Teaching interrelated concepts of fraction for understanding and teacher’s pedagogical content knowledge
Fractions are perceived as one of the most difficult areas in school mathematics to learn and teach. The most frequently mentioned factors contributing to the complexity are fractions having five interrelated constructs (part-whole, ratio, operator, quotient and measure) and teachers’ pedagogical approaches to address these constructs. The present study used the five interrelated constructs of fraction and the Knowledge Quartet Framework to investigate a teacher’s teaching of fraction in a New Zealand Year 7 classroom. Video recordings and transcribed audio-recordings were analysed through the lenses of the five integrated constructs of fraction and the Knowledge Quartet Framework. The findings showed that students often initiated uses of fractions as quotient and as operator, drawing on part-whole understanding when solving fraction problems. The study showed that the teacher’s focus in connecting the constructs and procedures of the lesson as well as shaping the classroom discussion when the lesson unfolded supported students’ learning of the fraction constructs.
KeywordsTeaching fractions Pedagogy and content knowledge Knowledge Quartet Mathematics
The involvement and contributions of Professor Kim Beswick, Associate Professor Helen Chick, and Professor Tom Nicholson are acknowledged, as is the support of Professor Roberta Hunter.
This project was funded by the Australian Research Council Grant No. DP130103144.
- Abell, S. K., Rogers, M. A. P., Hanuscin, D. L., Lee, M. H., & Gagnon, M. J. (2009). Preparing the next generation of science teacher educators: a model for developing PCK for teaching science teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 20(1), 77–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-008-9115-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Barron, B., & Engle, R. A. (2007). Analyzing data derived from video records. In S. J. Derry (Ed.), Guidelines for video research in education: Recommendations from an expert panel (pp. 24–43). Chicago: Data Research Development Center Retrieved from http://drdc.uchicago.edu/what/video-research-guidelines.pdf. Accessed Jan 2017.
- Behr, M. J., Lesh, R., Post, T., & Silver, E. (1983). Rational number concepts. In R. Lesh & M. Landau (Eds.), Acquisition of mathematics concepts and processes (pp. 91–125). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Behr, M. J., Khoury, H. A., Harel, G., Post, T., & Lesh, R. (1997). Conceptual units analysis of preservice elementary school teachers' strategies on a rational-number-as-operator task. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(1), 48–69.Google Scholar
- Chick, H., Baker, M., Pham, T. & Cheng, H. (2006). Aspects of teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge for decimals. Paper presented at the In Proceedings of the 30th annual conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Prague.Google Scholar
- Cortina, J. L., & Visnovska, J. (2016). Reciprocal relations of relative size in the instructional context of fractions as measures. In C. Csikos, A. Rausch, & J. Szitanyi (Eds.), Proceedings of the 40th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 179–186). Szeged, Hungary: PME.Google Scholar
- Empson, S. B., & Levi, L. (2011). Extending children’s mathe-matics: fractions and decimals. Mathematics Education, 27(4), 403–434.Google Scholar
- Getenet, S. & Callingham, R. (2017). Teaching fractions for understanding: addressing interrelated concepts. In A. Downton, S. Livy & J. Hall (Eds.), 40 years on: we are still learning! (Proceedings of the 40th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia) pp. 277–284. Melbourne: MERGA.Google Scholar
- Gupta, D., & Wilkerson, T. L. (2015). Teaching and learning of fractions in elementary grades: let the dialogue begin! Curriculum and Teaching Dialogue, 17(1/2), 27–44.Google Scholar
- Hill, H. C., Blunk, M. L., Charalambous, C. Y., Lewis, J. M., Phelps, G. C., Sleep, L., & Ball, D. L. (2008). Mathematical knowledge for teaching and the mathematical quality of instruction: an exploratory study. Cognition and Instruction, 26(4), 430–511. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370000802177235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hunter, R., & Hunter, J. M. R. (2018). Opening the space for all students to engage in mathematical practices within collaborative inquiry and argumentation. In R. Hunter, M. Civil, B. Herbel-Eisenmann, N. Planas, & D. Wagner (Eds.), Mathematical discourse that breaks barriers and creates space for marginalized learners (pp. 1–22). Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
- Kieren, T. E. (1976). On the mathematical, cognitive, and instructional foundations of rational numbers. In R. Lesh (Ed.), Number and measurement: Papers from a research workshop ERIC/SMEAC (pp. 101–144). Columbus, OH.Google Scholar
- Ministry of Education. (2007). The New Zealand curriculum. Wellington: Learning Media. Retrieved from http://nzcurriculum.tki.org.nz/National-Standards/Mathematics-standards/The-standards/End-of-year-7. Accessed Jan 2017
- Mitchell, A., & Horne, M. (2009). There are more than part-whole strategies at work in understanding non-equal-parts fraction-area-models. In R. Hunter, B. Bicknell, & T. Burgess (Eds.), Crossing divides: proceedings of the 32nd annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research group of Australasia (Vol. 1, pp. 371–378). Wellington: MERGA.Google Scholar
- Reys, R. E., Lindquist, M., Lambdin, D. V., & Smith, N. L. (2014). Helping children learn mathematics (Australian edition). Australia, Milton: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
- Rowland, T. (2013). The knowledge quartet: the genesis and application of a framework for analysing mathematics teaching and deepening teachers’ mathematics knowledge. Sisyphus-Journal of Education, 1(3), 15–43.Google Scholar
- Rowland, T., & Turner, F. (2007). Developing and using the ‘Knowledge Quartet’: a framework for the observation of mathematics teaching. The Mathematics Educator, 10(1), 107–124.Google Scholar
- Rowland, T., Huckstep, P. & Thwaites, A. (2003). The knowledge quartet. In J. Williams (Ed.), Proceedings of the British Society for research into Learning Mathematics, 23(3), 97–103.Google Scholar
- Schmidt, W., Houang, R., Cogan, L., Blömeke, S., Tatto, M., Hsieh, F., & Paine, L. (2008). Opportunity to learn in the preparation of mathematics teachers: its structure and how it varies across six countries. The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 40(5), 735–747. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-008-0115-y.Google Scholar
- Siemon, D., Virgona, J., & Corneille, K. (2001). The middle years numeracy research project: 5–9 final report. Melbourne: RMIT University.Google Scholar
- Siemon, D., Beswick, K., Brady, K., Clark, J., Faragher, R., & Warren, E. (2015). Teaching mathematics: foundations to middle years (2nd ed.). Australia, Melbourne: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Strother, S., Brendefur, J. L., Thiede, K., & Appleton, S. (2016). Five key ideas to teach fractions and decimals with understanding. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 3(2), 132–137.Google Scholar
- Thompson, P. (2014). Constructivism in mathematics education. Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education, 96–100.Google Scholar
- Turner, F., & Rowland, T. (2011). The Knowledge Quartet as an organising framework for developing and deepening teachers’ mathematics knowledge. In T. Rowland & K. Ruthven (Eds.), Mathematical knowledge in teaching (pp. 195–212). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9766-8_2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Weston, T. L., Kleve, B., & Rowland, T. (2013). Developing an online coding manual for the Knowledge Quartet: an international project. Proceedings of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics, 32(3), 179–184.Google Scholar