Advertisement

Mathematics Education Research Journal

, Volume 29, Issue 1, pp 45–72 | Cite as

Characterization of mathematics instructional practises for prospective elementary teachers with varying levels of self-efficacy in classroom management and mathematics teaching

  • Carrie W. Lee
  • Temple A. Walkowiak
  • John L. Nietfeld
Original Article
First Online:

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between prospective teachers’ (PTs) instructional practises and their efficacy beliefs in classroom management and mathematics teaching. A sequential, explanatory mixed-methods design was employed. Results from efficacy surveys, implemented with 54 PTs were linked to a sample of teachers’ instructional practises during the qualitative phase. In this phase, video-recorded lessons were analysed based on tasks, representations, discourse, and classroom management. Findings indicate that PTs with higher levels of mathematics teaching efficacy taught lessons characterised by tasks of higher cognitive demand, extended student explanations, student-to-student discourse, and explicit connections between representations. Classroom management efficacy seems to bear influence on the utilised grouping structures. These findings support explicit attention to PTs’ mathematics teaching and classroom management efficacy throughout teacher preparation and a need for formative feedback to inform development of beliefs about teaching practises.

Keywords

Prospective teachers Elementary mathematics Classroom management efficacy Mathematics teaching efficacy Standards-based teaching practises 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 1118894.

References

  1. Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers. (2006). Standards for excellence in teaching mathematics in Australian schools. Adelaide, SA: AAMT.Google Scholar
  2. Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA) (2015). Australian Curriculum: Mathematics. Sydney: Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority. Retrieved from http://www.acara.edu.au/curriculum/learning-areas-subjects/mathematics. Author. (2013).
  3. Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching what makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ball, D. L., Sleep, L., Boerst, T. A., & Bass, H. (2009). Combining the development of practice and the practice of development in teacher education. The Elementary School Journal, 109(5), 458–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioural change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
  7. Bandura, A. (2012). On the functional properties of self-efficacy revisited. Journal of Management, 38(1), 9–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bates, A. B., Latham, N., & Kim, J. (2011). Linking prospective teachers’ mathematics self-efficacy and mathematics teaching efficacy to their mathematical performance. School Science and Mathematics, 111(7), 325–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Berry, R. Q., Rimm-Kaufman, S. E., Ottmar, E. M., Walkowiak, T. A., Merritt, E., & Pinter, H. H. (2013). The mathematics scan (M-scan): a measure of standards-based mathematics teaching practices (unpublished measure). Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia.Google Scholar
  10. Beard, K. S., Hoy, W. K., & Hoy, A. W. (2010). Academic optimism of individual teachers: confirming a new construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(5), 1136–1144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Borko, H., Stecher, B. M., & Alonzo, A. C. (2005). Artifact packages for characterizing classroom practice: a pilot study. Educational Assessment, 10(2), 73–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Briley, J. S. (2012). The relationships among mathematics teaching efficacy, mathematics self-efficacy, and mathematical beliefs for elementary pre-service teachers. Issues in The Undergraduate Mathematics Preparation of School Teachers: The Journal, 5, Retrieved from http://www.k-12prep.math.ttu.edu/journal/5.attributes/briley01/article.pdf.
  13. Brown, A. B. (2012). Non-traditional preservice teachers and their mathematics efficacy beliefs. School Science and Mathematics, 112(3), 191–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bruner, J. S. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Chamberlin, M. T. (2005). Teachers’ discussions of students’ thinking: meeting the challenge of attending to students’ thinking. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 8(2), 141–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chapin, S. H., O’Connor, C., & Anderson, N. C. (2009). Classroom discussions: using math talk to help students learn, grades K-6. Sausalito, CA: Math Solutions.Google Scholar
  17. Charalambous, C. Y., Philippou, G. N., & Kyriakides, L. (2008). Tracing the development of preservice teachers’ efficacy beliefs in teaching mathematics during fieldwork. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 67(2), 125–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2014). Learning and teaching early math: the learning trajectories approach. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Clunies-Ross, P., Little, E., & Kienhuis, M. (2008). Self-reported and actual use of proactive and reactive classroom management strategies and their relationship with teacher stress and student behaviour. Educational Psychology, 28(6), 693–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
  21. Darling-Hammond, L. (2010). The flat world and education: how America’s commitment to equity will determine our future. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  22. Derry, S. J., Pea, R. D., Barron, B., Engle, R. A., Erickson, F., Goldman, R., Hall, R., Koschmann, T., Lemke, J. L., Sherin, M. G., & Sherin, B. L. (2010). Conducting video research in the learning sciences: guidance on selection, analysis, technology, and ethics. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(1), 3–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Duval, R. (2006). A cognitive analysis of problems of comprehension in a learning of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61(1–2), 103–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Empson, S. B., & Levi, L. (2011). Extending children’s mathematics; fractions and decimals. Portsmouth, NJ: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  25. EACEA. (2011). Mathematics education in Europe: common challenges and national policies. Brussels, Belgium: Education, Audiovisual, and Culture Executive Agency.Google Scholar
  26. Emmer, E. T., & Hickman, J. (1991). Teacher efficacy in classroom management and discipline. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 51(3), 755–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Enochs, L., Smith, P. L., & Huinker, D. (2000). Establishing factorial validity of the mathematics teaching efficacy beliefs instrument. School Science and Mathematics, 100(4), 194–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Evertson, C. M., & Weinstein, C. S. (Eds.). (2006). Handbook of classroom management: research, practice, and contemporary issues. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  29. Gabriele, A. J., & Joram, E. (2007). Teachers’ reflections on their reform-based teaching in mathematics: implications for the development of teacher self-efficacy. Action in Teacher Education, 29(3), 60–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gest, S. D., & Rodkin, P. C. (2011). Teaching practices and elementary classroom peer ecologies. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 32(5), 288–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gibson, S., & Dembo, M. H. (1984). Teacher efficacy: a construct validation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(4), 569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Goodson-Espy, T., Cifarelli, V. V., Pugalee, D., Lynch-Davis, K., Morge, S., & Salinas, T. (2014). Applying NAEP to improve mathematics content and methods courses for preservice elementary and middle school teachers. School Science and Mathematics, 114(8), 392–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Greeno, J. G. (1997). On claims that answer the wrong questions. Educational Researcher, 26(1), 5–17.Google Scholar
  34. Hoy, A. W., & Spero, R. B. (2005). Changes in teacher efficacy during the early years of teaching: a comparison of four measures. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(4), 343–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hufferd-Ackles, K., Fuson, K. C., & Sherin, M. G. (2004). Describing levels and components of a math-talk learning community. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35(2), 81–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Huinker, D., & Enochs, L. (1995). Mathematics teaching efficacy beliefs instrument (MTEBI). Milwaukee: University of Wisconsin, Center for Mathematics and Science Education Research.Google Scholar
  37. Ingersoll, R. M., & Smith, T. M. (2003). The wrong solution to the teacher shortage. Educational Leadership, 60(8), 30–33.Google Scholar
  38. Jackson, C., Simoncini, K., & Davidson, M. (2013). Classroom profiling training: increasing preservice teachers’ confidence and knowledge of classroom management skills. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 38(8), 30–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kafman, D., & Moss, D. M. (2010). A new look at preservice teachers’ conceptions of classroom management and organisation: uncovering complexity and dissonance. The Teacher Educator, 45(2), 118–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Klassen, R. M., Tze, V. C., Betts, S. M., & Gordon, K. A. (2011). Teacher efficacy research 1998-2009: signs of progress or unfulfilled promise? Educational Psychology Review, 23(1), 21–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2004). Modeling natural variation through distribution. American Educational Research Journal, 41(3), 635–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lesh, R. A., Cramer, K., Doerr, H., Post, T., & Zawojewski, J. (2003). Model development sequences. In R. A. Lesh & H. Doerr (Eds.), Beyond constructivism: a models and modeling perspective on mathematics teaching, learning, and problem solving (pp. 35–58). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  43. Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia. (2010). MERGA’s response to Australian Curriculum (Mathematics). Retrieved from http://studylib.net/doc/15418636/merga-s-response-to-the-acara-k-10-curriculum-draft.
  44. McCoy, A. C. (2011). Specialized mathematical content knowledge of preservice elementary teachers: The effect of mathematics teacher efficacy (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, MO.Google Scholar
  45. McDonnough, J. T., & Matkins, J. J. (2010). The role of field experience in elementary preservice teachers’ self-efficacy and ability to connect research to practice. School Science and Mathematics, 110(1), 13–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Melnick, S. A., & Meister, D. G. (2008). A comparison of beginning and experienced teachers’ concerns. Educational Research Quarterly, 31(3), 39–56.Google Scholar
  47. Mewborn, D. S., & Tyminski, A. M. (2006). Lortie’s apprenticeship of observation revisited. For the Learning of Mathematics, 26(3), 23–32.Google Scholar
  48. Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: a methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
  49. Moody, V. R., & DuCloux, K. K. (2015). Mathematics teaching efficacy among traditional and non-traditional elementary pre-service teachers. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3(2), 105–114.Google Scholar
  50. Moseley, C., & Utley, J. (2006). The effect of an integrated science and mathematics content-based course on science and mathematics teaching efficacy of preservice elementary teachers. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 18(2), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.Google Scholar
  52. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2014). Principles to actions: ensuring mathematical success for all. Reston, VA: NCTM.Google Scholar
  53. National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common Core state standards for mathematics. Washington, DC: NGA & CCSSO.Google Scholar
  54. Newton, K. J., Leonard, J., Evans, B. R., & Eastburn, J. A. (2012). Preservice elementary teachers’ mathematics content knowledge and teacher efficacy. School Science and Mathematics, 112(5), 289–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Oliver, R. M., & Reschly, D. J. (2007). Effective classroom management: tTeacher preparation and professional development. Washington, DC: National Comprehensive Centre for Teacher Quality Retrieved from: http://www.bobbijokenyon.com/crm/effectiveclassroommanagement.pdf.Google Scholar
  56. O’Neill, S., & Stephenson, J. (2012). Does classroom management coursework influence pre-service teachers’ perceived preparedness or confidence? Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(8), 1131–1143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Ottmar, E. R., Rimm-Kaufman, S. E., Berry, R. Q., & Larsen, R. A. (2013). Does the responsive classroom approach affect the use of standards-based mathematics teaching practices? The Elementary School Journal, 113(3), 434–457.Google Scholar
  58. Peters, J. H. (2012). Are they ready? Final year pre-service teachers’ learning about managing student behaviour. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 37(9), 18–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Poulou, M. (2007). Personal teaching efficacy and its sources: student teachers’ perceptions. Educational Psychology, 27(2), 191–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Putnam, R. T., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Ritter, J. T., & Hancock, D. R. (2007). Exploring the relationship between certification sources, experience levels, and classroom management orientations of classroom teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(7), 1206–1216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Rittle-Johnson, B., & Star, J. R. (2007). Does comparing solution methods facilitate conceptual and procedural knowledge? An experimental study on learning to solve equations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(3), 561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Ross, J. A., McDougall, D., Hogaboam-Gray, A., & LeSage, A. (2003). A survey measuring elementary teachers’ implementation of standards-based mathematics teaching. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34(4), 344–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Santagata, R., & Angelici, G. (2010). Studying the impact of the lesson analysis framework on preservice teachers’ abilities to reflect on videos of classroom teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(4), 339–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Smagorinsky, P., & Barnes, M. E. (2014). Revisiting and revising the apprenticeship of \ observation. Teacher Education Quarterly, 41(4), 29–52.Google Scholar
  66. Star, J. R., & Strickland, S. K. (2008). Learning to observe: using video to improve preservice mathematics teachers’ ability to notice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11(2), 107–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Stein, C. C. (2007). Let’s talk: promoting mathematical discourse in the classroom. Mathematics Teacher, 101(4), 285–289.Google Scholar
  68. Stein, M. K., Engle, R. A., Smith, M. S., & Hughes, E. K. (2008). Orchestrating productive mathematical discussions: five practices for helping teachers move beyond show and tell. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 10(4), 313–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Stein, M. K., Smith, M. S., Henningsen, M. A., & Silver, E. A. (2009). Implementing standards-based mathematics instruction: a casebook for professional development. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  70. Sullivan, P., Mousley, J., & Zevenbergen, R. (2006). Teacher actions to maximize mathematics learning opportunities in heterogeneous classrooms. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 4(1), 117–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Swars, S. L. (2005). Examining perceptions of mathematics teaching effectiveness among elementary preservice teachers with differing levels of mathematics teacher efficacy. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 32(2), 139–147.Google Scholar
  72. Swars, S., Daane, C. J., & Giesen, J. (2006). Mathematics anxiety and mathematics teacher efficacy: what is the relationship in elementary prospective teachers? School Science and Mathematics, 106(7), 306–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Swars, S., Hart, L. C., Smith, S. Z., Smith, M. E., & Tolar, T. (2007). A longitudinal study of elementary pre-service teachers’ mathematics beliefs and content knowledge. School Science and Mathematics, 107(8), 325–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Truxaw, M. P., & DeFranco, T. C. (2007). Lessons from Mr. Larson: an inductive model of teaching for orchestrating discourse. Mathematics Teacher, 101(4), 268–272.Google Scholar
  75. Truxaw, M. P., Gorgievski, N., & DeFranco, T. C. (2008). Measuring K-8 teachers’ perceptions of discourse use in their mathematics classes. School Science and Mathematics, 108(2), 58–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Tschannen-Moran, M., & McMaster, P. (2009). Sources of self-efficacy: four professional development formats and their relationship to self-efficacy and implementation of a new teaching strategy. The Elementary School Journal, 110(2), 228–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Tschannen-Moran, M., Hoy, A. W., & Hoy, W. (1998). Teacher efficacy: its meaning and measure. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 202–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Utley, J., Moseley, C., & Bryant, R. (2005). Relationship between science and mathematics teaching efficacy of preservice elementary teachers. School Science and Mathematics, 105(2), 82–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Van de Walle, J. A., Karp, K. S., & Bay-Williams, J. M. (2015). Elementary and middle school mathematics: teaching developmentally (8th ed.). Boston: Pearson.Google Scholar
  80. Walker, J. M. (2009). Authoritative classroom management: how control and nurturance work together. Theory Into Practice, 48(2), 122–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Walkowiak, T. A., Berry, R. Q., Meyer, J. P., Rimm-Kaufman, S. E., & Ottmar, E. R. (2014). Introducing an observational measure of standards-based mathematics teaching practices: evidence of validity and score reliability. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 85(1), 109–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Woolfolk, A. E., & Hoy, W. K. (1990). Prospective teachers’ sense of efficacy and beliefs about control. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 81–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Wyatt, M. (2014). Towards a re-conceptualization of teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs: tackling enduring problems with the quantitative research and moving on. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 37(2), 166–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Inc. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carrie W. Lee
    • 1
  • Temple A. Walkowiak
    • 2
  • John L. Nietfeld
    • 2
  1. 1.East Carolina UniversityGreenvilleUSA
  2. 2.Department of Teacher Education and Learning SciencesNorth Carolina State UniversityRaleighUSA

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options