Advertisement

Application of high-throughput screening for evaluating hydrolytic potential of cellulases

  • V. G. Choudhari
  • A. A. OdanethEmail author
  • A. M. Lali
Original Article
  • 73 Downloads

Abstract

Heterogeneous nature of cellulose is defiant to enzymatic hydrolysis and individual methods for activity determination of cellulases are inefficient to define actual potency. Hence, three major enzyme activities (FPase, CMCase, CBase) along with protein concentrations were determined to define biomass hydrolyzing potential of cellulases. In present study, tenfold downscaled (modified) assays based on high-throughput screening (HTS) system were developed to increase the throughput and efficiency of enzyme component assays. HTS is a powerful tool which facilitates discovery of new or improved enzymes with appropriate biochemical properties for commercial biorefineries. Cellulase activity of four commercial cellulase preparations was determined and was found to have no significant difference at the 95% confidence level between the values obtained using standard (IUPAC) method and modified microplate method. This modification allowed us to characterize cellulases based on the relative ratios of their individual components and avoids ambiguity concerning potency based on the conventional FPase assay. Also, this work puts forth a simple, rapid, and complete cellulolytic enzyme assay method.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

High-throughput screening Assay methods Cellulase FPase CMCase CBase 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the financial support provided by Department of Biotechnology, Ministry of Science and Technology, Government of India. The authors are also thankful to DBT-ICT Centre for Energy Biosciences, Institute of Chemical Technology for providing the research infrastructure and facilities.

Supplementary material

13399_2019_391_MOESM1_ESM.docx (219 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 219 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Dashtban M, Maki M, Leung KT, Mao C, Qin W (2010) Cellulase activities in biomass conversion: measurement methods and comparison. Crit Rev Biotechnol 30:302–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gusakov AV (2013) Cellulases and hemicellulases in the 21st century race for cellulosic ethanol. Biofuels 4:3–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Klein-Marcuschamer D, Oleskowicz-Popiel P, Simmons BA, Blanch HW (2012) The challenge of enzyme cost in the production of lignocellulosic biofuels. Biotechnol Bioeng 109:1083–1087CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Percival Zhang YH, Himmel ME, Mielenz JR (2006) Outlook for cellulase improvement: screening and selection strategies. Biotechnol Adv 24:452–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gurram RN, Menkhaus TJ (2014) Continuous enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass with simultaneous detoxification and enzyme recovery. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 173:1319–1335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rani V, Mohanram S, Tiwari R, Nain L, Arora A (2014) Beta-glucosidase : key enzyme in determining efficiency of Cellulase and biomass hydrolysis. J Bioproces Biotech 5:1–8Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kumar R, Wyman CE (2009) Effect of enzyme supplementation at moderate cellulase loadings on initial glucose and xylose release from corn stover solids pretreated by leading technologies. Biotechnol Bioeng 102:457–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Knutsen JS, Davis RH (2004) Cellulase retention and sugar removal by membrane ultrafiltration during lignocellulosic biomass hydrolysis. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Symposium on Biotechnology for Fuels and Chemicals Held May 4–7, 2003, in Breckenridge, CO. Humana Press, New York, pp 585–599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tu M, Chandra RP, Saddler JN (2007) Evaluating the distribution of cellulases and the recycling of free cellulases during the hydrolysis of lignocellulosic substrates. Biotechnol Prog 23:398–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lee SUNBOK, Shin HS, Ryu DDY (1982) Adsorption of cellulase on cellulose: effect of physicochemical properties of cellulose on adsorption and rate of hydrolysis. Biotechnol Bioeng 24:2137–2153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sotaniemi V-H et al (2015) Effect of enzyme and substrate dosing strategies on mixing and hydrolysis of old corrugated cardboard. Biomass Conv Bioref 5:141–148.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-014-0136-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ghose TK (1987) International Union of Pure Commission on Biotechnology, measurement of cellulase activities. Pure Appl Chem 59:257–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Xiao Z, Storms R, Tsang A (2004) Microplate-based filter paper assay to measure total cellulase activity. Biotechnol Bioeng 88:832–837.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.20286 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yu X, Liu Y, Cui Y, Cheng Q, Zhang Z (2016) Measurement of filter paper activities of cellulase with microplate-based assay. Saudi J Biol Sci 23:S93–S98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ortiz G (2016) An economical and high throughput alternative for endoglucanase activity determination. Biotechnology. 12:70–74Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Xiao ZZ, Storms R, Tsang A (2005) Microplate-based carboxymethylcellulose assay for endoglucanase activity. Anal Biochem 342:176–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    King BC, Donnelly MK, Bergstrom GC, Walker LP, Gibson DM (2008) An optimized microplate assay system for quantitative evaluation of plant cell wall-degrading enzyme activity of fungal culture extracts. Biotechnol Bioeng 102:1033–1044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chundawat SPS, Balan V, Dale BE (2008) High-throughput microplate technique for enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass. Biotechnol Bioeng 99:1281–1294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Victoria J, Odaneth A, Lali A (2017) Importance of cellulase cocktails favoring hydrolysis of cellulose. Prep Biochem Biotechnol 6068:547–553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Eibinger M, Sigl K, Sattelkow J, Ganner T, Ramoni J, Seiboth B (2016) Functional characterization of the native swollenin from Trichoderma reesei: study of its possible role as C 1 factor of enzymatic lignocellulose conversion. Biotechnol Biofuels:1–19Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Smith PK (1985) Measurement of protein using bicinchoninic acid. Anal Biochem 150(1):76–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Olson BJ (2016) Assays for determination of protein concentration. Current Protocols in Pharmacology 73(1):A–3AGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Camassola M, Dillon AJP (2012) Cellulase determination: modifications to make the filter paper assay easy, fast, practical and efficient. J Anal Bioanal Tech 1:10–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Eveleigh DE, Mandels M, Andreotti R, Roche C (2009) Measurement of saccharifying cellulase. Biotechnol Biofuels 8(1):–8Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wood TM, Mccrae SI, Bhat KM (1989) The mechanism of fungal cellulase action. Synergism between enzyme components of Penicillium pinophilum cellulase in solubilizing hydrogen bond-ordered cellulose. Biochem J 260(1):37–43Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Chen R, Chen R (2015) A paradigm shift in biomass technology from complete to partial cellulose hydrolysis: lessons learned from nature. Bioengineered 5979:69–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Dondelinger E, Aubry N, Ben Chaabane F, Cohen C, Tayeb J, Rémond C (2016) Contrasted enzymatic cocktails reveal the importance of cellulases and hemicellulases activity ratios for the hydrolysis of cellulose in presence of xylans. AMB Express 6:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sugathan S, Pradeep NS, Abdulhameed S (eds) (2017) Bioresources and bioprocess in biotechnology: volume 2: exploring potential biomolecules. Enzymes for bioenergy (Sukumaran RK, et al) Springer, pp 3–34Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Zhang Y, Zhou W (2014) On improved mechanistic modeling for enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose. J Chem Eng Process Technol 5:190Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Qing Q, Li H, Kumar R, Wyman CE (2013) Xylooligosaccharides production, quantification, and characterization in context of lignocellulosic biomass pretreatment. In: Aqueous pretreatment of plant biomass for biological and chemical conversion to fuels and chemicals. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Qing Q, Yang B, Wyman CE (2010) Xylooligomers are strong inhibitors of cellulose hydrolysis by enzymes. Bioresour Technol 101:9624–9630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Bommarius AS, Katona A, Cheben SE, Patel AS, Ragauskas AJ, Knudson K, Pu Y (2008) Cellulase kinetics as a function of cellulose pretreatment. 10:370–381Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.DBT-ICT Centre of Energy BiosciencesInstitute of Chemical TechnologyMumbaiIndia

Personalised recommendations