Advertisement

Mathematics Education Research Journal

, Volume 27, Issue 3, pp 385–400 | Cite as

Narrative assessment: making mathematics learning visible in early childhood settings

  • Glenda Anthony
  • Claire McLachlan
  • Rachel Lim Fock Poh
Original Article
First Online:

Abstract

Narratives that capture children’s learning as they go about their day-to-day activities are promoted as a powerful assessment tool within early childhood settings. However, in the New Zealand context, there is increasing concern that learning stories—the preferred form of narrative assessment—currently downplay domain knowledge. In this paper, we draw on data from 13 teacher interviews and samples of 18 children’s learning stories to examine how mathematics is made visible within learning stories. Despite appreciating that mathematics is embedded in a range of everyday activities within the centres, we found that the nature of a particular activity appeared to influence ‘how’ and ‘what’ the teachers chose to document as mathematics learning. Many of the teachers expressed a preference to document and analyse mathematics learning that occurred within explicit mathematics activities rather than within play that involves mathematics. Our concern is that this restricted documentation of mathematical activity could potentially limit opportunities for mathematics learning both in the centre and home settings.

Keywords

Assessment Early years Mathematisation Mathematical play 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Anthony, G., & Walshaw, M. (2009). Mathematics education in the early years: building bridges. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 10(2), 107–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Basford, J., & Bath, C. (2014). Playing the assessment game: an English early childhood education perspective. Early Years, 34(2), 119–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blaiklock, K. (2008). A critique of the use of learning stories to assess the learning disposition of young children. New Zealand Research in Early Childhood Education, 11, 77–88.Google Scholar
  4. Blaiklock, K. (2010). Assessment in New Zealand early childhood settings: a proposal to change from learning stories to learning notes. Early Education, 48, 5–10.Google Scholar
  5. Brodie, K. (2011). Working with learners’ mathematical thinking: towards a language of description for changing pedagogy. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(1), 174–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carpenter, T., Fennema, E., Peterson, P., Chiang, C., & Loef, M. (1989). Using knowledge of children’s mathematics thinking in classroom teaching: an experimental study. American Educational Research Journal, 26, 499–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carr, M. (2001). Assessment in early childhood settings: learning stories. London: Paul Chapman.Google Scholar
  8. Carr, M., & Lee, W. (2012). Learning stories: constructing learner identities in early education. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
  9. Dockett, S., & Goff, W. (2013). Noticing young children’s mathematical strengths and agency. In V. Steinle, L. Ball & C. Bardini (Eds.), Mathematics education: Yesterday, today and tomorrow (Proceedings of the 36th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, pp. 771–774). Melbourne: MERGA.Google Scholar
  10. Drummond, M. (1993). Assessing children’s learning. London: David Fulton.Google Scholar
  11. Education Review Office. (2007). The quality of assessment in early childhood education. Wellington: ERO.Google Scholar
  12. Fleer, M., & Quiñones, G. (2013). An assessment perezhivanie: building an assessment pedagogy for, with and of early childhood science learning. In D. Corrigan et al. (Eds.), Valuing assessment in science education: Pedagogy, curriculum, policy (pp. 231–247). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fleer, M., & Raban, B. (2007). Constructing cultural-historical tools for supporting young children’s concept formation in early literacy and numeracy. Early Years, 27(2), 103–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Forman, G., & Fyfe, B. (1998). Negotiated learning through design, documentation and discourse. In C. Edwards, L. Grandini, & G. Forman (Eds.), The hundred languages of children: The Reggio Emilia approach—Advanced reflections (pp. 239–260). Greenwich, CT: Ablex.Google Scholar
  15. Hedges, H., & Cullen, J. (2005). Meaningful teaching and learning: children’s and teachers’ content knowledge. ACE Papers, 16, 11–24.Google Scholar
  16. Hedges, H., & Cullen, J. (2012). Participatory learning theories: a framework for early childhood pedagogy. Early Child Development and Care, 182(7), 921–940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jung, H. Y., & Reifel, S. (2011). Promoting children’s communication: a kindergarten teacher’s conception and practice of effective mathematics instruction. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 25(2), 194–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. McLachlan, C., Edwards, S., Margrain, V., & McLean, K. (2013a). Children’s learning and development: Contemporary assessment in the early years. South Yarra: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  19. McLachlan, C., Fleer, M., & Edwards, S. (2013b). Early childhood curriculum: Planning, assessment and implementation. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Miles, M., & Huberman, A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  21. Ministry of Education. (1996). Te Whāriki. He whāriki mātauranga mō ngā mokopuna o Aotearoa: Early childhood curriculum. Wellington: Ministry of Education.Google Scholar
  22. Ministry of Education. (2004). Kei Tua o te Pae / Assessment for learning: Early Childhood Exemplars. Wellington: Learning Media.Google Scholar
  23. Ministry of Education. (2009). Kei Tua o te Pae / Assessment for learning: Early Childhood Exemplars. Wellington: Learning Media.Google Scholar
  24. Mitchell, L. (2008). Assessment practices and aspects of curricula in early childhood education. Wellington: New Zealand Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar
  25. Nuttall, J. (2005). Educators and children learning together: reflections on the early childhood assessment exemplars. Early Education, 38, 63–71.Google Scholar
  26. Perry, B., Dockett, S., & Harley, E. (2007). Learning stories and children’s powerful mathematics. Early Childhood Research and Practice, 9(2).Google Scholar
  27. Perry, B., Dockett, S., & Harley, E. (2012). The early years learning framework for Australia and the Australian Curriculum: Mathematics—linking educators’ practice through pedagogical inquiry questions. In B. Atweh, M. Goos, R. Jorgensen, & D. Siemon (Eds.), Engaging the Australian curriculum mathematics (pp. 153–174). Adelaide: Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia.Google Scholar
  28. Sarama, J., & Clements, D. (2009). Building blocks and cognitive building blocks: playing to know the world mathematically. American Journal of Play, 1(3), 313–337.Google Scholar
  29. Scoffin, S. (2013). How does job-embedded teacher development influence children’s experience of mathematics. Master’s thesis, University of Toronto, Toronto.Google Scholar
  30. Siraj-Blatchford, I. (2010). A focus on pedagogy: case studies of effective practice. In K. Sylva, E. Melhuish, P. Sammons, I. Siraj-Blatchford, & B. Taggart (Eds.), Early childhood matters: Evidence from the effective pre-school and primary education project. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Siraj-Blatchford, I., & Sylva, K. (2004). Researching pedagogy in English pre-schools. British Education Research Journal, 30(5), 713–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. van Oers, B. (2013). Communicating about number: fostering young children’s mathematical orientation in the world. In L. English & J. Mulligan (Eds.), Reconceptualizing early mathematics learning (pp. 183–203). Dordrecht: Springer Science+Business Media.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wager, A. (2014). Noticing children’s participation: insights into teacher positionality toward equitable mathematics pedagogy. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 45(3), 312–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Walshaw, M., & Anthony, G. (2008). The role of pedagogy in classroom discourse: a review of recent research into mathematics. Review of Educational Research, 78(3), 516–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Inc. 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Glenda Anthony
    • 1
  • Claire McLachlan
    • 2
  • Rachel Lim Fock Poh
    • 1
  1. 1.Massey University Institute of EducationPalmerston NorthNew Zealand
  2. 2.Massey University Institute of EducationAucklandNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options