Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Using expectancy-value theory to explore aspects of motivation and engagement in inquiry-based learning in primary mathematics

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Mathematics Education Research Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Inquiry-based learning (IBL) is a pedagogical approach in which students address complex, ill-structured problems set in authentic contexts. While IBL is gaining ground in Australia as an instructional practice, there has been little research that considers implications for student motivation and engagement. Expectancy-value theory (Eccles and Wigfield 2002) provides a framework through which children’s beliefs about their mathematical competency and their expectation of success are able to be examined and interpreted, alongside students’ perceptions of task value. In this paper, Eccles and Wigfield’s expectancy-value model has been adopted as a lens to examine a complete unit of mathematical inquiry as undertaken with a class of 9–10-year-old students. Data were sourced from a unit (∼10 lessons) based on geometry and geometrical reasoning. The units were videotaped in full, transcribed, and along with field notes and student work samples, subjected to theoretical coding using the dimensions of Eccles and Wigfield’s model. The findings provide insight into aspects of IBL that may impact student motivation and engagement. The study is limited to a single unit; however, the results provide a depth of insight into IBL in practice while identifying features of IBL that may be instrumental in bringing about increased motivation and engagement of students in mathematics. Identifying potentially motivating aspects of IBL enable these to be integrated and more closely studied in IBL practises.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Australian Academy of Science (AAS). (n.d.). reSolve: Mathematics by Inquiry. Retrieved from https://www.science.org.au/learning/schools/resolve.

  • Australian Curriculum and Reporting Authority [ACARA]. (2016). Australian curriculum: Mathematics v8.3. Retrieved from http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/mathematics/Curriculum/F-10.

  • Ainley, J., Pratt, D., & Hansen, A. (2006). Connecting engagement and focus in pedagogic task design. British Educational Research Journal, 32(1), 23–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, R. D. (2002). Reforming science teaching: What research says about inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(1), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, T. P., Corbitt, M. K., Kepner, H. S., Lindquist, M. M., & Reys, R. E. (1981). Results from the second mathematics assessment of the National Assessment of educational progress. Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camenzuli, J., & Buhagiar, M. A. (2014). Using inquiry-based learning to support the mathematical learning of students with SEBD. International Journal of Emotional Education, 6(2), 69–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dweck, C. S. (1998). The development of early self-conceptions: Their relevance for motivational processes. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J. S. (2006). A motivational perspective on school achievement. In R. J. Sternberg & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), Optimizing student success in schools with the other three Rs: reasoning, resilience, and responsibility (pp. 199–224). Greenwich: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J. S., Wigfield, A., & Schiefele, U. (1998). Motivation to succeed. In N. Eisenberg (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (Vol. 3, 5th ed., pp. 1017–1095). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T. (1992). Values, valences, expectations, and actions. Journal of Social Issues, 48(2), 109–124. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1992.tb00887.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fielding-Wells, J. (2010). Linking problems, conclusions and evidence: Primary students’ early experiences of planning statistical investigations. In C. Reading (Ed.), Proceedings of the 8th international conference on teaching statistics. Voorburg: International Statistical Institute.

  • Fielding-Wells, J. (2014). Where’s your evidence? Challenging young students’ equiprobability bias through argumentation. In K. Makar, B. de Sousa, & R. Gould (Eds.), International conference on teaching statistics (ICOTS9) Flagstaff, Arizona, USA. Voorburg: International Statistical Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fielding-Wells, J. (2015). Identifying Core elements of argument-based inquiry in primary mathematics learning. In M. Marshman, V. Geiger, & A. Bennison (Eds.), Mathematics education in the margins (Proceedings of the 38th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia). Sunshine Coast: MERGA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fielding-Wells, J., & Makar, K. (2008). Student (dis)engagement with mathematics. Paper presented at the Australian Association of Research in Education (AARE), Brisbane, Australia. http://www.aare.edu.au/08pap/mak08723.pdf.

  • Fielding-Wells, J., & Makar, K. (2012). Developing primary students’ argumentation skills in inquiry-based mathematics classrooms. In K. T. Jan van Aalst, M. J. Jacobson, & P. Reimann (Eds.), The Future of Learning: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of the Learning Sciences [ICLS 2012]—Volume 2 Short Papers, Symposia, and Abstracts (pp. 149–153). International Society of the Learning Sciences: Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fielding-Wells, J., & Makar, K. (2013). Inferring to a model: Using inquiry-based argumentation to challenge young children’s expectations of equally likely outcomes. Paper presented at the the 9th International Conference on Statistical Reasoning, Thinking and Literacy. Superior Shores, MN: SRTL.

  • Fielding-Wells, J., Dole, S., & Makar, K. (2014). Inquiry pedagogy to promote emerging proportional reasoning in primary students. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 26(1), 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. doi:10.2307/3516061.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, B. A., Miller, R. B., Crowson, H. M., Duke, B. L., & Akey, K. L. (2004). Predicting high school students’ cognitive engagement and achievement: contributions of classroom perception and motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 462–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grolnick, W. S., Gurland, S. T., Jacob, K. F., & Decourcey, W. (2002). The development of self-determination in middle childhood and adolescence. In A. Wigfield & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), The development of achievement motivation (pp. 147–171). Burlington: Elsevier Science.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Haimovitz, K., & Dweck, C. S. (2016). What predicts children’s fixed and growth intelligence mind-sets? Not their parents’ views of intelligence but their parents’ views of failure. Psychological Science, 27(6), 859–869. doi:10.1177/0956797616639727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kogan, M., & Laursen, S. L. (2014). Assessing long-term effects of inquiry-based learning: A case study from college mathematics. Innovative Higher Education, 39(3), 183–199. doi:10.1007/s10755-013-9269-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kong, Q., Wong, N., & Lam, C. (2003). Student engagement in mathematics: Development of instrument and validation of construct. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 15(1), 4–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makar, K. (2012). The pedagogy of mathematics inquiry. In R. M. Gillies (Ed.), Pedagogy: New developments in the learning sciences (pp. 371–397). New York: Nova Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makar, K., & Fielding-Wells, J. (2011). Teaching teachers to teach statistical investigations. In C. Batanero, G. Burrill, & C. Reading (Eds.), Teaching statistics in school mathematics-challenges for teaching and teacher education Vol. 14 (pp. 347–358). Dordrecht: Springer.

  • Martin, A. J. (2012). Part II commentary: motivation and engagement: conceptual, operational, and empirical clarity. In A. Christenson, A. Reschly, & C. White (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 303–311). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McGregor, D. (2016). Exploring the impact of inquiry based learning on students’ beliefs and attitudes towards mathematics. Paper presented at the 38th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia. Adelaide: Australia.

  • Minsky, M. (1961). Steps toward artificial intelligence. Proceedings of the IRE, 49(1), 8–30. doi:10.1109/JRPROC.1961.287775.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NCTM. (1989). Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Reston: NCTM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, R. S. (2002). What do I need to do to succeed… when I don’t understand what I’m doing!?: developmental influences on students’ adaptive help seeking. In A. Wigfield & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), The development of achievement motivation (pp. 285–306). Burlington: Elsevier Science.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ormrod, J. E. (2006). Educational Psychology (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Merrill Prentice Hall.

  • Pintrich, P. R. (2003). A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 667–686. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R., Marx, R. W., & Boyle, R. A. (1993). Beyond cold conceptual change: the role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change. Review of Educational Research, 63(2), 167–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H. (2002). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications (2nd ed.). Columbus: Merrill Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, A. B., Francisco, J. M., & Maher, C. A. (2003). An analytical model for studying the development of learners' mathematical ideas and reasoning using videotape data. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 22(4), 405–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reitman, W. R. (1965). Cognition and thought: an information processing approach. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandoval, W. A., & Millwood, K. A. (2007). What can argumentation tell us about epistemology? In S. Erduran & M. P. Jimenez-Aleixandre (Eds.), Argumentation in science education (pp. 71–88). Dordrecht: Springer.

  • Schunk, D. H., & Mullen, C. A. (2012). Self-efficacy as an engaged learner. In A. Christenson, A. Reschly, & C. White (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 219–235). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1973). The structure of ill-structured problems. Artificial Intelligence, 4(3–4), 181–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skilling, K., Bobis, J., & Martin, A. (2015). The engagement of students with high and low achievement levels in mathematics. In K. Beswick, T. Muir, & J. Fielding-Wells (Eds.), Proceedings of the 39 th Psychology of Mathematics Education Conference (Vol. 4, pp. 185–192). Hobart: PME.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wigfield, A., Eccles, J. S., Fredricks, J. A., Simpkins, S., Roeser, R. W., & Schiefele, U. (2015). Development of achievement motivation and engagement. In R. M. Lerner & M. E. Lamb (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science (Vol. 3, pp. 657–701). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wigfield, A., Eccles, J. S., Schiefele, U., Roeser, R., & Davis-Kean, P. (2006). Development of achievement motivation. In W. Damon & N. Eisenberg (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 933–1002). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to acknowledge the participating students. This work was funded by the ARC grants DP120100690 and DP140101511 and an Australian Postgraduate Award.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, 4072, Australia

    Jill Fielding-Wells & Katie Makar

  2. Griffith University, Nathan, QLD, 4111, Australia

    Mia O’Brien

Authors
  1. Jill Fielding-Wells
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mia O’Brien
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Katie Makar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jill Fielding-Wells.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fielding-Wells, J., O’Brien, M. & Makar, K. Using expectancy-value theory to explore aspects of motivation and engagement in inquiry-based learning in primary mathematics. Math Ed Res J 29, 237–254 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-017-0201-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-017-0201-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation