Advertisement

Mathematics Education Research Journal

, Volume 27, Issue 1, pp 83–102 | Cite as

Recognising ‘good at mathematics’: using a performative lens for identity

  • Lisa Darragh
Original Article
First Online:

Abstract

Many students do not recognise in themselves positive learner identities in mathematics and thus exclude themselves from further mathematics education, limiting their life opportunities. In this study, I use a performance metaphor for identity, drawing on G.H. Mead, Erving Goffman and Judith Butler to analyse interviews with students, taken at four time points as they make the transition from primary to secondary school. The question I focus on is ‘How do you recognise someone who is “good at mathematics”?’ The students’ responses reveal that there is a wide variety of scripts available when enacting the role of ‘good at mathematics’, and these include getting high marks, knowing the answer quickly, helping others and demonstrating the confidence to put up their hand to answer questions. Despite the variety of ways in which to demonstrate ‘good at mathematics’, most of the students did not recognise themselves in their own descriptions. This goes some way towards explaining why students may opt out of further study in mathematics, despite high achievement in this subject.

Keywords

Identity Performance Recognition Transition Mathematics Education 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Aydeniz, M., & Hodge, L. L. (2011). Identity: A complex structure for researching students' academic behavior in science and mathematics. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 6, 509–523. doi: 10.1007/s11422-011-9331-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bartholomew, H., Darragh, L., Ell, F., & Saunders, J. (2011). 'I'm a natural and I do it for love!': Exploring students' accounts of studying mathematics. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 42(7), 915–924. doi: 10.1080/0020739x.2011.608863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bishop, J. P. (2012). "She' always been the smart one. I've always been the dumb one": Identities in the mathematics classroom. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 43(1), 34–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Black, L. (2004). Differential participation in whole-class discussions and the construction of marginalised identities. Journal of Educational Enquiry, 5(1), 34–54.Google Scholar
  5. Boaler, J., & Greeno, J. G. (2000). Identity, agency and knowing in mathematics worlds. In J. Boaler (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on mathematics teaching and learning. Westport: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  6. Boaler, J., Wiliam, D., Zevenbergen, R. (2000). The construction of identity in secondary mathematics education. Paper presented at the International Mathematics Education and Society Conference, Montechoro, Portugal. http://eprints.ioe.ac.uk/1142/1/Boalertheconstructionofidentity.pdf.
  7. Boylan, M., & Povey, H. (2009). Telling stories about mathematics. In L. Black, H. Mendick, & Y. Solomon (Eds.), Mathematical relationships in education: Identities and participation. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brown, M., Brown, P., & Bibby, T. (2008). "I would rather die": Reasons given by 16-year-olds for not continuing their study of mathematics. Research in Mathematics Education, 10(1), 3–18. doi: 10.1080/14794800801915814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Butler, J. (1988). Performative acts and gender constitution: An essay in phenomenology and feminist theory. Theatre Journal, 40(4), 519–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chronaki, A. (2011). “Troubling” essentialist identities: Performative mathematics and the politics of possibility. In M. Kontopodis, C. Wulf & B. Fichtner (Eds.), Children, Development and Education (Vol. 3, pp. 207–226). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  12. Chval, K. B., Arbaugh, F., Lannin, J. K., van Garderen, D., Cummings, L., Estapa, A. T., et al. (2010). The transition from experienced teacher to mathematics coach: Establishing a new identity. Elementary School Journal, 111(1), 191–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cobb, P., & Hodge, L. L. (2009). An interpretive scheme for analyzing the identities that students develop in mathematics classrooms. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 40(1), 40–68.Google Scholar
  14. Cox, S., & Kennedy, S. (2008). Students' achievement as they transition from primary to secondary schooling. Wellington: Research and Evaluation Team, Ministry of Education.Google Scholar
  15. Da Silver, F. C. (Ed.). (2011). G. H. Mead: A reader. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Darragh, L. (2013). Constructing confidence and identities of belonging in mathematics at the transition to secondary school. Research in Mathematics Education, 15(3), 215–229. doi: 10.1080/14794802.2013.803775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Epstein, D., Mendick, H., & Moreau, M.-P. (2010). Imagining the mathematician: Young people talking about popular representations of maths. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 31(1), 45–60.Google Scholar
  18. Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity, youth and crisis. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  19. Esmonde, I. (2009). Ideas and identities: Supporting equity in cooperative mathematics learning. Review of Educational Research, 79(2), 1008–1043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gee, J. P. (2000). Identity as an analytic lens for research in education. Review of Research in Education, 25, 99–125. doi: 10.2307/1167322.Google Scholar
  21. Gee, J. P. (2011). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. London: The Penguin Press.Google Scholar
  23. Gutiérrez, R. (2013). The sociopolitical turn in mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(1), 37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hernandez-Martinez, P., Williams, J., Black, L., Davis, P., Pampaka, M., & Wake, G. (2011). Students' views on their transition from school to college mathematics: Rethinking 'transition' as an issue of identity. Research in Mathematics Education, 13(2), 119–130. doi: 10.1080/14794802.2011.585824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hird, M. J. (1998). Theorising student identity as fragmented: Some implications for feminist critical pedagogy. British Educational Research Journal, 19(4), 517–526. doi: 10.1080/0142569980190404.Google Scholar
  26. Hogan, M. P. (2008). The tale of two Noras: How a Yup'ik middle schooler was differently constructed as a math learner. Diaspora, Indigenous, and Minority Education: Studies of Migration, Integration, Equity, and Cultural Survival, 2(2), 90–114. doi: 10.1080/15595690801894079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Holland, D., & Lachicotte, W., Jr. (2007). Vygotsky, Mead, and the new sociocultural studies of identity. In H. Daniels, M. Cole, & J. Wertsch (Eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Vygotsky (pp. 101–135). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Holland, D., Skinner, D., Lachicotte, W., & Cain, C. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Jenkins, R. (1996). Social identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). InterViews (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  31. Lerman, S. (2012a). Agency and identity: Mathematics teachers' stories of overcoming disadvantage. Paper presented at the 36 th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education http://www.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/imperia/md/content/mathematik/Roesken/pme36_taipeh_volume3.pdf#page=105.
  32. Lerman, S. (2012b). 'Identity' as a unit of analysis in researching and teaching mathematics. In H. Daniels (Ed.), Vygotsky and sociology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. Llewellyn, A. (2012). Unpacking understanding: The (re)search for the Holy Grail of mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 81(3), 385–399. doi: 10.1007/s10649-012-9409-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lucey, H., & Reay, D. (2000). Identities in transition: Anxiety and excitement in the move to secondary school. Oxford Review of Education, 26(2), 191–286. doi: 10.1080/713688522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mead, G. H. (1913/2011). The social self. In F. C. da Silver (Ed.), G. H. Mead: A Reader (pp. 58–62). Oxon: Routledge (Reprinted from Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods, 10 (1913), 374–80).Google Scholar
  36. Mendick, H. (2002). Narratives of gender and maths. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 3rd International MES Conference., Copenhagen.Google Scholar
  37. Mendick, H. (2005). A beautiful myth? The gendering of being/doing 'good at maths'. Gender and Education, 17(2), 203–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mendick, H., Moreau, M.-P., & Epstein, D. (2009). Special cases: Neoliberalism, choice, and mathematics. In L. Black, H. Mendick, & Y. Solomon (Eds.), Mathematical Relationships in Education: Identities and Participation. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  39. Mishler, E. G. (1986). Research interviewing. Context and narrative. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Nasir, N. S. (2002). Identity, goals, and learning: Mathematics in cultural practice. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 4(2&3), 213–247. doi: 10.1207/S15327833MTL04023_6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Osborn, M., McNess, E., & Pollard, A. (2006). Identity and transfer: A new focus for home-school knowledge exchange. Educational Review, 58(4), 415–433. doi: 10.1080/00131910600971867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Reay, D., & Wiliam, D. (1999). 'I'll be a nothing': Structure, agency and the construction of identity through assessment. British Educational Research Journal, 25(3), 343–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sfard, A., & Prusak, A. (2005). Telling identities: In search of an analytic tool for investigating learning as a culturally shaped activity. Educational Researcher, 34(4), 14–22. doi: 10.1207/s15327884mca0704_03.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Skemp, R. R. (1976). Relational understanding and instrumental understanding. Mathematics Teaching, 77, 20–26.Google Scholar
  45. Solomon, Y. (2007a). Experiencing mathematics classes: Ability grouping, gender and the selective development of participative identities. International Journal of Educational Research, 46, 8–19. doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2007.07.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Solomon, Y. (2007b). Not belonging? What makes a functional learner identity in undergraduate mathematics? Studies in Higher Education, 32(1), 79–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Solomon, Y. (2007c). Theorising fragile identities: What can we learn from mathematics students? Paper presented at the 2nd Conference in Socio-cultural Theory, University of Manchester. http://www.education.manchester.ac.uk/research/centres/lta/ltaresearch/socioculturaltheoryinterestgroupsctig/socioculturaltheoryineducationconference2007/conferencepapers/groupfivepapers/_files/fileuploadmax10mb,135265,en.pdf.
  48. Solomon, Y., & Black, L. (2008). Talking to learn and learning to talk in the mathematics classroom. In N. Mercer & S. Hodgkinson (Eds.), Exploring Talk in Schools: Inspired by the Work of Douglas Barnes. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
  49. Stentoft, D. (2007). Multiple identities in the mathematics classroom: A theoretical perspective. In D. Pitta-Pantazi & G. Philippou (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fifth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 1597–1606). Lapaca (Cyprus): ERME - University of Cyprus.Google Scholar
  50. Tytler, R., Osborne, J., Williams, G., Tytler, K., & Cripps-Clark, J. (2008). Opening up pathways: Engagement in STEM across the primary-secondary school transition. Camberra: DEEWR.Google Scholar
  51. Walkerdine, V. (1989). Femininity as performance. Oxford Review of Education, 15(3), 267–279. doi: 10.1080/0305498890150307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Walkerdine, V. (1990). Schoolgirl fictions. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  53. Walshaw, M. (2011). Identity as the cornerstone of quality and equitable mathematical experiences. In B. Atweh, M. Graven, W. Secada, & P. Valero (Eds.), Mapping equity and quality in mathematics education. Dordrect: Springer Science.Google Scholar
  54. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. William, D., Bartholomew, H., & Reay, D. (2004). Assessment, learning and identity. In P. Valero & R. Zevenbergen (Eds.), Researching the socio-political dimensions of mathematics education. Boston: Kluwer.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Inc. 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Auckland UniversityAucklandNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options