Skip to main content
Log in

Noticing numeracy now! Examining changes in preservice teachers’ noticing, knowledge, and attitudes

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Mathematics Education Research Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examined the impact of an intervention, focused on professional noticing of children’s conceptual development in whole number and arithmetic reasoning, on preservice elementary teachers’ (PSETs’) professional noticing skills, attitudes toward mathematics, and mathematical knowledge for teaching mathematics. A video-based professional noticing module, situated in the pedagogies of practice framework, was used with 224 PSETs from five universities. Comparison data was also collected with similar groups not participating in the instructional module. Through pre- and post-assessments, findings indicated that PSETs can develop sound professional noticing skills as a result of participation in a video-based module. The impact on attitudes toward mathematics was less convincing as significant changes were revealed in intervention as well as comparison groups. We hypothesized the potential for professional noticing of children’s mathematical thinking to serve as a mechanism for increasing the capabilities of PSETs to negotiate the complexities of mathematics teaching and learning; however, mathematics knowledge for teaching showed no significant increase for either group.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amador, J. M., Carter, I., Hudson, R. A., & Galindo, E. (2017). Following a teacher’s mathematical and scientific noticing across career progression from field experiences to classroom teaching. In E. O. Schack, M. H. Fisher, & J. Wilhelm (Eds.), Teacher noticing: bridging and broadening perspectives, contexts, and frameworks (pp. 161–181). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ambrose, R. (2004). Initiating change in prospective elementary school teachers’ orientations to mathematics teaching by building on beliefs. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 7, 91–119. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JMTE.0000021879.74957.63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Association of Mathematics Teacher Educators (AMTE). (2017). Standards for preparing teachers of mathematics. Retrieved from https://amte.net/standards.

  • Australian Curriculum, Assessment, and Reporting Authority (ACARA). (2014). Numeracy. Retrieved from http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/generalcapabilities/numeracy /introduction/introduction.

  • Ball, D. L. (1989). Breaking with experience in learning to teach mathematics: the role of a preservice methods course (Issue Paper #89-10). East Lansing: National Center for Research on Teacher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, D. L. (1990). The mathematical understandings that prospective teachers bring to teacher education. The Elementary School Journal, 90, 449–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teachers: what makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407. Retrieved from http://www.math.ksu.edu/~bennett/onlinehw/qcenter/ballmkt.pdf. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108324554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumert, J., Kunter, M., Blum, W., Brunner, M., Voss, T., Jordan, A., & Tsai, Y. (2010). Teachers’ mathematical knowledge, cognitive activation in the classroom, and student progress. American Educational Research Journal, 47(1), 133–180. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831209345157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beattie, H. L., Ren, L., Smith, W. M., & Heaton, R. M. (2017). Measuring elementary mathematics teachers’ noticing: using child study as a vehicle. In E. O. Schack, M. H. Fisher, & J. Wilhelm (Eds.), Teacher noticing: bridging and broadening perspectives, contexts, and frameworks (pp. 321–338). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Beswick, K. (2006). Changes in preservice teachers’ attitudes and beliefs: the net impact of two mathematics education units and intervening experiences. School Science and Mathematics, 106(1), 36–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blömeke, S., Hsieh, F.-J., Kaiser, G., & Schmidt, W. H. (Eds.). (2014). International perspectives on teacher knowledge, beliefs, and opportunities to learn: TEDS-M results. Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., Franke, M. L., Levi, L., & Empson, S. B. (1999). Children’s mathematics: cognitively guided instruction. Portsmouth: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Central Advisory Council for Education (England). (1959). A report of the Central Advisory Council for Education (England), Crowther Report. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, D. (2001). Understanding, assessing, and developing young children’s mathematical thinking: research as a powerful tool for professional growth. In J. Bobis, B. Perry, & M. Mitchelmore (Eds.), Numeracy and beyond: Proceedings from the 24 th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 11–29). Sydney: MERGA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, B., Cheeseman, J., & Clarke, D. (2006). The mathematical knowledge and understanding that young children bring to school. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 18, 78–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2009). Learning and teaching early math: the learning trajectories approach. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: design and analysis issues for field settings. Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, D. I. (2009). Alignment, cohesion, and change: examining mathematics teachers’ belief structures and their influence on instructional practices. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 12(5), 325–346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-009-9120-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L., Hammerness, K., Grossman, P., Rust, F., & Shulman, L. (2007). The design of teacher education programs. In L. Darling-Hammond & J. Bransford (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world: what teachers should learn and be able to do. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dick, L. K. (2017). Investigating the relationship between professional noticing and specialized content knowledge. In E. O. Schack, M. H. Fisher, & J. Wilhelm (Eds.), Teacher noticing: bridging and broadening perspectives, contexts, and frameworks (pp. 339–358). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dilworth, M. E., & Coleman, M. J. (2014). Time for a change: diversity in teaching revisited—a background paper. National Education Association. Retrieved from https://www.nea.org/assets/docs/Time_for_a_Change_Diversity_in_Teaching_Revisited_(web).pdf.

  • Ebby, C. B. (2000). Learning to teach mathematics differently: the interaction between coursework and fieldwork for preservice teachers. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 3(1), 69–97. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009969527157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhart, M., Borko, H., Underhill, R., Brown, C., Jones, D., & Agard, P. (1993). Conceptual knowledge falls through the cracks: complexities of learning to teach mathematics for understanding. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 24(1), 8–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, M. H., Schack, E. O., Thomas, J., Jong, C., Eisenhardt, S., Tassell, J., & Yoder, M. (2014). Examining the relationship between preservice elementary teachers’ attitudes toward mathematics and professional noticing capacities. In J. J. Lo, K. R. Leatham, & L. R. Van Zoest (Eds.), Research trends in mathematics teacher education (pp. 219–237). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fosnot, C. T., & Dolk, M. (2001). Young mathematicians at work: constructing number sense, addition, and subtraction. Portsmouth: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of the grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldsmith, L. T., & Seago, N. (2011). Using classroom artifacts to focus teacher noticing: affordances and opportunities. In M. G. Sherin, V. R. Jacobs, & R. A. Philipp (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing: seeing through teachers’ eyes (pp. 169–187). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goulding, M., Rowland, T., & Barber, P. (2002). Does it matter? Primary teacher trainees’ subject knowledge in mathematics. British Educational Research Journal, 28, 689–704. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141192022000015543a.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimshaw, J., Campbell, M., Eccles, M., & Steen, N. (2000). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for evaluating guideline implementation strategies. Family Practice, 17(90001), 11–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, P. (2011). Framework for teaching practice: a brief history of an idea. Teachers College Record, 113(12), 2836–2843. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451212472235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, P., Compton, C., Igra, D., Ronfeldt, M., Shahan, E., & Williamson, P. (2009). Teaching practice: a cross-professional perspective. Teachers College Record, 111, (ID Number: 15018). Retrieved from https://cset.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/files/documents/publications/Grossman-TeachingPracticeACross-ProfessionalPerspective.pdf.

  • Henry, G. T., Purtell, K. M., Bastian, K. C., Fortner, C. K., Thompson, C. L., Campbell, S. L., & Patterson, K. M. (2014). The effects of teacher entry portals on student achievement. Journal of Teacher Education, 65(1), 7–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, H. C., & Ball, D. L. (2004). Learning Mathematics for Teaching: results from California’s mathematics professional development institutes. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 35, 330–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, H., Rowan, B., & Ball, D. L. (2005). Effects of teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 42(2), 371–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, V. R., Lamb, L. L. C., & Philipp, R. A. (2010). Professional noticing of children’s mathematical thinking. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 41(2), 169–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jong, C., & Hodges, T. E. (2013). The influence of elementary preservice teachers’ mathematics experiences on their attitudes towards teaching and learning mathematics. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 8(2–3), 100–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kentucky Numeracy Project (n.d.). About. Retrieved from http://knp.kentuckymathematics.org/#!/page_about.

  • Lamb, L. C., Philipp, R. A., Jacobs, V. R., & Schappelle, B. P. (2009). Developing teachers’ stances of inquiry: Studying teachers evolving perspectives (STEP). In D. Slavit, T. Holmlund Nelson, & A. Kennedy (Eds.), Perspectives on supported collaborative inquiry (pp. 16–45). New York: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, J. (2002). Researching your own practice: the discipline of noticing. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, J. (2011). Noticing: roots and branches. In M. G. Sherin, V. R. Jacobs, & R. A. Philipp (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing: seeing through teachers’ eyes (pp. 35–50). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, M. E., & Seaman, W. I. (2007). The effects of different undergraduate mathematics courses on the content knowledge and attitude towards mathematics of pre-service elementary teachers. Issues in the Undergraduate Mathematics Preparation of School Teachers, 1, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mewborn, D. (2000). Learning to teach elementary mathematics: ecological elements of a field experience. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 3, 27–46. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009925728974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulligan, J., Bobis, J., & Francis, C. (1999). Insights into early numeracy: the count me in too project. Australian Primary Mathematics Classroom, 4, 22–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2014). Principles to action: ensuring mathematical success for all. Reston: NCTM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olive, J. (2001). Children’s number sequences: an explanation of Steffe’s constructs and an extrapolation to rational numbers of arithmetic. The Mathematics Educator, 11, 4–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD)/Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA). (2005). The definition and selection of key competencies. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/pisa/35070367.pdf.

  • Philipp, R. A. (2007). Mathematics teachers’ beliefs and affect. In F. K. Lester Jr. (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (Vol. 1, pp. 257–315). Charlotte: Information Age.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, R. J. (1997). Effects of mathematics methods courses on the mathematical attitudes and content knowledge of preservice teachers. The Journal of Educational Research, 91, 108–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220679709597528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schack, E. O., Fisher, M. H., Thomas, J., Eisenhardt, S., Tassell, J., & Yoder, M. (2013). Prospective elementary school teachers’ professional noticing of children’s early numeracy. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 16(3), 379–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schack, E. O., Fisher, M. H., & Wilhelm, J. (Eds.). (2017). Teacher noticing: bridging and broadening perspectives, contexts, and frameworks. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schackow, J. (2005). Examining the attitudes toward mathematics of preservice elementary school teachers enrolled in an introductory mathematics methods course and the experiences that have influenced the development of these attitudes (unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of South Florida, Tampa.

  • Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2001). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Wadsworth: Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherin, M. G., Jacobs, V. R., & Philipp, R. A. (Eds.). (2011). Mathematics teacher noticing: seeing through teachers’ eyes. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Star, J. R., & Strickland, S. K. (2008). Learning to observe: using video to improve preservice mathematics teachers’ ability to notice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11, 107–125. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10857-007-9063-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Star, J. R., Lynch, K., & Perova, N. (2011). Using video to improve mathematics’ teachers’ abilities to attend to classroom features: a replication study. In M. G. Sherin, V. R. Jacobs, & R. A. Philipp (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing: seeing through teachers’ eyes (pp. 117–133). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steffe, L. (1992). Learning stages in the construction of the number sequence. In J. Bideaud, C. Meljac, & J. Fischer (Eds.), Pathways to number: children’s developing numerical abilities (pp. 83–88). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steffe, L. P., von Glasersfeld, E., Richards, J., & Cobb, P. (1983). Children’s counting types: philosophy, theory, and application. New York: Praeger Scientific.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steffe, L. P., Cobb, P., & von Glasersfeld, E. (1988). Construction of arithmetical meanings and strategies. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stein, M. K., Engle, R. A., Smith, M. S., & Hughes, E. K. (2008). Orchestrating productive mathematical discussions: five practices for helping teachers move beyond show and tell. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 10, 314–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stockero, S. L., & Rupnow, R. L. (2017). Measuring noticing within complex mathematics classroom interactions. In E. O. Schack, M. H. Fisher, & J. Wilhelm (Eds.), Teacher noticing: bridging and broadening perspectives, contexts, and frameworks (pp. 281–301). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tapia, M. (2012). What is happening to the gender gap? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association. Lexington

  • Tapia, M., & Marsh II, G. E. (2004). An instrument to measure mathematics attitudes. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 8(2), 16–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tapia, M., & Marsh II, G. E. (2005). Attitudes toward mathematics inventory redux. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 9(3), 272–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teacher Education Ministerial Advisory Group. (2014). Action now: classroom ready teachers. Retrieved from https://docs.education.gov.au/system/files/doc/other /action_now_classroom_ready_teachers_accessible.pdf.

  • Thomas, J., & Tabor, P. D. (2012). Differentiating instruction to facilitate quantitative mental imagery. Teaching Children Mathematics, 19, 174–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J., Tabor, P. D., & Wright, R. J. (2010). Three aspects of first-graders’ number knowledge: observations and instructional implications. Teaching Children Mathematics, 16, 299–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Walle, J. A., Karp, K. S., & Bay-Williams, J. M. (2012). Elementary and middle school mathematics: teaching developmentally (8th ed.). New York: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • van den Kieboom, L. A., Magiera, M. T., & Moyer, J. C. (2017). Learning to notice student thinking about the equal sign: K-8 preservice teachers’ experiences in a teacher preparation program. In E. O. Schack, M. H. Fisher, & J. Wilhelm (Eds.), Teacher noticing: bridging and broadening perspectives, contexts, and frameworks (pp. 141–159). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • van Es, E. A. (2011). A framework for learning to notice student thinking. In M. G. Sherin, V. R. Jacobs, & R. A. Philipp (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing: seeing through teachers’ eyes (pp. 117–133). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Es, E. A., & Sherin, M. G. (2002). Learning to notice: scaffolding new teachers’ interpretations of classroom interactions. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10, 571–596.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, K. J. (2017). Noticing students’ conversations and gestures during group problem-solving in mathematics. In E. O. Schack, M. H. Fisher, & J. Wilhelm (Eds.), Teacher noticing: bridging and broadening perspectives, contexts, and frameworks (pp. 183–204). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkins, J. (2008). The relationship among elementary teachers’ content knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and practices. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11, 139–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, R. J., Martland, J., & Stafford, A. (2006). Early numeracy: assessment for teaching and intervention (2nd ed.). London: Paul Chapman Publications/Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young-Loveridge, J., Bicknell, B., & Mills, J. (2012). The mathematical content knowledge and attitudes of New Zealand pre-service primary teachers. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 14, 28–49.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Molly H. Fisher.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fisher, M.H., Thomas, J., Schack, E.O. et al. Noticing numeracy now! Examining changes in preservice teachers’ noticing, knowledge, and attitudes. Math Ed Res J 30, 209–232 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-017-0228-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-017-0228-0

Keywords

Navigation