Boundary crossing and brokering between disciplines in pre-service mathematics teacher education
In many countries, pre-service teacher education programs are structured so that mathematics content is taught in the university’s mathematics department and mathematics pedagogy in the education department. Such program structures make it difficult to authentically interweave content with pedagogy in ways that acknowledge the roles of both mathematicians and mathematics educators in preparing future teachers. This article reports on a project that deliberately fostered collaboration between mathematicians and mathematics educators in six Australian universities in order to investigate the potential for learning at the boundaries between the two disciplinary communities. Data sources included two rounds of interviews with mathematicians and mathematics educators and annual reports prepared by each participating university over the three years of the project. The study identified interdisciplinary boundary practices that led to integration of content and pedagogy through new courses co-developed and co-taught by mathematicians and mathematics educators, and new approaches to building communities of pre-service teachers. It also developed an evidence-based classification of conditions that enable or hinder sustained collaboration across disciplinary boundaries, together with an empirical grounding for Akkerman and Bakker’s conceptualisation of transformation as a mechanism for learning at the boundary between communities. The study additionally highlighted the ambiguous nature of boundaries and implications for brokers who work there to connect disciplinary paradigms.
KeywordsMathematics teacher education Boundary crossing Boundary practices Brokering Community of practice Interdisciplinary collaboration
This article draws on papers presented at conferences of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (Bennison and Goos 2016; Goos 2015) and the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Goos and Bennison 2017).
This project was funded by the Australian Government Office for Learning and Teaching (grant #MS13-3174). Following the cessation of the OLT in June 2016, the Australian Government Department of Education and Training continued to support the Enhancing the Training of Mathematics and Science Teachers program and projects. The views expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of the Australian Government Office for Learning and Teaching or Department of Education and Training.
- Ball, D., & Bass, H. (2000). Interweaving content and pedagogy in teaching and learning to teach: knowing and using mathematics. In J. Boaler (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 83–104). Westport, CT: Ablex.Google Scholar
- Bennison, A., & Goos, M. (2016). Learning at the boundaries: collaboration between mathematicians and mathematics educators within and across institutions. In B. White, M. Chinnapan, & S. Trenholm (Eds.), Opening up mathematics education research (Proceedings of the 39th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, pp. 124–131). Adelaide: MERGA.Google Scholar
- Bouwma-Gearhart, J., Perry, K., & Presley, J. B. (2012). Improving postsecondary STEM education: strategies for successful collaboration and brokering across disciplinary paradigms. APLU/SMTI Paper 4. Washington, DC: Association of Public and Land-grant Universities. Retrieved 30 August 2017 from http://www.aplu.org/projects-and-initiatives/stem-education/SMTI_Library/APLU-SMTI-Paper-4/file
- Department of Education and Training (DET). (2016). Enhancing the training of mathematics and science teachers program. Retrieved 30 August 2017 from https://www.education.gov.au/enhancing-training-mathematics-and-science-teachers-program
- Goos, M. (2015). Learning at the boundaries. In M. Marshman, V. Geiger, & A. Bennison (Eds.), Mathematics in the margins (Proceedings of the 38th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, pp. 269–276). Sunshine Coast: MERGA.Google Scholar
- Goos, M., & Bennison, A. (2017). Learning at the boundaries in pre-service mathematics teacher education. In B. Kaur, W. K. Ho, T. L. Toh, & B. H. Choy (Eds.), Proceedings of the 41st conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, p. 199). Singapore: PME.Google Scholar
- Hodgson, B. (2001). The mathematical education of school teachers: role and responsibilities of university mathematicians. In D. Holton (Ed.), The teaching and learning of mathematics at university level: an ICMI Study (pp. 501–518). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
- Jackson, N. (2003). Engaging and changing higher education through brokerage. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
- Kubiak, C., Fenton-O’Creevy, M., Appleby, K., Kempster, M., Reed, M., Solvason, C., & Thorpe, M. (2014). Brokering boundary encounters. In E. Wenger-Trayner, M. Fenton-O’Creevy, S. Hutchinson, C. Kubiak, & B. Wenger-Trayner (Eds.), Learning in landscapes of practice: boundaries, identity, and knowledgeability in practice-based learning (pp. 81–95). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Tatto, M., Schwille, J., Senk, S., Ingvarson, L., Rowley, G., Peck, R., … Reckase, M. (2012). Policy, practice, and readiness to teach primary and secondary mathematics in 17 countries: findings from the IEA Teacher Education and Development Study in Mathematics (TEDS-M). Amsterdam: IEA.Google Scholar
- Thornton, S. (2008). Speaking with different voices: knowledge legitimation codes of mathematicians and mathematics educators. In M. Goos, R. Brown, & K. Makar (Eds.), Navigating currents and charting directions (Proceedings of the 31st annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, pp. 523–529). Adelaide: MERGA.Google Scholar