Base-10 Blocks: a study of iPad virtual manipulative affordances across primary-grade levels
The purpose of the inquiry was to understand how children in primary grades (i.e., preschool, kindergarten, and second grade) engaged with affordances and constraints of features in a Base-10 Blocks virtual manipulative mathematics app designed to promote learning opportunities. Researchers conducted one-to-one interviews with 100 primary grade children as they interacted with the Montessori Number Base-10 Blocks iPad app. The video data were qualitatively analyzed using open descriptive, thematic, and structured coding. Results show that children’s actions when interacting with app features can affect their engagement with designed mathematics constraints and affordances. Results also identified three emergent themes around children’s engagement with the app’s simultaneous linking features: verification, self-correction, and making connections. Findings suggest the importance of helping children identify and reflect on affordances within virtual manipulative mathematics apps. These findings also indicate that as designers, educators and researchers design or select virtual manipulative mathematics apps for classroom use; they should to consider children’s prior achievement as well as in-app perceptions and engagement with design features in the apps.
KeywordsAffordances Base-10 Blocks Virtual manipulative Mathematics
- Burlamaqui, L., & Dong, A. (2014). The use and misuse of the concept of affordance. In J. S. Gero (Ed.), Design computing and cognition DCC’14. Springer.Google Scholar
- Chang, W. L., Yuan, Y., Lee, C. Y., Chen, M. H., & Huang, W. G. (2013). Using magic board as a teaching aid in third grader learning of area concepts. Educational Technology & Society, 16(2), 163–173.Google Scholar
- Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research Design. Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
- Hansen, A. & Mavrikis, M. (2015). Learning mathematics from multiple representations: two design principles. In Information Communications Rechnology in Matheamtics Education Conference, Faro, Portugal. Google Scholar
- Herodotou, C. (2018). Young children learning with mobile devices: research on design and implementation. In: AERA Annual Conference 2018, 13-17 Apr 2018, New York.Google Scholar
- Kim, R., & Albert, L. R. (2014). The history of base-ten-blocks: why and who made base-ten-blocks? Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(9), 356.Google Scholar
- Kosko, K. W. (2017). Effects of student-reported gameplay strategy related to growth in multiplicative reasoning. Electronic Journal of Mathematics & Technology, 11(3).Google Scholar
- Mcleod, J., VaSinda, S., & Dondlinger, M. J. (2012). Conceptual visibility and virtual dynamics in technology-scaffolded learning environments for conceptual knowledge of mathematics. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 31(3), 283–310.Google Scholar
- Mendiburo, M. A. (2010). Virtual and Physical Manipulatives: Technology's Impact on Fraction Learning (Doctoral dissertation, Vanderbilt University). Retrieved from https://etd.library.vanderbilt.edu/available/etd-04052010-171448. Accessed 23 Sept 2016.
- Moyer-Packenham, P. S. & Bolyard, J. J. (2016). Revisiting the definition of a virtual manipulative. In P. Moyer-Packenham (Ed.), International perspectives on teaching and learning mathematics with virtual manipulatives (pp. 5–16). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- Moyer-Packenham, P. S. & Suh, J. M. (2012). Learning mathematics with technology: The influence of virtual manipulatives on different achievement groups. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 31(1), 39–59.Google Scholar
- Moyer-Packenham, P. S., & Westenskow, A. (2013). Effects of virtual manipulatives on student achievement and mathematics learning. International Journal of Virtual adn Personal Learning Environments, 4(3), 35–50.Google Scholar
- Moyer-Packenham, P. S., & Westenskow, A. (2016). Revisiting the effects and affordances of virtual manipulatives for mathematics learning. In K. Terry, & A. Cheney (Eds.), Utilizing virtual and personal learning environments for optimal learning (pp. 186–215). Hershey, PA: IGI GLobal. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-8847-6.
- Pagar, D. (2013). The Effects of a Grouping by Tens Manipulative on Children's Strategy Use, Base Ten Understanding and Mathematical Knowledge (Doctoral dissertation, Columbia University).Google Scholar
- Rau, M. A., Aleven, V., Rummel, N., & Rohrbach, S. (2012). Sense making alone doesn’t do it: fluency matters too! ITS support for robust learning with multiple representations. In International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 174–184). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.Google Scholar
- Saldaña, J. (2015). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Newcastle upon Tyne: Sage.Google Scholar
- Teck, W. K. (2013). Promoting conceptual understanding of algebra using virtual manipulative: a study of form 4 students. Journal Penyelidikan IPG KBL, 11, 1–14.Google Scholar
- Zuckerman, O., Arida, S., & Resnick, M. (2005). Extending tangible interfaces for education: digital montessori-inspired manipulatives. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 859–868). ACM.Google Scholar