Mathematics Education Research Journal

, Volume 30, Issue 4, pp 407–428 | Cite as

Fostering young children’s interest in numeracy through demonstration of its value: the Footsteps Study

  • Yeshe ColliverEmail author
Original Article


Children’s early mathematical abilities are fundamental to their later academic achievement. An interest in mathematics in the early years is likely to establish a positive attitude to later mathematical learning, hopefully sustaining continued interest in mathematics and mathematical learning. Approaches to early mathematics teaching in the early years, however, are typically adult-initiated, which may fail to capture children’s interest. Given the importance of children’s motivation and sustained interest, the study described here strove to spark children’s interests in mathematical problems in everyday life. The study sought to determine if children would incorporate more numeracy-related concepts into their free play if exposed to adult demonstrations of age-appropriate numeracy activities such as patterning. For at least 15 min three times weekly, participating children’s parents and educators demonstrated numeracy problem-solving nearby, while children engaged in other activities. Demonstrations were thought to ascribe social value to the problem-solving activities. If children became interested in participating, adults told them to wait until the demonstrations finished, further indicating social value. Results show these children chose to play with numeracy-related activities in their free play time at preschool significantly more than children in a control group. These results suggest that seeking to foster children’s interest in mathematics through child-initiated play, rather than prescribing adult-initiated mathematics activities, may be an important means of laying the foundation for lifelong mathematics learning. Ascribing social value to numeracy applications is proposed as a new approach to teaching mathematics in the early years.


Play-based curricula Learning through play Legitimate peripheral participation Child-initiated mathematics 


  1. Adams, S., Alexander, E., Drummond, M. J., & Moyles, J. (2004). Inside the foundation stage: recreating the reception year—final report. London: Association of Teachers and Lecturers.Google Scholar
  2. Anning, A. (2010). Play and legislated curriculum. In J. Moyles (Ed.), The excellence of play (3rd ed., pp. 19–33). Berkshire: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Anthony, G., Mclachlan, C., & Lim, F. P. (2015). Narrative assessment: making mathematics learning visible in early childhood settings. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 27(3), 385–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA). (2014). National Report on Schooling in Australia 2012. Retrieved from Sydney, Australia: ACARA. Retrieved from
  5. Bellin, H. F., & Singer, D. G. (2006). My magic story car: video-based play to strengthen emergent literacy of at-risk preschoolers. In R. M. Golinkoff, D. G. Singer, & K. Hirsh-Pasek (Eds.), Play = learning: how play motivates and enhances children’s cognitive and social-emotional growth (pp. 101–123). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brooker, L. (2010). Constructing the triangle of care: power and professionalism in practitioner/parent relationships. British Journal of Educational Studies, 58(2), 181–196. doi: 10.1080/00071001003752203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burghardt, G. (2011). Defining and recognizing play. In A. Pellegrini (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of the development of play (pp. 9–18). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Campbell, F. A., Pungello, E. P., Miller-Johnson, S., Burchinal, M., & Ramey, C. T. (2001). The development of cognitive and academic abilities: growth curves from an early childhood educational experiment. Developmental Psychology, 37(2), 231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carmichael, C., MacDonald, A., & McFarland-Piazza, L. (2014). Predictors of numeracy performance in national testing programs: insights from the longitudinal study of Australian children. British Educational Research Journal, 40(4), 637–659. doi: 10.1002/berj.3104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Casey, B. M., Lombardi, C. M., Thomson, D., Nguyen, H. N., Paz, M., Theriault, C. A., & Dearing, E. (2016). Maternal support of children’s early numerical concept learning predicts preschool and first-grade math achievement. Child Development. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12676.
  11. Chambers, B., Cheung, A. C. K., & Slavin, R. E. (2016). Literacy and language outcomes of comprehensive and developmental-constructivist approaches to early childhood education: a systematic review. Educational Research Review, 18, 88–111. doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2016.03.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Christie, J. F. (1991). Play and early literacy development. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  13. Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2008). Experimental evaluation of the effects of a research-based preschool mathematics curriculum. American Educational Research Journal, 45(2), 443–494. doi: 10.3102/0002831207312908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Colliver, Y. (2016). Mothers’ perspectives on learning through play. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 41(1), 4–12.Google Scholar
  15. Colliver, Y. (2017). From listening to understanding: interpreting young children’s perspectives. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 25(6), (Accepted 16/08/2016).Google Scholar
  16. Colliver, Y., & Arguel, A. (2016). Following in our footsteps: how adult demonstrations of literacy and numeracy can influence children’s spontaneous play and improve learning outcomes. Early Child Development and Care. doi: 10.1080/03004430.2016.1248958.
  17. Cooney, M. H. (2004). Is play important? Guatemalan kindergartners’ classroom experiences and their parents’ and teachers’ perceptions of learning through play. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 18(4), 261–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Copple, C., & Bredekamp, S. (2009). Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs: serving children from birth through age 8 (3rd ed.). Washington DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.Google Scholar
  19. Curenton, S. M., Dong, N., & Shen, X. (2015). Does aggregate school-wide achievement mediate fifth grade outcomes for former early childhood education participants? Developmental Psychology, 51(1), 921–934. doi: 10.1037/a0039295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Doig, B., McCrae, B., & Rowe, K. (2003). A good start to numeracy: effective numeracy strategies from research and practice in early childhood. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia. Retrieved from
  21. Duncan, G., Dowsett, C., Claessens, A., Magnuson, K., Huston, A., Klebanov, P., et al. (2007). School readiness and later achievement. Developmental Psychology, 43(6), 1428–1446. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.43.6.1428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Elkind, D. (2007). The hurried child: growing up too fast too soon. Cambridge: Da Capo.Google Scholar
  23. Elkonin, D. B. (2005). On the historical origin of role play. Journal of Russian & East European Psychology, 43(1), 49–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fleer, M., Tonyan, H. A., Mantilla, A. C., & Rivaland, C. M. (2009). World yearbook of education: a cultural–historical analysis of play as an activity setting in early childhood education: views from research and from teachers. In M. Fleer, M. Hedegaard, & J. Tudge (Eds.), Childhood studies and the impact of globalization policies and practices at global and local levels (pp. 292–312). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Fox, J. (2006). A justification for mathematical modelling experiences in the preparatory classroom. Paper presented at the 29th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Canberra, Australia.Google Scholar
  26. Fung, C. K. H., & Cheng, D. P. W. (2012). Consensus or dissensus? Stakeholders’ views on the role of play in learning. Early Years: An International Journal of Research and Development, 32(1), 17–33. doi: 10.1080/09575146.2011.599794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gibbons, A. (2007). The politics of processes and products in education: an early childhood metanarrative crisis? Educational Philosophy and Theory, 39(3), 300–311. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-5812.2007.00323.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ginsburg, H. P. (2002). Little children, big mathematics: learning and teaching in the pre-school. In A. Cockburn & E. Nardi (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th annual meeting of the International Group for the Psychology of mathematics education (pp. 3–14). Norwich: University of East Anglia.Google Scholar
  29. Ginsburg, K. R. (2007). The importance of play in promoting healthy child development and maintaining strong parent–child bonds. Pediatrics, 119(1), 182–191. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-2697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gutierrez, K. D., & Rogoff, B. (2003). Cultural ways of learning: individual traits or repertoires of practice. Educational Researcher, 32(5), 19–25. doi: 10.3102/0013189x032005019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Habgood, M. P. J., & Ainsworth, S. E. (2011). Motivating children to learn effectively: exploring the value of intrinsic integration in educational games. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 20(2), 169–206. doi: 10.1080/10508406.2010.508029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Han, M., Moore, N., Vukelich, C., & Buell, M. (2010). Does play make a difference? How play intervention affects the vocabulary learning of at-risk preschoolers. American Journal of Play, 3(1), 82–105.Google Scholar
  33. Harcourt, D. (2011). An encounter with children: seeking meaning and understanding about childhood. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 19(3), 331–343. doi: 10.1080/1350293X.2011.597965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hattie, J. (2008). Visible learning: a synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Heckman, J. J., & Masterov, D. V. (2007). The productivity argument for investing in young children. Review of Agricultural Economics, 29(3), 446–493. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9353.2007.00359.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hedges, H., & Cooper, M. (2016). Inquiring minds: theorizing children’s interests. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 48(3), 303–322. doi: 10.1080/00220272.2015.1109711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hedges, H., & Cullen, J. (2012). Participatory learning theories: a framework for early childhood pedagogy. Early Child Development and Care, 182(7), 921–940. doi: 10.1080/03004430.2011.597504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hunting, R. P., Mousley, J. A., & Perry, B. (2012). A study of rural preschool practitioners’ views on young children’s mathematical thinking. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 24(1), 39–57. doi: 10.1007/s13394-011-0030-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Huntsinger, C. S., Jose, P. E., Larson, S. L., Krieg, D. B., & Shaligram, C. (2000). Mathematics, vocabulary, and reading development in Chinese American and European American children over the primary school years. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 745–760. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.92.4.745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Johnson, J. E., Sevimli-Celik, S., & Al-Mansour, M. (2012). Play in early childhood education. In B. Spodek & O. N. Saracho (Eds.), Handbook of research on the education of young children (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  41. Jordan, N. C., Kaplan, D., Locuniak, M. N., & Ramineni, C. (2007). Predicting first-grade math achievement from developmental number sense trajectories. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 22(1), 36–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Karpov, Y. (2005). The neo-Vygotskian approach to child development. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, N. L. (2014). Kaufman test of educational achievement: technical and interpretive manual (3rd ed.). Bloomington: NCS Pearson.Google Scholar
  44. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. LeFevre, J.-A., Skwarchuk, S.-L., Smith-Chant, B. L., Fast, L., Kamawar, D., & Bisanz, J. (2009). Home numeracy experiences and children’s math performance in the early school years. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement, 41(2), 55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ma, X., & Kishor, N. (1997). Assessing the relationship between attitude toward mathematics and achievement in mathematics: a meta-analysis. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(1), 26–47. doi: 10.2307/749662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Marcon, R. A. (2002). Moving up the grades: relationship between preschool model and later school success. Early Childhood Research & Practice, 4(1), 1–24.Google Scholar
  48. Meiers, M., Reid, K., McKenzie, P., & Mellor, S. (2013). Literacy and numeracy interventions in the early years of schooling: a literature review: report to the Ministerial Advisory Group on Literacy and Numeracy. Retrieved from Department of Education and Communities
  49. Melhuish, E. (2010). Why children, parents and home learning are important. In K. Sylva, E. Melhuish, P. Sammons, I. Siraj-Blatchford, & B. Taggart (Eds.), Early childhood matters: evidence from the effective pre-school and primary education project (pp. 44–89). Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  50. Melhuish, E., Phan, M. B., Sylva, K., Sammons, P., Siraj-Blatchford, I., & Taggart, B. (2008). Effects of the home learning environment and preschool center experience upon literacy and numeracy development in early primary school. Journal of Social Issues, 64(1), 95–114. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2008.00550.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Moffitt, T. E., & Caspi, A. (2001). Childhood predictors differentiate life-course persistent and adolescence-limited antisocial pathways among males and females. Development and Psychopathology, 13(02), 355–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Monighan-Nourot, P., Scales, B., van Hoorn, J., & Almy, M. (1987). Looking at children’s play: a bridge between theory and practice. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  53. Morrow, L. M. (1990). Preparing the classroom environment to promote literacy during play. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 5(4), 537–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Murayama, K., Pekrun, R., Suzuki, M., Marsh, H. W., & Lichtenfeld, S. (2016). Don’t aim too high for your kids: parental overaspiration undermines students’ learning in mathematics. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 111(5), 766–779. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. National Research Council, Committee on Early Childhood Mathematics. (2009). Mathematics learning in early childhood: paths toward excellence and equity. Washington DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  56. Norberg-Hodge, H. (2000). Ancient futures: learning from Ladakh. Milsons Point: Random House.Google Scholar
  57. Nutbrown, C., Clough, P., & Selbie, P. (2008). Early childhood education: history, philosophy and experience. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  58. O’Gorman, L., & Ailwood, J. (2012). ‘They get fed up with playing’: parents’ views on play-based learning in the preparatory year. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 13(4), 266–275 Retrieved from Scholar
  59. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2006). Starting Strong II: early childhood education and care. Retrieved from Paris, France:
  60. Papic, M. (2013). Improving numeracy outcomes for young Australian indigenous children. In L. English & J. T. Mulligan (Eds.), Reconceptualizing early mathematics learning (pp. 253–281). New York: SpringerLink ebooks.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Papic, M., & Mulligan, J. (2005). Pre-schoolers’ mathematical patterning. Paper presented at the 28th Mathematical Education Research Group of Australasia Conference. Melbourne: Australia: MERGA.Google Scholar
  62. Papic, M., Mulligan, J., Highfield, K., McKay-Tempest, J., & Garrett, D. (2015). The impact of a patterns and early algebra program on children in transition to school in Australian indigenous communities. In B. Perry, A. MacDonald, & A. Gervasoni (Eds.), Mathematics and transition to school (pp. 217–236). Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar
  63. Pearce, A., Sawyer, A. C. P., Chittleborough, C. R., Mittinty, M. N., Law, C., & Lynch, J. W. (2016). Do early life cognitive ability and self-regulation skills explain socio-economic inequalities in academic achievement? An effect decomposition analysis in UK and Australian cohorts. Social Science & Medicine, 165, 108–118. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.07.016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Pope, C., Ziebland, S., & Mays, N. (2000). Qualitative research in health care: analysing qualitative data. British Medical Journal, 320(7227), 114–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Press, F., & Hayes, A. (2000). OECD thematic review of early childhood education and care policy. Australian Background Report. Sydney: Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
  66. Rogers, S., & Evans, J. (2008). Inside role-play in early childhood education: researching young children’s perspectives. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Rogoff, B., Mistry, J., Göncü, A., & Mosier, C. (1993). Guided participation in cultural activity by toddlers and caregivers. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 58(8), 1–177. doi: 10.1111/1540- 5834.ep11871652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Rogoff, B., Moore, L., Najafi, B., Dexter, A., Correa-Chavez, M., & Solis, J. (2006). Children’s development of cultural repertoires through participation in everyday routines and practices. In J. E. Grusec & P. D. Hastings (Eds.), Handbook of socialization: theory and research (pp. 490–515). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  69. Roskos, K. A., Christie, J. F., Widman, S., & Holding, A. (2010). Three decades in: priming for meta-analysis in play-literacy research. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 10(1), 55–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Schiefele, U., Krapp, A., & Winteler, A. (1992). Interest as a predictor of academic achievement: a meta-analysis of research. In A. Renninger, S. Hidi, & A. Krapp (Eds.), A matter of interest: the role of interest in learning and development (pp. 183–212). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  71. Schweinhart, L. J., & Weikart, D. P. (1997). The high/scope preschool curriculum comparison study through age 23. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 12(2), 117–143. doi: 10.1016/S0885-2006(97)90009-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Schweinhart, L. J., Montie, J., Xiang, Z., Barnett, W. S., Belfield, C. R., & Nores, M. (2005). Lifetime effects: The HighScope Perry Preschool study through age 40. (monographs of the HighScope educational research foundation, 14). Ypsilanti: HighScope Press.Google Scholar
  73. Shimpi, P. M., & Nicholson, J. (2014). Using cross-cultural, intergenerational play narratives to explore issues of social justice and equity in discourse on children’s play. Early Child Development and Care, 184(5), 719–732. doi: 10.1080/03004430.2013.813847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Shonkoff, J. P., Boyce, W. T., & McEwen, B. S. (2009). Neuroscience, molecular biology, and the childhood roots of health disparities: building a new framework for health promotion and disease prevention. Journal of the American Medical Association, 301(21), 2252–2259. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Stephen, C. (2012). Looking for theory in preschool education. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 31(3), 227–238. doi: 10.1007/s11217-012-9288-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Sylva, K., Melhuish, E., Sammons, P., Siraj, I., Taggart, B., Smees, R., et al. (2014). Effective pre-school, primary and secondary education 3–16 project (EPPSE 3–16) students’ educational and developmental outcomes at age 16. London: University College London.Google Scholar
  77. Thorpe, K., Tayler, C., Bridgstock, R., Grieshaber, S. J., Skoien, P., Danby, S., & Petriwskyj, A. (2004). Preparing for school: Report of the Queensland preparing for school trials 2003/4. Retrieved from
  78. Vassallo, S., Sanson, A., & Olsson, C. A. (2014). 30 years on: some key insights from the Australian temperament project. Family Matters, 94, 29–34.Google Scholar
  79. Vygotsky, L. S. (1933/1967). Play and its role in the mental development of the child (C. Mulholland, Trans.). Voprosy psikhologii, 6, 1–18.Google Scholar
  80. Wager, A. (2013). Practices that support mathematics learning in a play-based classroom. In L. English & J. Mulligan (Eds.), Reconceptualizing early mathematics learning (pp. 163–182). London: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Walsh, G. M., McGuinness, C., Sproule, L., & Trew, K. (2010). Implementing a play-based and developmentally appropriate curriculum in Northern Ireland primary schools: what lessons have we learned? Early Years, 30(1), 53–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Warren, E. (2005). Young children’s ability to generalise the pattern rule for growing patterns. In H. Chick & J. Vincent (Eds.), Paper presented at the 29th conference of the International Group for the Psychology of mathematics education. Melbourne: PME.Google Scholar
  83. Wood, E. (2007). New directions in play: consensus or collision? Education 3–13, 35(4), 309–320. doi: 10.1080/03004270701602426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Wood, E. A. (2013). Play, learning and the early childhood curriculum (3rd ed.). London, England: Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Inc. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Educational StudiesMacquarie UniversityNorth RydeAustralia

Personalised recommendations