201706155065); the Guangdong Province Engineering Research Center of Highly Efficient and Low Pollution Energy Conversion; and the Key Laboratory of Efficient and Clean Energy Utilization of Guangdong Higher Education Institutes, South China University of Technology (KLB10004).

References

  1. 1.
    Žičkienė S, Tamašauskienė Z (2019) Carbon neutrality and sustainable development. In: Leal Filho W (ed) Encyclopedia of sustainability in higher education. Springer, Cham, pp 1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63951-2_266-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Liu Y, Dong J, Liu G, Yang H, Liu W, Wang L, Kong C, Zheng D, Yang J, Deng L (2015) Co-digestion of tobacco waste with different agricultural biomass feedstocks and the inhibition of tobacco viruses by anaerobic digestion. Bioresour Technol 189:210–216.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.04.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wang C, Li L, Chen R, Ma X, Lu M, Ma W, Peng H (2019) Thermal conversion of tobacco stem into gaseous products. J Therm Anal Calorim 137(3):811–823.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-019-08010-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chen Z, Leng E, Zhang Y, Zheng A, Peng Y, Gong X, Huang Y, Qiao Y (2018) Pyrolysis characteristics of tobacco stem after different solvent leaching treatments. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 130:350–357.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2017.12.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wu W, Mei Y, Zhang L, Liu R, Cai J (2015) Kinetics and reaction chemistry of pyrolysis and combustion of tobacco waste. Fuel 156:71–80.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2015.04.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hu X, Gholizadeh M (2019) Biomass pyrolysis: a review of the process development and challenges from initial researches up to the commercialisation stage. J Energy Chem 39:109–143.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jechem.2019.01.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dhyani V, Bhaskar T (2017) A comprehensive review on the pyrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass. Renew Energy 129:695–716.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.04.035 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dai L, He C, Wang Y, Liu Y, Yu Z, Zhou Y, Fan L, Duan D, Ruan R (2017) Comparative study on microwave and conventional hydrothermal pretreatment of bamboo sawdust: hydrochar properties and its pyrolysis behaviors. Energy Convers Manag 146:1–7.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2017.05.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zhang S, Chen T, Xiong Y, Dong Q (2017) Effects of wet torrefaction on the physicochemical properties and pyrolysis product properties of rice husk. Energy Convers Manag 141:403–409.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2016.10.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kumar M, Oyedun AO, Kumar A (2018) A review on the current status of various hydrothermal technologies on biomass feedstock. Renew Sust Energ Rev 81:1742–1770.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.270 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dai L, He C, Wang Y, Liu Y, Ruan R, Yu Z, Zhou Y, Duan D, Fan L, Zhao Y (2018) Hydrothermal pretreatment of bamboo sawdust using microwave irradiation. Bioresour Technol 247:234–241.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.08.104 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fang J, Zhan L, Ok YS, Gao B (2018) Minireview of potential applications of hydrochar derived from hydrothermal carbonization of biomass. J Ind Eng Chem 57:15–21.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2017.08.026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Elaigwu SE, Greenway GM (2019) Characterization of energy-rich hydrochars from microwave-assisted hydrothermal carbonization of coconut shell. Waste Biomass Valoriz 10(7):1979–1987.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-018-0209-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    He C, Giannis A, Wang JY (2013) Conversion of sewage sludge to clean solid fuel using hydrothermal carbonization: hydrochar fuel characteristics and combustion behavior. Appl Energy 111(11):257–266.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.04.084 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chen X, Ma X, Peng X, Lin Y, Yao Z (2018) Conversion of sweet potato waste to solid fuel via hydrothermal carbonization. Bioresour Technol 249:900–907.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.10.096 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    He C, Zhao J, Yang Y, Wang J (2016) Multiscale characteristics dynamics of hydrochar from hydrothermal conversion of sewage sludge under sub- and near-critical water. Bioresour Technol 211:486–493.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.03.110 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Xiong Z, Syed-Hassan SSA, Xu J, Wang Y, Hu S, Su S, Zhang S, Xiang J (2018) Evolution of coke structures during the pyrolysis of bio-oil at various temperatures and heating rates. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 134:336–342.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2018.06.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zheng X, Ying Z, Wang B, Chen C (2019) Effect of calcium oxide addition on tar formation during the pyrolysis of key municipal solid waste (MSW) components. Waste Biomass Valoriz 10(8):2309–2318.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-018-0249-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Liu S, Xie Q, Zhang B, Cheng Y, Liu Y, Chen P, Ruan R (2016) Fast microwave-assisted catalytic co-pyrolysis of corn stover and scum for bio-oil production with CaO and HZSM-5 as the catalyst. Bioresour Technol 204:164–170.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.12.085 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dickerson T, Soria J (2013) Catalytic fast pyrolysis: a review. Energies 6(1):514–538.  https://doi.org/10.3390/en6010514 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ding K, Zhong Z, Wang J, Zhang B, Fan L, Liu S, Wang Y, Liu Y, Zhong D, Chen P, Ruan R (2018) Improving hydrocarbon yield from catalytic fast co-pyrolysis of hemicellulose and plastic in the dual-catalyst bed of CaO and HZSM-5. Bioresour Technol 261:86–92.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.03.138 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zheng A, Zhao Z, Chang S, Huang Z, Zhao K, Wei G, He F, Li H (2015) Comparison of the effect of wet and dry torrefaction on chemical structure and pyrolysis behavior of corncobs. Bioresour Technol 176:15–22.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.10.157 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lin Y, Ma X, Peng X, Yu Z (2016) A mechanism study on hydrothermal carbonization of waste textile. Energy Fuel 30(9):7746–7754.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.6b01365 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kambo HS, Dutta A (2015) Comparative evaluation of torrefaction and hydrothermal carbonization of lignocellulosic biomass for the production of solid biofuel. Energy Convers Manag 105:746–755.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2015.08.031 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Nakason K, Panyapinyopol B, Kanokkantapong V, Viriya-empikul N, Kraithong W, Pavasant P (2018) Characteristics of hydrochar and hydrothermal liquid products from hydrothermal carbonization of corncob. Biomass Conv Bioref 8(1):199–210.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-017-0279-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rodríguez Correa C, Ngamying C, Klank D, Kruse A (2018) Investigation of the textural and adsorption properties of activated carbon from HTC and pyrolysis carbonizates. Biomass Conv Bioref 8(2):317–328.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-017-0280-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Channiwala SA, Parikh PP (2002) A unified correlation for estimating HHV of solid, liquid and gaseous fuels. Fuel 81(8):1051–1063.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-2361(01)00131-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Islam MA, Akber MA, Limon SH, Akbor MA, Islam MA (2019) Characterization of solid biofuel produced from banana stalk via hydrothermal carbonization. Biomass Conv Bioref.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-019-00405-5
  29. 29.
    Zhao C, Jiang E, Chen A (2016) Volatile production from pyrolysis of cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin. J Energy Inst 90(6):902–913.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joei.2016.08.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wang T, Zhai Y, Zhu Y, Li C, Zeng G (2018) A review of the hydrothermal carbonization of biomass waste for hydrochar formation: process conditions, fundamentals, and physicochemical properties. Renew Sust Energ Rev 90:223–247.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.03.071 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Liu Z, Quek A, Hoekman SK, Balasubramanian R (2013) Production of solid biochar fuel from waste biomass by hydrothermal carbonization. Fuel 103(1):943–949.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2012.07.069 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Yao Z, Ma X (2018) Characteristics of co-hydrothermal carbonization on polyvinyl chloride wastes with bamboo. Bioresour Technol 247:302–309.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.09.098 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Liang M, Zhang K, Lei P, Wang B, Shu C-M, Li B (2019) Fuel properties and combustion kinetics of hydrochar derived from co-hydrothermal carbonization of tobacco residues and graphene oxide. Biomass Conv Bioref.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-019-00408-2
  34. 34.
    Sevilla M, Maciá-Agulló JA, Fuertes AB (2011) Hydrothermal carbonization of biomass as a route for the sequestration of CO: chemical and structural properties of the carbonized products. Biomass Bioenergy 35(7):3152–3159.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.04.032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Falco C, Marco-Lozar JP, Salinas-Torres D, Morallón E, Cazorla-Amorós D, Titirici MM, Lozano-Castelló D (2013) Tailoring the porosity of chemically activated hydrothermal carbons: influence of the precursor and hydrothermal carbonization temperature. Carbon 62(5):346–355.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2013.06.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Fernandez ME, Ledesma B, Román S, Bonelli PR, Cukierman AL (2015) Development and characterization of activated hydrochars from orange peels as potential adsorbents for emerging organic contaminants. Bioresour Technol 183(6):221–228.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.02.035 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Cao X, Ro KS, Libra JA, Kammann CI, Lima I, Berge N, Li L, Li Y, Chen N, Yang J (2013) Effects of biomass types and carbonization conditions on the chemical characteristics of hydrochars. J Agric Food Chem 61(39):9401–9411.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jf402345k CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Dong X, Guo S, Wang H, Wang Z, Gao X (2018) Physicochemical characteristics and FTIR-derived structural parameters of hydrochar produced by hydrothermal carbonisation of pea pod (Pisum sativum Linn.) waste. Biomass Conv Bioref 9:531–540.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-018-0363-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Patwardhan PR, Satrio JA, Brown RC, Shanks BH (2010) Influence of inorganic salts on the primary pyrolysis products of cellulose. Bioresour Technol 101(12):4646–4655.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.01.112 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Yu Z, Dai M, Huang M, Fang S, Xu J, Lin Y, Ma X (2018) Catalytic characteristics of the fast pyrolysis of microalgae over oil shale: analytical Py-GC/MS study. Renew Energy 125:465–471.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.02.136 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Jiang H, Deng S, Chen J, Zhang M, Li S, Shao Y, Yang J, Li J (2017) Effect of hydrothermal pretreatment on product distribution and characteristics of oil produced by the pyrolysis of Huadian oil shale. Energy Convers Manag 143:505–512.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2017.04.037 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Zhao S, Bang X, Rony AH, Toan S, Chen S, Gasem KAM, Adidharma H, Fan M, Xiang W (2017) Thermogravimetric and kinetics investigation of pine wood pyrolysis catalyzed with alkali-treated CaO/ZSM-5. Energy Convers Manag 146:182–194.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2017.04.104 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Lee S, Lee MG, Park J (2018) Catalytic upgrading pyrolysis of pine sawdust for bio-oil with metal oxides. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 20(3):1553–1561.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-018-0716-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Zhu X, Qiang LU, Wenzhi LI, Zhang D (2010) Fast and catalytic pyrolysis of xylan: effects of temperature and M/HZSM-5 (M = Fe, Zn) catalysts on pyrolytic products. Front Energy Power Eng China 4(3):424–429.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-010-0015-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Vichaphund S, Aht-Ong D, Sricharoenchaikul V, Atong D (2014) Effect of synthesis time on physical properties and catalytic activities of synthesized HZSM-5 on the fast pyrolysis of Jatropha waste. Res Chem Intermed 40(7):2395–2406.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11164-014-1646-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Bagheri S (2017) Catalytic pyrolysis of biomass. In: Catalysis for green energy and technology. Springer, Cham, pp 141–154.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43104-8_8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Krutof A, Hawboldt KA (2018) Upgrading of biomass sourced pyrolysis oil review: focus on co-pyrolysis and vapour upgrading during pyrolysis. Biomass Conv Bioref 8(3):775–787.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-018-0326-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Dai M, Yu Z, Fang S, Ma X (2019) Behaviors, product characteristics and kinetics of catalytic co-pyrolysis spirulina and oil shale. Energy Convers Manag 192:1–10.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2019.04.032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Chen L, Yu Z, Liang J, Liao Y, Ma X (2018) Co-pyrolysis of Chlorella vulgaris and kitchen waste with different additives using TG-FTIR and Py-GC/MS. Energy Convers Manag 177:582–591.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2018.10.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Ma J, Luo H, Li Y, Liu Z, Li D, Gai C, Jiao W (2019) Pyrolysis kinetics and thermodynamic parameters of the hydrochars derived from co-hydrothermal carbonization of sawdust and sewage sludge using thermogravimetric analysis. Bioresour Technol 282:133–141.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.03.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Liu F, Yu R, Guo M (2017) Hydrothermal carbonization of forestry residues: influence of reaction temperature on holocellulose-derived hydrochar properties. J Mater Sci 52(3):1736–1746.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-016-0465-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Li B, Lv W, Zhang Q, Wang T, Ma L (2014) Pyrolysis and catalytic pyrolysis of industrial lignins by TG-FTIR: kinetics and products. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 108:295–300.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2014.04.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Electric PowerSouth China University of TechnologyGuangzhouChina
  2. 2.Guangdong Province Key Laboratory of Efficient and Clean Energy UtilizationGuangzhouChina

Personalised recommendations