Advertisement

Mathematics Education Research Journal

, Volume 26, Issue 4, pp 791–810 | Cite as

Exploring ESL students’ understanding of mathematics in the early years: factors that make a difference

  • Jodie Miller
  • Elizabeth Warren
Original Article
First Online:

Abstract

Students living in disadvantaged contexts and whose second language is English (ESL) are at risk of not succeeding in school mathematics. It has been internationally recognised that students’ socioeconomic background and their achievements in mathematics is more pronounced for Australian students (Thomson et al. 2011). This gap is even more prominent for students who also have English as their second language (ESL). This paper explores the impact of the representations, oral language and engagement in mathematics (RoleM) learning experiences on ESL students’ performance in mathematics in the early years (foundation–year 2). All students participating in the study are from disadvantaged contexts (n = 461). The sample comprised 328 students who identified themselves as having English as a second language (ESL) and 133 mainstream students. Pre- and post-tests were conducted at the commencement and completion of each school year. All students demonstrated a significant improvement on their post-test scores, with ESL students displaying greater gains than the mainstream students. Additionally, students’ results were meeting norm-referenced expectations for students of the same age. A hypothesised taxonomy was developed to further investigate which types of test items foundation ESL students displayed greatest gains. ESL students again outperformed the mainstream cohort on all levels of test categorisation, including questions that were linguistically and conceptually challenging for foundation students.

Keywords

Assessment Early years mathematics English as a second language Mathematical language Representations 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Adebi, J., & Lord, C. (2001). The language factor in mathematics tests. Applied Measurement in Education, 14, 219–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adler, J. (1996). Secondary teachers’ knowledge of the dynamics of teaching and learning mathematics in multilingual classrooms. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg.Google Scholar
  3. Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). (2011). Census of population and housing. Canberra: ABS.Google Scholar
  4. Australian Council for Educational Research. (2010). PATMaths: progressive achievement tests in mathematics (3rd ed.). Hawthorn, VIC: Australian Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar
  5. Australian Council of Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA). (2013). My school. Retrieved from http://www.myschool.edu.au/
  6. Baturo, A., Cooper, T. J., Michaelson, M., & Stevenson, J. (2008). Using national numeracy testing to benefit Indigenous students: case studies of teachers taking back control of outcomes. In M. Goos, R. Brown, & K. Makar (Eds.), Navigating currents and charting directions (Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Brisbane (pp. 59–66). Brisbane, Queensland: MERGA.Google Scholar
  7. Bautista, D., & Mulligan, J. T. (2010). Why do disadvantaged Filipino children find word problems in English difficult? In L. Sparrow, B. Kissane, & C. Hurst (Eds.), Shaping the future of mathematics education (Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Fremantle (pp. 69–76). Fremantle: MERGA.Google Scholar
  8. Boaler, J. O., & Staples, M. (2008). Creating mathematical futures through an equitable teaching approach: the case of railside school. Teachers College Record, 110(3), 608–645.Google Scholar
  9. Bose, A., & Choudhury, M. (2010). Language negotiation in a multilingual mathematics classroom: an analysis. In L. Sparrow, B. Kissane, & C. Hurst (Eds.), Shaping the future of mathematics education (Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Fremantle (pp. 93–100). Fremantle: MERGA.Google Scholar
  10. Burns, R. B. (2000). Introduction to research methods. NSW: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  11. Clarke, D. M., Sullivan, P., Cheeseman, J., & Clarke, B. (2000). The early numeracy research project: developing a framework for describing early numeracy learning. In J. Bana & A. Chapman (Eds.), Mathematics education beyond 2000 (Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Fremantle (pp. 180–187). Fremantle: MERGA.Google Scholar
  12. Cleveland, W. S., & McGill, R. (1984). Graphical perception: theory, experimentation, and application to the development of graphical methods. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 79(387), 531–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  14. Doig, B., & de Lemos, M. (2000). I can do maths. Melbourne: ACER Press.Google Scholar
  15. Education Queensland. (2007). ESL handbook for schools. Retrieved from: http://education.qld.gov.au/studentservices/inclusive/cultural/esl/docs/schoolseslhandbook2006–07.pdf.
  16. Fernandes, A. (2011). Mathematics pre-service teachers learning about English language learners through task-based interviews. In J. Clark, B. Kissane, J. Mousley, T. Spencer, & S. Thornton (Eds.), Mathematics: traditions and [new] practices (Proceedings of the 34th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia and the 23rd biennial conference of the Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers, Alice Springs (pp. 235–243). Adelaide: AAMT & MERGA.Google Scholar
  17. Galligan, L. (1997). Relational word problems: a cross-cultural comparison. In A. Begg (Ed.), People in mathematics education (Proceedings of the 20th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Rotorua (pp. 177–183). Rotorua: MERGA.Google Scholar
  18. Garcia, E., & Cuellar, D. (2006). Who are these linguistically and culturally diverse students? Teachers College Record, 108(11), 220–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Geiger, V., Goos, M., & Dole, S. (2011). Trajectories into professional learning in numeracy teaching. In J. Clarke, B. Kissane, J. Mousely, T. Spencer, & S. Thornton (Eds.), Traditions and (new) practices (Proceedings of the 34th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Alice Springs, NT (pp. 297–305). Alice Springs: MERGA.Google Scholar
  20. Goldenberg, C. (2008). Teaching English language learners. American Educator, (8–44). Retrieved from http://old.dmps.k12.ia.us/programs/7researcharticle.pdf.
  21. Goldin, G. (2002). Representation in mathematical learning and problem solving. In L. D. English (Ed.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (pp. 197–218). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.Google Scholar
  22. Goldin, G., & Kaput, J. (1996). A joint perspective on the idea of representations in learning and doing mathematics. In S. P. Leslie & N. Pearla (Eds.), Theories of mathematical learning. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  23. Gonski, D., Boston, K., Greiner, K., Lawrence, C., Scales, B., & Tannock, P. (2011). Review of funding for schooling—final report. Canberra: Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations.Google Scholar
  24. Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Sociolinguistics aspects of mathematical education. In M. Halliday (Ed.), The social interpretation of language and meaning (pp. 194–204). London: University Park.Google Scholar
  25. Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: a synthesis of over 800 meta analyses relating to achievement. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Janzen, J. (2008). Teaching English language learners in the content areas. Review of Educational Research, 78(4), 1010–1038. doi: 10.3102/0034654308325580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lowrie, T., & Diezmann, C. M. (2007). Solving graphics problems: student performance in the junior grade. Journal of Educational Research, 100(6), 369–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lowrie, T., Diezmann, C. M., & Logan, T. (2012). A framework for mathematics graphical tasks: the influence of the graphic element on student sense making. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 24(2), 169–187. doi: 10.1007/s13394-012-0036-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mackinlay, J. (1999). Automating the design of graphical presentations of relational information. In S. K. Card, J. D. Mackinlay, & B. Schneiderman (Eds.), Readings in information visualization: using vision to think (pp. 66–81). San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar
  30. Martiniello, M. (2008). Math word problems. Harvard Educational Review, 78(2), 333–369.Google Scholar
  31. McDonald, S., Warren, E., & DeVries, E. (2011). Refocusing on oral language and rich representations to develop the early mathematical understandings of Indigenous students. The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 40(1), 9–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Moschkovich, J. (2002). A situated and sociocultural perspective on bilingual mathematics learners. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 4(2–3), 189–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 Assessment and analytical framework: Mathematics, reading, science, problem solving and financial literacy. Retrieved from: http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1787/9789264190511-en.
  34. Okamoto, Y., & Case, R. (1996). Exploring the microstructure of children’s central conceptual structures in the domain of number. Monographs of the Society of Research in Child Development, 61, 27–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pettit, S. K. (2011). Factors influencing middle school mathematics teachers’: beliefs about ELLs in mainstream classrooms. Issues in the Undergraduate Mathematics Preparation of School Teachers, 5.Google Scholar
  36. Planas, N., & Civil, M. (2013). Language-as-a-resource and language-as-political: tensions in the bilingual mathematics classroom. Mathematics Education Research Journal. doi: 10.1007/s13394-013-0075-6.Google Scholar
  37. Sarama, J., & Clements, D. H. (2009). Early childhood mathematics education research: learning trajectories for young students. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  38. Schleiger, H., & Gough, J. (2001). Diagnostic mathematical tasks. Sydney: UNSW Press.Google Scholar
  39. Schleppegrell, M. J. (2007). The linguistic challenges of mathematics teaching and learning: a research review. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 23(2), 139–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Setati, M. (2005). Learning and teaching mathematics in a primary multilingual classroom. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 36(5), 447–466.Google Scholar
  41. Setati, M. (2008). Access to mathematics versus access to the language of power: the struggle in multilingual mathematics classrooms. South African Journal of Education, 28, 103–116.Google Scholar
  42. Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing one. Educational Researcher, 27, 4–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Shaftel, J., Belton-Kocher, E., Glasnapp, D., & Poggio, J. (2006). The impact of language characteristics in mathematics test items on the performance of English language learners and students with disabilities. Educational Assessment, 11(2), 105–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Smart, D., Sanson, A., Baxter, J., Edwards, B., & Hayes, A. (2008). Home-to-school transitions for financially disadvantaged children: final report. Sydney: The Smith Family.Google Scholar
  45. Solano-Flores, G., & Trumbull, E. (2003). Examining language in context: the need for new research and practice paradigms. Educational Researcher, 2(32), 3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Spanos, G., Rhodes, N. C., Dale, T. C., & Crandall, J. (1988). Linguistic features of mathematical problem solving: insights and applications. In R. R. Cocking & J. P. Mestre (Eds.), Linguistic and cultural differences on learning mathematics (pp. 221–240). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  47. Thomson, S., De Bortoli, L., Nicholas, M., Hillman, K., & Buckley, S. (2011). Challenges for Australian education: results from PISA 2009: the PISA 2009 assessment of students’ reading, mathematical and scientific literacy. Victoria: Australian Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar
  48. Tindal, G., Anderson, L., Helwig, R., Miller, S., & Glasgow, A. (2000). Accommodating students with learning disabilities on math tests using language simplification. Eugene: University of Oregon Research, Consultation, and Teaching Program.Google Scholar
  49. Valdés, G. (1999). The world outside and inside schools: language and immigrant children. Educational Researcher, 27(6), 4–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Valle, M. S., Waxman, H. C., Diaz, Z., & Padrón, Y. N. (2013). Classroom instruction and the mathematics achievement of non-English learners and English learners. The Journal of Educational Research, 106(3), 173–182. doi: 10.1080/00220671.2012.687789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Warren, E., & DeVries, E. (2009). Young Australian Indigenous students’ engagement with numeracy: actions that assist to bridge the gap. Australian Journal of Education, 53(2), 159–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Warren, E., & Miller, J. (2010). Exploring four year old Indigenous students’ ability to pattern. International Research in Early Childhood Education, 1(2), 42–56.Google Scholar
  53. Warren, E., & Miller, J. (2013). Young Australian Indigenous students’ effective engagement in mathematics. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 25(1), 151–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Warren, E., & Quine, J. (2013). Enhancing teacher professional development for early years mathematics teachers working in disadvantaged contexts. In L. English & J. Mulligan (Eds.), Reconceptualizing early mathematics learning: advanced series in mathematics education (pp. 283–308). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Warren, E., Young, J., & DeVries, E. (2008). The impact of early numeracy engagement on 4 year old Indigenous students. Australian Journal of Early Childhood Education, 33(4), 2–8.Google Scholar
  56. White, P., & Anderson, J. (2011). Teachers’ use of national test data to focus numeracy instruction. In J. Clark, B. Kissane, J. Mousley, T. Spencer, & S. Thornton (Eds.), Mathematics: Traditions and [new] practices (Proceedings of the 23rd biennial conference of the Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers Inc. and the 34th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia Inc., Vol. 2, pp. 777–785). Adelaide, SA: AAMT & MERGA.Google Scholar
  57. Wong-Fillmore, L. (1982). Language minority students and school participation: what kind of English is needed? Journal of Education, 164(2), 143–156.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Inc. 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Australian Catholic UniversityVirginiaAustralia

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options