Production and optimization of NaCl-activated carbon from mango seed using response surface methodology

  • Aaron Dzigbor
  • Annie ChimphangoEmail author
Original Article


Granular activated carbon (AC) produced from mango seed husk through chemical activation with NaCl has potential application in adsorption cooling system. The study investigated the relationship among process parameters and effects on physicochemical and functional properties of AC. Production conditions were optimized using response surface methodology for impregnation ratio (0.25, 0.5, and 0.75), soaking time (2 h, 4 h, and 6 h), and activation temperature (400 °C, 450 °C, and 500 °C). Surface area, ash content, and bulk density were response variables. The AC was produced with comparable quality to commercial AC. Impregnation ratio, soaking time, and carbonization temperature, but not their interaction, had significant effects (p < 0.05) on AC surface area, ash content, and bulk density. Optimum production conditions for soaking time, impregnation ratio, and carbonization temperature were 4 h, 0.25, and 500 °C, respectively, which gave BET surface area, ash content, and bulk density of 415 m2 g−1, 6.92%, and 243 kg m−3, respectively.


Activated carbon Chemical activation Optimization Response surface methodology 



The authors are indebted to Prof. Görgens for providing access to the pyrolysis equipment and the staff at the Analytical Laboratory at Department of Process Engineering, Stellenbosch University, for the technical support in the analysis of samples. The authors are also thankful to Hoedspruit Fruit Processors (South Africa) for providing the mango seeds.

Funding information

The authors are grateful for the financial support from the National Research Foundation (NRF) of South Africa under the Research and Technology Fund (RTF) and the Department of Process Engineering, Stellenbosch University.


  1. 1.
    Torres-Leon C, Rojas R, Contreras-Esquivel JC, Serna-Cock L, Belmares-Cerda RE, Aguilar CN (2016) Mango seed: functional and nutritional properties. Trends Food Sci Technol 55:109–117. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jahurul MHA, Zaidul ISM, Ghafoor K, Al-Juhaimi FY, Nyam KL, Norulaini NAN et al (2015) Mango (Mangifera indica L.) by-products and their valuable components: a review. Food Chem 183:173–180. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chakraborty S, De S, DasGupta S, Basu JK (2005) Adsorption study for the removal of a basic dye: experimental and modeling. Chemosphere 58:1079–1086. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yakout SM, Sharaf El-Deen G (2016) Characterization of activated carbon prepared by phosphoric acid activation of olive stones. Arab J Chem 9:S1155–S1162. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Matos M, Barreiro MF, Gandini A (2010) Olive stone as a renewable source of biopolyols. Ind Crop Prod 32:7–12. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ioannidou O, Zabaniotou A (2007) Agricultural residues as precursors for activated carbon production—a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 11:1966–2005. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rashidi NA, Yusup S (2017) A review on recent technological advancement in the activated carbon production from oil palm wastes. Chem Eng J 314:277–290. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nieto-Delgado C, Terrones M, Rangel-Mendez JR (2011) Development of highly microporous activated carbon from the alcoholic beverage industry organic by-products. Biomass Bioenergy 35:103–112. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nieto-Delgado C, Rangel-Mendez JR (2011) Production of activated carbon from organic by-products from the alcoholic beverage industry: surface area and hardness optimization by using the response surface methodology. Ind Crop Prod 34:1528–1537. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Moreno-Piraján JC, Giraldo L (2012) Study of activated carbons by pyrolysis of Mangifera Indica seed (mango) in presence of sodium and potassium hydroxide. E-Journal Chem 9:780–785. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Salas-Enrıquez BG, Torres-Huerta AM, Conde-Barajas E, Domınguez-Crespo MA, Dıaz-Garcia L, de la Negrete-Rodrıguez MLX (2016) Activated carbon production from the Guadua amplexifolia using a combination of physical and chemical activation. J Therm Anal Calorim 124:1383–1398.
  12. 12.
    Cobb A, Warms M, Maurer EP, Chiesa S (2012) Low-tech coconut shell activated charcoal production. Int J Serv Learn Eng 7:93–104Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Suhas CPJM, Ribeiro Carrott MML (2007) Lignin-from natural adsorbent to activated carbon: a review. Bioresour Technol 98:2301–2312. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Adinata A, Wan Daud WMA, Aroua MK (2007) Preparation and characterization of activated carbon from palm shell by chemical activation with K2CO3. Bioresour Technol 98:145–149. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gratuito MKB, Panyathanmaporn T, Chumnanklang RA, Sirinuntawittaya N, Dutta A (2008) Production of activated carbon from coconut shell: optimization using response surface methodology. Bioresour Technol 99:4887–4895. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cruz DC (2012) Production of bio-coal and cctivated carbon from biomass. Dissertation, The University of Western Ontario. Accessed 30 June 2015
  17. 17.
    Etim UJ, Umoren SA, Eduok UM (2012) Coconut coir dust as a low cost adsorbent for the removal of cationic dye from aqueous solution. J Saudi Chem Soc 20:S67–S76. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tan IAW, Ahmad AL, Hameed BH (2008) Preparation of activated carbon from coconut husk: optimization study on removal of 2,4,6-trichlorophenol using response surface methodology. J Hazard Mater 153:709–717. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hoseinzadeh Hesas R, Arami-Niya A, Wan Daud WMA, Sahu JN (2013) Preparation of granular activated carbon from oil palm shell by microwave-induced chemical activation: optimisation using surface response methodology. Chem Eng Res Des 91:2447–2456. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tsai WT, Chang CY, Lee SL (1998) A low cost adsorbent from agricultural waste corn cob by zinc chloride activation. Bioresour Technol 64:211–217. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Yakub I, Mohammad M, Yaakob Z (2013) Effects of zinc chloride impregnation on the characteristics of activated carbon produced from physic nut seed hull. Adv Mater Res 626:751–755. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) (2018) Phosphoric acid. Accessed 25 November 2018.
  23. 23.
    The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) (2015) Zinc chloride. Accessed 25 November 2018.
  24. 24.
    Anonymous (2010) Sodium chloride material safety data sheet. Accessed 26 November 2018.
  25. 25.
    Tang WK (1968) Effect of inorganic salts on pyrolysis of wood, cellulose, and lignin determined by differential thermal analysis. US For Serv Res Pap 82:1–37Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tooklang P, Vaivudh S, Sukchai S, Rakwichian W (2014) Thermal distribution performance of NPCM: NaCl, NaNO3 and KNO3 in the thermal storage system. Energy Power Eng 6:174–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Mise S, Patil TN (2015) Adsorption studies of chromium(VI) on activated carbon derived from Mangifera indica (mango) seed shell. J Inst Eng Ser 96:237–247. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Calgon Carbon Coporation (2013) Product bulletin Accessed 6 July 2017
  29. 29.
    Montgomery DC (2012) Design and analysis of experiments. Wiley & Sons Inc, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    ASTM International (1999), Standard test methods for moisture in activated carbon. ASTM Standard D2867.
  31. 31.
    ASTM International (2004) Standard test method for total ash content of activated carbon. ASTM Standard D2866.
  32. 32.
    ASTM International (2004) Standard test method for volatile matter content of activated carbon samples. ASTM Standard D 3175.
  33. 33.
    Sluiter A, Hames B, Ruiz RO, Scarlata C, Sluiter J, Templeton D et al (2008) Determination of structural carbohydrates and lignin in biomass. htpps:// Scholar
  34. 34.
    Molina-Sabio M, RodRíguez-Reinoso F, Caturla F, Sellés MJ (1995) Porosity in granular carbons activated with phosphoric acid. Carbon 33:1105–1113. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Mianowski A, Owczarek M, Marecka A (2007) Surface area of activated carbon determined by the iodine adsorption number.
  36. 36.
    AlOthman Z, Habila M, Ali R (2011) Preparation of activated carbon using the copyrolysis of agricultural and municipal solid wastes at a low carbonization temperature in: 2011 Int Conf Biol Environ Chem Singapore, pp. 67–72. Accessed 30 June 2015
  37. 37.
    Setoyama N, Kaneko K, Rodriguez-Reinoso F (1996) Ultramicropore characterization of microporous carbons by low-temperature helium adsorption. J Phys Chem 100:10331–10336. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Linares-Solano A, Salinas-Maritnez C, Alcafiiz-Monge J, Cazorla-Amoros D (1988) Further microporous advances carbons in the characterization by physical adsorption of of gases. Tanso 185 (1998) 316–325.
  39. 39.
    Lozano-Castello D, Cazorla-Amoros D, Linares-Solano A (2004) Usefulness of CO2 adsorption at 273 K for the characterization of porous carbons. Carbon 42:1231–1236. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    de Jonge H, Mittelmeijer-Hazeleger MC (1996) Adsorption of CO2 and N2 on soil organic matter: nature of porosity, surface area, and diffusion mechanisms. Environ Sci Technol 30:408–413. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Gergova K, Petrov N, Eser S (1994) Adsorption properties and microstructure of activated carbons produced from agricultural by-products by steam pyrolysis. Carbon 32:693–702. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Elizalde-González MP, Hernández-Montoya V (2007) Characterization of mango pit as raw material in the preparation of activated carbon for wastewater treatment. Biochem Eng J 36:230–238. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Ola FA, S.O. Jekayinfa SO (2014) Ref: C0605 pyrolysis of mango stone shell: effect of heating temperature and residence time on product yields. Pages 1–8. Accessed 4 June 2015
  44. 44.
    Yang H, Yan R, Chen H, Lee DH, Zheng C (2007) Characteristics of hemicellulose, cellulose and lignin pyrolysis. Fuel 86:1781–1788. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Silgado KJ, Marrugo GD, Puello J (2014) Adsorption of chromium (VI) by activated carbon produced from oil palm endocarp. Chem Eng Trans 37:721–726. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Qiao Z, Wang Y, Gao Y, Li H, Dai T, Y. Liu Y (2010) Commercial activated carbons as the sources for producing multicolor photoluminescent carbon dots by chemical oxidation. Chem Commun 46: 8812–8814.
  47. 47.
    Campbell QP, Bunt JR, Kasaini H, Kruger DJ (2012) The preparation of activated carbon from South African coal. J South African Inst Min Metall 112:37–44Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Pakuła M, Walczyk M, Biniak S, Światkowski A (2007) Electrochemical and FTIR studies of the mutual influence of lead(II) or iron(III) and phenol on their adsorption from aqueous acid solution by modified activated carbons. Chemosphere 69:209–219. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Peng H, Wang N, Hu Z, Yu Z, Liu Y, Zhang J, Ruan R (2012) Physicochemical characterization of hemicelluloses from bamboo (Phyllostachys pubescens Mazel) stem. Ind Crop Prod 37:41–50. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Henrique MA, Silverio HA, Flauzino Neto WP, Pasquini D (2013) Valorization of an agro-industrial waste, mango seed, by the extraction and characterization of its cellulose nanocrystals. J Environ Manag 121:202–209. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Process EngineeringStellenbosch UniversityStellenboschSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations